Za lošu recenziju hotel tuži gošću i traži 60.000 evra odštete?

Mnogo su nešto pružači usluga počeli da se bune na recenzije koje su samoregulišući mehanizam tržišta. Mene su majstori zvale da se žale i traže da uklonim utisak i pravičnih 3 od 5 zvezdica na Google recenzijama, kao 'oni od toga hrane porodicu', a pre toga mi majstor danima pričao o svom smart upravljanju svim mogućim uređajima u stanu, kako ima dil sa nekim iz EPS-a da mu jeftina struja bude preko dana, i kako žena troši 1000e na taksi mesečno, iako je politika firme da se ne ćaska sa mušterijama. Ja se sažalila i uklonila utisak :confused:
 
Pa jesu vratili 3% para?

Čak ni flašicu vode kao kompenzaciju za pretrpljen duhovni bol
Meni su u jednom hotelu (da sad ne navodim gde i koji, ali elitno mesto) za "kaznu" što soba nije bila spremna u zakazano vreme dali vaučer za besplatan doručak za sve vreme boravka.

Postoji razlog zašto je soba u jednom hotelu 200, 300, 500 eura za noć a na drugom 30. A to je, da sve mora da bude besprekorno.
 
I čitate li vi uopšte te recenzije ili samo gledate cifru?

Ako postoji problem u usluzi to će se osetiti na recenziji, ako postoji problem u prevarama tipa naplate nešto fantomski iz mini bara to se neće jednom desiti, ako nisu flexibilni pri check-in ili check-out situacijama i to se brzo sazna....

Meni smešno da neko u hotelu gde je noć 500€ uopšte ima rigorozan tretnman, upravo tu su najkooperativniji i najviše pažnje posvećuju jer služe i za zapadnoevropske standarde bolje platežne goste, koji nisu uopšte česti.
 
Nema svako pravo na mišljenje? Lažne tvrdnje se rade iz koristi.

Izgleda nema, nema više slobode govora....1984.

Ako je jedna od proverenih recenzija negativna onda je manje bitna. Ako je većina negativnih onda je prosek.

Recimo na kruzerima Britanci su poznati da se žale na uslugu da bi dobili nešto dodatno tokom krstarenja.

Verbalni delikt kao sa nekim političkim pitanjima, samo ovde hotelska usluga...
 
I čitate li vi uopšte te recenzije ili samo gledate cifru?

Ako postoji problem u usluzi to će se osetiti na recenziji, ako postoji problem u prevarama tipa naplate nešto fantomski iz mini bara to se neće jednom desiti, ako nisu flexibilni pri check-in ili check-out situacijama i to se brzo sazna....

Meni smešno da neko u hotelu gde je noć 500€ uopšte ima rigorozan tretnman, upravo tu su najkooperativniji i najviše pažnje posvećuju jer služe i za zapadnoevropske standarde bolje platežne goste, koji nisu uopšte česti.
Negde sam pročitala da je gospođa za taj smeštaj platila 36e po danu. Ne znam šta je očekivala za taj novac.
Sigurno je bilo nekih propusta a da je baš sve crno, ne verujem.
Ja sam za ovo leto platila 86e po danu i nisam imala ni jednu zamerku. Možda zato što nisam zahtevna.
 
a onda...nisam u pravu...zavisi od drzave do drzave...evo sta kazu...

Can someone really sue me for an online review?​

The short answer to whether you can be sued for your online travel reviews is, of course, yes. You can be sued for just about anything. The barrier to entry for lawsuits in the United States is pretty low. There are several widely publicized legal disputes involving online travel reviews, from a Branson, Missouri tourist attraction suing a customer for a TripAdvisor rating to a hotel in Indiana that tried to charge $350 to a customer who left a negative review.

Whether a lawsuit has any legal merit is, of course, the real question. Attorney Jamie Lieberman of Hashtag Legal, a law firm focused on providing legal services for the digital world, advises that even when a reviewer is engaged in legally protected behavior, “it may not stop a business from suing or trying to stop a consumer from posting a negative review.” It takes time and money to make even the most frivolous of lawsuits go away. “In many states, the consumer is left responsible for legal fees for defending themselves, even if the reviewer was within their rights,” Lieberman warns.

What can reviewers do that might put them legally in the wrong? The answer is pretty simple: not telling the truth. The most common legal claim that a business might have against a customer leaving an online review is defamation. Emily D. Baker, an attorney who counsels online business owners navigating legal issues in the digital space said, “Defamation is governed state to state, but is broadly a public false statement that is intended to or does, in fact, cause injury (such as loss of business or reputation).”

In the United States at least, truth is a defense to defamation.

When writing negative online reviews, the best way to remain on the right side of the law is to simply be honest. Reviewers can do this most effectively when they stick to the facts. Explain what happened that caused you to give a business a low rating, such as visibly dirty bed sheets at a hotel or a restaurant that took over an hour to bring an order to your table.

Avoid jumping to conclusions or offering opinion. Just because you woke up with mysterious bites on your legs doesn’t necessarily mean your hotel is infested with bed bugs. Instead of saying, “This hotel is swarming with bed bugs” when you never saw an insect, say the following: “I woke up the first morning of our stay with 10 bites on my legs. I informed the hotel manager. I asked for an inspection of my room by an exterminator and requested a new room. He refused both requests.” Let the readers of a review come to their own conclusions from the facts as you’ve presented them.

A koga zanima ceo tekst neka procita ovde

https://thepointsguy.com/guide/sued-negative-hotel-reviews/

i ovde

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/10/can-you-get-sued-over-a-negative-yelp-review.html
 

Back
Top