Kroasanije
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.188
Nije bilo adresirano tebi Mrkalj,mozda posredno.Ono o nacionalizmu sam namjenio i tebi zbog zara kojem se "nepristrano" posvecujes ovoj temi i mnogim ostalima gdje se tezisno raspravlja o povijesti koja se ne odnosi na tvoj nacionalni korpus,niti te kaci na bilo koji nacin.
Razina moje je moje a tvoje je tvoje je vise nego primjerena,za ovaj visoki nivo
According to the Worldmark Encyclopedia of Nations and the Grand Larousse encyclopédique, Croatia entered a personal union with Hungary in 1102, which remained the basis of the Hungarian-Croatian relationship until 1918,[3][65] while Encyclopædia Britannica specified the union as a dynastic one.[66] According to the research of the Library of Congress, Coloman crushed opposition after the death of Ladislaus I and won the crown of Dalmatia and Croatia in 1102, thus forging a link between the Croatian and Hungarian crowns that lasted until the end of World War I.[53] Hungarian culture permeated northern Croatia, the Croatian-Hungarian border shifted often, and at times Hungary treated Croatia as a vassal state. Croatia had its own local governor, or Ban; a privileged landowning nobility; and an assembly of nobles, the Sabor.[53] According to some historians, Croatia became part of Hungary in the late 11th and early 12th century,[67] yet the actual nature of the relationship is difficult to define.[60] Sometimes Croatia acted as an independent agent and at other times as a vassal of Hungary.[60] However, Croatia retained a large degree of internal independence.[60] The degree of Croatian autonomy fluctuated throughout the centuries as did its borders.[10]
The alleged agreement called Pacta conventa (English: Agreed accords) or Qualiter (first word of the text) is today viewed as a 14th-century forgery by most modern Croatian historians. According to the document King Coloman and the twelve heads of the Croatian nobles made an agreement, in which Coloman recognised their autonomy and specific privileges. Although it is not an authentic document from 1102, nonetheless there was at least a non-written agreement that regulated the relations between Hungary and Croatia in approximately the same way,[55][66] while the content of the alleged agreement is concordant with the reality of rule in Croatia in more than one respect.[56]
Izvori svi madarski i engleski.Bellamy,Atilla,Pal Englel,Barrany itd
Doduse,ovo je c/p sa wikipedije ali izvori su dobri.
Razina moje je moje a tvoje je tvoje je vise nego primjerena,za ovaj visoki nivo
According to the Worldmark Encyclopedia of Nations and the Grand Larousse encyclopédique, Croatia entered a personal union with Hungary in 1102, which remained the basis of the Hungarian-Croatian relationship until 1918,[3][65] while Encyclopædia Britannica specified the union as a dynastic one.[66] According to the research of the Library of Congress, Coloman crushed opposition after the death of Ladislaus I and won the crown of Dalmatia and Croatia in 1102, thus forging a link between the Croatian and Hungarian crowns that lasted until the end of World War I.[53] Hungarian culture permeated northern Croatia, the Croatian-Hungarian border shifted often, and at times Hungary treated Croatia as a vassal state. Croatia had its own local governor, or Ban; a privileged landowning nobility; and an assembly of nobles, the Sabor.[53] According to some historians, Croatia became part of Hungary in the late 11th and early 12th century,[67] yet the actual nature of the relationship is difficult to define.[60] Sometimes Croatia acted as an independent agent and at other times as a vassal of Hungary.[60] However, Croatia retained a large degree of internal independence.[60] The degree of Croatian autonomy fluctuated throughout the centuries as did its borders.[10]
The alleged agreement called Pacta conventa (English: Agreed accords) or Qualiter (first word of the text) is today viewed as a 14th-century forgery by most modern Croatian historians. According to the document King Coloman and the twelve heads of the Croatian nobles made an agreement, in which Coloman recognised their autonomy and specific privileges. Although it is not an authentic document from 1102, nonetheless there was at least a non-written agreement that regulated the relations between Hungary and Croatia in approximately the same way,[55][66] while the content of the alleged agreement is concordant with the reality of rule in Croatia in more than one respect.[56]
Izvori svi madarski i engleski.Bellamy,Atilla,Pal Englel,Barrany itd
Doduse,ovo je c/p sa wikipedije ali izvori su dobri.
Poslednja izmena:
