Хаос око Брегзита је шанса за енглеске Троцкисте

[комшија]

Ma Dzonson ce dobiti izbore i vladace barem 8 godina, (...),

 

[комшија]

 

[Cosmopolite]

Bilo bi dobro da Djiki saradjuje sa Korbinatorom , razmena je odlicna stvar.

 

[комшија]

Winter election a 'once in generation chance' to protect NHS from privatisation

JEREMY CORBYN accused Boris Johnson today of putting the NHS “up for grabs” for private corporations, during what could have been the pair’s final clash before a pre-Christmas election.

The Labour leader said that the snap general election planned for December 12 would be a “once-in-a-generation chance” to end privatisation of the NHS by kicking the Tories out of office.
During Prime Minister’s Questions, Mr Corbyn said that the Conservatives have imposed the “longest spending squeeze ever in NHS history.”

He noted that NHS officials have reportedly been in secret talks with US-based pharmaceutical firms to prepare to put the NHS on the table in a post-Brexit trade deal yet to be agreed with US President Donald Trump.
“This government is preparing to sell out our NHS. Our health service is in more danger than at any time in its glorious history,” Mr Corbyn said.

PM Mr Johnson claimed that a Labour government would result in an “economic catastrophe,” before going on to vow that he would end “dither and delay” over Brexit — despite breaking his own “do or die” pledge to take Britain out of the EU by today.

As PMQs took place, the Lords prepared to consider the one-page Bill passed by MPs on Tuesday that would enable an election to take place on Thursday December 12.

After receiving royal assent, it would pave the way for Parliament to be dissolved on Wednesday November 6.
Mr Johnson has cautioned his MPs ahead of a “tough” general election battle.

Tory MP Amber Rudd — who gave up the whip after 21 rebel colleagues were suspended — and Sir David Lidington announced today that they will not stand in the election, joining a growing number of Tory or former Tory independents not standing.

Some 17 Labour MPs, three Lib Dems, two former Labour MPs, Speaker John Bercow and The Independent Group for Change’s Joan Ryan have also announced that they will not stand.
Shadow chancellor John McDonnell said that Labour’s campaign offered the party a real opportunity for government.
“We’re going to have a real go at this and I think we’ll win,” he said.

“I think we’ll have a majority government by Christmas, so I can’t think of a better Christmas present, basically.

 

[комшија]

Cuban trade unions salute history of friendship with Britain's labour movement

The Unions for Cuba conference sends a united message of resistance to the US blockade


CUBAN trade unionists paid tribute to the “historic friendship and solidarity” between their and Britain’s labour movements at a packed Unions for Cuba conference in central London at the weekend.

Cuban trade union federation CTC deputy general secretary Carmen Rosa Lopez Rodriguez said British workers’ solidarity action in fighting the illegal US blockade of the island and for freedom for the Miami Five had “cemented our traditions of struggle and defence of workers’ rights.”

She led a delegation of 14 Cuban trade unionists, 12 of them women, who are visiting Britain this week to share experiences and build closer links with their British counterparts.

Saluting the internationalist outlook that has led Cuba to send medical workers and educators abroad, Unison London regional secretary Maggi Ferncombe praised Operation Miracle — the cataract-removing mission that has restored sight to 3.4 million people around the world — and the literary Yes I Can campaign that has taught nine million people in poorer countries to read.

Unite leader Len McCluskey said the Cuban revolution continued to inspire the British working class.
Recalling the news of the revolution spreading among Liverpool dockers in 1959, he said: “In the community I come from I remember how welcome that news was.

“It brought to mind stories of the tears of joy shed by British miners at news of the Russian Revolution of 1917.
“The Cuban elite took off for Florida expecting to come back to their mansions and plantations in a few months. How wrong they were!” he said to stormy applause.

CWU leader Dave Ward noted that Cuba’s new constitution, approved after exhaustive consultation with trade unions and citizens through thousands of workplace meetings, declared that socialism was “irreversible.”
Looking to the election campaign now underway that pits a socialist and anti-imperialist Labour leader against Boris Johnson, he wondered “whether we in Britain might be taking steps in that direction.

“We are on the brink of a rebirth of collectivism in Britain,” he said. “And we are inspired by the way you have resisted the US blockade and [Donald] Trump. We are going to give this everything we’ve got — we will bring about irreversible change, irreversible socialism!”

 

[комшија]

Trump visit during Nato Summit to be met with protests

ANTI-WAR protests will “welcome” US President Donald Trump to London during the 2019 Nato summit, campaigners announced yesterday.

Mr Trump will also be visiting the Queen during the summit in December, who will be hosting a reception for Nato leaders at Buckingham Palace.

Stop the War Coalition convener Lindsey German said: “Trump will be coming here the week before an election and will endorse [Prime Minister Boris] Johnson.

“We need an alternative to war, militarism and racism — an anti-war government and a mass demonstration against Trump and Nato.”

Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament general secretary Kate Hudson said: “Nato is a hugely dangerous and destructive nuclear-armed alliance with the capacity to destroy all forms of life many times over.
“This is no time to celebrate and welcome it to London. It’s time to put an end to Nato, and build the peaceful, just world that we want to see.”

Crowds will be assembling in Trafalgar Square on December 3, from 4pm before setting off towards Ms Windsor’s luxury home.

 

[комшија]

Jewish Voice for Labour's statement on Tom Watson, Chris Williamson and Ian Austin

Friday, November 8, 2019

JEREMY CORBYN’S characteristically generous letter to Tom Watson marks the end of a turbulent relationship between the deputy leader and the Labour Party’s twice massively acclaimed popular leader, as well as a huge majority of the party.


It is fair to say that Watson steadily worked himself into an impossible position in the party: in September 2016 he proposed a draconian rule change for the election of the leader (to place selection entirely with the Parliamentary Labour Party) which would have ensured Corbyn’s deselection.


In an open letter to Watson in July this year general secretary Jennie Formbywrote: “You are complicit in creating a perception that anti-semitism is more prevalent in the Labour Party than wider society. This is deeply irresponsible for the deputy leader of a party which seeks to be in government.”


Whilst welcoming Watson’s statement that he will continue to support Labour during the campaign, for members who are committed to the party’s transformative programme, and who are now having to confront his denigration of the party leader on the doorstep, his exit has been long awaited.


Resigning from the party is Chris Williamson, a direct casualty of the attack on the left spearheaded, amongst others, by Watson. As a principled socialist and prominent Corbyn supporter, Williamson was targeted by the right within the party and Labour’s enemies outside, in alliance with those who define as anti-semitism support for the Palestinians’ fight against their oppression.


We knew that another onslaught by this coalition was coming; it was launched by Ian Austin’s acrimonious attack on Corbyn and his extraordinary exhortation to vote for Boris Johnson. Not unsurprising as Austin left Labour nine months ago to be appointed as a Prime Ministerial Trade Envoy to Israel.


Having been denied the opportunity to fight for re-election to his seat in Derby North, Chris Williamson faces an impossible choice: allow his parliamentary career to be cut short after decades of dedication to the Labour cause, or resign to campaign as an independent.


We wanted Chris to stay in the party so that we can continue to campaign for his reinstatement as a valued member, and we are disappointed that he has decided to stand as an independent.


Glyn Secker is Jewish Voice for Labour secretary.

 

[комшија]

 

[комшија]

 

[комшија]

 

[KESH]

Na šta su spale ove balkanske komunjare, da istomišljenike traže u kolijevci antikomunizma

 

[комшија]

Na šta su spale ove balkanske komunjare, da istomišljenike traže u kolijevci antikomunizma

Прво, да ниси Босанац знао би да је писцу "Капитала" и "Манифеста Комунистичке партије" Карлу Марксу тридесет и четири године Велика Британија била домовина (од 1849 до смрти 1883).

Марксов надгробни споменик на лондонском гробљу Хајгејт уврштен је у британску културну баштину.


Друго, Маркс је своје револуционарне идеје и своју теорију развијао управо у колевкама капитализма, које су на Западу, а за вашу "мајчицу" генијални Маркс је између осталог написао ово (цитат) :

Москва се формирала и одрасла у школи подлости пролазећи кроз страшно монголско ропство. Њена моћ је порасла тако што је виртуозно овладала вештином слугањства.

 

[комшија]

 

[комшија]

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/broadband-bolshevism-spooking-capitalist-class

Broadband Bolshevism is spooking the capitalist class

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn talks with students at Lancaster University regarding the party's plans to deliver fast and free full fibre broadband across the country

LABOUR’S plan to roll out free high speed fibre-optic broadband to every home and enterprise throughout the country and organise this around nationalising the key elements of BT Broadband has sent a shiver up the spines of big business.

It is not just the threat of a significant loss of revenues as the money which the monopoly owners of these services draw from our use of these utilities and devices vanishes from their profit margins.

It is the prospect that de-commodifying such a significant slice of revenue-producing utilities might set the standard for other sectors and stimulate a change in the way people think about markets.

There is a substantial slab of icing on the cake in the proposal to fund the programme with a tax on the transnational tech companies that depend on the physical infrastructure to make their profits.

The mouthpiece for the broadband suppliers says Labour doesn’t seem to understand the dynamics of the interrelationships in the industry.

This is code for saying Labour does. And so do millions of broadband customers who have been educated in the idiocies of privatisation by decades of commercial chicanery by the parasitic owners of almost everything we need to live in modern society.

By and large most people get their internet services delivered through a technical infrastructure based on British Telecom’s decades-old network of copper wire backed up by big investments in newer technologies.

The logo at the top of our internet services bill simply signifies the identity of the intermediary enterprise that supplies the router and manages the transactions. We pays our money and makes our choice. But really it is a choice between one bundle of bullshit and another.

An behind the bewildering range of different packages and competing offers there is simply a common utility from which this host of nominally different companies buy access and then scheme to make money from selling this to us at a higher price than they pay.

The competition in the system lies largely in the public face these firms put on their sales pitch.

It is no less daft than the stupid system made possible by privatisation in which our gas, water and electricity come from exactly the same source as does that supplied to everyone else. If our “supplier” gets its sums wrong and goes out of business we can still light the gas hob, flush the loo or switch on the telly.

It raises the obvious question: why do we need to pay these people?

Aside from obvious benefit to our budgets that the free delivery of superfast broadband confers – between £30 and £50 a month for most people – Labour’s plan makes sense because Britain is way down the league table in the speed and scale of our digital services. Modern economies depend more and more on the fast exchange of data and on services that cannot function at optimum efficiently with an outdated communications network.

Labour’s plan will aid the diversification of economic activity away from south-east England with substantial reductions in travel and thus a reduction in carbon emissions.

In investment Britain lags behind every developed economy except Greece. The US and Germany invest 20 per cent of GDP, Britain just 16 per cent but critically our private-sector fixed investment relative to GDP is smaller compared to other developed economies.

A fast, efficient, free at the point of use network is a necessary precondition for a productivity-led renaissance of our productive economy. This needs public enterprise and it is clear that it cannot depend on a lacklustre private sector.

 

[комшија]

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...-that-tories-offered-peerages-to-brexit-party

Police assessing claims that Tories offered peerages to Brexit party

Lord Falconer urges Met to look at allegations candidates were offered peerages to stand down

Sat 16 Nov 2019 10.03 GMT

Scotland Yard is assessing two allegations of electoral fraud after claims the Tories offered peerages to senior Brexit party figures to persuade them to stand down in the general election.

The Labour peer Lord Falconer has written to the Metropolitan police commissioner and director of public prosecutions calling for an investigation into what he said were “exceptionally serious allegations”.

In a letter to Cressida Dick and Max Hill QC he referred to Nigel Farage’s claim that he and eight other senior figures within the Brexit party were offered peerages and said they should be investigated by police as a matter of urgency order to maintain public confidence in the integrity of the election.

The Met said: “The MPS [Metropolitan Police Service] has received two allegations of electoral fraud and malpractice in relation to the 2019 general election. The MPS special inquiry team is responsible for investigating all such criminal allegations. Both allegations are currently being assessed.

Boris Johnson has acknowledged that there may have been “conversations” between senior Tories and people in the Brexit party but flatly denied there had been any offers of peerages, saying that is “just not the way we operate”.

The Labour chairman, Ian Lavery said: “If what Nigel Farage suggests is true, that Brexit party members have been approached by senior Conservatives asking to step down with the result being peerages, what state of affairs is our politics in? It’s an absolute outrage.

“This could be political corruption of the highest order and in addition to that it could be seen as criminal activity. This cannot be accepted. There should be undoubtedly an investigation into the situation.”

In his letter, the former Lord Chancellor, said: “I believe these allegations raise serious questions about the integrity of the upcoming general election, and in particular whether senior individuals at CCHQ [Conservative campaign headquarters] or No 10 have breached two sections of the Representation of the People Act 1983.”

He then cites the parts of the act that refer to “bribery” and “corruptly” inducing or procuring someone to withdraw as a candidate at an election.

Commenting on the letter on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Michael Gove said: “I’ve got great respect for Charlie Falconer but I think that this sounds pretty nonsensical to me.”

The row came amid growing pressure on Farage, in the run-up to the close of nominations on Thursday, to stand down Brexit party candidates in all but a few dozen constituencies to avoid splitting the pro-leave vote.

The Brexit party leader had already said they would not contest the 317 seats that the Conservatives won in the 2017 election.

Suspicions that individual Brexit party candidates were coming under pressure to stand aside were heightened after the prospective candidate for Dudley North announced he would not be running for fear of enabling a Labour victory..

Falconer’s letter also mentions Ann Widdecombe, the former Tory MP now standing for the Brexit party in Plymouth Sutton and Devonport. She said she was offered a role in the Brexit negotiations if she stepped aside.

Pressed on Widdecombe’s claim, Gove said: “I haven’t spoken to Ann and I don’t know anyone who has spoken to Ann for months now.”

Commenting on whether he asked anyone in the Conservative party if the claims were true, Gove said: “I think the prime minister has been very clear that we’re not engaging in pacts, negotiations – the decision for the Brexit party to stand down was, as I understand it, a unilateral decision that was taken because the leadership of the Brexit party recognised that if they stood in a range of seats they would imperil the chance of a Conservative majority government.”

Brexit party MEP Ben Habib rebuffed the Tory denials. “They’re being economical with the truth for sure,” he told Sky. “Absolutely. It has been going on. Without a shadow of a doubt.”

Meanwhile, the SNP has demanded a Cabinet Office probe into the allegations. Tommy Sheppard, the party’s candidate for Edinburgh East and its Cabinet Office spokesman, said the allegations “go to the heart of the abuse of the peerage system”.

“While the SNP campaign every day to outline our positive vision for Scotland, the Westminster parties seem more consumed with dodgy backroom deals to rig the system in their own favour,” he said. “This is unacceptable.”

 

[комшија]

The Tories rely on Russian money – that’s why they ignore Russian meddling

If the intelligence report on this matter is not made public, voters can only conclude the party has something to hide
• Chris Bryant
Chris Bryant is a former chair of the parliamentary group on Russia

Wed 13 Nov 2019 18.30 GMT Last modified on Thu 14 Nov 2019 12.50 GMT



‘Boris Johnson admitted that the biggest mistake he made as foreign secretary was his visit to Moscow, and thinking it was possible to reset relations.’ Johnson in Red Square, December 2017. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/Reuters

Anyone who really wants to understand the government’s determination to suppress parliament’s intelligence and security committee report on Russia needs to go back to 2009. I was the Europe minister and my opposite number, Mark Francois, made it abundantly clear that a future Tory government intended to “normalise” relations with Vladimir Putin’s Russia. So when David Cameron arrived in Downing Street he wiped the slate clean. Russia was one of the world’s major fast-growing economies. We needed to do more trade with Putin and let bygones be bygones.
That required quite a lot of wilful amnesia by Conservative ministers. Alexander Litvinenko had been poisoned with polonium in the UK in 2006. All the evidence pointed to the Kremlin, but as then home secretary Theresa May stated quite openly, the reason she was blocking an inquiry into his murder was that it would harm diplomatic relations. Likewise, Sergei Magnitsky died in a Russian jail in 2009 after he discovered massive corruption by Kremlin officials while working for a British firm. But time and again when I asked Cameron and May whether they would bar anyone associated with his murder from entering the UK, they obfuscated and prevaricated.

So began the massive influx of Russian money into the UK. Oligarchs squirrelled their money away here and dramatically inflated the housing market in the process. Tier 1 “golden” visas were handed out like confetti to dubious characters on the sole understanding that they had £2m “available” to invest in the UK – even if they never actually invested a rouble here.


One investment was commonplace, though – in the Conservative party. Sometimes it was the oligarch himself – as with Alexander Temerko, who had previously had a prominent role in the Russian arms industry. Sometimes it was the oligarch’s naturalised wife – as with Lubov Chernukhin, whose husband was Putin’s deputy finance minister. A payment of £160,000 granted her a tennis match with Cameron and Johnson. In all, Russian money has dripped into the Tory party to the tune of at least £3.5m since Cameron came to power – with at least £500,000 in the past year alone.

It is time Boris Johnson woke up to the fact that Russia is intent on undermining our political system

No wonder the government is determined to block publication of the intelligence committee report. You have to listen very carefully to what successive Conservative ministers have said. They never deny that Russia has attempted to interfere with our democracy. What they say repeatedly is that there have been no “successful” attempts. The implication is clear. But leaving aside the question of what constitutes “success”, the British people surely deserve to know what those attempts look like. Voters need to go into this general election with their eyes wide open.

The truth is, Putin believes he is at war with the west. That doesn’t involve tanks or missiles, but a highly effective manipulation of our democratic system. His bot and troll factory in St Petersburg targets individual British politicians and groups that are especially critical of Putin, running specially generated negative tweets and Facebook material and magnifying attack material put out by others. The aim is simple – destabilise and undermine all Putin critics with as little comeback as possible.


He also runs a systematic campaign of obfuscation and misinformation on everything from the attack in Salisbury, relations with the US, the political situation in Ukraine, and the bringing down of the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17. Often the inconsistencies in the Russian line seem preposterously careless, but they simply underline the disdain in which Putin’s spokespeople hold western concepts of the rule of law.

The news that the Labour party has suffered multiple attempts at cyberattacks this week will not be a surprise in the parliamentary IT department, as they have regularly warned the Commons finance committee of repeated attempts to penetrate the Commons IT systems from Russia and China. And sometimes the Russians go further. I gather the food poisoning and the repeated phone calls to my hotel room every hour through the night on a ministerial visit to Nizhniy Novgorod were standard irritants meted out by the FSB to “difficult” visitors. When the Russian government complained that I, while chair of the all-party parliamentary group on Russia, was too critical of Putin (and too homosexual), Conservatives worked directly with the Russian embassy to have me removed. Sergey Nalobin organised the lavish launch of the Conservative Friends of Russia group at the embassy in 2012, and a few months later half the then cabinet and more than 150 Conservative MPs turned up at the AGM to vote me out. Evidence recently provided to the foreign affairs select committee inquiry on autocracies claims that this was directly sanctioned by the Kremlin’s foreign intelligence agency, the SVR.

Boris Johnson admitted that the biggest mistake he made as foreign secretary was his visit to Moscow, and thinking it was possible to reset relations. It is time he woke up to the fact that Russia is intent on undermining our political system. He should come clean now and publish the intelligence committee report. It’s the only way he can counter the Russian influence that clearly hangs over him and his party. At best, successive Conservative prime ministers have been naive about Putin. If Johnson continues to refuse to publish, though, the only conclusion will be that he is complicit and has something to hide.


• This article was updated on 14 November to clarify Alexander Temerko’s position.

 

[комшија]

 

[комшија]

 

[комшија]

Najbogatiji Britanci se sele ako bi Korbin postao premijer

Najbogatiji ljudi u Velikoj Britaniji spremni su da odmah napuste zemlju, u slucaju da Džeremi Korbin postane premijer, strahujući zbog moguće promene poreske politike i kontrole kapitala

Najbogatiji ljudi u Velikoj Britaniji spremni su da odmah napuste zemlju, u slucaju da Džeremi Korbin postane premijer, strahujući zbog moguće promene poreske politike i kontrole kapitala, prenosi Gardijan.

Advokati i računovođe najbogatijih britanskih porodica rekli su da su bili „preplavljeni” pozivima milijardera i milionera koji su tražili pomoć i savete u izboru zemlje preseljenja, navodi list.

Istovremeno, premeštaju kapital u inostranstvo i sa decom sklapaju ugovore o poklonima, ne bi li izbegli obećhanje laburista da će oporezovati nasledstvo čija vrednost premašuje 125.000 funti.

Savetnici su naveli da potencijalna Korbinova vlada predstavlja veću pretnju po bogatstvo i životni standard jednog procenta najbogatijh od Bregzita, prenosi RTS.

Džefri Tod, partner u advokatskoj kompaniji "Budl Hetfild" je rekao da su mnogi od njegovih klijenata vecH pripremili plan za prebacivanje bogatstva iz zemlje u roku od nekoliko minuta, ukoliko Korbin bude izabran za premijera.

"Mnogo bogatih ljudi zabrinuto je zbog toga što bi morali da plate mnogo veci porez na bogatstvo i vec su pripremljeni za mogucnost da Korbin sastavi vladu. Transferi bogatstva su vec osmišljeni - u mnogim slučajevima fali samo potpis na dokumentu", naveo je Tod.

 

[veliki krang]

Šansa za siromašne trockiste? Pardon, suvišno je ovo "siromašni" pošto se podrazumeva

 

[комшија]

Corbyn's 'Wikileaks moment' revealed the extent of the threat to our NHS

BEST guesstimates are that just about four million people have access to private healthcare in Britain, and apart from the super-rich the great bulk of private healthcare users obtain it as a work-related perk.
No one, even the relatively wealthy, thinks it is worth forking out earned income on healthcare that is provided free at the point of use; is in clinical terms among the best in the world, and is paid for through a universal contributory national-insurance scheme.

Top bosses in the private sector routinely get top quality and fully comprehensive healthcare which, when needed, is often provided in NHS facilities by NHS staff working under private contract.

Management types lower down the pecking order get a more limited and capped service designed more to jump NHS waiting lists than deliver care of a better quality than that routinely available in the NHS.
Of course, our NHS is already partly privatised. And only recently the European Union was in negotiation with the US over the shape of a trade agreement. Much of the opposition to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) centred on its likely effect on the NHS.

Opponents of TTIP argued that including healthcare in the agreement would force further privatisation on the NHS. The market mechanisms which EU membership already entails has steadily enriched health-service vultures the like of Richard Branson.

Think of private healthcare as an industry created by the deliberate failure of government to fund adequately the service upon which the vast bulk of citizens depend.
It is a central part of a neo-liberal political project designed to accustom the British people even more to a future in which all aspects of life, all services upon which we depend, all utilities are even more stratified along class line than they already are.

Into this political project and ideological construct, we have the stratification of education in which academies and grammar schools sometimes provide a service of an intermediate quality while the pampered offspring of the rich and not-so rich attend private schools themselves stratified by cost. The rest of us send our kids to schools whose funding shortfall worsens every term.

Think of private education as an industry created by the deliberate failure of government to fund adequately the service upon which the vast bulk of citizens depend.
Because a cash-strapped NHS rations healthcare by medical urgency and queuing, the thin edge of the private-healthcare wedge depends on NHS facilities and NHS staff trained at public expense. In the same way, the private education system depends on staff largely educated and trained at public expense (and itself is vastly subsidised by tax breaks).

Contrast our NHS — with all its problems — to the United States where healthcare is a chaotic mixture of partially and inadequately funded public services, compulsory private insurance-based schemes and, for millions, no health cover at all.

In the US it is routine for pre-existing conditions to disqualify suffers, for limits on costs to lead to cutoffs in treatment and for people with serious or long-term health problems to be forced into personal bankruptcy.
Neither Johnson nor any of his privileged circle are going to present the rest of us with their full prospectus which awaits us if they get back into government.

But Jeremy Corbyn’s demonstration that Johnson lied when he said allegations that the NHS was a bargaining chip in secret discussions with the US were “an absolute invention” shows just how dangerous it is to trust a Tory with the NHS, Brexit or anything of importance.

 

[Turpentine]

Šta kažu grbave kolege sa Krste ?
Škotska se odvaja, Vels isto, ne može se zuluma trpeti više.

Realnost - Union Bears

A tek ovo -

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mrp-election-poll-boris-johnson-heads-for-big-majority-qrqsq9f7r

 

[комшија]

 

[комшија]

Niko nije iznad zakona: Vođa laburista o aferi sa podvođenjem maloletnica i umešanosti princa Endrjua


Lider britanske opozicione Laburističke stranke Džeremi Korbin izjavio je danas, povodom afere oko princa Endrua, da niko nije iznad zakona i da bi svako ko je uradio nešto pogrešno trebalo da bude otvoren za istragu



Princ Endrju

• 
  Britanski princ odstupio zbog pedofilske afere

Lider britanske opozicione Laburističke stranke Džeremi Korbin izjavio je danas, povodom afere oko princa Endrjua, da niko nije iznad zakona i da bi svako ko je uradio nešto pogrešno trebalo da bude otvoren za istragu.

Korbin je to izjavio upitan da li bi princ Endrju trebalo da da izjavu američkim vlastima.

"Stvari koje su se otkrile u vezi sa Džefrijem Epstajnom su užasne i smatram da bi trebalo da se krene od principa da su tu bile neke žrtve - očajne mlade žene prema kojima se ophodilo na grozan način", rekao je Korbin.

PROČITAJTE JOŠ - Britanski princ odstupio zbog pedofilske afere

Britanski princ Endrju je u sredu objavio je da se povlači iz javnog života, navodeći da su kontroverze oko njegovog nepromišljenog odnosa sa američkim finansijerom Epstajnom, koji je osuđen zbog podvođenja maloletnica, donele velike smetnje kraljevskoj porodici.

Endru je naveo da se "odriče svih svojih javnih dužnosti u doglednoj budućnosti".

Princ je, takođe, od svoje majke, kraljice Elizabete Druge, zatražio dozvolu da se povuče.

PROČITAJTE JOŠ - Britanski princ nije primetio sumnjivo ponašnje kod Epstajna

Pokušaji britanskog princa Endrjua da razjasni svoje prijateljske odnose s finansijerom pedofilom Džefrijem Epstajnom u intervjuu koji je dao pre nekoliko dana za BBC izazvali su mnoga negativna reagovanja.

Princ Endrju prvi put je u tom intervjuu odgovarao na pitanja o vezama sa osuđenim pedofilom Epstajnom, u kojem je priznao da je bila greška što je boravio u njegovoj kući.

Princ Endrju je u jednom od retkih intervjua za BBC kategorički odbacio navode da je imao seksualni odnos sa Amerikankom Virdžinijom Roberts, koja ga je optužila za seksualno zlostavljanje u vreme kada je bila maloletna.

Višesatni intervju odmah je postao udarna tema na društvenim mrežama. Reagovanja su bila brojna, a malo njih je išlo princu u prilog, preneo je Blumberg.

 

[комшија]

Laburisti predstavili program, Korbin želi trijumf

Lider britanske opozicione Laburističke partije Džeremi Korbin predstavio je program svoje stranke u kom je izneo radikalne planove o transformaciji Biritanije.

​

Olanovi se ogledaju u povećanje plata u javnom sektoru, veće poreze i nacionalizaciju infrastrukture.

Korbin je rekao da će ta obećanja ispuniti ako pobedi na izborima 12. decembra, a program stranke nazvao je "manifestom nade".

On je istakao da mu je cilj da trijumfuje na izborima, a ne samo da osvoji dovoljno mesta za formiranje koalicione vlade.
"Borimo se na ovim izborima da pobedimo kao Laburistička stranka, ne borimo se da bi išli u koaliciju sa nekim", kazao je Korbin, prenosi Rojters.
Korbin je, programom predstavljenom u Birmingemu u centralnoj Engleskoj, ponudio za svakoga po nešto - od pomoći za roditelje sa malom decom, do besplatnog studiranja i više novca za brigu o starim licima.
U govoru, prekidanom aplauzima i ovacijama pristalica, Korbin je obećao da će se zalagati za obične ljude protiv "bankara, milijardera i establišmenta".
"Program laburista je program nade koji će omogućiti realnu šansu", dodao je Korbin.
Što se tiče Bregzita, Korbin je rekao da će to pitanje rešiti u roku od šest meseci, sa novim sporazumom o izlasku koji bi morao da bude potvrđen na drugom referendumu.
U programu ponovo se oživljava politika nacionalizacije i kontrole centralne vlade od koje su odustale i konzervativne i laburističke vlade od 80-ih godina prošlog veka, konstatuje AP.
"Da, to je radikalan program. Ali, kada putujete ovom zemljom i razgovarate sa ljudima, radikalni odgovori su ono što je neophodno", poručio je Korbin.
Korbin je rekao da će njegova politika biti popularna u javnosti, a sebe je uporedio sa bivšim američkim predsednikom Frenklinom Ruzveltom čije je paket mera "Nju dil" doprineo prevazilaženju ekonomske krize poznate kao Velika depresija.
Korbin je rekao da je Ruzvelt "morao da krene na bogate i moćne u Americi da bi to postigao".
"Prihvatam da je protivljenje i neprijateljstvo bogatih i moćnih neizbežno", zaključio je Korbin.