prvo pazi malo iliri i tracani nemaju veze sa srbima nediraj ono sto je tudje!
drugo nije sporno da danasnji srbi imaju poreklo od ilira i tracana zato sto su se srbi - sloveni mesali sa starosedeocima
ranije se smatralo da su Sloveni bili mnogobrojni i da su na Balkanu zauzeli doline reka koje su bile gusce naseljene a starosedeoci uglavnom Romanizovani a delom i Helenizovani znaci Vlasi npr.koji su bili Romanizovani starosedeoci Balkana oni su se povukli u planinske krajeve kojih ima dosta na Balkanu ali su ti krajevi bili manje naseljeni i oni su bili brojcano u odnosu na Slovene u manjini.
Sada se smatra nakon genetskih istrazivanja da je naprotiv manje bilo Slovena pa da Srbi,Makedonci,Bugari od Slovena imaju samo 15% gena porekla a 85% od starobalkanskog stanovnistva.Crna Gora i BiH ima i nesto vise od 85% porekla od Balkanaca jedino Hrvati imaju 30% Slovenskog porekla neznam Slovenci koliko imaju Slovenskog porekla o tome se radi Sloveni su se mesali sa starosedeocima Balkanskog poluostrva i stvarajuci drzave i putem vere a i skole nametnuli su starosedeocima Balkanskog poluostrva svoj jezik i kulturu.
Tako npr. neznam tacno koje godine Bugarska je imala 80% ili vise obrazovanog stanovnistva pre Turskog osvajanja Balkana.
Znaci desila se svuda na Balkanu kulturna asimilacija starosedelaca od strane malobrojnih Slovena.
Sloveni su starosedeoci Balkana i svi Sloveni vode poreklo sa Balkana..
Seoba Slovena je izmisljotina..
Rusi su dokazali i da slovenski gen-R1a-vodi poreklo sa Balkana..
U 7 Veku je na Balkanu zivelo preko 5 miliona Slovena-dok je iza Karpata odakle su navodno doselili Sloveni bilo oko 200 000 stanovnika..
The ancient Kiev chronicle, erroneously ascribed to the monk Nestor, is the earliest authority quoted for the theory that the original home of the Slavs is to be sought in the region of the Danube. Here in detail is related for the first time how the Slavs spread from the lower Danube to all the countries occupied later by them.
The Noricans and Illyrians are declared to be Slavs, and Andronikos and the Apostle Paul are called Apostles to the Slavs because they laboured in Illyria and Pannocia.
This view was maintained by the later chroniclers and historical writers of all Slavonic peoples, as the Pole Kadlubek, "Chronika pol." (1206), Boguchwal (d. 1253), Dlugos, Matej Miechowa, Decius, and others.
Among the Czechs, this theory was supported by Kozmaz (d. 1125), Dalimir (d.1324), Johann Marignola (1355-1362), Pribik Pulkava (1374), and V. Hajek (1541).
The Russians also developed their theories from the statements of their first chronicler, while the Greek Laonikos Harkondilos of the fifteenth century did not commit himself to this view.
The southernSlavs have held this theory from the earliest period up to the present time with the evident intention to base on it their claims to the Church Slavonic in the Liturgy. At an early period, in the letter of Pope John X (914-29) to the Croatian Ban Tomislav and the Sachlumian ruler Mihael, there is a reference to the prevalent tradition that St. Jerome invented the Slavonic alphabet.
This tradition maintained itself through the succeeding centuries, finding supporters even outside these countries, and was current at Rome itself. Consequently if we were to follow strictly the written historical authorities, of which a number are very trustworthy, we would be obliged to support the theory that the original home of the Slavs is in the countries along the Danube and on the Adriatic coast.
Tako jednom davno vodim neke jugovice u razgledanje grada i vide reklame na sve strane sa natpisom Albani i jedan mi kaze: Uhh sto je bogat ovaj tvoj zemljak 
