theory in a nutshell:
q:
simillarity and difference between communism and anarchy
a:
Ah, a classic debate! Communism and anarchy, while both aiming for a society free from oppression, take very different paths to get there.
Let's break it down:
Similarities:
- Shared Goal: Both ideologies strive for a society without class divisions, where everyone has equal access to resources and power.
- Rejection of Capitalism: Both systems reject the capitalist model of private ownership and profit-driven production.
- Emphasis on Collective Ownership: Both believe in some form of collective ownership of resources, be it by the state (communism) or the community (anarchy).
Differences:
- Role of the State: This is the biggest difference. Communism advocates for a strong, centralized state to control the means of production and enforce equality. Anarchy, on the other hand, rejects the state entirely, believing it to be inherently oppressive and unnecessary.
- Methods of Achieving Equality: Communism relies on revolution and state control to achieve equality, while anarchy promotes decentralized, voluntary cooperation and direct democracy to achieve similar ends.
- Individual Freedom: While both ideologies value individual freedom, communism may limit individual freedom in the name of collective good, while anarchy prioritizes individual autonomy and self-determination.
In a nutshell:
Communism is like a
strict, organized orchestra aiming for harmony through a conductor (the state). Anarchy is like a
free-flowing jazz band improvising and creating harmony through collective improvisation.
But, there's more to explore! Do you want to delve deeper into the historical development of these ideologies, or perhaps examine the criticisms they face?
q:
if it is true that communism is controlled by the state what about teachings about state disappearance
a:
You've hit upon a fascinating point! It's true that many communist ideologies envision a "withering away of the state" as a final stage of development. This idea, often attributed to Karl Marx, suggests that once a communist society has achieved a classless, egalitarian state, the need for a centralized state will diminish.
Here's the catch:
- The "Withering Away" is a Long-Term Goal: This is not a quick fix. It's a theoretical endpoint that many communist thinkers believe will only happen after a long period of social transformation and development.
- The State is Necessary for Transition: In the early stages of communist revolution, a strong state is considered essential to dismantle the old capitalist system, redistribute wealth, and establish a socialist society.
- Interpretations Vary: Different communist thinkers have different interpretations of what the "withering away" entails and how it might happen. Some believe it will happen organically as people become more self-sufficient and cooperative, while others envision a more deliberate process of dismantling state institutions.
So, while the idea of a stateless society is a core part of communism, it's important to remember:
- It's a long-term goal, not an immediate reality.
- The state is seen as a necessary tool for achieving a communist society, even if it's ultimately meant to disappear.
- There's no single, universally accepted interpretation of how the "withering away" will happen.
Would you like to explore the different interpretations of the "withering away" theory, or perhaps delve into the criticisms of this concept?
--------------
studenti zagovaraju funkcionalne institucije, a institucije su olicenje drzave, konsekventno studenti vise naginju ka komunizmu nego ka anarhiji (kako ih neki kriticari nazivaju)
ako cemo pravo oni i jesu unuci i praunuci komunizma, samo su se tek sad otkrili i samo je ostalo da razumeju sta zapravo rade. Verujem da hoce.
