Silent Bob
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 6.849
Tokom "dogadjaja" u Srebrenici 1995, poginuo je jedan Holandjanin... ubili su ga Muslimani... kad su napali Holandsku patrolu...
-
- Popularno:
- Boris Tadić, kao bivši predsednik...
- Blokaderi u Novom Sadu blokiraju...
- Putin prvi ruski lider koji će...
- Prevara ili razvod?
- Svetinje: srpsko jedinstvo, četništvo i...
- Mobilni telefon vs lap top/kompjuter
- Koncept “otvorene veze”
- Mladići u Prijedoru slavili logore na...
- Zašto se Srbi van Srbije ponašaju...
- Zašto je Vučić toliko opsjednut...
SREBRENIČANI OD HOLANDIJE I UN-a TRAŽE DVIJE MILIJARDE KM!!!
- Začetnik teme RainbowSix
- Datum pokretanja
Istocni Vetar
Domaćin
- Poruka
- 4.571
Interesantno misljenje jednog ruskog analiticara.
UN nije ni pokusao da stiti Srebrenicu..
Srbija nije kriva i nema nikakvog dokaza da je neko naredio iz Srbije..
In particular, the court discussed the massacre of Muslims in Srebrenica. The international tribunal operating under the UN banner tried to please both sides by recognizing the fact of the massacre without granting Bosnia's request to find Serbia guilty of genocide and demand that they pay compensation to the victims, allegedly because it did not find proof of the claim that the massacre had been approved by the political leadership of the former Yugoslavia, or Serbia and Montenegro, or Serbia.
Judging Serbia for actions taken by a country that has disappeared from the political map may be legal from the viewpoint of international law, but it is completely absurd from the viewpoint of common sense. It is like judging modern Germany for the actions of East Germany, although even that would be more logical than the trial of Serbia. After all, East Germany has joined West Germany to form a united Germany, while Yugoslavia has fallen apart.
According to information provided to the court, the killers calmly walked to Srebrenica across an area controlled by peacekeepers from the Netherlands, whose mission was to prevent such crimes. However, the court did not question the actions of the peacekeepers, while the Dutch authorities rewarded them with military decorations.
UN nije ni pokusao da stiti Srebrenicu..
Srbija nije kriva i nema nikakvog dokaza da je neko naredio iz Srbije..
In particular, the court discussed the massacre of Muslims in Srebrenica. The international tribunal operating under the UN banner tried to please both sides by recognizing the fact of the massacre without granting Bosnia's request to find Serbia guilty of genocide and demand that they pay compensation to the victims, allegedly because it did not find proof of the claim that the massacre had been approved by the political leadership of the former Yugoslavia, or Serbia and Montenegro, or Serbia.
Judging Serbia for actions taken by a country that has disappeared from the political map may be legal from the viewpoint of international law, but it is completely absurd from the viewpoint of common sense. It is like judging modern Germany for the actions of East Germany, although even that would be more logical than the trial of Serbia. After all, East Germany has joined West Germany to form a united Germany, while Yugoslavia has fallen apart.
According to information provided to the court, the killers calmly walked to Srebrenica across an area controlled by peacekeepers from the Netherlands, whose mission was to prevent such crimes. However, the court did not question the actions of the peacekeepers, while the Dutch authorities rewarded them with military decorations.
