SAD:Homoseksualizam i bombardovanje

Pošto svi postavljaju neke autorske teme, evo i od mene jedna: pokušavam da se setim vrednih inovacija i događaja koje su nam došli iz SAD.I to nisu tehnološke inovacije koje su nam unapredile život, već ratovi po svetu od WWII i stalna promocija i reklamiranje homoseksualizma.Šta mislite, da li ove dve američke agende donose najviše novca
Amerima pa ih zato naturaju celom svetu?

капитализам , религисјки фанатизам ,ратови , бобме, ескплоатација и смрт то су тековине САД
 
капитализам , религисјки фанатизам ,ратови , бобме, ескплоатација и смрт то су тековине САД
Шта би тек говорила да САД изврши геноцид над сопственим грађанима као, кхм, неке источне назови-државе...
 
Шта би тек говорила да САД изврши геноцид над сопственим грађанима као, кхм, неке источне назови-државе...
па зар се то већ није десило ..извршили су геноцид над Индијаницима , Африканцима ...
 
Pa Prvi svetski rat je izazvao Gavrilo Princip,clan Mlade Bosne.Niko ne bi napao Srbiju,da taj tip nije izvrsio atentat na Prestolonaslednika Austro
Ugarske.Pored Ferdinanda,ubio je Gavrilo,i njegovu suprugu u osmom mesecu trudnoce.Zar ne smatras da je to,bedni cin jednog bolesnog manijaka.!!!
Jest baš zbog njega izvršili agresiju na Srbiju. Pa što nisu njega na mjestu lica ubili već im je trebao neko za njihov prodor na istok Drang nach Osten. Gavrilo nije imao nikakve veze sa Srbijom i rođen je u mjestu koje udaljeno preko 500km od srbijanske granice. Nije bio član "Mlade Srbije" no Mlade Bosne. I šta je radio taj Ferdinad u Bosni ?? Niko nije zvao Austro Ugare da nas okupiraju...još poveo trudnu ženu sa sobom. Valjda je ženi mjesto u kući,a ne da je voda trudnu sa sobom.
 
Ne kenjajte.

1. homosexuals are here to stay, as they’ve been with us from the beginning of time. It seems that most classical civilizations (Sumer, Babylonia, Egypt, China, India, Greece, old Americas,..) didn’t even possess “binary” concepts we all use. And the presence of this type of behavior had had nothing to do with civilizational flourishing & decline

2. they are a minority- but, how many of them are out there, anyway? I don’t know. I think this is unanswerable. As a rule of thumb, we can accept 1-2% for gays & half of that for lesbians. But- I’m puzzled. Homo behavior is so strange to me, a mystery I can’t decipher. I can accept they are attracted to the same sex, so I’m OK with “natural-born” homos (alteration in brain formation during gestation), but:

a) I don’t get why otherwise straight people go gay in prison. To me- it is unthinkable. Yet, this is rather trivial. Freud may have been, after all, right when he was talking about “polymorphous perversity”. Perhaps male brain is innately perverse, at least for a non-negligible percent. As for females-they are confused sex/gender. For virtually all straight men, it is impossible to go gay after, say, 10-20 years of marriage (without prior conscious repression); for women, it is perfectly possible to switch to lez just like that, after divorce & 2 kids, having no history of desire for the same sex.

Women are both confused & a mystery.

b) it is a mistake to equate (male) homos only with extravagant promiscuity & sexual obsession. A part of them is super-Babylonian in excess; on the other hand, many are more or less not a big deal in that department. And why reduce them to sex only? They are perfectly capable of love, sometimes more than ordinary men. Lesbians too.

c) they are not “sick” in ordinary usage of that word.

d) I don’t believe in Big Fag Conspiracy to undermine Western civilization (after all, many of them have been builders of that very civilization). All hullabaloo about their “marriage” is actually irrelevant (their “marriage” is great for tasteless jokes). The problem is in the collapse of male-female normal family structure & female refusal to have children -and this has nothing to do with gays. I am convinced that most-say, more than 80-90%- women are incomplete without pregnancy & children. Some , 5-15% are not, but they have other reasons (male brain, health issues, …). In short- there is a maternal instinct, while there is no paternal instinct, just genuine paternal feeling. Men create civilization, while women create- life. Artificial wombs, even if completely possible, would destroy human civilization. Nuclear normal family is the basis of all civilization.

Homo family is an irrelevant side-show (perhaps crucial for lesbians, but basically marginal for most/many male homos).

e) homos are not just effeminate; there is a history of extreme male aggressiveness & sadism associated with militarism & murderousness (elite troops in Greece, Ottoman Empire, SA & not infrequently SS). In fact, Hugo Boss’ design for SS uniforms is uber-gay stylish exhibitionism realized

To reduce homosexuals to extreme sexual behavior is one-dimensional & basically stupid; to think they are something less than fully human & the cause of weaknesses of Western civilization is plain dumb.

My favorite sage Tricky Dick Nixon was wrong when he said that strong societies like USSR ruthlessly suppress gays & therefore survive. Well- stronk USSR collapsed & “gay” USA is still here.


 
Ja sam postavio pitanje, kakav je i koliki u novcu interes Amerikanaca da svetu nameću homoseksualizam kao važan cilj u našim životima i odnosima među državama.Šta tu nije jasno?
jednokratni lek za SIDU (jedini efikasan) kosta 400 evra na zapadu, glavni americki producent je u sklopu svajcarskog koncerna BAYER (u vlasnistvu ROTSHILDA) ..............................da nastavim?
 
Непоправљиви смо. Морамо безусловно да навијамо. Ако није Партизан и Звезда, онда је Русија и Америка. Сада ми се онај филм "Три карте за Холивуд" чини тоталном дефиницијом Срба на ову тему.
Ја сам по свему русофил, али просто је дебилно игнорисати огроман амерички позитиван допринос цивилизацији, као и раније британски, француски, немачки итд. Размере њихових деструктивних и злочиначких доприноса су можда још веће, али гледати све црно - бело, а не приметити да је скоро целој планети живот промењен након њихових технолошких иновација је аутистично.
То су нам трајни непријатељи, требало би, да се као Кинези што више "огребемо", али потцењивање непријатеља је најглупља могућа стратегија. Мања грешка је њихови прецењивање.
 

Back
Top