Tako su pričali i pisali nisu "balavili" kao neki. Na kraju "magistra vitaes" je to dokazala. Sve se zna, pa ni ova naša planeta Zemlja nije tako misteriozna, sve se zna . I ko su ovi, oni...........
-
- Popularno:
- "Kompleks provincije"
- Da li si veći Srbin Il veći...
- Policija u Kruševcu zabranila Prajd...
- Политичко-психолошки профил ћација...
- Одакле 'Вучићу' новац ?
- Vučić zaratio sa Slovacima
- Да ли ће Вучић дочекати нову глобалну...
- Burek
- Gde nikad ne bi gurnuli prst?
- Građani u Novom Sadu protestuju protiv...
Ustaska i jevrejska saradnja
- Začetnik teme Sorab1
- Datum pokretanja
- Poruka
- 587
Шимон Перес и кољач срба:
Израел подржава шиптаре и отимање српског косова:
http://www.kosovapress.com/ks/repository/images/thaqi_peres(070207)_thmb.jpg
Израел подржава шиптаре и отимање српског косова:
http://www.kosovapress.com/ks/repository/images/thaqi_peres(070207)_thmb.jpg
bubobubo
Ističe se
- Poruka
- 2.683
pa ne moze tako napamet. sta, jel mu se javlja?проф-Гроф:
i koji su mu izvori? neki rasisticki sajtovi ili neka ozbiljna literatura. neka lepo napise da mozemo da proverimo.
Alekasandar2
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.546
Sorab1:
Усташе су Срби
највећи део усташа и то најокорелијих су они који су сами или друго колено покатоличени Срби.
1. генетски код Хрвата готово је истоветан са Српским.
2. Ако причамо да су Хрвати покатоличени Срби и да Хрвати у ствари не постоје, онда су самим тим и Усташе - Срби
3. Највеци део коусташких злочинаца долази из Српских делова бивше југославије:
- Далмације, Херцеговине, Славоније и Лике, и сви су покатоличени Срби, Српска крв, српски гени
4. Најмањи део усташа је из Загорја и Истре, ако поледаш дан данас народ Истре и Загорја, једни Итало-Словени други прави Хрвати немају ништа против Срба
5. Колико усташких кољача има презимена која зе завршавају на "Ић" и "вић"?
Балије:
Стопроцентно, Муслимани су генетски потурчени Срби.
Значи Алија ИзетбеноВИЋ је Србин, и сам је то пар пута писао да има српске корене. Па зато ови муслимани шо су нас клали у два рата су- Срби, али сви одреда.
А имамо и случај Јована Дивјака, чистог Србина, генерала Алије Изетбеговића...
ЗАКЉУЧАК
Остави се да ли је неки хрват кресао неку јеврејку или је неки јевреј напумпапо Павелићеву маму, него ми објасно зашто су Срби највећ Усташки и Балијски кољачи!?
Alekasandar2
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.546
Sorab1:Шимон Перес и кољач срба:
Израел подржава шиптаре и отимање српског косова:
http://www.kosovapress.com/ks/repository/images/thaqi_peres(070207)_thmb.jpg
Sharon: Independent Kosovo would be centre of Islamic terrorism
April 06, 1999
Tel Aviv, April 6 (Tanjug) - Israeli Foreign Minister Ariel Sharon has warned that, if Kosovo were granted independence, it would become a part of the so-called Greater Albania and the centre of extremist Islamic terrorism that would spread throughout Europe.
Israel's state radio quoted Sharon as telling a conference of the United States-based Jewish leaders held in New York, that all must be done to stop the plight of innocent civilians in Yugoslavia.
http://www.serbia-info.com/news/1999-04/06/10570.html
eremita
Zaslužan član
- Poruka
- 117.177
Alekasandar2:
Aleksandre2, извини, али како можеш овако нешто да пишеш. С којим правом ??? Питам се шта те је то спопало???
Познато ми је да овакве болесне закључке и идеје заступа Шешељ - али не могу да поверујем да се на овакве антисрпске идеје и ти примаш! НИЈЕ У РЕДУ !!!!!
Alekasandar2
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.546
eremita:Aleksandre2, извини, али како можеш овако нешто да пишеш. С којим правом ??? Питам се шта те је то спопало???
Познато ми је да овакве болесне закључке и идеје заступа Шешељ - али не могу да поверујем да се на овакве антисрпске идеје и ти примаш! НИЈЕ У РЕДУ !!!!!
Не секирај се, само ударам контру
Ако је овај поблесавио па написао да су Јевреји сарадници Усташа, ако не чак и Јевреји били Усташе онда сам га смо питао колико усташа има Српско порекло.
Не секирај се не приамм се ја нинашта само желим да му покажем како језичким фигурама и заменом теза можеш да докажеш аба баш све на овом свету.
не трпим такве као што су ова тема.
Значи Сарказам и иронија су у питању.
bubobubo
Ističe se
- Poruka
- 2.683
e svasta!!!!!Alekasandar2:Sharon: Independent Kosovo would be centre of Islamic terrorism
April 06, 1999
Tel Aviv, April 6 (Tanjug) - Israeli Foreign Minister Ariel Sharon has warned that, if Kosovo were granted independence, it would become a part of the so-called Greater Albania and the centre of extremist Islamic terrorism that would spread throughout Europe.
Israel's state radio quoted Sharon as telling a conference of the United States-based Jewish leaders held in New York, that all must be done to stop the plight of innocent civilians in Yugoslavia.
http://www.serbia-info.com/news/1999-04/06/10570.html
pa izrael je jedna od retkih drzava koja nas NIJE bombardovala.
a JESU
ameri
svabe
englezi
francuzi
....................
a kako su onda tu jevreji nekakvi zlikovci? i zasto? zabole njih za tamo neku srbiju.
a
ameri
svabe
englezi
francuzi
.................... JESU zlikovci.
ups! greska. nisam ni pogledao tekst. to ti je kad je jezik brzi od pameti.
ovde se JASNO VIDI DA SU JEVREJI na strani srba.
ipak bilo bi iskrenije reci da su oni protiv muslimana, a za srbe ih bas briga, tj mali smo i nezanimljivi i ne interesuju se za nas. u ovom slucaju oni razmisljaju "neprijatelji nasih neprijatelja su nasi prijatelji".
a mi umesto da na taj nacin okupljamo saveznike, mi od njih pravimo neprijatelje.
bubobubo
Ističe se
- Poruka
- 2.683
Шимон Перес и кољач срба????Sorab1:Шимон Перес и кољач срба:
Израел подржава шиптаре и отимање српског косова:
http://www.kosovapress.com/ks/repository/images/thaqi_peres(070207)_thmb.jpg
alo!!!! sa koljacem srba se rukovao SVAKI predsednik zapadnih drzava.
ne znam odakle imas vise razloga da mrzis jevreje od npr francuza ili nemaca?
bubobubo
Ističe se
- Poruka
- 2.683
to sto si ti uradio je JAKO PAMETNO. na zalost, ljudi koji mrze to ne mogu da razumeju.Alekasandar2:
ne kaze se bez veze "zaslepljen od mrznje"
bubobubo
Ističe se
- Poruka
- 2.683
ja ne mrzim ni hrvate, ni jevreje.Sorab1:
ali da pitam tebe? pre bi verovao hrvatima nego jevrejima?
i ovo je samo njihova propaganda. srbe nisu ubijeli hrvati nego jevreji.
ko bi u ovo mogao da poveruje. mogli su da napisu da su svi ti likovi ruskog porekla.
ti bi odmah napisao "Ko ono lupi da su rusi srbima prijatelji?"
- Poruka
- 1.861
By Max Shpak
According to Neo-Conservative pundits, there seem to be Good Muslims and Bad Muslims, and who gets what label depends on who Muslim insurgents are attacking.
While the Kristols, Safires, and Podhoretzes shed copious crocodile tears over the plight of well-armed KLA 'freedom fighters' and Chechen rebels, they inevitably cheer every Israeli effort to gun down rock-throwing Palestinian Arabs. That the neo-cons are hardly consistent in their affected sympathies is hardly surprising, after all, these are the same 'experts' whose duplicitous prattle informed us that Kurdish rebels in Turkey were 'terrorists' while Kurdish rebels fighting for the exact same cause [an independent Kurdistan] in Iraq were heroic 'freedom fighters.' The hypocrisy over the Kurds was so blatant that almost anybody could see through it, while the seemingly schizophrenic attitude of the neos to Muslim 'freedom fighters' in Kosovo and Chechnya versus 'terrorists' in Israel is a little more subtle.
Basically, Yugoslavia was chosen to be Israel's whipping boy by the neo-cons. It is well known that Israel is central to the neo-con agenda, this fanatically 'Israel First' attitude that lead the late Russell Kirk and others to quip that the neoconservativess seem to believe that Tel Aviv, not Washington, is America's capital.
Since by their definition Israel can do no wrong and America's security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever Israel's interests are at stake, reality demands a little damage control. While the neocons insist that Israel is of vital strategic interest to the United States and that protecting and subsidizing Israel is tactically equivalent to defending the US itself, reality dictates otherwise, and as a result, little adjustments have to be made.
It is readily apparent that US aid to Israel comes at a huge cost to America. After all, it is Arab nations, not Israel, that provide us with oil, and it should be remembered that America's support of Israel has lead to oil crises when Arab oil nations decide to cut us off in protest. Furthermore, the majority of Arab and Muslim hostility towards the US and the West is due to America's support for Israel and the Zionist cause, regardless of how often the neocons repeat incantations about how 'the Arabs hate us because we are free, not because we support Israel.'
If it weren't for US military and economic aid to Israel, it is no great stretch to argue that there would be no Arab bombings of US military bases or embassies, no Bin Laden, and no efforts by Iraq or Iran to curry favor with China or Russia. On a more timely note, there would have been no attack on the USS Cole, and the lives of our sailors would have been spared.
This leaves the neo-cons in quite a predicament. On the one hand, these scribbling shysters like to pose as 'patriots' who love America, and yet they are more than happy to support policies which harm their country when Israel, the nation of their true love and loyalty is threatened. This calls for a little two-faced damage control. Thus, we get William Safire wailing about Russian 'genocide' against Chechens, and Bill Kristol burbling repetitively about the plight of Kosovar Albanians and Bosnians. Their hope is that by having America champion the cause of Albanian and Bosnian Muslims, the Arab world will forgive, or at least overlook, all of Israel's excesses.
Hence, Yugoslavia came to play the role of whipping boy for Israel. The Serbs would be beaten for Israel's misbehavior, for like the princes of yesteryear, it was unthinkable that Sacred Cow Israel could ever be punished. Within months of the Kosovo 'crisis,' we heard such gems about 'crushing Serb skulls' from Bill Kristol, together with all the saccharine, sticky moralisms about 'human rights' and the evils of 'ultra-nationalism.'
When the bombs dropped over Belgrade, nobody cheered louder than the Born-Again Zionist neo-cons. The more brutally Yugoslavia was bombed, they hoped, the more pro-Israeli activities they [and the Washington functionaries on both sides of the aisle who all too often capitulate to the demands of neocon think tanks] could get away with in the future. In the back of their minds, the Kristols, the Kagans, the Goldbergs [sans Lewis, of course,] the Podhoretzes, the Kampelmans, and the Safires sat back contentedly thinking, 'Ah, the next time our friends in Israel shoot some Arab kids throwing rocks, we can bring up how we rescued their Muslim brethren from the evil Milosevic.
Though this game may seem pervese beyond belief to any sane individual, it makes perfect sense in light of neo-con priorities. A neutral, objective individual would say that the natural way to deal with potential Arab hostility would be for America to remain neutral in the Middle East, and similarly, demand neutrality in the Balkans. But the neo-cons have a mission as apologists and cheerleaders for Israel, and the possibility of disengaging from our alliance with Tel Aviv is not even an option that can be entertained. Once this is realised, the fact that neo-cons pretend to 'feel the pain' of the alle ged sufferings of Albanians and Bosnians starts to make more sense.
US aid to Israel, therefore, has implications which go far beyond our role in the Middle East. How much longer will America and the rest of the world have to pay for the annual tribute we pay to Tel Aviv?
According to Neo-Conservative pundits, there seem to be Good Muslims and Bad Muslims, and who gets what label depends on who Muslim insurgents are attacking.
While the Kristols, Safires, and Podhoretzes shed copious crocodile tears over the plight of well-armed KLA 'freedom fighters' and Chechen rebels, they inevitably cheer every Israeli effort to gun down rock-throwing Palestinian Arabs. That the neo-cons are hardly consistent in their affected sympathies is hardly surprising, after all, these are the same 'experts' whose duplicitous prattle informed us that Kurdish rebels in Turkey were 'terrorists' while Kurdish rebels fighting for the exact same cause [an independent Kurdistan] in Iraq were heroic 'freedom fighters.' The hypocrisy over the Kurds was so blatant that almost anybody could see through it, while the seemingly schizophrenic attitude of the neos to Muslim 'freedom fighters' in Kosovo and Chechnya versus 'terrorists' in Israel is a little more subtle.
Basically, Yugoslavia was chosen to be Israel's whipping boy by the neo-cons. It is well known that Israel is central to the neo-con agenda, this fanatically 'Israel First' attitude that lead the late Russell Kirk and others to quip that the neoconservativess seem to believe that Tel Aviv, not Washington, is America's capital.
Since by their definition Israel can do no wrong and America's security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever Israel's interests are at stake, reality demands a little damage control. While the neocons insist that Israel is of vital strategic interest to the United States and that protecting and subsidizing Israel is tactically equivalent to defending the US itself, reality dictates otherwise, and as a result, little adjustments have to be made.
It is readily apparent that US aid to Israel comes at a huge cost to America. After all, it is Arab nations, not Israel, that provide us with oil, and it should be remembered that America's support of Israel has lead to oil crises when Arab oil nations decide to cut us off in protest. Furthermore, the majority of Arab and Muslim hostility towards the US and the West is due to America's support for Israel and the Zionist cause, regardless of how often the neocons repeat incantations about how 'the Arabs hate us because we are free, not because we support Israel.'
If it weren't for US military and economic aid to Israel, it is no great stretch to argue that there would be no Arab bombings of US military bases or embassies, no Bin Laden, and no efforts by Iraq or Iran to curry favor with China or Russia. On a more timely note, there would have been no attack on the USS Cole, and the lives of our sailors would have been spared.
This leaves the neo-cons in quite a predicament. On the one hand, these scribbling shysters like to pose as 'patriots' who love America, and yet they are more than happy to support policies which harm their country when Israel, the nation of their true love and loyalty is threatened. This calls for a little two-faced damage control. Thus, we get William Safire wailing about Russian 'genocide' against Chechens, and Bill Kristol burbling repetitively about the plight of Kosovar Albanians and Bosnians. Their hope is that by having America champion the cause of Albanian and Bosnian Muslims, the Arab world will forgive, or at least overlook, all of Israel's excesses.
Hence, Yugoslavia came to play the role of whipping boy for Israel. The Serbs would be beaten for Israel's misbehavior, for like the princes of yesteryear, it was unthinkable that Sacred Cow Israel could ever be punished. Within months of the Kosovo 'crisis,' we heard such gems about 'crushing Serb skulls' from Bill Kristol, together with all the saccharine, sticky moralisms about 'human rights' and the evils of 'ultra-nationalism.'
When the bombs dropped over Belgrade, nobody cheered louder than the Born-Again Zionist neo-cons. The more brutally Yugoslavia was bombed, they hoped, the more pro-Israeli activities they [and the Washington functionaries on both sides of the aisle who all too often capitulate to the demands of neocon think tanks] could get away with in the future. In the back of their minds, the Kristols, the Kagans, the Goldbergs [sans Lewis, of course,] the Podhoretzes, the Kampelmans, and the Safires sat back contentedly thinking, 'Ah, the next time our friends in Israel shoot some Arab kids throwing rocks, we can bring up how we rescued their Muslim brethren from the evil Milosevic.
Though this game may seem pervese beyond belief to any sane individual, it makes perfect sense in light of neo-con priorities. A neutral, objective individual would say that the natural way to deal with potential Arab hostility would be for America to remain neutral in the Middle East, and similarly, demand neutrality in the Balkans. But the neo-cons have a mission as apologists and cheerleaders for Israel, and the possibility of disengaging from our alliance with Tel Aviv is not even an option that can be entertained. Once this is realised, the fact that neo-cons pretend to 'feel the pain' of the alle ged sufferings of Albanians and Bosnians starts to make more sense.
US aid to Israel, therefore, has implications which go far beyond our role in the Middle East. How much longer will America and the rest of the world have to pay for the annual tribute we pay to Tel Aviv?
Slične teme
