Rat u Ukrajini (27)

Da li će biti značajnih teritorijalnih promena na frontu u narednom periodu?


  • Ukupno glasova
    104
stanje
Zatvorena za pisanje odgovora.
normalno , britanci , sve lepo kazuju , ukrajinci pobedjuju ali
pobeda nece biti pre bozica.

👆👉“Ukraine is winning the war with Russia, but it won’t end by Christmas”: The Times essentially draws a line under the counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - they expected a lot, nothing happened, we need to start preparing for 2024.

“Western weapons mean Russians are outnumbered and Putin is hesitant, but Zelensky’s counteroffensive remains agonizingly slow. Those optimists who confidently predicted a quick and easy victory when Ukraine launched its long-awaited counteroffensive did not serve Kyiv well by raising expectations to unrealistic levels.
For both sides, the war has become routine. Like Russia, Ukraine has now largely abandoned bold promises of imminent victories. Instead, we are talking about individual villages taken, about company-level efforts achieved or frustrated. As one pessimistic United States official put it, “We are not quite done with 2023 yet, but we are expanding our vision for 2024.”
There is a growing realization in Kyiv and in the West that they need to start working in a new, longer time frame. The Ukrainians admit that the counter-offensive did not go according to plan and they have made no progress.”
 
i dok , mi koji i pratimo sta se sve desava , i kako se ukrajinci satiru i tehnika im se inustava.
ono sto i najvise boli neke tu a ponajvise braboljka.
za to vreme , ovde se plasira vesti da Rusija , samo sto se nije pocela razbijati iznutra i da je teska situacija na ekonomskom planu , nedostatak vojne tehnike.
i naravno , kredibitiANALNA pisanija , takozvanih strucnjaka.

The Hill
The Hill

Follow

The Ukraine War might really break up the Russian Federation​

Opinion by Alexander J. Motyl, opinion contributor•1h



1691930496125.png


The Ukraine War might really break up the Russian Federation

The Ukraine War might really break up the Russian Federation© Provided by The Hill
It’s time to start taking the potential disintegration of Russia seriously.

A number of analysts see the shattering of the Russian Federation as a possible aftermath of Vladimir Putin’s catastrophic war in Ukraine.
Although the world would be better off with a much weakened Russia, its fall may not go smoothly.
The Jamestown Foundation’s Janusz Bugajski would probably agree with this assessment: “as a rump state, under intense international sanctions and shorn of its resource base in Siberia, [Russia] will have severely reduced capabilities to attack neighbors.”
As a result, “NATO’s eastern front will become more secure; while Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova will regain their occupied territories and petition for European Union and NATO integration without fear of Russia’s reaction.” Moreover, “countries in Central Asia will also feel increasingly liberated.
Washington Post columnist David Ignatius holds a gloomier view: “A fragmenting, demoralized Russia is a devil’s playground. … Russia’s internal disarray poses a severe dilemma for Putin, but it’s very dangerous for the West, too.”
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Tatiana Stanovaya occupies a middle ground, while leaning toward Ignatius. She writes that, on the one hand, “the Kremlin will be wrestling simultaneously with…a deepening crisis of Putin’s leadership, a growing lack of political accountability, increasingly ineffective responses by the authorities to new challenges, an intensifying fragmentation among elites, and a society that is growing more antiestablishment.”
On the other hand, although “the world will have to contend with a more dangerous and unpredictable Russia,” it’s likely that “this inward turn could lead to a more pragmatic approach to the war against Ukraine.”
Bugajski’s optimism derives from his focus on a post-disintegration Russia, one that is a rump state under international scrutiny, lacking the economic and military resources it would need to pursue an imperialist agenda. Ignatius’s pessimism, like that of Stanovaya, derives from their focus on the process of Russia’s disintegration, which, even in the best imaginable circumstances, would be very messy. Both Ignatius implicitly and Stanovaya explicitly worry about a less predictable Russia, which would presumably be more dangerous.
 
Kupyanskoe direction.

⏺The operation to advance in the direction of Kupyansk continues. From today, the local Gauleiter administration has begun a mandatory evacuation from Kupyansk and the region.

⏺ Gradually, Our Army is advancing on a wide front in the direction of the left bank of the Oskol and the city of Kupyansk. In some places, no more than 5 km remain directly to the outskirts of Kupyansk.

⏺In this direction, Our Army has accumulated significant forces. According to some sources, up to 50 thousand personnel, about 900 tanks and a huge amount of Artillery.

⏺The enemy is not able to stop Our army and he is gradually shifting his forces to the right bank of the Oskol and building a new line of defense.
 
Ja bi se odjavio sa interneta

The Russian Defense Ministry on the course of the special operation:

▪️on the Donetsk, Kupyansk and Krasnoliman directions, 13 enemy attacks were successfully repelled

▪️Ukrainian drone control post hit near Pervomaiskoye settlement in DPR

▪️Enemy losses per day amounted to more than 400 Ukrainian military
 
stanje
Zatvorena za pisanje odgovora.

Back
Top