Rat u Ukrajini (17)

Koji od tri ishoda vam je najverovatniji?


  • Ukupno glasova
    130
stanje
Zatvorena za pisanje odgovora.
Odesa jutros. Bambusanje se nastavlja.

🇷🇺🔥 Красивое.

Последствия ракетного удара по объекту инфраструктуры в Одессе.

photo_2022-12-11_07-30-00.jpg
 
Stize novo NATO nacisticko meso i oklop nasima da ih uniste

Bice unisteni ko i svi prethodni pre njih

to samo znaci da se nato i ameri zvanicno ukljucuju u rat jer ukropi ne znaju da koriste leoparde samo vozac da bi uspesno savladao koristenje leoparda treba mu 2 godine po recima americkih i britanskih tenkista koji su govorili o toj temi na youtubu
 
to samo znaci da se nato i ameri zvanicno ukljucuju u rat jer ukropi ne znaju da koriste leoparde samo vozac da bi uspesno savladao koristenje leoparda treba mu 2 godine po recima americkih i britanskih tenkista koji su govorili o toj temi na youtubu

Slazem se i to znaci samo jedno.

Bice mrtvih NATO Nacista na buljuke :super:

Vidjacemo kovcege od camovine prekrivene poljskim americkim i nemackim zastavama - na dnevnoj bazi.
 
Рат у Украјини разоткрио је слабост америчке војске - Лари Џонсон, син нове америчке револуције (хттпс://сонар21.цом/тхе-вар-ин-украине-хас-екпосед-тхе-веакнесс-оф -тхе-у-с-војска/)

..."Верујем да смо сведоци краја америчких дана као светског полицајца. Војска САД је скупа експедициона снага. Распоређивање трупа и опреме у страним земљама за вођење рата је скуп посао. Не само у смислу изгубљених живота , али то захтева, као што смо видели у Авганистану и Ираку, милијарде долара који се спаљују на ратиштима без постизања било каквог значајног политичког исхода који јача безбедност Сједињених Држава. Сведоци смо нове фазе ове реалности у Украјини. Америчко оружје на ратишту у Донбасу не мења игру. Рат у Украјини је разоткрио слабост логистичких способности и САД и чланица НАТО-а. Дошли смо до тачке у којој одбрамбени извођачи Сједињених Држава могу произвести само 20.000 артиљеријских граната за месец дана, док Русија толико испали у једном дану и може да настави да снабдева своје трупе“.

:maramica:

https://sonar21.com/the-war-in-ukraine-has-exposed-the-weakness-of-the-u-s-military/


THE WAR IN UKRAINE HAS EXPOSED THE WEAKNESS OF THE U.S. MILITARY​

10 December 2022 by Larry Johnson 22 Comments

FacebookTwitterEmailShare
image-11-1024x576.png

I would love to take credit for the following words, but they belong to a new friend. A now retired journalist who had an exemplary career. He reached out to me recently and expressed his appreciation for what I was writing and encouraged me to keep it up. It is humbling when a legend takes the time to tell you that you are doing good work.
I will leave his name out of this for now (unless he grants me permission to reveal his identity). But he is spot on in his analysis of what has happened to the U.S. military. While U.S. politicians keep insisting, like the Evil Queen in Snow White staring into the Magic Mirror, that the United States is the fairest of them all, the truth is otherwise.

19th century Britain went almost a century after Waterloo with no major war (beside Crimea). Its military became an expeditionary force dispatched on brief wars against various Fuzzy Wuzzie without first class weapons or even good tactical discipline. Rather like the US since Vietnam.
What Trump calls the “forever wars” (and I call the wars of sheer imperialism), after the fall of the USSR the Pentagon shifted planning and operations to what had been the stepchild of DOD for years — “Special Operations.” The Special Operations Command (aka SOCOM) came into being and the battle doctrine became dominated by Rangers, Special Forces, SEALS, etc and our military arsenal shrunk accordingly to support light operations with air control and total domination of the battle field. War by XVIII Airborne Corps.

Fielding of weapons became a lost art. Even paying attention to the Air Defense leapfrog by the Russians and Chinese, which we are seeing chew up Ukraine and NATO support weapons, became too much trouble. Now the Russians are exposing the paper tiger of American and NATO military power as they “demilaratize” us as well as Ukraine. Our response to the huge new challenge to carrier groups and old fashioned manned bombers is the Idiotic B 21. We are strangled by past legends, an arrogant assumption of continued postwar hegemony, and are sliding towards becoming a 2nd rate power.

Whatever US staff planned the support operation for Ukraine should be shot. We sent them the wrong armaments (lacking the right ones) and sat by while they ran through all the warehoused support we had like a drunken teenager. Now we can no longer support them. And they are hanging on the ropes.

After Napoleon, the Russians are the best artillerymen in the world. This war was always going to come down to artillery. And we sent them a air deliverable special operations design basic howitzer M777 that wasn’t tough enough for the job and easily disabled from excessive use and then ran out of ammo.
We should have seen all this coming up front. We not only proceeded on an arrogant basis without proper study, We knew we were in an industrial war and that was a game we couldn’t play for long. This was a military catastrophe from the beginning. Any planner worth his salt would recommend against it. Looks like DOD is scared now and is going to resist Biden Administration neocon pressure to “escalate.” The muttering about Crimea indicates the Administration is beginning to think about the end game.
I have had the honor of working with U.S. military Special Operations Forces for 37 years. These units have some remarkable capabilities in conducting hostage rescue and raids. What makes them “special” is the selection process the various units employ for qualifying men (and some women) to carry out the missions. Notwithstanding their skill and smarts, these units cannot turn the tide of battle in a peer-to-peer war. They do not have magic powers to withstand sustained artillery bombardments. They may be able to endure the hardship better than a regular Army or Marine troop, but when confronted with a foe that commands the air and dominates with artillery and armor they are as susceptible to being killed or wounded as the average grunt.
I believe we are witnessing the end of America’s days as the World’s Policeman. The U.S. military is an expensive expeditionary force. Deploying troops and equipment to foreign countries to wage war is a costly business. Not just in terms of lives lost, but it requires, as we have seen in Afghanistan and Iraq, billions of dollars that are burned up on battlefields without achieving any significant political outcome that strengthens the security of the United States.
We are witnessing a new phase of this reality in Ukraine. U.S. weapons on the battlefield on the Donbas are not game changers. The war in Ukraine has exposed the weakness of the logistics capability of both the United States and the NATO members. We have reached a point where the United States defense contractors can only produce 20,000 artillery shells in a month while Russia is firing that many in one day and is able to continue supplying its troops.
The obsession of the United States in producing grossly expensive combat and bomber aircraft is self destructive. We have reached the point in history where piloted aircraft no longer are viable in light of the air defense systems that Russia and China have deployed. Technology has brought us to the point where a precision guided missile can do the work of a bomber or a jet fighter with only a fraction of the money required to deploy and maintain a manned aircraft.
The United States military is aggravating the mistake the U.S. Army made going into World War II:
The last cavalry charge made on horseback by the U.S. Army took place in 1942, when the United States fought the Japanese army in the Philippines. After that, the mounted cavalry was replaced by tanks.
https://www.ridinghall.com/when-did-the-us-cavalry-stop-using-horses/
Think about that for a minute. World War I and the advent of the tank and the machine gun rendered horse cavalry irrelevant to modern warfare. Yet, the U.S. Army insisted on maintaining that capability even though it was useless strategically and tactically. The U.S. military today is making a similar mistake — i.e., hanging onto legacy defense systems that have been made obsolete by technology.
 
NE postoji ukrajinsko stanovnistvo. Sve su to Rusi. Kokoska je starija od jajeta a ovo su granice Rusije iz 1914.

Tako da Rusija ima pravo da povrati svoju teritoriju otetu od strane komunista i zapada. Obrnuto ne vazi.

Malo se edukuj o istoriji pre nego izlupetas gluposti

Ova sadasnja ukrajina postoji kao drzava jedva 30 i kusur godina

Russia_1000.jpg
Izmisljaju se razne vikipedije kako bi se nametnulo kao novi izvor informacija iz istorije umesto da se uzme knjiga u ruke.
 
Kaze vojni ekspert da Amerika puca sa vojskom. Forsiraju bombardere koji su prevazidjeni u danasnje vreme jer njihov posao odradjuju rakete i dronovi za delic cene kostanja samog aviona.

Da su Rusi posle Napoleona i Francuza najbolji artiljerci na svetu. I da Rusi dnevno ispale u Ukrajini 20.000 granata i proizvode jos vise na dnevnoj bazi, dok Amerikanci mogu da proizvedu ukupno 20.000 granata MESECNO :maramica:

I da je americki poraz u Ukrajini samim tim dugorocno gledano NEIZBEZAN
 
Pojasni ti nama kako su Rusi imali pravo (a imali su) da vrate Ceceniju sa vecinskim cecenskim stanovnistvom u RF dok Ukrajinci takvo pravo nemaju kad je u pitanju Donbas, deo Ukrajine sa vecinskim ukrajinskim stanovnistvom.
Minskim sporazumom bio je predvidjen povratak DNR i LNR u sastav Ukrajine uz status sire autonomije,hoholji su to izigrali i zeleli su etnicko ciscenje rusko govornog stanovnistva iz DNR i LNR.Sa druge strane Rusi su Cecene nagradili velikim investicijama u zamenu za lojalnost
Hoholji su to pravo izigravanjem Minskog izgubili
 
nije problem amerikanaca u mogućnosti proizvodnje granata koliko saznanje da nemaju kapaciteta da u jednom bezrezevnom klasičnom sukobu sa rusijom obezbjede druge interese i vlastitu sigurnost na globalnom nivou..
 
Kaze vojni ekspert da Amerika puca sa vojskom. Forsiraju bombardere koji su prevazidjeni u danasnje vreme jer njihov posao odradjuju rakete i dronovi za delic cene kostanja samog aviona.

Da su Rusi posle Napoleona i Francuza najbolji artiljerci na svetu. I da Rusi dnevno ispale u Ukrajini 20.000 granata i proizvode jos vise na dnevnoj bazi, dok Amerikanci mogu da proizvedu ukupno 20.000 granata MESECNO :maramica:

I da je americki poraz u Ukrajini samim tim dugorocno gledano NEIZBEZAN
Poraz amerike u Ukrajini sto je najvaznije, imace mnogo sire posledice. Jedna od njih moze se videti jeste i istup Vicica oko kosova. Vec se nadzire ishod rata u Ukrajini i on ce uticati na kompletan region i generalno na politiku
 
Partnerstvo za mir napustili su Rusi kada su shvatili da tamo ne mogu biti jednaki sa Amerima, zajednicka komanda i odlucivanje. Ukrajina nije koristila svoju teritoriju na stetu Rusije, naprotiv, Rusi imali baze na Krimu.
Samim pristupanjem NATO paktu Ukrajina bi se stavila u službu američke hegemonije i stavila svoju teritoriju na raspolaganju za dejstva koja predstavljaju pretnju po bezbednost Ruske Federacije. Ne samo Ukrajina, sve bivše sovjetske republike su se postepeno uvlačile u NATO, Ove veće poput Ukrajine, Belorusije i Kazahstana izazivanjem pučeva i instaliranjem anti-ruskih režima.

Što se Krima i Sevastopolja tiče tu je već bila spremna pedala za Ruse.
 
Eksplozije i na Krimu i u sjedištu ruske crnomorske flote

Također su se pojavila izvješća o višestrukim eksplozijama koje su pogodile Krim, koji je Rusija anektirala. Navodno je pogođena i vojarna. Ukrajinski dužnosnici nisu komentirali eksplozije na Krimu. Bilo je i izvješća o eksplozijama u Sevastopolju, sjedištu ruske crnomorske flote, u ruskoj vojnoj vojarni u Sovjetskom i u područjima Hvardiiske, Dzhankoi i Nižniohirski.

Neslužbeni krimski medijski portal Krimski veter objavio je da u eksploziji u ruskoj vojnoj vojarni u Sovjetskom ima mrtvih i ranjenih. Međutim, proruski krimski kanal tvrdi da je požar u vojarni izazvan "neopreznim rukovanjem vatrom". "Dvije osobe su umrle. Sada su svi vojnici, dvjestotinjak ljudi, smješteni u druge prostorije", navodi se.


Opet pušenje gdje se ne smije..
 
Eksplozije i na Krimu i u sjedištu ruske crnomorske flote

Također su se pojavila izvješća o višestrukim eksplozijama koje su pogodile Krim, koji je Rusija anektirala. Navodno je pogođena i vojarna. Ukrajinski dužnosnici nisu komentirali eksplozije na Krimu. Bilo je i izvješća o eksplozijama u Sevastopolju, sjedištu ruske crnomorske flote, u ruskoj vojnoj vojarni u Sovjetskom i u područjima Hvardiiske, Dzhankoi i Nižniohirski.

Neslužbeni krimski medijski portal Krimski veter objavio je da u eksploziji u ruskoj vojnoj vojarni u Sovjetskom ima mrtvih i ranjenih. Međutim, proruski krimski kanal tvrdi da je požar u vojarni izazvan "neopreznim rukovanjem vatrom". "Dvije osobe su umrle. Sada su svi vojnici, dvjestotinjak ljudi, smješteni u druge prostorije", navodi se.


Opet pušenje gdje se ne smije..
nista mi se to ne svidja

ako rusi zele pobjediti ne smeju izgubiti !!!!!
 
stanje
Zatvorena za pisanje odgovora.

Back
Top