
,Jel se Ti zayebavas ili sta ? O cemu Ti covjece pricas.Sve sto si ovde postavio i taj rad gjde izvlacis recenice koje ni sam ne razumjes,samo pokazuje da su Juzni Sloveni zatekli i mjesali se sa doslovenskim stanovnistvom na Balkanu o odatle taj Mix koji je drugaciji nego kod Istocnih Slovena,I NISTA VISE.
U kojem si ti filmu sebi preveo o masovnoj asimilaciji "vecinskog doslovenskog od strane manjinskog Slovenskog".
Kako Ti sebi u glavi prevodis ovo i kakva Ti je zbrka ne znam osim da se ocito radi o totalnom neznanju.
"combining all lines of evidence,we sugest that the major part of the within balto slavic genetic variation can be primarily attributed to the assimilation of the pre existing regional gene
tic ,which differed for west,east and south slavic speaking peoples as we know them today."
Ili "englez"

,kako si Ti ovo shvatio,hajde nam prevedi i svojim rijecima objasni
Taken together, several mechanisms including cultural assimilation of the autochthonous populations by expanding Slavs while maintaining the pre-Slavic genetic boundaries, and in situ gene pool shaping, are needed to explain the genetic patterns observed on the eastern, north-eastern and western margins of the current ‘Slavic area’ within Central-East Europe.
The presence of two distinct genetic substrata in the genomes of East-West and South Slavs would imply cultural assimilation of indigenous populations by bearers of Slavic languages as a major mechanism of the spread of Slavic languages to the Balkan Peninsula. Yet, it is worthwhile to add here evidence from the analysis of IBD segments: the majority of Slavs from Central-East Europe (West and East) share as many IBD segments with the South Slavs in the Balkan Peninsula as they share with non-Slavic populations residing nowadays between Slavs (Fig 4A and 4B; Table G in S1 File). This even mode of IBD sharing might suggest shared ancestry/gene flow across the wide area and physical boundaries such as the Carpathian Mountains, including the present-day Finno-Ugric-speaking Hungarians, Romance-speaking Romanians and Turkic-speaking Gagauz. A slight peak at 2–3 cM in the distribution of shared IBD segments between East-West and South Slavs (Fig 4A and 4B) might hint at shared “Slavonic-time” ancestry, but this question requires further investigation.
Hajde sad ENGLEZ prevedi ovo
Comparing genetic and linguistic reconstructions with geography has a long tradition in human population genetics [67]. Here, we have studied the autosomal, NRY and mtDNA diversity of all Balto-Slavic populations in the context of their linguistic variation and geography. A remarkable agreement between these five systems was found: correlation coefficients range from 0.68 to near the maximum (0.95). This agreement between datasets from different systems supports the reliability of the results and in most cases, when drawing a conclusion, we could find one supported by the majority of the systems analyzed.
In particular, we found that autosomal and NRY compositions and geographic affiliations of the Balto-Slavic populations form a triad, all variables of which are very similar to each other.
Combining all lines of evidence, we suggest that the major part of the within-Balto-Slavic genetic variation can be primarily attributed to the assimilation of the pre-existing regional genetic components, which differed for West, East and South Slavic-speaking peoples as we know them today.
Pogledajte prilog 416306