Da li ste audiofil?

[manem78]

Priprema za audiofilsko veče

 

[manem78]

Rega vs Rega

 

[pura moca]

Priprema za audiofilsko veče
Pogledajte prilog 1768666

lep kutić ♥
basovi 8"?
koliko Hz sviraju dole?
šta će ti ove anakonde od kablova?
zašto skupo plaćaš pasivne filtere?

 

[manem78]

lep kutić ♥
basovi 8"?
koliko Hz sviraju dole?
šta će ti ove anakonde od kablova?
zašto skupo plaćaš pasivne filtere?

E, ništa nije moje. Drugar ima ovu donju Regu i hoće da kupi gornju koja je 3x skuplja pa smo testirali. A kod mene je setup jer je dobra akustika. Stvarno vredi. Uzeo čovek.

 

[manem78]

lep kutić ♥
basovi 8"?
koliko Hz sviraju dole?
šta će ti ove anakonde od kablova?
zašto skupo plaćaš pasivne filtere?

Nego, sad mi stoji taj sistem kod mene već nekoliko dana. I interesantno mi je što npr. moj lični sistem ne zaostaje nešto puno u zvuku iza ovog višestruko skupljeg.
Q Acoustics 3030i
Yamaha Pianocraft RX-E810
M-Audio Fast Track Pro, kao DAC

Poredim paralelno i nema tu sad baš WOW efekta. Rega sa Kairosima ima veći bass malo veću sliku. I svilenkastije visoke.

 

[Vladimir983]

Odvratno

Pa zavisi koji. Danas se svašta naziva narodnjacima.

 

[pura moca]

The one of greatest importance in audio is the amplitude of
electrical signal or sound level vs. frequency, or as it is
commonly known: the frequency response.
It is the principal determinant of sound quality.

Music and movies are art. Audio is a science. "Science in
the service of art" is our business. The final evaluation, how-
ever, of any audio product, hardware or software, is a lis-
tening test—and that is part of the problem. How do we
determine what causes something to sound "good" or "bad"?
The audio industry is in a "circle of confusion." Loud-
speakers are evaluated by using recordings . . . which are
made by using microphones, equalization, reverb, and ef-
fects . . . which are evaluated by using loudspeakers . . .
which are evaluated by using recordings . . . etc., etc.
Recordings are then used to evaluate audio products. This
is equivalent to doing a measurement with an uncalibrated
instrument! Of course, professional audio engineers use pro-
fessional monitor loudspeakers . . . which are also evaluated
by using recordings . . . which are made by using micro-
phones, etc. . . . which are evaluated by using professional
monitor loudspeakers . . . which are once again evaluated
by using recordings . . . which are then auditioned through
consumer loudspeakers!

Thus the circle of confusion continues. It is broken only when the professional
monitor loudspeakers and the consumer loudspeakers sound like
each other—when they have the same sonic signature, i.e.,
when they are similarly good.

FLOYD E. TOOLE, Vice President, Acoustical Enqineerinq, Harman International Industries

Uvek sam tvrdio da je podela na monitore i hi-fi zvučnike vrlo sumnjiva rabota. Čudo jedno, i ovaj čova koga sam citirao misli isto. Dotični, koji je slučajno doktor nauka, uvek veoma insistira i na upotrebi što preciznijih ekvilajzera. Ali šta lupa taj tupan, svaki neškolovani audiofil će da mu objasni da su tonske kontrole jeres.

 

[pura moca]

 

[pura moca]

 

[Duskwood]

https://vocaroo.com/1kzjvu8IK9X5

 

[pura moca]

In 2022, an AVS Forum member known as M. Zillch ran a blind listening test that has resurfaced in 2025 amid fresh debates over whether high-end vinyl gear is truly worth it.

In this test, he wanted to see if people could tell the difference between two turntable systems. One of which cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and another was worth less than a basic dinner out.

When all votes were counted, 58.3% of 60 participants picked Turntable A as the half-million-dollar rig. But, they were wrong. Turntable A was the $78 Acoustic Research AR-XA, while Turntable B, chosen correctly by only 41.7%, was the ultra-luxury TechDAS Air Force Zero setup.