Ja_Dosao_Biciklom
Primećen član
- Poruka
- 794
Е фала ти ко брату:
Шта још тачно пише у тај твој тефтер, ван контекста, као што ти радиш:
3.1. C. diphtheriae cases
The four cases due to C. diphtheriae were seen in two women, a
child and a man. A 26-year-old woman from China, who had been
living in France for 2 years and was unvaccinated, became ill with
pseudomembranous pharyngitis. The source of infection was not
identified. She was staying in France illegally and had very limited
contact with people outside her home. However, she probably had
contacts with other immigrants from China. She was hospitalized in
an intensive care unit (ICU) because she presented with renal failure
and QT interval prolongation the day after onset of the disease.
She received antitoxin serum a few days later. A 5-year-old boy, who
had been fully immunized for his age, presented with non-severe
pharyngitis after returning from Madagascar. He was to receive his
fifth dose of vaccine 4 months later. A 45-year-old man was injured
in a traffic accident in Madagascar, and the bacterium was identified
from a wound on his leg 2 weeks later. He had received a booster
dose more than 20 years before. A 71-year-old woman, returning
from a trip to Russia, became ill with pseudomembranous pharyngitis
and was hospitalized for 4 months. All four cases recovered
fully.
All C. diphtheriae isolates were producing diphtheria toxin
3.2. Cases due to other Corynebacterium spp
Diphtheria immunization status was known for only six cases:
two of them had not been immunized and four had received more
than three doses of diphtheria vaccine (a 53-year-old who had
received a final booster more than 30 years before, a 46-yearoldwoman
with bacteraemia who had received a booster 1 year
previously, and a 28-year-old diabetic man with skin ulcer who had
received a booster 1 year before. The date of last booster was not
available for the fourth case).
None of the 12 patients with C. ulcerans had a history of recent
travel or contact with dairy animals but 10 did have contact with
domestic animals (Table 1 ).Two animals were found to be positive
for C. ulcerans and one for Corynebacterium auriscanis. The patients
in contact with these dogs developed pseudomembranous pharyngitis
(n = 2) and otorrhoea (n = 1) due to C. ulcerans. Automated
ribotyping of the isolates indicated that C. ulcerans isolates from
the patients and their respective dogs were indistinguishable. One
patient had contact with a sick cat, which was tested negative. Three
other animals were not tested because the owners could not afford
to pay the veterinary fees and the public animal health authority
refused to sample the dogs because diphtheria is not considered
to be a zoonotic disease. One other dog died before it could be
tested. To our knowledge, only one positive dog was tested a second
time, following treatment with amoxicillin: the bacterium was still
present and the animal was euthanized.
Of the three cases due to C. pseudotuberculosis, one patient
lived in a rural environment, but had no direct contact with two
goats belonging to a neighbour or with a herd of Australian angora
goats living 800 m from the house. These animals were not tested.
Another case was in a patient who did not have any contact with
animals. Information was unavailable for the third case.
...found that only 33.7% of those surveyed had
received a booster dose in the last 15 years, decreasing to 10.5%
in those aged 64 and over
... аnd on the most recent (1988) sero-epidemiological study which had
found that almost 30% of the French population over 50 years old
had no detectable antibodies for diphtheria or antibodies below the
0.01 UI/ml protection threshold. Of 660 elderly people checked
during the 2006 annual influenza vaccination at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, 28% had
received a diphtheria booster in the previous
10 years. In the 60–69, 70–79 and 80+ age groups, 44%, 32% and
17% were up-to-date for diphtheria vaccination, respectively.
Among the 12 C. ulcerans infections, none had
contact with cattle, and 10 had contact with domestic animals:
two of six animals tested were found to be carriers of C. ulcerans
isolates harbouring the same ribotypes.
This result is in favour of
a domestic animal reservoir or novel ways of transmission: these
hypotheses should be confirmed by the systematic sampling of animals
that have been in contact with human cases.
Uncertainties are not related to treatment alone, as the efficacy
of the vaccine against non-C. diphtheriae diseases is not known
Значи неки од ових су имали контакт са зараженим животињама, неки нису а за неке се не зна.
Исто тако, већина је била вакцинисана против болести, неки нису, а за неке се не зна.
Закључак:
1. Животиње изгледа могу пренети неке врсте бактерија на људе, али то још наука треба да детаљније испита и да се сложи.
2. Вакцина осим ако се не даје редовно, барем у сваких 10 година - не ради.
А нико то не ради. Ни са осталим вакцинама.
А већ смо показали да их могу заразити "свеже" вакцинисани. Значи не требају им куце и маце.