Naučnici otkrili: homofobija je latentna homoseksualnost

Ово истраживање је само још једно у низу наручених истраживања. Требало би да смо до сада научили да резултат истраживања зависи искључиво од наручиоца, а не од реалног стања. То су педери врло паметно смислили да би свима који их нападну(а који се грозе педера) могли да кажу како их нападају само зато сто су прикривени педери. Е, још да нађу некога ко ће у то да им верује. У такве ствари могу само глупи амерички хомери да верују, док ће сва мислећа бића, већ после пар секунди да их одјебу!
 
u tekstu pise da su istrazivaci sa americkog univerziteta u dzordziji napravili eksperiment sa 36 muskarca koji su homofobicni i 29 muskarca koji nisu homofobicni.svakom muskarcu iz obe grupe su bili prikazani heteroseksualni i homoseksualni video sardzaji.stepen seksualne uzbudjenosti je bio meren specijalnim instrumentom(penile plethysmography).rezultat eksperimenta je pokazao da su homofobicni muskarci pokazali znacajnu seksualnu uzbudjenost dok su gledali homoseksualni video sardzaj. medjutim to nije bio slucaj sa muskarcima koji nisu homofobicni

aha..
ozbiljno istrazivanje sprovedeno na 50 ljudi.
gluposti.
 
Psychoanalytic theory holds that homophobia -- the fear, anxiety, anger, discomfort and aversion that some ostensibly heterosexual people hold for gay individuals -- is the result of repressed homosexual urges that the person is either unaware of or denies. A study appearing in the August 1996 issue of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association (APA), provides new empirical evidence that is consistent with that theory. Researchers at the University of Georgia conducted an experiment involving 35 homophobic men and 29 nonhomophobic men as measured by the Index of Homophobia scale. All the participants selected for the study described themselves as exclusively heterosexual both in terms of sexual arousal and experience.

Each participant was exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual and lesbian videotapes (but not necessarily in that order). Their degree of sexual arousal was measured by penile plethysmography, which precisely measures and records male tumescence.

Men in both groups were aroused by about the same degree by the video depicting heterosexual sexual behavior and by the video showing two women engaged in sexual behavior. The only significant difference in degree of arousal between the two groups occurred when they viewed the video depicting male homosexual sex: 'The homophobic men showed a significant increase in penile circumference to the male homosexual video, but the control [nonhomophobic] men did not.'

Broken down further, the measurements showed that while 66% of the nonhomophobic group showed no significant tumescence while watching the male homosexual video, only 20% of the homophobic men showed little or no evidence of arousal. Similarly, while 24% of the nonhomophobic men showed definite tumescence while watching the homosexual video, 54% of the homophobic men did.

When asked to give their own subjective assessment of the degree to which they were aroused by watching each of the three videos, men in both groups gave answers that tracked fairly closely with the results of the objective physiological measurement, with one exception: the homophobic men significantly underestimated their degree of arousal by the male homosexual video.
http://www.philosophy-religion.org/handouts/homophobia.htm

Ma kome ti majku partizansku?
 
Psychoanalytic theory holds that homophobia -- the fear, anxiety, anger, discomfort and aversion that some ostensibly heterosexual people hold for gay individuals -- is the result of repressed homosexual urges that the person is either unaware of or denies. A study appearing in the August 1996 issue of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association (APA), provides new empirical evidence that is consistent with that theory. Researchers at the University of Georgia conducted an experiment involving 35 homophobic men and 29 nonhomophobic men as measured by the Index of Homophobia scale. All the participants selected for the study described themselves as exclusively heterosexual both in terms of sexual arousal and experience.

Each participant was exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual and lesbian videotapes (but not necessarily in that order). Their degree of sexual arousal was measured by penile plethysmography, which precisely measures and records male tumescence.

Men in both groups were aroused by about the same degree by the video depicting heterosexual sexual behavior and by the video showing two women engaged in sexual behavior. The only significant difference in degree of arousal between the two groups occurred when they viewed the video depicting male homosexual sex: 'The homophobic men showed a significant increase in penile circumference to the male homosexual video, but the control [nonhomophobic] men did not.'

Broken down further, the measurements showed that while 66% of the nonhomophobic group showed no significant tumescence while watching the male homosexual video, only 20% of the homophobic men showed little or no evidence of arousal. Similarly, while 24% of the nonhomophobic men showed definite tumescence while watching the homosexual video, 54% of the homophobic men did.

When asked to give their own subjective assessment of the degree to which they were aroused by watching each of the three videos, men in both groups gave answers that tracked fairly closely with the results of the objective physiological measurement, with one exception: the homophobic men significantly underestimated their degree of arousal by the male homosexual video.
http://www.philosophy-religion.org/handouts/homophobia.htm

Aham... Daj izvor... Mislim ime te naučne fondacije ili kako već
Ko ono oko obrezivanja kite - jako zdravo, mnogo bolje nego prirodno, jednostavan proces od 40 minuta diličenja po jednom od pet nervnih sistema, zajebancija takoreći, evo tako tvrdi Dr, Mr, Pr...
Isto stavljali Dr Mr Pr... samo su prikrivali zašto to rade... i onda niknu sasvim suprotne grupacije isto sa dr mr pr i krenu o prirodnom...

Elem, homofobija je potiskivanje biseksualnosti i zapravo je vrlo pozitivna stvar.
Na taj način čuvamo prirodan odnos medju polovima i formu porodice

Ako primetite u prirodi možete da vidite mama kravu, tata kravu i tele kravu...
Tako je htela priroda...
 

7554.jpg


Ovde nije trebalo mnogo Photoshop-a :mrgreen:
 
Poslednja izmena:
u tekstu pise da su istrazivaci sa americkog univerziteta u dzordziji napravili eksperiment sa 36 muskarca koji su homofobicni i 29 muskarca koji nisu homofobicni.svakom muskarcu iz obe grupe su bili prikazani heteroseksualni i homoseksualni video sardzaji.stepen seksualne uzbudjenosti je bio meren specijalnim instrumentom(penile plethysmography).rezultat eksperimenta je pokazao da su homofobicni muskarci pokazali znacajnu seksualnu uzbudjenost dok su gledali homoseksualni video sardzaj. medjutim to nije bio slucaj sa muskarcima koji nisu homofobicni

ne znam na koju vrstu "uzbudjenosti" su mislili, da li na erekciju ili su ih prikljucili na neke aparate pa merili parametre... mozda su bili vise "uznemireni" nego "uzbudjeni"
uznemirenost nije isto sto i uzbudjenost
u prvoj reci je koren "nemir" a u drugoj "budnost" iliti paznja
prvo i prvo, tih 36 "homofobicnih" su prvo valjda priznali da su "homofobicni", tj. da imaju neobjasnjiv strah od (muskih) homoseksualaca, pa stoga i pojacanu uznemirenost

bla bla bla

jos jedna u nizu ciljanih budalastina
 

Back
Top