Два авиона нису проузроковала рушење „близнакиња"

[umrimuski]

konspiracija je tolika da osim neke VELIKE revolucije nista ne mozemo "delati"

 

[Titus.]

Brzina je vrlina.Koga interesuje svedocenje onih 193 svedoka koji su sopstvenim ocima videli kako jedan Boing going iznad njihovih glava.Koga interesuje svedocenje kontrolora leta kad je agent ciJe kao i onhih 193 ocevidca.Mislim,koga interesuje to sto su spahlama skidali fleke osamdesetak putnika i clanova posade sa rusevina objekta,da bi DNA analizom utvrdili identifikaciju Spakovali sve putnike u Tomahavk pa eskurzija po pentagonu,logika
Mozda je bio montiran u praznom krilu radiofar koji je navodio avion na objekat kao pri postupku sletanja.

O, je! 193 ocevidaca, ali samo jedna kamera...kako da ne...jedna kamera je samo pokrivala pentagon a ostale su bas taj dan zatajile A sve druge kamere u radijusu od 20-tak km su zaplenjene, bilo sa benzinskih pumpi, bilo iz restorana ili hotela...I nikada snimci nisu ugledali svetlost dana! A medju 193 ocevidaca imamo i onih koji su videli sledece:

Eyewitness' testimony has been color coded as the following...

Supports conspiracy - Describes something very different than an American Airlines Boeing 757 or other suspicious stuff.
Supports official claim - Describes a large aircraft, a Boeing 757, or something very similar (i.e. 727, 747).
Aircraft hitting ground - Describes the aircraft hitting the ground which conflicts with the lawn photos.
Aircraft hitting light poles - Describes aircraft hitting light poles which is consistent with the light pole evidence..
Second Plane - Describes seeing a second plane in the area at the time of the crash other than the military jetfighters who arrived later.
Odd/Unique/Strange - Testimony that has not been corroborated or seems to contradict everybody.
Trajectory of aircraft - Describes the altitude and action of the aircraft as it flew in.
Description of interest - Describes something of a particular interest.

http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/witnesses.html

Izdvojicu samo par highlights:

Terrance Kean, 35 - who lives in a 14-story building nearby, heard the loud jet engines and glanced out his window. "I saw this very, very large passenger jet," said the architect, who had been packing for a move. "It just plowed right into the side of the Pentagon. The nose penetrated into the portico. And then it sort of disappeared, and there was fire and smoke everywhere. . . . It was very sort of surreal."

D. S. Khavkin - my husband and I heard an aircraft directly overhead. At first, we thought it was the jets that sometimes fly overhead. However, it appeared to be a small commercial aircraft. The engine was at full throttle. First, the plane knocked down a number of street lamp poles, then headed directly for the Pentagon and crashed on the lawn near the west side the Pentagon.

Sve u svemu, vrlo pouzdani svedoci

 

[hedon29]

Ih, pa istorija se ponavlja. Samo, malo strasno deluje razbijanje iluzije o pravu i demokratiji, i saznanje da je vecina samo potroshni materijal za igre mocnika.

 

[sumnjivo lice]

O, je! 193 ocevidaca, ali samo jedna kamera...kako da ne...jedna kamera je samo pokrivala pentagon a ostale su bas taj dan zatajile A sve druge kamere u radijusu od 20-tak km su zaplenjene, bilo sa benzinskih pumpi, bilo iz restorana ili hotela...I nikada snimci nisu ugledali svetlost dana! A medju 193 ocevidaca imamo i onih koji su videli sledece:

Eyewitness' testimony has been color coded as the following...

Supports conspiracy - Describes something very different than an American Airlines Boeing 757 or other suspicious stuff.
Supports official claim - Describes a large aircraft, a Boeing 757, or something very similar (i.e. 727, 747).
Aircraft hitting ground - Describes the aircraft hitting the ground which conflicts with the lawn photos.
Aircraft hitting light poles - Describes aircraft hitting light poles which is consistent with the light pole evidence..
Second Plane - Describes seeing a second plane in the area at the time of the crash other than the military jetfighters who arrived later.
Odd/Unique/Strange - Testimony that has not been corroborated or seems to contradict everybody.
Trajectory of aircraft - Describes the altitude and action of the aircraft as it flew in.
Description of interest - Describes something of a particular interest.

http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/witnesses.html

Izdvojicu samo par highlights:

Terrance Kean, 35 - who lives in a 14-story building nearby, heard the loud jet engines and glanced out his window. "I saw this very, very large passenger jet," said the architect, who had been packing for a move. "It just plowed right into the side of the Pentagon. The nose penetrated into the portico. And then it sort of disappeared, and there was fire and smoke everywhere. . . . It was very sort of surreal."

D. S. Khavkin - my husband and I heard an aircraft directly overhead. At first, we thought it was the jets that sometimes fly overhead. However, it appeared to be a small commercial aircraft. The engine was at full throttle. First, the plane knocked down a number of street lamp poles, then headed directly for the Pentagon and crashed on the lawn near the west side the Pentagon.

Sve u svemu, vrlo pouzdani svedoci

Naravno sve lazovi,sve agenti ciJeAjde genije objasni kako su dosple tela(mleveno meso)putnika u zgradu pentagona?

 

[Titus.]

Naravno sve lazovi,sve agenti ciJeAjde genije objasni kako su dosple tela(mleveno meso)putnika u zgradu pentagona?

Je l' imas neki konkretan dokaz za to? Je l' ima nekih snimaka? Hajde, genije, daj da vidim taj materijal, nije valjda da nema nikakvih video zapisa, samo tvrdnje zvanicnika pentagona?

A evo jos nekih nebuloza vezano za slucaj "mrtvih putnika iz aviona"

Fireproof DNA found at the Pentagon



“ No Arabs wound up on the morgue slab…”

— Thomas R. Olmsted, M.D.



The lack of evidence that a Boeing 757 had crashed into the Pentagon is only surpassed by the incredulous nature of the DNA fable.

Here are some of the many inconsistencies:
The government story line alleges that the heat was so intense that the fuselage and engines of the plane vaporized, this is how the Pentagon explained away the nearly total lack of aircraft debris in the photos. Whatever wasn’t “pulverized” on impact, melted away in the ensuing fire — so went the official story.

The melting point of aluminum is around 1,700 degrees F. The heat that was generated in the Pentagon fire supposedly was well above this, since they claimed that the aluminum vaporized! That happens at 11,000 degrees F!!!
DNA is an organic molecule that is very fragile, easily destroyed by temperatures at just a few hundred degrees C. It doesn’t need to be vaporized it can be destroyed by just being close to heat!
Analysis was done at Dover AFB from tissue samples that were collected for DNA identification.[ii]
Shrouded in secrecy, the government assembled a team of their own experts. The group assembled, as the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), claimed to have identified the human remains of all but one of the passengers on Flight 77. In other words, 99% of the remains of the people onboard were identified.
The only passenger unidentified on Flight 77 was a toddler. That passenger was Dana Falkenberg.[iii] [iv]
How is it possible that during a total vaporization of an airline, only one highly delicate DNA sample wasn’t degraded sufficiently enough to be recognized? How does human tissue survive when massive metal engines cannot? The government can’t have it both ways.
At the World Trade Center, the New York City Medical Examiner’s office only managed to identify about half of these people killed using DNA analysis. In aiding their efforts, many bodies were intact as scores of victims died due from the collapse of the building and not due to fire.
Despite the multiple violent blasts and terrible fire, of the Pentagon attack, authorities reported that they had identified 120 out of 124 Pentagon employees, which is a 97% success rate.[ii]
How do we explain a 50% rate of identification in New York, with a 97% identification rate at the Pentagon? [ii]
The AFIP team was working on the combined samples from both the Pentagon and Shanksville incidents.
There is no public evidence that definitively linked the bodies to the Pentagon crash site. DNA technicians would have no way of knowing where all the samples came from. That would be the job of army and FBI personnel that did the collecting.
Families of the airplanes’ passengers and crews and those who died within the Pentagon provided DNA samples.[iii]
All five hijackers were identified with DNA.[ii] But, to make identification with DNA you need a sample to compare it to. How would the U.S. government get samples from hijackers’ families to make the comparisons?
If the hijackers were identified, then why does there names not appear on the autopsy list of those killed on Flight 77?
The government completely controlled the autopsy. Independent investigations were never allowed.
No single family member ever insisted on an independent DNA test to match the remains held by the government with that of their loved ones.
Lisa Raines’ family was notified that her remains were identified through her fingerprints. How is it possible that fingerprints could be taken after such a “pulverizing” crash and vaporizing fire? Is it possible that her fingers were so well preserved that her fingerprints could be taken? If fingerprint matching has a higher error rate than modern DNA testing, then why wouldn’t the Pentagon have used a simple and more accurate DNA test instead?
Flight 77 passenger, Suzanne Calley’s, wedding ring, and driver’s license turns up in perfect condition from Pentagon wreckage. Capt. Jim Ingledue of the Virginia Beach Fire Department recently reported he found the completely unblemished California ID card amidst the devastation and rubble at the Pentagon.[v] Reasonable people would agree, that this is a bit ridiculous!
Thomas R. Olmsted, M.D., who made a recent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in order to “get to the bottom of what he calls a staged and phony government autopsy report… I undertook by FOIA request to get the autopsy list. Guess what? Still no Arabs on the list.” See Appendix for official autopsy list.
The names on the airline passenger manifest and the names provided by the official Pentagon autopsy report showed that three names were on the autopsy list that were never passengers on Flight 77.

http://911exposed.org/DNA.htm

 

[john doe]

Posle serijala filmova Zeitgeist (prvi je o 9-11), sta ima vise dodati i polemisati... Sve je lepo objasnjeno i zasto i kako i zbog koga i na koji nacin...

https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-594683847743189197

Topla preporuka svima koji nisu gledali...

 

[sumnjivo lice]

Titus@
Kontrolor leta je neko ko je pratio oteti avion od pocetka do kraja jer je zaduzen za njegov let.Neko ko taj posao radi duze vreme,znaci agent,spavac koji je tada aktiviran
193 osobe koje se videle da je pre samog udara avion preleto preko njihovih glava su lokalne osobe koje nemaju gotovo nikakve veze sa vladom SADMislim kako da nepogledaju na nebo kad stotinjak metara iznad njihovih glava proleti jedan boing i koji svi zamene za sta?
Ako je po vama zavernicima udario neki manji mlaznjak sta se dogodilo sa pravim putnicima,?Agenti neke od sluzbi ih oteli i pobili daleko od ociju javnosti?
To sto jedno telo nije ugljenisano na znaci nista.Kada je avion JAT-a pao u Cehoslovackoj samo je jedna stjuardesa prezivela i koja je bila visina?Preko 20 000 stopa?Da se takav slucaj ranije nije dogodio i da ti neko danas kaze da je jedna stjuardesa pala u jednom od delova raspadnutog aviona sa visine od 20 000stopa ti bi rekao da je taj ludak sto ti prica jer se tako nesto nikad ranije nije desilo.

 

[Titus.]

Titus@
Kontrolor leta je neko ko je pratio oteti avion od pocetka do kraja jer je zaduzen za njegov let.Neko ko taj posao radi duze vreme,znaci agent,spavac koji je tada aktiviran
193 osobe koje se videle da je pre samog udara avion preleto preko njihovih glava su lokalne osobe koje nemaju gotovo nikakve veze sa vladom SADMislim kako da nepogledaju na nebo kad stotinjak metara iznad njihovih glava proleti jedan boing i koji svi zamene za sta?
Ako je po vama zavernicima udario neki manji mlaznjak sta se dogodilo sa pravim putnicima,?Agenti neke od sluzbi ih oteli i pobili daleko od ociju javnosti?
To sto jedno telo nije ugljenisano na znaci nista.Kada je avion JAT-a pao u Cehoslovackoj samo je jedna stjuardesa prezivela i koja je bila visina?Preko 20 000 stopa?Da se takav slucaj ranije nije dogodio i da ti neko danas kaze da je jedna stjuardesa pala u jednom od delova raspadnutog aviona sa visine od 20 000stopa ti bi rekao da je taj ludak sto ti prica jer se tako nesto nikad ranije nije desilo.

Alo, momak, je l' ti pratis uopste sta ja pisem? Lepo sam ti naveo dva totalno suprotstavljena vidjenja svedoka o tome sta su videli da je proletelo iznad njihovih glava. Jedan svedok je video ogromnu letilicu, nalik na dzambo dzet, a drugi vrlo malu komercijalnu letilicu, nalik na sporski avion???? I sad cemo da pricamo o tome sta je 193 svedoka videlo??? Pa u toj konfuziji, ljudi, obicni laici su svedocili sugestivno, jer u stanju shoka, nakon napada na bliznakinje, nije cudo da im se prividjao i svemirski brod a ne putnicki avion. Drugo, sve i da ostavimo mogucnost da je putnicki avion zaista preleteo preko njihovih glava, kako onda objasniti sve druge neverovatnosti navodnog udara istog u zgradu pentagona, pocevsi od neostecenih dalekovoda, neverovatno male rupe na mestu udara, neostecenih prozorskih stakala, cistog travnjaka, konfiskovanog materijala koje su napravile ostale kamere iz okoline, tajanstvenost i netransparentnost autopsije putnika, nebuloze tipa ocuvana licna karta i verenicki prsten, nekakvi otisci prstiju iz ugljenisanih tela, i na kraju, neverovatnost da se iz dna materijala identifikuju otmicari, iako nikakva komparativna analiza iz genetskog materijala njihove rodbine nije radjena? Mislim, ima jos mnogo toga, aili i ovo je razboritom coveku dovoljno, valjda...

 

[Titus.]

Titus@
Kontrolor leta je neko ko je pratio oteti avion od pocetka do kraja jer je zaduzen za njegov let.Neko ko taj posao radi duze vreme,znaci agent,spavac koji je tada aktiviran

Dobro. I? Kako je tekla konverzacija izmedju pilota i kontrolora leta? Daj transkript razgovora! E, da, daj link da preslusamo snimke koje je zabelezila crna kutija sa otetog leta 77, hoces? Imamo dna analize, otiske prstiju, neostecene licne karte i vozacke dozvole, pa daj da preslusamo i snimak iz crne kutije, pa nek' ide zivot...

 

[Ewa Kant]

kako bilo,profesionalno odradjen posao.Jadi oni koji su se nasli pogresan dan na pogresnom mjestu.

 

[strawbbery_city]

Dobro. I? Kako je tekla konverzacija izmedju pilota i kontrolora leta? Daj transkript razgovora! E, da, daj link da preslusamo snimke koje je zabelezila crna kutija sa otetog leta 77, hoces? Imamo dna analize, otiske prstiju, neostecene licne karte i vozacke dozvole, pa daj da preslusamo i snimak iz crne kutije, pa nek' ide zivot...

ma slusali smo crnu kutiju ima ono

mujo daj malo ja da vozim

 

[ПАПРИКАРИУС]

Dobro. I? Kako je tekla konverzacija izmedju pilota i kontrolora leta? Daj transkript razgovora! E, da, daj link da preslusamo snimke koje je zabelezila crna kutija sa otetog leta 77, hoces? Imamo dna analize, otiske prstiju, neostecene licne karte i vozacke dozvole, pa daj da preslusamo i snimak iz crne kutije, pa nek' ide zivot...

А и ти си ми велики стручњак!?
Па зар нису наранџасте!!!
И пошто су тражили наранџасте,
а које су услед дуже изложености високој температури
једноставно, промениле боју и постале стварно црне,
"ОВИ НИСУ НИ МОГЛИ ДА НА ИХ НАЂУ"!!!

 

[kosta1703]

Ne znam jednostavno vise na koji nacin ove "strucnjake" koji tvrde razne nebuloze izvaditi iz tog matriksa u kojem zive?
Ja se uvek setim , jednog dela iz Stounovog filma "JFK" kada Kostner kaze pricajuci o nedoumicama oko ubistva Kenedijaprafraziracu)Da se ovako nesto dogodilo u SSSR-u, toliko sumnjivih stvari i aljkavosti vlasti, mislim da bi SVAKI slobodouman covek MORAO pomisliti da se tu nesto gadno kuva.

Samo promente subjekat o kojem se prica(Kenedija zamenite za kule) i to je to....
PS:skoro sam siguran da bi ovi strucnjaci bili najglasniji zagovornici zavere da se to kojim slucajem stvarno desilo u Rusiji.
Samo.....Rusija kada zeli da ubije svoje gradjane zbog viseg cilja, to ne radi tako aljkavo, kao amerikanci sa kulama.

 

[Titus.]

A vidi sad ovo...

A u ovoj, najnovijoj, isti covek, koji je, uzgred, obavljao funkciju drugog coveka Amerike, tvrdi sasvim suprotno, t.j., da Irak nikada nije bio umesan u 11-to septembarski napad i da nikada nisu postojali dokazi za tako nesto. Mislim, stvarno...:

 

[gost 47473]

Klituse, pogledaj ispitivanje japanskih i americkih naucnika iz 1988. godine.... i sta ostane od boinga 737 kada udari u ojacani betonski zid, slican onom od koga je napravljen pentagon...

Samo dugmici i nista vise....

 

[RainbowSix]

cruise missile on the test range... looks exactly like the Pentagon strike!!

 

[Titus.]

Pogledajte sta je izjavio penzionisani General Albert N. Stubblebine!!!

“I do not believe the free press is free anymore [...] The press is saying what they have been told to say about this. Now do I have proof about this? No. But I believe that all the stories that were told about 9/11 were false.”

you look at the buildings falling, they didn’t fall down because of an airplane hit them, they fell down because explosives went off inside. Demolition. Look at Building 7 for God sakes.

http://world911truth.org/tag/major-general-albert-n-stubblebine/

Major General Albert N. Stubblebine is a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy (West Point, class of 52) who enjoyed a distinguished 32 year career in the U.S. Army.

He retired as the Commanding General of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM).