Пресретач
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 36.527
Коме да преда наоружаним цивилима?
Па зар не видиш да су "Јасмин револуције" војне операције које се по начину и методу разликују од класичних војних операција?
-
- Popularno:
- Zasto se Vucic toliko boji Rusa?
- Istraživanje Crte: Za studentsku listu...
- Toma Momirović gradi hotel na Zlatiboru
- Zašto su neki ljudi gej
- Aci Srbinu okrenuli leđa EU, Ameri...
- Hoće li neko da odgovara za Zlatibor?
- Zašto su jaja bolji izbor za doručak od...
- U prvom krugu izbora najviše opština...
- Cene registracija skupe ko djavo - sto...
- Istina o inkognito modu
RAT U LIBIJI
- Začetnik teme Paganko
- Datum pokretanja
- stanje
Коме да преда наоружаним цивилима?
Па зар не видиш да су "Јасмин револуције" војне операције које се по начину и методу разликују од класичних војних операција?
Пресретач
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 36.527
Исто као и Тито у Југославији.
Ангел.
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 47.501
Власт се на сабљи добија, на сабљи се и губи. Старо правило.
- Poruka
- 27.467
Тачно је само ово о болести али погрешно постављено.
Болест ментална озбиљно је захватила аутора горенаписане будалаштине.
Мирне, дипломатске бомбе? Мирно, дипломатско убиство више хиљада
либијских цивила од фашистичке удруге НАТО? То је твој идеал?
Прави је бисер мудрости када дупеглавац означи некога диктаторим.
- Poruka
- 11.751
Kad čovek pogleda ovog ludaka koji je vuče svoj narod u kolektivno samoubistvo,Slobi bi trebalo dići zlatni spomenik što je mirno predao unapred izgubljenu borbu i poštedeo nas ovoga kroz šta prolaze Libijci.
Пресретач
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 36.527
22 August, 2011, 12:47
Meanwhile, the rebels have warned of intelligence reports indicating that troops loyal to Muammar Gaddafi are advancing towards the center of the Libyan capital.
The situation in Tripoli is chaotic, with few precise details emerging of developments in the capital.
http://rt.com/news/rebels-gaddafi-capital-tripoli-975/
Meanwhile, the rebels have warned of intelligence reports indicating that troops loyal to Muammar Gaddafi are advancing towards the center of the Libyan capital.
The situation in Tripoli is chaotic, with few precise details emerging of developments in the capital.
http://rt.com/news/rebels-gaddafi-capital-tripoli-975/
Lepi Bora
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 38.422
Pa pisano je - NATO i najamnici iz americkih paravojnih privatnih firmi vode glavnu rec ..
Poslednja izmena:
Тихи
Starosedelac
- Poruka
- 187.605
jednog diktatora ce zameniti drugi . Libijski narod je gluplji nego srpski
Gledam juce , "pobunjenik" vozi LEXUSA! Znaci toliko je lose ziveo pod Gadafijem da je dobio od Gadafija jedan od najskupljih auta koji postoje Lexus GS klasu . A pre dolaska Gadafija "vozio" se na magarecim taljigama . I tupan ne kapira da ce sada kada i ako vlast uspostavi novi americki diktator Dzalil - opet iz lexusa da ode na taljige.
Al kad je neko glup i ne zasluzuje nista bolje.
Isti slucaj kao i sa nama Srbima.
Gledam juce , "pobunjenik" vozi LEXUSA! Znaci toliko je lose ziveo pod Gadafijem da je dobio od Gadafija jedan od najskupljih auta koji postoje Lexus GS klasu . A pre dolaska Gadafija "vozio" se na magarecim taljigama . I tupan ne kapira da ce sada kada i ako vlast uspostavi novi americki diktator Dzalil - opet iz lexusa da ode na taljige.
Al kad je neko glup i ne zasluzuje nista bolje.
Isti slucaj kao i sa nama Srbima.
Тихи
Starosedelac
- Poruka
- 187.605
Zato je Srbija danas najsiromasnija drzava u Evropi .
Bas smo se usrecili sa vama Tadicevskim slugama zapadnih nacista.
Ista "sreca" ceka i Libijce .
- Poruka
- 27.467
Зашто одмах не напишеш да одушевљено скидаш гаће при сваком наиласку
варвара и пљачкаша, надајући се да ће и за тебе нека мрвица испод стола
остати?
Боље је часно изгубити битку него бедно скидати гаће и намештати ду*е.
- Poruka
- 11.751
U svakom slučaju smo u goвnima.Mada je naša kanalizacijska svakodnevnica zezanje naspram onog što čeka Libiju.
Тихи
Starosedelac
- Poruka
- 187.605
Libiju ceka sudbina Iraka.
Gradjanski rat ubistva propast ekonomska i svaka druga.
Sto se tice koliki je ko diktator - Gadafi je imao vladu dok je ovaj predsednik pobunjenickog saveta raspustio svoju i vlada sam .
No kad je diktator "proamericki" on je za Tadiceve teletabise odmah dobar.
- Poruka
- 11.751
Nisam od tih demokratskih....
Poslednja izmena:
Тихи
Starosedelac
- Poruka
- 187.605
'Libya likely to become next Iraq'
NATO's invasion of Tripoli prompts discussion of a potential occupation of Libya where the people of Libya could experience the suffering of Iraq.
Press TV talks with Jeff Steinberg, Executive Intelligence Review, in Washington who claims this is a heavy NATO invasion of Tripoli not the outcome of a civil war and that similar misery is set to befall the Libyan people as NATO moves ever toward an occupation of another oil rich Muslim country. Following is a transcript of the interview.
Press TV: What do you think of the new developments in Libya?
Jeff Steinberg: First of all this is not an action by the rebels as an independent force; this is a NATO action. The NATO air cover has been a decisive factor and if the reports about what has happened on the ground are true mainly that Muammar Gaddafi and his sons have either been captured or surrendered then this is not some internal event in Libya, but is a decision primarily made by Britain and France And Italy with full backing from the US to bring Gaddafi down.
A similar thing happened in March of 2003 in Iraq and within several months what we found was that the forces that were part of the old system had basically realized that they couldn't win the fight and they went into resistance mode with weapons and capabilities and they began to whittle away at the occupation.
And of course for a two to three year period after the initial 'dramatic success' - Bush on the USS Abraham winked and said, “Mission accomplished". It turned out it was a real asymmetric warfare slug fest that went on for quite some time. And it is yet to be seen if the US will be the big winner or the big loser in Iraq.
I think it's important to bear that recent history in mind as we see the events unfolding at this moment in Libya.
This was not an internal development; the rebel opposition had no capacity to take Tripoli on their own. It was on the basis of the US and key NATO allies really in this case driven by a political commitment to replace Gaddafi on the part of the British and French and Italians that we're in this situation right now.
So, do a little bit of historical research and don't jump to any hasty conclusions prematurely, that's my basic point today.
Press TV: Are you saying that the facts that are coming and news of Libyan rebel forces controlling Tripoli except Az Zawiya are not correct?
Jeff Steinberg: It probably is correct; but it is not the result of the outcome of an internal civil war; it's the result of a NATO-directed invasion and overthrow of a regime and instillation of a government that may or may not have a real prospect of survival.
What we don't know and what is going to play out in the months ahead is whether or not forces loyal to Gaddafi have decided to go into an asymmetric resistance mode because of the NATO factor and that they realize that they're not going to win in a direct showdown over who controls Tripoli.
Remember, it was considered a miraculously affective invasion and takeover of Iraq in March/April of 2003. But by June of 2003 a very effective resistance movement surfaced and the big casualties for the American occupation force in Iraq occurred long after the, quote 'successful invasion' had been completed.
So we don't know what is going to happen on the ground in Libya at this point. We know that the rebel opposition could never in a million years have taken Tripoli and consolidated control and, presumably if the reports are accurate and I can't even say that they are, captured Muammar Gaddafi and his sons including Saif al-Islam who is the designated successor.
Whether it's true or not it really remains to be seen whether or not a stable government is stood up in Tripoli and whether Libyan oil begins to flow again at some point in the not too distant future.
So this is not some kind of end of a civil war like Lincoln defeated the Confederacy and the civil war ended and the nation of the US was reunited. This is something quite different...
Press TV: Yesterday in his speech, Gaddafi said that the tribes and the people should march to Tripoli and “purify the city” - this is according to Libyan state television and he said also, “The West will not protect you” and “Tripoli will be destroyed”.
Today a spoke men for Gaddafi said, “The number of deaths that have occurred; NATO is causing this. Gaddafi is our leader and he will take control”.
So far over 10,000 have died although we don't have exact numbers and now after six months of fighting Gaddafi and his men want to sit down for peace negotiations. What do you think about that?
Jeff Steinberg: It's over. The whole idea of these negotiations back and forth was always a sham. The issue was the decision made by western NATO forces that Gaddafi would be brought down. And in the recent period the Russians and to some extent the Chinese even sort of accepted the fact that it's now inevitable that Gaddafi is going to be gone from power.
And nobody wants to lose altogether their impact and influence and economic ties in Libya. So, I think the rhetoric of the last few days will be very quickly forgotten.
NATO's invasion of Tripoli prompts discussion of a potential occupation of Libya where the people of Libya could experience the suffering of Iraq.
Press TV talks with Jeff Steinberg, Executive Intelligence Review, in Washington who claims this is a heavy NATO invasion of Tripoli not the outcome of a civil war and that similar misery is set to befall the Libyan people as NATO moves ever toward an occupation of another oil rich Muslim country. Following is a transcript of the interview.
Press TV: What do you think of the new developments in Libya?
Jeff Steinberg: First of all this is not an action by the rebels as an independent force; this is a NATO action. The NATO air cover has been a decisive factor and if the reports about what has happened on the ground are true mainly that Muammar Gaddafi and his sons have either been captured or surrendered then this is not some internal event in Libya, but is a decision primarily made by Britain and France And Italy with full backing from the US to bring Gaddafi down.
A similar thing happened in March of 2003 in Iraq and within several months what we found was that the forces that were part of the old system had basically realized that they couldn't win the fight and they went into resistance mode with weapons and capabilities and they began to whittle away at the occupation.
And of course for a two to three year period after the initial 'dramatic success' - Bush on the USS Abraham winked and said, “Mission accomplished". It turned out it was a real asymmetric warfare slug fest that went on for quite some time. And it is yet to be seen if the US will be the big winner or the big loser in Iraq.
I think it's important to bear that recent history in mind as we see the events unfolding at this moment in Libya.
This was not an internal development; the rebel opposition had no capacity to take Tripoli on their own. It was on the basis of the US and key NATO allies really in this case driven by a political commitment to replace Gaddafi on the part of the British and French and Italians that we're in this situation right now.
So, do a little bit of historical research and don't jump to any hasty conclusions prematurely, that's my basic point today.
Press TV: Are you saying that the facts that are coming and news of Libyan rebel forces controlling Tripoli except Az Zawiya are not correct?
Jeff Steinberg: It probably is correct; but it is not the result of the outcome of an internal civil war; it's the result of a NATO-directed invasion and overthrow of a regime and instillation of a government that may or may not have a real prospect of survival.
What we don't know and what is going to play out in the months ahead is whether or not forces loyal to Gaddafi have decided to go into an asymmetric resistance mode because of the NATO factor and that they realize that they're not going to win in a direct showdown over who controls Tripoli.
Remember, it was considered a miraculously affective invasion and takeover of Iraq in March/April of 2003. But by June of 2003 a very effective resistance movement surfaced and the big casualties for the American occupation force in Iraq occurred long after the, quote 'successful invasion' had been completed.
So we don't know what is going to happen on the ground in Libya at this point. We know that the rebel opposition could never in a million years have taken Tripoli and consolidated control and, presumably if the reports are accurate and I can't even say that they are, captured Muammar Gaddafi and his sons including Saif al-Islam who is the designated successor.
Whether it's true or not it really remains to be seen whether or not a stable government is stood up in Tripoli and whether Libyan oil begins to flow again at some point in the not too distant future.
So this is not some kind of end of a civil war like Lincoln defeated the Confederacy and the civil war ended and the nation of the US was reunited. This is something quite different...
Press TV: Yesterday in his speech, Gaddafi said that the tribes and the people should march to Tripoli and “purify the city” - this is according to Libyan state television and he said also, “The West will not protect you” and “Tripoli will be destroyed”.
Today a spoke men for Gaddafi said, “The number of deaths that have occurred; NATO is causing this. Gaddafi is our leader and he will take control”.
So far over 10,000 have died although we don't have exact numbers and now after six months of fighting Gaddafi and his men want to sit down for peace negotiations. What do you think about that?
Jeff Steinberg: It's over. The whole idea of these negotiations back and forth was always a sham. The issue was the decision made by western NATO forces that Gaddafi would be brought down. And in the recent period the Russians and to some extent the Chinese even sort of accepted the fact that it's now inevitable that Gaddafi is going to be gone from power.
And nobody wants to lose altogether their impact and influence and economic ties in Libya. So, I think the rhetoric of the last few days will be very quickly forgotten.
Lepi Bora
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 38.422
Gde odose sa teme oni ,, Otporasi ,, ?? ...
Da im nije neki Libijac upao u prostorije - lile ??
Da nije Pukovnik vratio NATO i americke placenike na polazne pozicije ...
Da im nije neki Libijac upao u prostorije - lile ??
Da nije Pukovnik vratio NATO i americke placenike na polazne pozicije ...
gost 265142
Primećen član
- Poruka
- 629
ZIVELA DEMOKRATIJA......
Владан
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 37.700
Хоће ли челници НАТО пакта одговарати пред Хашким трибуналом због убиства цивила у Либији и због тероризма на једну суверену земљу?
Lepi Bora
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 38.422
Gde odose sa teme oni ,, Otporasi ,, ?? ...
Da im nije neki Libijac upao u prostorije - lile ??
Da nije Pukovnik vratio NATO i americke placenike na polazne pozicije ...
KOJI BI TO BIO BLAM ZA NATO ...
.. A SVET VISE NISTA NECE VEROVATI CNN , BBC , AL DZAZIRI - SVI CE POCETI DA GLEDAJU ,, RUSIJA TUDEJ ,, .. 
vd
Domaćin
- Poruka
- 3.147
neće
hoće li suditi Gadafiju (ako ga uhvate ili ne pogine)? hoće
istoriju su uvek pisali oni koji pobeđuju.
da li je to pravedno? verovatno nije
i šta sad?
ko nije naučio na greškama drugih učiće na svojim
vd
Domaćin
- Poruka
- 3.147
a onda je mrmot zavio čokoladu...KOJI BI TO BIO BLAM ZA NATO ...
gost 265142
Primećen član
- Poruka
- 629
PODRZAVAM DEMOKRATIJU..A JEDNOM SI REKAO SA CES DA ME SELIS..KAD UDJE NATO U SRBIJU, VIDECEMO KO CE KOGA..ps u Libiji su USA kordinatori....
gost 265142
Primećen član
- Poruka
- 629
dr.mr
Aktivan član
- Poruka
- 1.935
ti uporno pricas kako su libijci super ziveli pod gadafijem i onda se digli na
ustanak jer ih je neko potplatio..
pa toga nema ni u bajkama za laku noc
.
- Poruka
- 128
Stiže demokratija.
wsox
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.592
I Gadafi odlazi
još jedan četnik manje
još jedan četnik manje- stanje
