Kad je i Staljin demokratičniji od zapadnih elita.....
STALJIN (1951.): "U Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama, u Britaniji, kao iu Francuskoj, postoje agresivne sile željne novog rata. Njima je rat potreban da bi stekli superprofite, da bi opljačkali druge zemlje. To su milijarderi i milijunaši koji rat smatraju zaradom koja daje kolosalne profite.Ove agresivne sile kontroliraju reakcionarne vlade i upravljaju njima. Ali istovremeno se boje svojih naroda koji ne žele novi rat i zalažu se za očuvanje mira.Stoga pokušavaju iskoristiti reakcionarne vlade kako bi lažima zapleli svoje narode, zavarali ih i novi rat prikazali kao obrambenu, a miroljubivu politiku miroljubivih zemalja kao agresivnu. Oni pokušavaju prevariti svoje narode kako bi im nametnuli svoje agresivne planove i uvukli ih u rat.Upravo zato se boje kampanje za obranu mira, bojeći se da bi ona mogla razotkriti agresivne namjere reakcionarnih vlada.Upravo zbog toga odbili su prijedlog Sovjetskog Saveza za sklapanje Pakta o miru, za smanjenje naoružanja, za zabranu atomskog oružja, bojeći se da bi usvajanje tih prijedloga potkopalo agresivne mjere reakcionarnih vlada i učiniti utrku u naoružanju nepotrebnom.Kakav će biti kraj ove borbe između agresivnih i miroljubivih snaga?Mir će se sačuvati i učvrstiti ako narodi uzmu stvar očuvanja mira u svoje ruke i brane ga do kraja. Rat može postati neizbježan ako ratni huškači uspiju zaplesti narodne mase u laži, prevariti ih i uvući u novi svjetski rat.Zato je široka kampanja za očuvanje mira kao sredstvo razotkrivanja zločinačkih spletki ratnih huškača sada od prvorazredne važnosti.”
When is War Not Inevitable?
February 16, 1951
Question: Do you consider a new world war inevitable?
Answer: No. At least at the present time it cannot be considered inevitable.
Of course, in the United States of America, in Britain, as also in France, there are aggressive forces thirsting for a new war. They need war to obtain super-profits, to plunder other countries. These are the billionaires and millionaires who regard war as an item of income which gives colossal profits.
They, these aggressive forces, control the reactionary governments and direct them. But at the same time they are afraid of their peoples who do not want a new war and stand for the maintenance of peace. Therefore they are trying to use the reactionary governments in order to enmesh their peoples with lies, to deceive them, and to depict the new war as defensive and the peaceful policy of the peace-loving countries as aggressive. They are trying to deceive their peoples in order to impose on them their aggressive plans and to draw them into a war.
Precisely for this reason they are afraid of the campaign in defense of peace, fearing that it can expose the aggressive intentions of the reactionary governments.
Precisely for this reason they turned down the proposal of the Soviet Union for the conclusion of a Peace Pact, for the reduction of armaments, for banning the atomic weapon, fearing that the adoption of these proposals would undermine the aggressive measures of the reactionary governments and make the armaments race unnecessary.
What will be the end of this struggle between the aggressive and peace-loving forces?
Peace will be preserved and consolidated if the peoples will take the cause of preserving peace into their own hands and will defend it to the end. War may become inevitable if the warmongers succeed in entangling the masses of the people in lies, in deceiving them and drawing them into a new world war.
That is why the wide campaign for the maintenance of peace as a means of exposing the criminal machinations of the warmongers is now of first-rate importance.
As for the Soviet Union, it will continue in the future as well firmly to pursue the policy of averting war and maintaining peace.
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1951/02/16.htm
Пентагон отвара фабрику муниције како би обезбедио снабдевање Украјине оружјем, пише New York Times
(То је строго пословно)
