DA LI ONI LEZE U PLANETARNIM BITJIMA ILI...
Donji video pokazuje kako da instalirate aplikaciju na početni ekran svog uređaja.
Napomena: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
moram te razocarati ali si jos daleko od korena...simple_things:ok....Den se bas i nije narocito potrudio da osvetla obraz astrolozima...Mogao si da ubacis i nesto na srpskom ,nisu bas svi engleziA i svi smore se kada vide toliki post...Ja ga npr. nisam citala...sorry
Koreni astrologije poticu od samog razvitka prvog civilizovanog drustva.Konkretno :nastala je i pocela da se primenjuje u praksi jos davne 4000 god p.n.e.Njeni pocetci vezuju se za Egipat.Postoji jedna zanimljivost vezana za to,stari egipcani su verovali da je reka Nil zemaljska projekcija mlecnog puta!?
U pocetku su astronomija i astrologija bile jedna te ista nauka ,zato sto se obe zasnivaju na slicnim principima.Kasnije se razdvajaju i astronomija ostaje nauka koja proucava magnitude,sirine ,duzine i rastojanja i bavi se brojkama u sirem smislu...U svom proucavanju koristi se pomagalima (teleskopi)...I njeno proucavanje je sa jedne strane objektivno i naucno dokazivo.Astrologija npr. ima subjektivan pogled na kosmos i takodje je dokaziva.Astrologija je zapravo uticaj makrokosmosa na mikrokosmos....!!!
U njenom samom pocetku delila se na ove grupe:
-meteoroloska ( proucava uticaje nebeskih tela na vremenske prilike)
-mundana (proucava uticaje nebeskih tela na politicke razmirice i delovanja u jednoj drzavi)
-natalna (bazira se na uticaju nebeskih tela na jedinku)
Danas ... postoji bezbroj razlicitih astroloskih podela....
To je u principu to ...ne volim monologe ,a i spava mi se ...
pOz
jel si to sam sastavio ili si to sa copy funkcijom zavrsio???koliko si se potrudio toliko i kapiras astrologiju.kao gomilu podataka nabacanih bez veze????zbog takvih je sve manje poverenja u ovu egzaktnu nauku.zanimljivo je da se uvek pominje kao gotova nauka.nije li to malo cudno???ali svejedno nisam na to mislio. nula poena za odgovor!!!Den:
Malo je duzi post, ali bice poucno ako si strpljiv i procitas!
Is Astrology for You?
“WHAT type of person am I?” “What is my calling in life?” “What does the future hold for me?” Have you ever pondered over those questions? Most people have. In search for answers millions throughout history have turned to astrology. What is meant by this term?
The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia defines astrology as a study that “assumes that the heavenly bodies [sun, moon, stars and planets] exert, according to their relative positions at certain times, a direct influence upon human life and destiny.”
Is there some valid basis to astrology? Can one gain supernatural knowledge by employing it? If you were to become involved in astrology, would it exercise a good influence over you?
Mounting Interest in Astrology Today
Recent years have seen an enormous upsurge of interest in astrology. Concerning this, writer Jess Stearn stated:
“Astrology, the once discredited art of the Chaldeans and Babylonians, is now going through a singular resurgence. So strong has the vogue become—not only with gullible old ladies, but with intellectuals and the young—that architects are designing homes especially for people born under certain signs of the zodiac [and] interior decorators and manufacturers are adapting color schemes to people with these self-same signs.”
Interest in astrology is found among people of all walks of life. Rich and poor alike read their horoscopes daily. In the United States alone some ten million individuals zealously follow astrology and about forty million more have some contact with it. Twenty years ago horoscope columns could be found in less than a hundred newspapers in this country. Today over a thousand United States newspapers carry them.
Why do people pursue astrology? Self-interest is often a motivating factor. For example, young men and women with romantic intentions often compare horoscopes to see if they are “right” for each other. Many seek by astrology to know what financial moves to make and when. In Asia marriage and burial dates are often determined by astrology. In the East both the time and precise direction of ceremonial marches are frequently determined by astrologers. Even palace walls have been torn down so that a procession could move in alignment with the planets.
Astrologers insist that what they do is really a science. One of them recently wrote: “It is the greatest body of knowledge in human history—bar none.” However, many reference works define astrology as a “pseudoscience” (that is, “false or pretended science”). What is the truth of the matter? How do astrologers go about making their calculations? Is their method truly scientific? The answer to these questions may have a bearing on whether astrology is for you.
Is Astrology Scientific?
In ancient times the earth was thought to be the center of the universe. Because the earth makes one full rotation on its axis every twenty-four hours, to one standing upon the earth it seems that the sun, moon and stars revolve around the earth.
Ancient astrologers concluded that these heavenly movements had some special significance for man. They noted twelve particular star groups or constellations to which they gave names of persons and of animals, such as Leo (for lion), Taurus (for bull) and Aries (for ram). The assumed circular path through which these stars and planets seem to travel came to be called the zodiac, meaning “[circle] of animals (or, living creatures).” Concerning the zodiac, The World Book Encyclopedia comments: “From the earliest times, men have divided the zodiac into 12 equal parts of 30° each. These parts are called the signs of the zodiac. About 2,000 years ago, each sign received the name of the constellation that occupied its position.”
Because of the movement of the earth around the sun, from the earth it appears that the sun progresses from one constellation to the next each month, making a complete circuit in twelve months.
Astrologers claim that at the exact moment of birth a person is especially affected by the constellation in which the sun appears and also by the one rising at the time on the eastern horizon at the place of his birth. Astrologers also say that the positions of the planets with relation to the stars and to one another at certain times can affect the individual favorably or unfavorably. This is especially true, they claim, at the moment of birth. A chart, showing these positions is called a “horoscope.” Supposedly, radiations from these heavenly bodies strike the newborn infant’s cells, causing hereditary changes that determine what type of person he will be. Is this really true?
University of Arizona astronomer Dr. Bart J. Bok says, No. He stated:
Studies of the stars and planets have shown that the amounts of radiation from these bodies that are received on earth are exceedingly small and that any gravitational effects are so slight as to be negligible in comparison with those from nearby objects.
“Apart from the sun, the moon is the only celestial body that regularly produces a force in excess of the gravitational force produced by adjacent objects at the time of birth. Only under the most favorable conditions can the gravitational attraction of the planet Mars equal that produced by the doctor in charge of the delivery.”
Even if the celestial bodies could affect a person’s cells and mold his personality, would this occur at birth? Leading geneticist Amram Scheinfeld points out:
“[The astrologers’] position that cosmic forces affect an infant’s personality at the moment of birth is genetically untenable. For this theory to be valid, the influence on the genes would have to occur at the moment of the child’s conception, not at his birth. . . . All their charts are plotted nine months too late.”
Because of this difficulty, some astrologers try to calculate from the time of conception. But who can determine that moment with precision?
nemoj odmah da se ljutis.nisam mislio nista ruzno,samo sam hteo da podstaknem ljude da malo razmisljaju o onome o cemu diskutuju...simple_things:Izvoli "Miha27"...prosvetli me....nestrpljivo ocekujem tvoj post koji ce nas uzdici na visi nivo znanja o korenima ove egzaktne nauke 8)
to je sve mnogo lepo sto si rekao,koreni astrologije leze u nama samima zato sto smo mi sami odraz kosmosa u kome se nalazimo,ma bio taj kosmos astralan,materijalan,mentalan,sve je u nama.otkriti sebe je zapravo najveca nagrada koju astrologija moze da pokloni.da ,da pokloni jer nacin na koji zivimo nam ne dozvoljava da pridjemo sami sebi i zato samo pukom slucajnoscu dodjemo do nekih uvida.tu mislim na sve one male robice u velikoj masini koja se zove svakodnevni zivot.svaka cast onima koji mogu sebi da priuste neki normalan duhovni zivot.ali oni sigurno imaju brze metode od komplikovane astrologije da dodju do samih sebe...Omen:... ALI se astrologijom bavim više od dvadeset godina, onako - za svoju dušu...
Bez obzira šta ko od autoriteta govorio, ja jednostavno astrologiju ne doživljavam baš kao egzaktnu nauku. Koncept... pravila, zakonitosti... sve se to da naučiti. Za primenu svih tih znanja, možda više nego u bilo kojoj prirodnoj ili društvenoj nauci - potreban je svojevrstan talenat, potreban je dar. Astrologija je, za mene, više umetnost negoli nauka. Slaganje konkretnog mozaika (npr. natal ili tumačenje tranzita) na osnovu poznavanja astrologije, ne čini se po principu: to je tu... onda to znači to, pa je aspektovano ovim, onda... Jednostavno - ne može tako! Doći ćemo do oprečnih stavova i naći se u nedoumici. Natal (recimo) nije puki zbir pojedinačnih objašnjenja za određene pozicije (kuća, planeta...), iako su ta objašnjenja apsolutno tačna i nesumnjiva. Do prave slike dolazimo tek umešnom i pažljivom analizom.
Tumačenja koja deje - mislim isključivo na mundanu astrologiju - mogu zaista biti neverovatno precizna. Greške nastaju kod pokušaja da se sve što smo saznali primeni. Astrološki uticaji su jaki (lako ih je dokazati!) ali nisu nešto što ovaj svet - i mi u njemu - treba pasivno da podnosi. Sve su to samo predispozicije, na koje možemo i moramo uticati svojim konkretnim aktivnim odnosom prema životu.
Kogod kaže... "tu i tada, dogodiće ti se tačno to..." - običan je šarlatan! Pravi astrolog će reći... "sve ukazuje na to da će se vrlo izvesno dogoditi..." ali neće propustiti da kaže i da se morate potruditi da se "to nešto" tako zaista i dogodi/ne dogodi!
Astrologija nam pokazuje mogući najbolji put. Na nama je da biramo - hoćemo li krenuti njim ili ne.
to je ok sto kazes,ali kada nesto sto procitam dopre do mene i kada to mogu da prihvatim onda te citate tretiram kao svoje misljenje,citirao sam iz knjige zato sto nisam hteo da kvarim svojim uplivima lepotu izrazavanja visih civilizacija.naravno da zelim da astrologija zauzme svoje mesto u drustvu egzaktnih nauka,koje joj sa pravom i pripada,ali nemam bas puno pedagoskog u sebi.to nikako ne znaci da ne volim astrologiju,ja je zivim svakim trenutkom zivota.kada bi svako od nas malo vise obratio paznju na prirodu i njene zakone ova planeta bi bila mnogo lepse mesto za zivot.kada bi svako,makar malo se potrudio izmenila bi se cela aura planete a samim tim bi i medjuplanetarni energetski aspekti bili drugaciji.ali treba sici u korene i dotaci materiju na samom izvoru...simple_things:ok....miha...ne znam dali se bavis astrologijom i koliko si upoznat sa njom,ali ukoliko su ti namere "casne" ,ukoliko zelis da oplemenis i upoznas ovo drustvo sa principima astroloskih tumacenja ,mislim da ti je potreban jedan sofisticiraniji pristup i pre svega sloboda izrazavanja...Dakle ,bilo bi lepo kada nebi prepisivao iz knjige i kada bi sam rekao ono sto je na tebe ostavilo utisak i sto je tebi dalo inspiraciju pri susretu sa astrologijom.To bi doprinelo da citanje onoga sto si napisao bude mnogo prijatnije i mnogo bi veci utisak ostavilo...Ok je ovo sto si naveo iz knjige ,ali daj nesto pristupacno sirokim narodnim masama ukoliko ti je zaista stalo da astrologija zazivi...
Ovaj poslednji poznat kao Ehnaton, psihicki obolela pedercina i bolesnik.
bio je potpuno deformisan, nesumljivo da je imao neki hormonski poremećaj, al je zato imao najlepšu ženu - čuvenu NefertitiTrpao se sa muskarcima, ne zna se sa sigurnoscu da li je bio dvopolac ili jednopolac. Imao je kukove zene, bio udaren u mozak, imao i neke telesne deformitete.
http://www.hermetizam.com/stari-egipat/ehnaton.html
Malo, malo, pa procitam nesto od tebe tipa "Pedercina" "Biseksualac" "Lezbejka" i jos neke seksualne, hm, devijacije koje volis da pomenes onako, k'o "dobar dan".