suave
Domaćin
- Poruka
- 3.894
Vrlo interesantno...Ja sam isto mislio da je razlog zbog kojeg to imamo u avramovskim svetim spisima medicinske prirode. To sam i ranije pisao na forumu kada smo diskutovali o poreklu svinjskog tabua, ali nisam razmišljao o tome u kontekstu anahronizama.
Sažetak rada pomenutog u snimku, arheologa Ričarda Redinga iz mičigenskog univerziteta: The Pig and the Chicken in the Middle East: Modeling Human Subsistence Behavior in the Archaeological Record Using Historical and Animal Husbandry Data
The role of the pig in the subsistence system of the Middle East has a long and, in some cases, poorly understood history. It is a common domesticated animal in earlier archaeological sites throughout the Middle East. Sometime in the first millennium, BC pig use declined, and subsequently it became prohibited in large areas of the Middle East. The pig is an excellent source of protein, but because of low mobility and high water needs, it is difficult to move long distances. While common in sites, the pig is rarely mentioned in texts. In contrast, the use of cattle, sheep, and goats is extensively documented. In the human subsistence system of the arid and semiarid areas of the Middle East, the pig was a household-based protein resource that was not of interest to the central authority. Sometime in the late second or first millennium BC, the chicken was introduced into the Middle East. The chicken is an even more ideal household-based protein resource and, like the pig, is rarely mentioned in texts. In arid and semiarid areas of the Middle East, the pig and the chicken compete for food and labor in the human subsistence system. I hypothesize that in arid and semiarid areas of the Middle East, the chicken largely replaced the pig because the chicken is a more efficient source of protein, it produces a secondary product, the egg, and it is a smaller package; hence, a family can consume one in a day or two. This made the pig redundant and available for use in other human systems. The pig, however, never disappeared from the diet of humans in the Middle East.
Ipak bih rekao da ono da je to bilo sastavni deo stvaranja etničkog identiteta na Bliskom istoku (prvo kod Jevreja samih, pa onda i drugih) deluje kao najuverljivija teorija.
Postoji jedan rad iz 2014 "Pig taboo in ancient Near East" gde se raspravlja o korenima zabrane konzumacije svinja u različitim društvima Bliskog istoka, kod Hetita, Egipćana i Mesopotamaca. Autor navodi da je ta zabrana jedino kod drevnih Izraelaca bila dosledno sprovedena tako da se slažem da je ona kod njih verovatno imala religiozan karakter, dok je kod drugih naroda bila uslovljena različitim drušvenim i socijalnim promenama.
http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_13_November_2014/15.pdf
