Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
Bugari na Kosovu?! Ovog puta si prevazišao samog sebe
-
- Popularno:
- Четници нису били брадоње
- Godišnjica kraja Bitke za Košare
- Studentski protest 28.06.
- Cene hrane u Rusiji
- Dete oštetilo umetničko delo vredno 56...
- Upucani američki političari!
- Kome je teze ostati sam
- Израел је напао иранске нуклеарне...
- 25 članova SANU zatražilo ostavku...
- Putin obećao moćne rakete Iranu ako ih...
Историја Бугара
- Začetnik teme Lamasu
- Datum pokretanja
Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
Poučan članak iz pera bugarskog autora Profesora Nikole Avrejskog.
Бугарски председник др Желју Желев постао је први шеф државе на свету који је позвао НАТО да удари на српске положаје у преосталој Југославији (1992). Бугарска је не само одбила предлог Грчке и Румуније да се укине југословенски ембарго и сазове Балканска конференција, већ је на амерички подстицај ојачала своје везе са чланицама Организације исламске конференције Турском и Албанијом. Након што је постигнут Дејтонски споразум о Босни (1. новембар 1995), Бугарска се придружила војном присуству НАТО-а у Босни и Херцеговини (6). У вези са напетостима у српској покрајини Косово, бугарска влада је низом декрета поново увела ембарго Савезној Републици Југославији, замрзнула своја и средства Републике Србије, увела забрану нових бугарских инвестиција у Србију, па чак и забранила летове југословенских превозника између Савезне Републике Југославије и Бугарске (6. мај – 25. новембар 1998) (7). Бугарски председник Петар Стојанов је два пута (1998. и 1999. године) изјавио да „ако нас затраже ваздушни коридор за НАТО нападе на Србију, ми ћемо им га дати“. Народна скупштина је подржала напоре за решавање захуктавајућег сукоба на Косову војном интервенцијом НАТО-а (23. октобар 1998), позвала је Београд да попусти пред захтевима „међународне заједнице“ (25. март 1999) и обезбедила ваздушни простор и логистичку подршку за НАТО бомбардовање Југославије (4. мај 1999) (8) – иако није постојала резолуција Савета безбедности УН у том смислу, Србија није напала државу чланицу НАТО-а или било коју другу земљу, а анкете у то време су показивале да је одлуку парламента подржало само 17% бугарских грађана.
Българският президент д-р Желю Желев стана първият в света държавен глава, призовал НАТО да нанесе удари върху сръбските позиции в остатъчна Югославия (1992). България не само отклони предложението на Гърция и Румъния за сваляне на югоембаргото и свикване на балканска конференция, но по американско внушение укрепи връзките си с членките на Организацията Ислямска конференция Турция и Албания. След постигането на Дейтънското споразумение за Босна (1 ноември 1995), България се включи в натовското военно присъствие в Босна и Херцеговина (6). Във връзка с напрежението в сръбската област Косово българското правителство отново наложи, с поредица от постановления, ембарго спрямо СР Югославия, замрази нейните и на Република Сърбия средства, установи забрана за нови български инвестиции в Сърбия и дори забрани полетите на югославските превозвачи между СР Югославия и България (6 май – 25 ноември 1998) (7). Българският президент Петър Стоянов на два пъти (през 1998 и 1999) заяви, че ,,ако ни поискат въздушен коридор за нанасяне на удари на НАТО върху Сърбия, ще им го дадем”. Народното събрание подкрепи усилията за решаване на зреещия конфликт в Косово чрез военна намеса на НАТО (23 октомври 1998), призова Белград да отстъпи пред исканията на ,,международната общност” (25 март 1999) и предостави въздушно пространство и логистична подкрепа за натовските бомбардировки над Югославия (4 май 1999) (8) – макар да липсваше резолюция на Съвета за сигурност на ООН за това, Сърбия не беше атакувала страна членка на НАТО или пък друга държава, а социологическите проучвания от онова време сочеха че решението на парламента се подкрепя от едва 17% от българските граждани.
https://geopolitica.eu/2024/213-bro...badeshteto-na-balgarsko-srabskite-otnosheniya
O autoru:
Бугарски председник др Желју Желев постао је први шеф државе на свету који је позвао НАТО да удари на српске положаје у преосталој Југославији (1992). Бугарска је не само одбила предлог Грчке и Румуније да се укине југословенски ембарго и сазове Балканска конференција, већ је на амерички подстицај ојачала своје везе са чланицама Организације исламске конференције Турском и Албанијом. Након што је постигнут Дејтонски споразум о Босни (1. новембар 1995), Бугарска се придружила војном присуству НАТО-а у Босни и Херцеговини (6). У вези са напетостима у српској покрајини Косово, бугарска влада је низом декрета поново увела ембарго Савезној Републици Југославији, замрзнула своја и средства Републике Србије, увела забрану нових бугарских инвестиција у Србију, па чак и забранила летове југословенских превозника између Савезне Републике Југославије и Бугарске (6. мај – 25. новембар 1998) (7). Бугарски председник Петар Стојанов је два пута (1998. и 1999. године) изјавио да „ако нас затраже ваздушни коридор за НАТО нападе на Србију, ми ћемо им га дати“. Народна скупштина је подржала напоре за решавање захуктавајућег сукоба на Косову војном интервенцијом НАТО-а (23. октобар 1998), позвала је Београд да попусти пред захтевима „међународне заједнице“ (25. март 1999) и обезбедила ваздушни простор и логистичку подршку за НАТО бомбардовање Југославије (4. мај 1999) (8) – иако није постојала резолуција Савета безбедности УН у том смислу, Србија није напала државу чланицу НАТО-а или било коју другу земљу, а анкете у то време су показивале да је одлуку парламента подржало само 17% бугарских грађана.
Предизвикателствата на настоящето и бъдещето на българско-сръбските отношения
ПРОФ. Д-Р НИКОЛА АВРЕЙСКИ* 10 ЮЛИ 2024Българският президент д-р Желю Желев стана първият в света държавен глава, призовал НАТО да нанесе удари върху сръбските позиции в остатъчна Югославия (1992). България не само отклони предложението на Гърция и Румъния за сваляне на югоембаргото и свикване на балканска конференция, но по американско внушение укрепи връзките си с членките на Организацията Ислямска конференция Турция и Албания. След постигането на Дейтънското споразумение за Босна (1 ноември 1995), България се включи в натовското военно присъствие в Босна и Херцеговина (6). Във връзка с напрежението в сръбската област Косово българското правителство отново наложи, с поредица от постановления, ембарго спрямо СР Югославия, замрази нейните и на Република Сърбия средства, установи забрана за нови български инвестиции в Сърбия и дори забрани полетите на югославските превозвачи между СР Югославия и България (6 май – 25 ноември 1998) (7). Българският президент Петър Стоянов на два пъти (през 1998 и 1999) заяви, че ,,ако ни поискат въздушен коридор за нанасяне на удари на НАТО върху Сърбия, ще им го дадем”. Народното събрание подкрепи усилията за решаване на зреещия конфликт в Косово чрез военна намеса на НАТО (23 октомври 1998), призова Белград да отстъпи пред исканията на ,,международната общност” (25 март 1999) и предостави въздушно пространство и логистична подкрепа за натовските бомбардировки над Югославия (4 май 1999) (8) – макар да липсваше резолюция на Съвета за сигурност на ООН за това, Сърбия не беше атакувала страна членка на НАТО или пък друга държава, а социологическите проучвания от онова време сочеха че решението на парламента се подкрепя от едва 17% от българските граждани.
https://geopolitica.eu/2024/213-bro...badeshteto-na-balgarsko-srabskite-otnosheniya
O autoru:
Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
Са овим можеш само пред свог Ердогана.Крштеница од "Нишке бугарске црквене општине",година 1871
Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
O kakvoj to Bugarskoj može biti reči 1783?Nizozemska karta od 1738,tamo Nis,Vranje i Leskovac su bugarski
Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
Teorija je posledica evo ovoga:Nizozemska karta od 1738,tamo Nis,Vranje i Leskovac su bugarski
Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
Najmodernija i najnovija srednjovekovna tvrđava na svetu: Carevec, u XX veku je na temeljima stare turske tvrđave izgrađeno starije, lepše i veće utvrđenje, dostojno veličine Koburga i Todora Živkova.
Karel Skorpil, Rade Neimar naših dana, arhitekta još starije, veće i lepše tvrđave srednjovekovnih bugarskih careva, original je ipak bio nedostojan i jednog Koburga, a kamo li jednog Todora Živkova.
The first restoration/remodelling efforts of the Tsarevets Fortress began in 1930 under the direction of Czech-Bulgarian scientist Karel Skorpil, who had initiated archaeological research in the area in 1886. One of the first areas to be reconstructed was the main gate, followed by the restoration of the iconic Baldwin’s Tower in the 1930s. During the socialist era, reconstruction work intensified, and many of the walls and buildings were restored to bring back some of the fortress’s medieval splendor.
https://www.castlesintheworld.com/bulgaria/tsarevets-fortress/
Karel Skorpil, Rade Neimar naših dana, arhitekta još starije, veće i lepše tvrđave srednjovekovnih bugarskih careva, original je ipak bio nedostojan i jednog Koburga, a kamo li jednog Todora Živkova.
The first restoration/remodelling efforts of the Tsarevets Fortress began in 1930 under the direction of Czech-Bulgarian scientist Karel Skorpil, who had initiated archaeological research in the area in 1886. One of the first areas to be reconstructed was the main gate, followed by the restoration of the iconic Baldwin’s Tower in the 1930s. During the socialist era, reconstruction work intensified, and many of the walls and buildings were restored to bring back some of the fortress’s medieval splendor.
https://www.castlesintheworld.com/bulgaria/tsarevets-fortress/
Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
Po ugledu na bugarsku istoriografiju koja se svake godine obogaćuje novim i novim događajima i likovima ljudi koji za života* nisu znali da su Bugari
VIBRANT COMMUNITIES
Sat, 08/27/2022 - 11:03
Issue 191-192
Tsarevets's medieval fortifications, in Veliko Tarnovo, are among the best known images from Bulgaria. All were built either in the 1930s and in the 1980s
In fact, constructing new ruins has been popular in Bulgaria for almost a century. It is not difficult to see why. While Bulgarians are proud with their 1,300 years of history, the land lacks spectacular ancient and medieval ruins because wars, conquests and later generations reusing them as building material have destroyed most of them. In the late 19th century, when Bulgaria was liberated after 500 years of Ottoman domination, the lack of ruins became something of a political problem. Bulgarians knew that they were an ancient people with a glorious past, but the humble remains of medieval capitals and ancient cities hardly fostered a feeling of pride. They needed more. The ruins problem became particularly acute after the devastation and trauma caused by the territorial losses in the wake of the Balkan and the First World War in 1913-1918.
Rebuilding medieval ruins in Bulgaria began in the 1930s, in the old capital of Veliko Tarnovo. It was a time of heightened nationalistic sentiment that led to the country's involvement in the Second World War. The construction effort continued on a grand scale in the 1970s and the 1980s, when, after two decades of promoting "socialist internationalism," Communist Bulgaria switched to imaginative representation of those elements of the glorious past that the Communist Party thinkers deemed appropriate for the new order. At this time the foundations of the bigger buildings of the medieval capitals of Pliska, Preslav and Tarnovo were completely or partially rebuilt to what supposedly was their “medieval grandeur”.
Contractors at work to build Sozopol's supposedly ancient and medieval wall, in 2013. Iron bars, a technology unknown in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, are clearly visible
But boosting national pride was only a part of the reasoning behind the hectic construction of ruins in the 2000s and 2010s. EU money was abundant and the Regional Development programmes allowed it to be spent on excavation, restoration and opening up of historical sites to foster local tourism and businesses. Raising the ghosts of forts and cities from the ground was seen as a win-win situation. Tourists would find new places to visit and take selfies at. Archaeologists, architects and construction companies would get more employment, locals would get new jobs, and the hotels and the restaurants would get more customers.
However, the enthusiasm of making historical sites more exciting to visitors in combination with the lack of controls over the construction works led to severe breaches of international protocols for the preservation of archaeological heritage. Defined in the so-called Venice Charter and reaffirmed in the Nara Document of UNSECO's World Heritage Committee, the basic principles and rules of restoration of historical remains stipulate that preserving the authenticity of a monument is paramount. All reconstruction should be clearly indicated as such, and has to be done with materials as close to the original as possible. It must be designed after the original appearance of the monument.
The Late Antiquity fortress at the Yaylata plateau after it was rebuilt in the 2010s
This means that you cannot excavate the barely preserved walls of a fortress and then build on top of them towers, gates and crenellations unless you have a verifiable record showing what the original structure looked like. You cannot use concrete building blocks, shiny roof tiles and plastic window frames. A good example is the restoration of central Warsaw, now an UNESCO World Heritage Site, after the destruction of the Second World War: historical documents were referred to to rebuild the city as close to the original as possible. In Bulgaria, this is almost impossible because most of the medieval churches, forts and ancient city walls have been in ruins, literally, for centuries. The memories of their original design, not to speak of any blueprints and building papers, have been lost to time.
The chief result of a decade of hectic rebuilding of ruins in Bulgaria is that the new structures dotting the country from Vidin to Rezovo and from Gotse Delchev to Kamen Bryag look brand new. They lack any atmosphere or authenticity.
The "restored" ruins of the once atmospheric Trajan's Gate fortress
One of the early rebuilding projects of this sort was the restoration of the ancient and medieval fortification wall of Sozopol at the Black Sea coast. Erected in 2003 by an NGO with EU funding, it is still hailed as a major crowd-puller. Ironically, it has even gained an undeserved aura of authenticity in the hive mentality of Bulgarian social media. In 2021, when an entrepreneur successfully brought a legal case to demolish a part of the fortification wall as it obstructed the sea view from his restaurant, there was a public outcry. The Bulgarian Facebook saw this as yet another assault of uncontrolled capitalism on cultural heritage. Few remembered that the wall was less than 20 years old.
The new ruins built after Sozopol's example mostly focused on Bulgaria's storied medieval past. One of the most notorious examples is in Veliko Tarnovo. Reconstruction in the old capital went on by erecting a brand new fortification wall on Trapezitsa hill, where the wealthy citizens used to live in the 12th-14th centuries. Three towers of the medieval fort overlooking Kyustendil were restored to their supposed original height of 14 m. New structures were also erected at Peristera fort, near Perushtitsa. The list is long.
Plastic-fantastic: The "socialisation" of the Krakra fortress in Pernik went notoriously wrong
In 2013, the efforts of the Pernik City Council to attract more attention to the town's main tourist site, the medieval fortress of Krakra, backfired spectacularly. Claiming that they wanted to spare the original walls from the weight of a new construction, the investor erected over them a lighter structure of metal and plastic. In the daytime it represents how the fortification looked and by night the "artistically illuminated" plastic panels look like shields. Or at least that was the idea. The result is pure kitsch. People compared the new Krakra Fortress to the remains of some cheap movie set and dubbed it Pernikland.
Ancient Roman ruins were not spared either. The spectacular and deeply atmospheric ruin of a fortification known as Trajan's Gate, near Ihtiman, was rebuilt and reconstructed to such an extent that it has been completely robbed of its spirit. Another blatant example was the complete reconstruction of a Late Antiquity basilica in Sandanski. In the northeast of Bulgaria, the fortress on the Yaylata plateau was reconstructed using poor quality stones that had nothing in common with the original structure.
Near Belchin village, the humble remains of a Late Antiquity fort were heavily rebuilt, complete with a church, gate and towers. Concrete was used for the reconstruction. The thorough rebuilding of a whole church no one had ever seen was at least questionable. Despite this, the Tsari Mali Grad project, as the compound is known and advertised, won the 2013 Building of the Year Award for conservation and restoration of cultural and historical heritage. The project's managers not only invented the architecture of the site, they also invented its history. Little is known about the original fortification and even its name is obscure, but this did not stop the promotion of the newly-named Tsari Mali Grad, or Little King's Town, as the "place where Bulgaria began."
The trend for over-construction also affected one of Bulgaria's most important archaeological reserves. In 2017, the complete restoration of the Grand Basilica in Pliska, Bulgaria's first medieval capital, began. Parts of the church had already been restored under Communism, but in the 2010s this was obviously seen as insufficient. The whole structure should be finished, claimed the project's ideologue, the late Bozhidar Dimitrov, then director of the National History Museum. The Grand Basilica was the symbolic centre from which Christianity spread into the Bulgarian lands, and it was more important to "revive" it than to agonise over the stipulations of the Venice Charter and the Nara Document. Patriotism should come first. After an energetic start, the reconstruction of the Grand Basilica has now stalled, probably because the money ran out.
Amazingly, some communities resisted the temptation to build over their ruins. In 2015 a proposal for the reconstruction of Plovdiv's fortification walls in the Old Town was tabled. Local citizens, architects and archaeologists did all they could, including booing Bozhidar Dimitrov during a public discussion, to have the project cancelled.
https://www.vagabond.bg/rebuilding-bulgarias-past-3516
*Primer: slučaj novopečenog “Bugarina” Starine Novaka, koji je kao Srbin pogubljen na samom početku XVII veka, da bi u XXI veku postao “Bugarin”. Takođe je zanimljiv i slučaj Deli Marka, Srbina koji je posthumno postao “Bugarin” zaobilaznim putem: proglašen je za “Dalmatinca”, a pošto je ratovao pod “Bugarinom” Starinom Novakom, onda je naravno i on morao da bude “Bugarin”:
Najmodernije srednjovekovne tvrđave na svetu: svake godine postaju starije, veće i lepše.
(RE)BUILDING BULGARIA'S PAST
by Dimana Trankova; photography by Anthony GeorgieffVIBRANT COMMUNITIES
Sat, 08/27/2022 - 11:03
Issue 191-192
Over-restored ancient, medieval ruins keep popping up in past 15 years
Tsarevets's medieval fortifications, in Veliko Tarnovo, are among the best known images from Bulgaria. All were built either in the 1930s and in the 1980s
In fact, constructing new ruins has been popular in Bulgaria for almost a century. It is not difficult to see why. While Bulgarians are proud with their 1,300 years of history, the land lacks spectacular ancient and medieval ruins because wars, conquests and later generations reusing them as building material have destroyed most of them. In the late 19th century, when Bulgaria was liberated after 500 years of Ottoman domination, the lack of ruins became something of a political problem. Bulgarians knew that they were an ancient people with a glorious past, but the humble remains of medieval capitals and ancient cities hardly fostered a feeling of pride. They needed more. The ruins problem became particularly acute after the devastation and trauma caused by the territorial losses in the wake of the Balkan and the First World War in 1913-1918.
Rebuilding medieval ruins in Bulgaria began in the 1930s, in the old capital of Veliko Tarnovo. It was a time of heightened nationalistic sentiment that led to the country's involvement in the Second World War. The construction effort continued on a grand scale in the 1970s and the 1980s, when, after two decades of promoting "socialist internationalism," Communist Bulgaria switched to imaginative representation of those elements of the glorious past that the Communist Party thinkers deemed appropriate for the new order. At this time the foundations of the bigger buildings of the medieval capitals of Pliska, Preslav and Tarnovo were completely or partially rebuilt to what supposedly was their “medieval grandeur”.
Contractors at work to build Sozopol's supposedly ancient and medieval wall, in 2013. Iron bars, a technology unknown in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, are clearly visible
But boosting national pride was only a part of the reasoning behind the hectic construction of ruins in the 2000s and 2010s. EU money was abundant and the Regional Development programmes allowed it to be spent on excavation, restoration and opening up of historical sites to foster local tourism and businesses. Raising the ghosts of forts and cities from the ground was seen as a win-win situation. Tourists would find new places to visit and take selfies at. Archaeologists, architects and construction companies would get more employment, locals would get new jobs, and the hotels and the restaurants would get more customers.
However, the enthusiasm of making historical sites more exciting to visitors in combination with the lack of controls over the construction works led to severe breaches of international protocols for the preservation of archaeological heritage. Defined in the so-called Venice Charter and reaffirmed in the Nara Document of UNSECO's World Heritage Committee, the basic principles and rules of restoration of historical remains stipulate that preserving the authenticity of a monument is paramount. All reconstruction should be clearly indicated as such, and has to be done with materials as close to the original as possible. It must be designed after the original appearance of the monument.
The Late Antiquity fortress at the Yaylata plateau after it was rebuilt in the 2010s
This means that you cannot excavate the barely preserved walls of a fortress and then build on top of them towers, gates and crenellations unless you have a verifiable record showing what the original structure looked like. You cannot use concrete building blocks, shiny roof tiles and plastic window frames. A good example is the restoration of central Warsaw, now an UNESCO World Heritage Site, after the destruction of the Second World War: historical documents were referred to to rebuild the city as close to the original as possible. In Bulgaria, this is almost impossible because most of the medieval churches, forts and ancient city walls have been in ruins, literally, for centuries. The memories of their original design, not to speak of any blueprints and building papers, have been lost to time.
The chief result of a decade of hectic rebuilding of ruins in Bulgaria is that the new structures dotting the country from Vidin to Rezovo and from Gotse Delchev to Kamen Bryag look brand new. They lack any atmosphere or authenticity.
The "restored" ruins of the once atmospheric Trajan's Gate fortress
One of the early rebuilding projects of this sort was the restoration of the ancient and medieval fortification wall of Sozopol at the Black Sea coast. Erected in 2003 by an NGO with EU funding, it is still hailed as a major crowd-puller. Ironically, it has even gained an undeserved aura of authenticity in the hive mentality of Bulgarian social media. In 2021, when an entrepreneur successfully brought a legal case to demolish a part of the fortification wall as it obstructed the sea view from his restaurant, there was a public outcry. The Bulgarian Facebook saw this as yet another assault of uncontrolled capitalism on cultural heritage. Few remembered that the wall was less than 20 years old.
The new ruins built after Sozopol's example mostly focused on Bulgaria's storied medieval past. One of the most notorious examples is in Veliko Tarnovo. Reconstruction in the old capital went on by erecting a brand new fortification wall on Trapezitsa hill, where the wealthy citizens used to live in the 12th-14th centuries. Three towers of the medieval fort overlooking Kyustendil were restored to their supposed original height of 14 m. New structures were also erected at Peristera fort, near Perushtitsa. The list is long.
Plastic-fantastic: The "socialisation" of the Krakra fortress in Pernik went notoriously wrong
In 2013, the efforts of the Pernik City Council to attract more attention to the town's main tourist site, the medieval fortress of Krakra, backfired spectacularly. Claiming that they wanted to spare the original walls from the weight of a new construction, the investor erected over them a lighter structure of metal and plastic. In the daytime it represents how the fortification looked and by night the "artistically illuminated" plastic panels look like shields. Or at least that was the idea. The result is pure kitsch. People compared the new Krakra Fortress to the remains of some cheap movie set and dubbed it Pernikland.
Ancient Roman ruins were not spared either. The spectacular and deeply atmospheric ruin of a fortification known as Trajan's Gate, near Ihtiman, was rebuilt and reconstructed to such an extent that it has been completely robbed of its spirit. Another blatant example was the complete reconstruction of a Late Antiquity basilica in Sandanski. In the northeast of Bulgaria, the fortress on the Yaylata plateau was reconstructed using poor quality stones that had nothing in common with the original structure.
Near Belchin village, the humble remains of a Late Antiquity fort were heavily rebuilt, complete with a church, gate and towers. Concrete was used for the reconstruction. The thorough rebuilding of a whole church no one had ever seen was at least questionable. Despite this, the Tsari Mali Grad project, as the compound is known and advertised, won the 2013 Building of the Year Award for conservation and restoration of cultural and historical heritage. The project's managers not only invented the architecture of the site, they also invented its history. Little is known about the original fortification and even its name is obscure, but this did not stop the promotion of the newly-named Tsari Mali Grad, or Little King's Town, as the "place where Bulgaria began."
The trend for over-construction also affected one of Bulgaria's most important archaeological reserves. In 2017, the complete restoration of the Grand Basilica in Pliska, Bulgaria's first medieval capital, began. Parts of the church had already been restored under Communism, but in the 2010s this was obviously seen as insufficient. The whole structure should be finished, claimed the project's ideologue, the late Bozhidar Dimitrov, then director of the National History Museum. The Grand Basilica was the symbolic centre from which Christianity spread into the Bulgarian lands, and it was more important to "revive" it than to agonise over the stipulations of the Venice Charter and the Nara Document. Patriotism should come first. After an energetic start, the reconstruction of the Grand Basilica has now stalled, probably because the money ran out.
Amazingly, some communities resisted the temptation to build over their ruins. In 2015 a proposal for the reconstruction of Plovdiv's fortification walls in the Old Town was tabled. Local citizens, architects and archaeologists did all they could, including booing Bozhidar Dimitrov during a public discussion, to have the project cancelled.
https://www.vagabond.bg/rebuilding-bulgarias-past-3516
*Primer: slučaj novopečenog “Bugarina” Starine Novaka, koji je kao Srbin pogubljen na samom početku XVII veka, da bi u XXI veku postao “Bugarin”. Takođe je zanimljiv i slučaj Deli Marka, Srbina koji je posthumno postao “Bugarin” zaobilaznim putem: proglašen je za “Dalmatinca”, a pošto je ratovao pod “Bugarinom” Starinom Novakom, onda je naravno i on morao da bude “Bugarin”:
Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
Борис се опет служи бугарским правописом за доказивање својих теорија: у речи ‘цькли’ мало јер је етимолошко, долази од прасловенског *stьklo, стакло. Писање бугарским правописом у овом случају не имплицира никакво мешање јерова.
*stьklo
South Slavic:- ⇒ Old Church Slavonic: стьклѣница (stĭklěnica)
- Bulgarian: стъкло́ (stǎkló), цкло (cklo)
- Macedonian: стакло (staklo)
- Serbo-Croatian: Cyrillic script: ста̀кло, скло̏, цкло̏
Latin script: stàklo, sklȍ, cklȍ- Montenegrin (Piperi): stȁkło
- Slovene: stéklo (tonal orthography)
цаклити/
Serbo-Croatian
Etymology
From ца̀кло.
Pronunciation
IPA(key): /t͡sǎkliti/
- Hyphenation: цак‧ли‧ти
ца̀клити impf (Latin spelling càkliti)
цакло
Serbo-CroatianEtymology
Metathesized from стакло.
Nounца̀кло n (Latin spelling càklo)
References
“цакло”, in Hrvatski jezični portal [Croatian language portal] (in Serbo-Croatian), 2006–2025
стакло
Etymology
Inherited from Proto-Slavic *stьklo, from Gothic 𐍃𐍄𐌹𐌺𐌻𐍃 (stikls).
Pronunciation
IPA(key): /stǎklo/
- Hyphenation: ста‧кло
ста̀кло n (Latin spelling stàklo)
Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
Лупање глупости пар екселанс, тј доказивање да пошто западнојужнословенских говора има и у Бугарској то имплицира да су и западнојужнословенски говори у Србији исто “бугарски”, тако може да се тера све до Караванки.
Casual Observer
Stara legenda
- Poruka
- 80.724
Како је то етимолошко мало јер (ь) “бугарски полугласник” када је у бугарском језику мало јер дало рефлекс ‘е’, а у српском ‘а‘ или се очувало (у архаичним рубним говорима југоисточне Србије и у Зети)?
