AELarisa
Zainteresovan član
- Poruka
- 144
Jezero Smokovo
From the word jezero you get the name of the lake Ozeros, in western-central Greece.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozeros
Donji video prikazuje kako da instalirate aplikaciju na početni ekran svog uređaja.
Napomena: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jezero Smokovo
Like my grandpa's village.
It was called Nivoliani (my grandpa pronounced it as njivoljani, so i guess it is from njivo), now called "Megalovryso". The old tavern in the village still has the name Nivoliani, reminding the old name of the place and many people still call it with its old name.![]()
They also changed slavic surnames. At least those that they understood that they were slavic (our surname was not so obvious that it is slavic, so they did not change it).
Has anybody mentioned Velestino?
It is a place near Volos.
God Veles has his own toponym.
The history books will not be rewritten. At least the ones of Greece.Well, isn't it impossible that Slavs settle in christian Eastern Roman Empire and have their pagan divinity toponym?Naaah... (I'm being ironc.
) Seems like someone's gonnna have to rewrite history books. And the day is coming really soon...
![]()
This name "smells" like Nevoljani, which would mean misfortunate people, troubled people, people in distress.
I can understand why it might have been necessary to downplay the Slavic heritage a century or two ago, when some in the West were bringing into question the Hellenic heritage of the modern Greeks (no doubt, you are familiar with Fallmerayer's racist theories about 'diluted blood'), and the process of consolidation of modern Greek national identity was still underway. Today, however, it hardly seems necessary. The partial Slavic origin of some of their ancestors in no way makes modern Greeks any less Greek, nor does it negate their Hellenic heritage.The history books will not be rewritten. At least the ones of Greece.
it is very clear that they do not want the people to know the whole truth.
I was never taught the chapter of Stefan Dusan's empire for example. That chapter does not exist in the history books of Greece and many others. The Slavs are presented like nomads that came to Greece and then left. What I know is from my personal effort and because I found out that the etymology of my surname is slavic.
This name "smells" like Nevoljani, which would mean misfortunate people, troubled people, people in distress.
Well, i know that.I can understand why it might have been necessary to downplay the Slavic heritage a century or two ago, when some in the West were bringing into question the Hellenic heritage of the modern Greeks (no doubt, you are familiar with Fallmerayer's racist theories about 'diluted blood'), and the process of consolidation of modern Greek national identity was still underway. Today, however, it hardly seems necessary. The partial Slavic origin of some of their ancestors in no way makes modern Greeks any less Greek, nor does it negate their Hellenic heritage.
like Poljani - habitants of field/acre
AELarisa, do you perhaps remember that Austrian historian - I cannot remember his name but he was a leading Byzantine scholar, from back when Vienna was still the leading center of Byzantine studies (before Athens took over) - who had claimed that almost a majority of Greeks can track Slavic descent. He was a prominent supporter of a theory according to which the Slavic migrations had drastically changed the Greek ethnic structure to the level of almost a discontinuity. He was once in Belgrade; I think he had an argument with a Greek historian and some people didn't take his considerations quite too lightly.![]()
One thing is sure, northern parts of your country is most Slavic area of all Greece.
Interestingly Slavs even came to the Peloponnese and Asia Minor.
Yes, that is also true.
However the Slavs that settled in Peloponnese and Asia Minor were few compared to those that settled in central and northern parts of Greece.
There were also some few that went to Crete and some islands.
Note that the most Slavs that settled in Asia Minor were those muslim Slavs that left the Balkans after the Ottoman empire was defeated and destroyed.
Yes, that is also true.
However the Slavs that settled in Peloponnese and Asia Minor were few compared to those that settled in central and northern parts of Greece.
There were also some few that went to Crete and some islands.
Note that the most Slavs that settled in Asia Minor were those muslim Slavs that left the Balkans after the Ottoman empire was defeated and destroyed.
You are perfectly correct. There are no examples of 'undiluted blood', as Fallmerayer put it, among the nations of Europe. His own nation is no exception. Moreover, there are no nations of note anywhere, in particular among those of great antiquity, which could possibly satisfy his ridiculous notions of 'blood purity' and undiluted heritage.Well, i know that.
You should tell that to the idiots/babies that govern Greece and write the history books.
I do not think that there is any pure nation in the Balkans and Europe generally. Even ancient Greeks were not a pure nation/tribe, as maybe some people imagine today.
Fallmerayer wanted to tell the Europeans that wanted to recognize the first Greek state that all Greeks are Slavs, so "don't help them".
Germans and Austrians were strongly against the recognition of a Greek independent state.
The theory that modern Greeks are all descandants of the ancient Greeks was basically supported by those who governed the first Greek state and many of them had Albanian or Vlach/Aromanian origin. I have noticed that these people do not want to accept that their ancestors were not Greek, so they keep saying that we are all pure descendants of ancient Greeks and you are an "anti-hellen" if you say the truth.![]()
I estimate that around 20% of the population of Greece must have some slavic origin. It is most dominant in Macedonia and Thrace (these Slavs are moslty related to Bulgarians) and then Thessaly (the Slavs of Thessaly are basically the same as Serbs/Croats/Bosnians).
You can see the racial map of Europe and Near East by the British historian Hammond.
It reveals the dominant race in each region at the beginning of 20th century (before the exchanges of population among balkan states and Turkey). As you can see, there is some yellow color (Serbs/Croats/Bosnians) in places of Volos, Larisa and Karditsa (this is where i come from).![]()
The Slavs of Peloponnese were just some small communities. They survived for many centuries, but the slavic element was never renewed and finally they were all absorbed by the rest population of the Peloponnese.Depends how you measure the quantity. Slavs in Peloponnese (or more commonly called in the past "Morea" which is of Slavic origin denoting sea – e.g. the final point of Slavic migration) are mentioned very late. For example after the fourth crusade, the Slavs (Melingi tribe) from mountain Taygetus are the only people unconquered by the western crusaders. Laonikos Chalkokondyles writes in 15 the century there are villages in Morea that speak similar language like the one spoken in Poland and Russia. And so on..
Given the abundance of Slavic toponyms in Morea, one can actually argue that is the South with more Slavic origin than the North! The reason why it usually appears that North have more Slavs, is that in the North was much easier to maintain contact with the rest of the Slavs and hence much harder to assimilate whereas in the South they were rather isolated. Also consider that before the Turks, in the North occasionally the region would go under control of various Slavic states whereas in the South you had only the Byzantines and Western Europeans. Franks or Latins as they were called had no chance of changing the identity of local population but the Byzantines had and did.
Having said all that, even if you knew exact genetic composition and its breakdown on Slavic genes (if such thing can be defined in the first place) and other genes, it does not matter what your identity is. Identity is something in the head, something that is a construct of education, family upbringing , regional culture and so on.
Well, you understand that those maps are not at all 100% accurate. Sometimes the author makes false estimations either because he may be unaware of some facts or because he wants to make politics.P.S. That map leaves much to be desired. It shows 'Croatians' living as far East as the Serbian-Romanian border, which is an absolute joke. In the late 19th and early 20th century (the map is from 1916, if I am not mistaken), the Croatian presence was negligible even in Bosnia, let alone Serbia. Similarly, the Albanians are afforded a more than generous treatment.
On the other hand, the Serbs, who far outnumbered the Croats, are barely shown on the map. In similar fashion, the significant Greek presence in the coastal regions of the Asia Minor is completely ignored, as is clear from the map below.
Of course, and that point stands.Well, you understand that those maps are not at all 100% accurate. Sometimes the author makes false estimations either because he may be unaware of some facts or because he wants to make politics.
My point was that Hammond shows a southslavic majority in regions of eastern Thessaly.