Genetička Struktura Srba i Hrvata

Ostalo ih je malo, ali činjenica da su kroz sva stoljeća zadržali srpski identitet govori o jakoj vezi sa izvorim srpskim plemenom, a ne samo o pukom nametanju imena.

Srbi su samo jedni od polapskih Slavena, drugi(koji su asmilirani btw) ne mogu se njima pribrajati.

Južna Poljska se uklapa u krajeve gdje su živjeli Bijeli Hrvati.

Balkanski i2a dolazi sa prostora zapadne Ukrajine koji sva struka veže uz pleme Hrvata.

Pogledajte prilog 1754721
Dolazi iz Polesja.

Nestor stavlja Srbe u juznu Poljsku.

Luzicki Srbi nisu pravi Srbi, vec pleme Luzicana koje je prihvatilo srpsko ime.

Zasto bi se nabski Srbi koji su imali taj identitet maltene do sredine srednjeg veka bili diskvalifikovani? Ako ista Bohemija se uklapa u taj prostor Bojke, mada postoje teze koje povezuju Bojku i za zapadnu Ukrajinu, otom potom.

Pleme Hodi koji su se nazivali i Srbima su bili gorstaci po Ceskoj, imaju visok nivo PH908, imaju poklpanja sa modernim Srbima u vise ogranaka y3120, a posebno u okviru PH908.
 
20250719_144716.jpg

20250719_144819.jpg
 
Pročaska malo i ja s GPT-om pa mi zanimljive odgovore daje iako to pripisujem drugačijem bazenu izvora iz kojeg on crpi svoje odgovore nego šta je to u tvom slučaju:


Let’s explore genetic distance using F<sub>ST</sub> and G25 (Global‑25) Euclidean distances, focusing on how Croatians, Bosnians (Bosniaks), and Serbs compare to each other and to neighboring populations. We’ll also look at regional G25 insights within these countries.


1. Genetic Distance (F<sub>ST</sub> & Euclidean)​

F<sub>ST</sub> from Autosomal Data​

Studies (e.g. Standing at the Gateway to Europe) show:
  • Croatians & Bosnians cluster tightly, overlapping with East‑Central Europeans like Hungarians, Slovenians, and Czechs.
  • Serbians and Montenegrins occupy an intermediate position between this western cluster and Eastern Balkan groups (e.g. Macedonians, Bulgarians)
  • The F<sub>ST</sub> values between Croats and Bosnians are extremely low—indicating very high genetic similarity, even tighter than between Croatians and Slovenians

PCA & Network Analysis​

The PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and Neighbor‑net based on F<sub>ST</sub> distances position the populations like this:
  • Western South Slavs (Croats, Bosnians, Slovenians) form one tight cluster leaning towards Central European Slavs (e.g. Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians).
  • Serbs form a more central Balkan cluster, intermediate between the West‑slavs plus Western Balkan core and Eastern Balkans.
  • Serbs are genetically between Croats/Bosnians and Macedonians/Bulgarians, reflecting a southern admixture component

2. G25 Euclidean Distance Insights​

Euclidean Distances on G25​

While specific numeric distances for Croats, Bosnians, and Serbs may vary by dataset, general trends from G25-based heatmaps and Reddit‑shared data suggest:
  • Croatians and Bosnians often plot closest to each other, indicating minimal Euclidean distance on G25 coordinates.
  • Serbs generally plot slightly southeast—they often show higher Southern Balkan (Thracian/Illyrian) input, placing them further from the Western cluster
Moreover, Bosnians sometimes plot as more Northern Slavic than Serbs, especially when samples come from central-north Bosnia—bringing them closer to Poles or Hungarians on G25.

3. G25 by Region Within Countries​

🇭🇷 Croatia (Regional Variation)

  • Northern Croats (Kajkavian and Istria‑Slovenia region): Strong affinity to Slovenians and Hungarians; more Central European DNA.
  • Dalmatians / South‑Croats (Split, Zadar): Plot closer to Bosnians and Serbs, showing more Balkan autochthonous ancestry (E‑V13 / I2a)

🇧🇦 Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Central‑north Bosnia (central Bosniaks): Tend to cluster more Western — overlapping with Croatians.
  • Eastern/southern Bosnia (Herzegovina, Romanija): Often shift slightly southwards but still closer to the Western cluster than Serbs.

🇷🇸 Serbia

  • Northern Serbia / Vojvodina: More Central European admixture, closer to Croats/Bosnians.
  • South / Southeast (Herzegovina-border, Sandžak): More Southern Balkan admixture; these individuals often plot further from the Western South Slavic cluster.

✅ 4. Summary Table​


ComparisonGenetic Distance (F<sub>ST</sub>)G25 DistanceNotes
Croats vs BosniansExtremely low (tight cluster)MinimalVery similar overall
Croats/Bosnians vs SerbsLow–moderateSlight shiftSerbs show more southern Balkan ancestry
Croats vs SerbsSlightly greater than Croats‑BosniansModerateCroatian regional variation matters
Regional Croatia (North vs South)Internal differentiation via F<sub>ST</sub>North plots close to Hungarians; south closer to BosniansKaikavian vs Shtokavian East-West differences


Usout je dobia i podpitanje:

1. Who has the strongest Slavic signal on G25?​


Bosnians (especially central-north)


  • Generally show the highest similarity to East-Central European (Slavic) reference samples, even occasionally more “northern Slavic” than Serbs.
  • Many Bosnians cluster tightly with Croatians and Slovenians, forming a “western South Slavic” group that inclines toward Poles, Czechs, and Hungarians
 
G25 rezultati, Hrvati prikupljali svoje, Srbi svoje itd, svako svoje, Poljak neki koji se bavi genetikom je sakupio sve, napravio program itd, klastere, i na osnovu toga se radi.
Radi se o autosomalnoj genetici.
Uspoređuje pojedince sa ostalim grupama, tj. grupnim prosjekom. Prikazani rezultati uvijek ovise o pojedincu i kao takvi vrlo lako mogu biti manipulirani.
 
Ja nisam kriv za neznanje, pogotovo za neobavestenost vas par.
Ovo su osnovne stvari, i osnovni izvori koje koriste svi koji su makar culi za geneticku geneologiju.
Prosek i klasteri su zvanicni za G25. Nemam sta da dodam.
Pre nego sto napises neku glupost otiđi barem kod nekog svog bolje upucenog istomisljenika, rodjaka, saborca, stq god, pa se raspitaj o cemu se radi, pre nego sto ispalis glupost.
 
Pročaska malo i ja s GPT-om pa mi zanimljive odgovore daje iako to pripisujem drugačijem bazenu izvora iz kojeg on crpi svoje odgovore nego šta je to u tvom slučaju:


Let’s explore genetic distance using F<sub>ST</sub> and G25 (Global‑25) Euclidean distances, focusing on how Croatians, Bosnians (Bosniaks), and Serbs compare to each other and to neighboring populations. We’ll also look at regional G25 insights within these countries.


1. Genetic Distance (F<sub>ST</sub> & Euclidean)​

F<sub>ST</sub> from Autosomal Data​

Studies (e.g. Standing at the Gateway to Europe) show:
  • Croatians & Bosnians cluster tightly, overlapping with East‑Central Europeans like Hungarians, Slovenians, and Czechs.
  • Serbians and Montenegrins occupy an intermediate position between this western cluster and Eastern Balkan groups (e.g. Macedonians, Bulgarians)
  • The F<sub>ST</sub> values between Croats and Bosnians are extremely low—indicating very high genetic similarity, even tighter than between Croatians and Slovenians

PCA & Network Analysis​

The PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and Neighbor‑net based on F<sub>ST</sub> distances position the populations like this:
  • Western South Slavs (Croats, Bosnians, Slovenians) form one tight cluster leaning towards Central European Slavs (e.g. Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians).
  • Serbs form a more central Balkan cluster, intermediate between the West‑slavs plus Western Balkan core and Eastern Balkans.
  • Serbs are genetically between Croats/Bosnians and Macedonians/Bulgarians, reflecting a southern admixture component

2. G25 Euclidean Distance Insights​

Euclidean Distances on G25​

While specific numeric distances for Croats, Bosnians, and Serbs may vary by dataset, general trends from G25-based heatmaps and Reddit‑shared data suggest:
  • Croatians and Bosnians often plot closest to each other, indicating minimal Euclidean distance on G25 coordinates.
  • Serbs generally plot slightly southeast—they often show higher Southern Balkan (Thracian/Illyrian) input, placing them further from the Western cluster
Moreover, Bosnians sometimes plot as more Northern Slavic than Serbs, especially when samples come from central-north Bosnia—bringing them closer to Poles or Hungarians on G25.

3. G25 by Region Within Countries​

🇭🇷 Croatia (Regional Variation)

  • Northern Croats (Kajkavian and Istria‑Slovenia region): Strong affinity to Slovenians and Hungarians; more Central European DNA.
  • Dalmatians / South‑Croats (Split, Zadar): Plot closer to Bosnians and Serbs, showing more Balkan autochthonous ancestry (E‑V13 / I2a)

🇧🇦 Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Central‑north Bosnia (central Bosniaks): Tend to cluster more Western — overlapping with Croatians.
  • Eastern/southern Bosnia (Herzegovina, Romanija): Often shift slightly southwards but still closer to the Western cluster than Serbs.

🇷🇸 Serbia

  • Northern Serbia / Vojvodina: More Central European admixture, closer to Croats/Bosnians.
  • South / Southeast (Herzegovina-border, Sandžak): More Southern Balkan admixture; these individuals often plot further from the Western South Slavic cluster.

✅ 4. Summary Table​


ComparisonGenetic Distance (F<sub>ST</sub>)G25 DistanceNotes
Croats vs BosniansExtremely low (tight cluster)MinimalVery similar overall
Croats/Bosnians vs SerbsLow–moderateSlight shiftSerbs show more southern Balkan ancestry
Croats vs SerbsSlightly greater than Croats‑BosniansModerateCroatian regional variation matters
Regional Croatia (North vs South)Internal differentiation via F<sub>ST</sub>North plots close to Hungarians; south closer to BosniansKaikavian vs Shtokavian East-West differences


Usout je dobia i podpitanje:

1. Who has the strongest Slavic signal on G25?​


Bosnians (especially central-north)


  • Generally show the highest similarity to East-Central European (Slavic) reference samples, even occasionally more “northern Slavic” than Serbs.
  • Many Bosnians cluster tightly with Croatians and Slovenians, forming a “western South Slavic” group that inclines toward Poles, Czechs, and Hungarians
Verovatno ti daje odgovore na osnovu tvojih predjasnjih upita.
Cet cesto ume da odgovara afirmativno, cak i da izmislja izvore, zato ga treba oprezno korisriti.
 
Ti i dalje ostajes nepoprvljivo lud i negator svega zivoga.
Ovo su proseci nacija, vise pojedinaca cini prosek.
Mozes uporedjivati i pojedinca, ali i prosek kao sto sam ja uradio.
Nisu prosjeci nacija, već prosjeci napravljenih uzoraka koji ne mogu biti reprezentativni za naciju zato što ne prate stroge statističke formule niti standarde. Dakle, veća zastupljenost u broju uzoraka jednog kraja ili jedne države(naročito urbanih sredina) u odnosu na drugi kraj ili drugu državu može stvoriti potpuno pogrešnu sliku tih nacija - a sistem je izložen manipulaciji jer ne postoje standardi za provjeru legitimiteta podataka koje korisnik unosi.

Osim toga, kako utvrditi koliko je onih koji se izjašnjavaju kao Srbi i njihovi rezultati se pridodaju srpskom prosjeku, a etnički su hrvatskog podrijetla?
 
Nisu prosjeci nacija, već prosjeci napravljenih uzoraka koji ne mogu biti reprezentativni za naciju zato što ne prate stroge statističke formule niti standarde. Dakle, veća zastupljenost u broju uzoraka jednog kraja ili jedne države(naročito urbanih sredina) u odnosu na drugi kraj ili drugu državu može stvoriti potpuno pogrešnu sliku tih nacija - a sistem je izložen manipulaciji jer ne postoje standardi za provjeru legitimiteta podataka koje korisnik unosi.

Osim toga, kako utvrditi koliko je onih koji se izjašnjavaju kao Srbi i njihovi rezultati se pridodaju srpskom prosjeku, a etnički su hrvatskog podrijetla?
Daj bre idi leči se.
Svakavih ludaka sam video, čak i fašista, nacista, al' ti si zajebao sve njih.
Rezultati su skupljani pažljivo, uostalom za Hrvate su ih skupljali Hrvati, a sve je to moralo proci pregled tog Poljaka i ostalih, ovime se sluze svi.
 
Daj bre idi leči se.
Svakavih ludaka sam video, čak i fašista, nacista, al' ti si zajebao sve njih.
Rezultati su skupljani pažljivo, uostalom za Hrvate su ih skupljali Hrvati, a sve je to moralo proci pregled tog Poljaka i ostalih, ovime se sluze svi.
Rezultati obuhvaćaju sve uzorke koji su poslani, bez statističkih formula i standarda kakve znanstvene studije, pa i medijske ankete moraju zadovoljiti. Prema njima, uzorci kojekakvih Šešelja, Dodika, Ivanovića i Bana bi se računali kao srpski, a to zasigurno nisu.
 
Poslednja izmena:
Imaš li regionalni?
Nemam za ove g25 kordinate, al štokavci su bliski jedni drugima, od prilike veci deo Srbije, stara hercegovina, BiH, Dalmacija i BiH Hrvati su najblizi jedni drugima po regionima.
Vetovatno i Slavonija barem delimicno, ako ne i cela.
Odskacu malo Crnogorci ( kao juzniji Srbi) i Kajkavci i taj deo hrvatskih severnjaka koji su maltene kao Česi.
/Slovenci.
Ostalo sve u sredini je blisko jedno drugome, sto je i logicno.
 
Ne znam sta se smejes, nisam rekao da su to Srbi, vec da ti ljudi u sredini, dakle najlakse mi ih je nazvati stokavcima cine jedan klaster, da su razlike realativno male medju njima.
Naveo sam to ti grupe koje malo odskacu, i naveo sam ti razlog zbog cega je to tako.
Postoje regionalni rezultati, al tesko mi ih je naci za G25 kalkulator, postoje za K13, ranije su postavljani ovuda.
 

Back
Top