Džaba ti to zamućivanje vode.
Tko je, kako i zašto srušio avion se znalo odmah nakon rušenja, a isto tako se zna i danas, bez obzira na hrpetinu izmišljenih "informacija", više ili manje naivnih montaža i teorija zavjera - sve generirano iz ruske obavještajene kuhinje.
E vis, kada bi se znalo ,tada bi se i zvanicno reklo, Ali posto Ti sve znas, ili mora da si bio na licino mesto il Ti imas takve informacije ,koje su dostupne samo onima koji i jesu ukljuceni u propagandni rat.
Dakle, sto si i Kaj bus rekel na sve ovo?
I da, pa gde je tvoja cuvena retorika da na Dokaz das protu dokaz. Jel te.
I kao sto SVET DANAS VIDI< VIDI DA SU LAZI USA< ENGLESKE i osttalih pijuncica, bile samo Lazi a da su sa tim lazima , vidimo da je to tada prosla ali danas Svet...i ljudi sve to gledaju drugacije a najbolji dokaz je da je parlament Engleske , odbacio insunancije o Dobrim Ukrajincima...Majdancovima.
CEO SVET VIDI DA SA SLIKOM HITLERA i sa njegovom politikom o ubijanju Rusa je "OCIGLEDNA", ups, pa samo istim prijateljima nemackim fasistima, oni i ne mogu i nece videti...
No, nadam se da ce i progledati ,pa barem sa onim ocima koji ce im biti zatvorene......
A nadam se daznas da citas na Engleskom i da razumes sta je napisano, a ak ne znas, trazi da ti ispricam...ponovo o lazima Cvetskim.
A ovo citaj vise puta, moze i kod tebe da se desi da " ti se tvori oci"
While Russia has provided all documented evidence it possesses since the incident first occurred, data including recordings and radar readouts from NATO and Ukraine have been suspiciously withheld. Instead of presenting documented evidence, the United States and its partners in NATO have worked tirelessly to stand up innuendo and baseless accusations in its place.
Finding “Facts” Between the Cushions
When in August of 2013 chemical weapons were used in an attack near the Syrian capital of Damascus, the United States and its European allies immediately blamed the Syrian government. With unprecedented speed, the decision to topple the Syrian government through direct military intervention was made. Yet just as fast as the US declared its intents, its pretext for war was dismissed by a skeptical public. When it came time to produce evidence, it was withheld (and is to this day) under the excuse that revealing it would compromise how it was gathered and thus jeopardize future operations.
Higgins, in tandem with hired defense contractor Dan Kaszeta, were tasked with building a body of lies inside the void left by the United States’ official refusal to release what they claimed they knew about the attacks.
When award-winning journalist Seymour Hersh released his own report on the attack, the closest, most accurate and most credible account to date of what actually happened along the outskirts of Damascus during the summer of 2013, Higgins and his supporters throughout the establishment media shamelessly wrote Hersh off as old fashioned and out of touch.
Unlike Higgins, however, Hersh’s report was based on intelligence and security professionals working in the United States government and their reports drawn from some of the best information available … not compilations of YouTube videos, Google Maps, dubious e-mail conversations with unverified anonymous individuals and amateur photographic “forensics.”
Hard at work
Is Reading Stains on the Sofa Really Analysis?
Higgins’ attention now follows wherever the Western media needs it most. Lately that has been in eastern Ukraine. He has been the star non-witness cum non-expert regarding all matters Ukraine and in particular, MH17. Since the United States and the rest of NATO refuses to release what evidence they claim they have (again), it has been up to Higgins and the growing mainstream media circus surrounding him to once again fill the void.
This explains why Higgins consistently only finds faults with Russia’s side of the story. At one point Higgins accused Russia of using Photoshop to doctor satellite images it provided to better illustrate the state of the battlefield when MH17 was downed.
German paper Spiegel consulted a real expert to refute Higgins and his “Bellingcat research group’s” accusations. When Jens Kriese, a researcher and professional image forensics expert, was asked what his thoughts were on Higgins’ use of the analysis tool FotoForensic.com, he responded by saying:
…[FotoForensic.com’s] founder Neal Krawetz also distanced himself from Bellingcat’s conclusions on Twitter. He described it as a good example of “how to not do image analysis.” What Bellingcat is doing is nothing more than reading tea leaves. Error Level Analysis is a method used by hobbyists.
Of course, the practice of “reading tea leaves” is based part on fraud, part on superstition, using one’s fears, ignorance and insecurities to gain advantage over them either socially or financially or both by claiming to hold exclusive insight into what otherwise random tea leaves are telling one about their future fortunes. And that is precisely what Higgins and his dubious methods are all about.