Komunisti nisu navikli na nerad. Nemoj da lupas. Pitaj tatu i mamu koliko si morao da ucis da bi dao neki ispit i da li je bilo lakih fakulteta? Koliko su vise znali posle srednje skole nego mi danas.
-
- Popularno:
- Poseta predsednika Srbije bolesniku
- Imovina političara: hacijende, imovina...
- Vreme je za 5 stepen uzbune, pitanje...
- Kremlj potvrdio: Zvanično dogovoren...
- Ako te opiči struja može da ti proradi...
- Ako nisi uz mene, protiv mene si
- Bacanje knjiga
- Амбасада Русије у БиХ о пресуди Додику:...
- Severina objavila singl "Pumpaj"
- Dal si kao kornjača?
Zašto komunisti podržavaju radikale?
- Začetnik teme Hygieia
- Datum pokretanja
Komunisti nisu navikli na nerad. Nemoj da lupas. Pitaj tatu i mamu koliko si morao da ucis da bi dao neki ispit i da li je bilo lakih fakulteta? Koliko su vise znali posle srednje skole nego mi danas.
Pijanista
Ističe se
- Poruka
- 2.680
Тако је, реци ти њему.
Питај га колико се црвених уселило у куће класних непријатеља, колико су људи поубијали, позатварали да би се увалили у њихове куће... навикло то да ради... колико је камена истуцано на Голом Отоку...
john doe
Veoma poznat
- Poruka
- 14.018
Ej, nemoj molim te. Cuj mamu i tatu, pa ja sam ziveo i radio tada... A za obrazovanje stoji, tadasnje i sadasnje skole, du.pe i oko...
- Poruka
- 4.740
Вуја
Veoma poznat
- Poruka
- 10.723
Dve stranke koje apsolutno imaju najvise ex-komunista su DS i SRS ...
john doe
Veoma poznat
- Poruka
- 14.018
ae nemo da laes,ni licnu kartu jos nisi dobio
Ma vazi... Ajde dete okani me se....
AU. Koliko si ti mator?
Recimo manje nego sto je ljudi pobijeno zbog politike SRS-a i SPS-a.
berislav83
Domaćin
- Poruka
- 4.696
komunisti koji podrzavaju radikale nisu komunisti.
jedite_kod_Joa
Elita
- Poruka
- 19.903
То што се комунсти залажу за другачије државно уређење од десничарског,не значи да треба да подрже корупцију и издају интереса грађана Србије,што спроводи Тадић са ДС-ом.
- Poruka
- 4.833
Parra-Bellum
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 40.087
Samo u nas moze da bude ovakav politicki cirkus, sve jedan komunista koji samo i pomisli nesto protiv druge nacije ili vere nema sa komunizmom bas nista, a jos kad podrzavaju radikale (ciji preci su se sa nacistima udruzili BAS zbog komunista), dovoljno govori. Pravih komunista skoro da i nema vise.
Berislav83 ima pravo.
Berislav83 ima pravo.
berislav83
Domaćin
- Poruka
- 4.696
razlika je u tome kako sebe neko dozivljava.ja za sebe mogu reci da sam sa marsa,a da li je to istina...tako i oni "komunisti"mogu za sebe reci da su komunisti,a da podrzavaju nacionaliste olicene u SRS i lopove i tiranine olicene u DS..a da li su komunisti onda?
- Poruka
- 3.235
- Poruka
- 1.478
Nazi and Communist Collaboration In Germany During the Decade Preceding Hitler's "Third Reich"[1923-1933]
By Emerson Vermaat
April 22, 2008 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org - "The extremes touch" is a well known saying and quite often it is true. Today, leftist Socialists and Marxists join radical Muslims or "Islamists" in what they perceive as the common struggle against the United States and the West. One of the best friends of the extremist Iranian president Ahmadinejad is Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, a radical Socialist who wants to follow the example of Cuba's Fidel Castro. This is the same Ahmadinejad who is a "Holocaust denier" who invites neo-Nazis and other Fascist Holocaust deniers to conferences in Tehran.
Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, two important branches of today's radical Islam, espouse the anti-Semitic conspiracy theories of the so-called "Protocols of the Wise Men (or Elders) of Zion." Ahmed Sheikh Yassin, the co-founder of Hamas, had an Arab translation of the "Protocols" on his desk when he was writing the Hamas Charter. 1
It is not coincidental, therefore, that the same charter specifically refers to the Protocols. Sheikh Yassin was also a strong admirer of a virulent Jew-hater whose name was Mohammed "Haj" Amin Al-Husseini, the former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who had been granted asylum by the Nazis in 1941 and who spent the war years in Berlin where he actively promoted the Nazi cause.2
The "Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion" were very popular in Hitler's "Third Reich." Nazi Party philosopher Alfred Rosenberg was born in Czarist Russia (actually he was born in Latvia which was then part of Russia) and it was this Baltic German who in 1918 took the text of the Protocols from Russia to Germany introducing it to his extreme rightist friends from the Thule Society in Munich. It was from this obscure group that the Nazi Party would evolve around 1920.
Heinrich Himmler, the notorious SS-Reichsführer, had a strong admiration for Eastern religions and Islam. He often talked to his friend Haj Amin Al-Husseini, and it was during the war that the SS ran several "imam schools" in Nazi Germany. Himmler admired Muslims because they did not mind dying in battle.3
A Muslim who dies in battle believes he goes straight to paradise - a mere fiction, of course. But for Himmler's SS such "holy warriors" were quite useful. Himmler's SS-Muslim units committed terrible atrocities and war crimes in Bosnia. Al-Husseini was the high ranking Arab cleric who encouraged these young fanatics to fight in the Nazi ranks. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem was a radical Muslim who believed in jihad, the Shari'a, and above all, in killing Jews. His alliance with the Nazis was not unique, however.
Today, Islamists from Hamas have been interviewed in the German neo-Nazi press. Both neo-Nazis and radical Palestinians are vehemently opposed to Israel, the USA and usually deny the Holocaust. (At the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal many top Nazis also lamely claimed they had never noticed anything about this genocide; although they could not deny the facts, they still claimed to be completely innocent which was also a form of Holocaust denial.) Many Marxists and so-called anti-globalists are making common cause with radical Muslims. Marxists, leftist "Third Worldists" and neo-Nazis usually have the same kind of enemies: the West, America, Israel, and so on. Marxists and neo-Nazis may be ideological enemies, yet they may find common ground when it comes to hating these common enemies. ("The enemy of my enemy is my friend.")
This, by the way, happened before. I am referring here to occasional alliances or coalitions between yesterday's Nazis and yesterday's Communists. It was in Germany's shaky post First World War democracy, the so-called "Weimar Republic," that Communists and Nazis organized a strike in Berlin 1932, and were marching together in demonstrations against the ever weaker forces of moderation and calm that still existed in the final years of the Weimar Republic
ceo tekst ovde http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/3438
- Poruka
- 1.136
Mislim da je daleko interesantnije i smislenije pitanje zasto "demokrate" podrzavaju oni koji su bombardovali Srbiju i koji danas otimaju Kosovo?
- Poruka
- 1.478
to ovde nije tema.otvori novu temu sa tim pitanjem
- Poruka
- 1.136
Varas se, i to je tema. Indikativno je da se ne postavlja to pitanje, a neko se bavi nekakvim imaginarnim i marginalnim komunistima. To dovoljno govori o postavljacu ove teme.
al bundy
Legenda
- Poruka
- 64.033
tema ti je potpuni promasaj jer se demokrate i njima bliske stranke otvoreno zalazu za evro-atlanske integracije i to jasno govore u svim svojim nastupima i na toj politici su i dobili veliki broj glasova ,sada bez da ulazim dal se to nekome svidja ili ne .Stvar je u tome da se oni zalazu za integraciju sa EU i sasvim je onda logicno da imaju i podrsku zemalja te iste unije,dok radikali mrse muda o tome kako su oni kao neka desnica ,pustaju falsifikovane cetnicke pesme na skupovima i ponose se nekim "cetnickim" pedigreom a podzavaju ih ortodoksne komunjare sto vec nema veze sa zivotom.
Black Rat
Zainteresovan član
- Poruka
- 190
Black Rat
Zainteresovan član
- Poruka
- 190
E moj komunjaro, da samo znas da je i tvoja crvena banda saradjivala i sa Nemcima i sa ustasama...
- Poruka
- 1.478
tema je: zasto komunisti podrzavaju radikale
