Vikipedija kao izvor ljudskog znanja!
Idi na svaki naucni sajt ili muzej, ne moras na wikipediu.
Evo uzecu kreacionisticki sajt kao primer, zanimalo me sta oni imaju da kazu o arkeopteriksu na primer.
Pocinju sa lupetanjem da je ceo fosil prevara, znaci opet globalne zavere koje traju 150 godina, onda lupaju najvecu glupost
" Yes, dinosaurs have some features in common with birds, especially aspects of their bone structure, but birds have many characteristics that dinosaurs do not have. No doubt, more will be discovered.
Another possibility is that a designer gave both birds and dinosaurs some common features, because each had similar needs. For example, gears are common to cars, bicycles, windmills, and watches. Everyone knows they were designed. No one teaches, advocates, or even considers that windmills turned into cars or watches. Efficiency dictates design similarities. How could anyone think dinosaurs evolved into hummingbirds? Time, mutations, and natural selection? "
Znaci ptice nisu nastale od dinosaurusa jer imaju mnoge karakteristike koje dinosaurusi nemaju ( sto bi se i ocekivalo jer su se razdvojile od dinosaurusa pre vise od 100 miliona godina ) , isto je moguce da ih je Bog stvorio sa slicnom anatomijom ( kako onda vidimo postepen nastank ptica kroz vreme, ne vidimo ptice pre dinosaurusa, ni dinosauruse posle odredjenog vremena koje su ptice prezivele ) itd/
Ovo dokazuje da ce ljudi koristiti argumente ravne osnovcima da bi poricali naucne cinjenice.
Evo i link, malo da reklamiram idiotizam
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ117.html
