Šta fali komunizmu?

IMG_0602.jpeg
 
не слажем се да је доста људи против , али је истина да је ревизија историје од стране Запада довела до тога да буде омржен и стигматизован , али смо због тога јер је успео да победи трули капиталистички Запад и обори га на колена
 
не слажем се да је доста људи против , али је истина да је ревизија историје од стране Запада довела до тога да буде омржен и стигматизован , али смо због тога јер је успео да победи трули капиталистички Запад и обори га на колена
Ko?
 
не слажем се да је доста људи против
Ne lupetaj.
, али је истина да је ревизија историје од стране Запада довела до тога да буде омржен и стигматизован
Vi komunisti ste falsifikatori istorije.
али смо због тога јер је успео да победи трули капиталистички Запад и обори га на колена
Ne lupetaj.
 
Ko je napravio Napoleona
Samo neobrazovana budaletina može da poredi pocetak 19. veka sa sredinom 20. veka. Porediti pocetak 19. veka sa sredinom 20. veka je ignorisanje konteksta vremena

Hitler je bio nacista. Staljin je bio komunista.
ili onog što je japancima bacio nuklearnu bombu na glavu nakon se rat praktično završio?
“There is a growing consensus among modern historians that the views as to the utility of the bomb held in August 1945 were correct. We now know that if the bomb had not been used, the invasion of Japan would have gone ahead. The best indication we have of the casualties that might have occurred are the actual figures for the eight-week campaign on Okinawa, in which 12,500 Americans died, and 39,000 were wounded. Fighting at the same intensity (it could not have been less) on Kyushu and Honshu, campaigns which would have lasted some 50 weeks, would have produced 80 to 100,000 American dead, and some 300 to 320,000 wounded. Are these casualties enough to justify Hiroshima and Nagasaki. If morality is based on numbers, and in this case it must be, then perhaps not. But what is usually overlooked in this numbers game, is the number of Japanese killed on Okinawa, which amounts to a staggering 250,000 military and civilian, about 20 Japanese killed for every dead American.
The losses in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were terrible, but not as terrible as the number of Japanese who would have died as the result of an invasion. The revisionist historians of the 1960s - and their disciples - are quite wrong to depict the decision to use the bombs as immoral. It would have been immoral if they had not been used”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/world...growing consensus,Japan would have gone ahead
 

Back
Top