gost 47473
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.729
konfiguracija terena 
-
- Popularno:
- Ana Brnabić glisirala hrvatskom plažom
- Zašto nikad neću da glasam za Europejce...
- Vlasnik ste firme - Da li bi ste...
- Iskoriscavanje pijanih
- Mikloš Horti u Mađarskom parlamentu
- Tehnike za ispitivanje da li vas lažu
- Sprema se veliki protest 1. septembra?...
- N1 мења плочу: од критике високих маржи...
- Šiptari otvorili most u KM za saobraćaj...
- Najbolji seks žene imaju u 36 godini
IRAN PRETI BOMBARDOVANJEM IZRAELA
- Začetnik teme Titus
- Datum pokretanja
- Poruka
- 1.014
Iran and Israel face off over nuclear weapons
AFP
Friday, September 21, 2007
Iran called for UN inspectors to be dispatched to verify whether Israel has nuclear weapons, in a heated showdown with the Jewish state at a meeting of the UN atomic agency Friday.
The face-off between the two nations came as Arab states condemned Israel for hiding an atomic arsenal, at a general conference of the 144-nation International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna.
Iranian envoy Ali Asghar Soltanieh told the conference that IAEA inspectors should be sent "to Israel to verify who is telling the truth."
Israel neither confirms nor denies it has nuclear weapons, but Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had hinted in a German television interview in December 2006 that Israel did in fact have the bomb.Soltanieh's comments came after Israeli ambassador Israel Michaeli told the conference that Arab speakers' assertions that Olmert had said Israel had nuclear weapons were "lies".
As for Arab condemnation of Israel for failing to sign the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and accept IAEA safeguard inspections, Michaeli said: "Those who call for the elimination of Israel have no moral standing when they criticise Israeli policies aimed at defending Israel's very existence."
The 50-year-old IAEA's tradition of consensus on decisions has broken down over Middle East issues, with debate now highly politicized.
Arab states had Thursday pushed through a resolution clearly aimed at Israel, calling for a Middle East free of nuclear weapons.
But it had to go to a vote, even though Israel backs a nuclear weapons-free-zone (NWFZ) within the framework of a Middle East peace settlement.
In the end, the resolution was backed by 53 votes, with two against and 47 abstentions.
Some Western and non-aligned diplomats said Iran was agitating behind the scenes for a showdown over Israel to distract from its own civilian nuclear programme, which is suspected of aiming to make nuclear weapons
On Friday, Omani ambassador Salim Mohammed Al-Riyami presented the agenda item "Israeli nuclear capabilities and threat" saying there was concern over the "failure of the universality" of the NPT since Israel refuses to sign it.
"Israel still benefits from total freedom to develop its nuclear capacities," Al-Riyami told the IAEA, which uses safeguard agreements to monitor compliance with the treaty.
Al-Riyami had said in a document submitted along with the agenda item: "The policies of successive Israeli governments have obstructed the peace process in the Middle East and all initiatives to free the region . . . of weapons of mass destruction, and in particular of nuclear weapons, have failed."
The IAEA also debated a resolution on safeguards, with Western nations pushing through language on strengthening IAEA inspections.
But non-aligned nations which back Iran got the wording weakened somewhat, dropping for instance the word "universally" in a call for strengthened safeguards.
The resolution finally passed with 80 votes in favour, zero against and 12 abstentions.
The general conference approves broad policy lines for the IAEA.
But the IAEA's 35-nation board of governors, which meets separately from the general conference, makes decisions for the agency on how policy is implemented.
In the past at the IAEA's general conference, Arab states introduce a resolution on the Israeli nuclear threat but withdraw it in the face of strong Western opposition.
It is then postponed to the following year in return for Israel agreeing to the call for a NWFZ in the Middle East.
This arrangement fell apart for the first time at last year's general conference, when the NWFZ resolution was forced to a vote and adopted by a vote of 89-2.
AFP
Friday, September 21, 2007
Iran called for UN inspectors to be dispatched to verify whether Israel has nuclear weapons, in a heated showdown with the Jewish state at a meeting of the UN atomic agency Friday.
The face-off between the two nations came as Arab states condemned Israel for hiding an atomic arsenal, at a general conference of the 144-nation International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna.
Iranian envoy Ali Asghar Soltanieh told the conference that IAEA inspectors should be sent "to Israel to verify who is telling the truth."
Israel neither confirms nor denies it has nuclear weapons, but Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had hinted in a German television interview in December 2006 that Israel did in fact have the bomb.Soltanieh's comments came after Israeli ambassador Israel Michaeli told the conference that Arab speakers' assertions that Olmert had said Israel had nuclear weapons were "lies".
As for Arab condemnation of Israel for failing to sign the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and accept IAEA safeguard inspections, Michaeli said: "Those who call for the elimination of Israel have no moral standing when they criticise Israeli policies aimed at defending Israel's very existence."
The 50-year-old IAEA's tradition of consensus on decisions has broken down over Middle East issues, with debate now highly politicized.
Arab states had Thursday pushed through a resolution clearly aimed at Israel, calling for a Middle East free of nuclear weapons.
But it had to go to a vote, even though Israel backs a nuclear weapons-free-zone (NWFZ) within the framework of a Middle East peace settlement.
In the end, the resolution was backed by 53 votes, with two against and 47 abstentions.
Some Western and non-aligned diplomats said Iran was agitating behind the scenes for a showdown over Israel to distract from its own civilian nuclear programme, which is suspected of aiming to make nuclear weapons
On Friday, Omani ambassador Salim Mohammed Al-Riyami presented the agenda item "Israeli nuclear capabilities and threat" saying there was concern over the "failure of the universality" of the NPT since Israel refuses to sign it.
"Israel still benefits from total freedom to develop its nuclear capacities," Al-Riyami told the IAEA, which uses safeguard agreements to monitor compliance with the treaty.
Al-Riyami had said in a document submitted along with the agenda item: "The policies of successive Israeli governments have obstructed the peace process in the Middle East and all initiatives to free the region . . . of weapons of mass destruction, and in particular of nuclear weapons, have failed."
The IAEA also debated a resolution on safeguards, with Western nations pushing through language on strengthening IAEA inspections.
But non-aligned nations which back Iran got the wording weakened somewhat, dropping for instance the word "universally" in a call for strengthened safeguards.
The resolution finally passed with 80 votes in favour, zero against and 12 abstentions.
The general conference approves broad policy lines for the IAEA.
But the IAEA's 35-nation board of governors, which meets separately from the general conference, makes decisions for the agency on how policy is implemented.
In the past at the IAEA's general conference, Arab states introduce a resolution on the Israeli nuclear threat but withdraw it in the face of strong Western opposition.
It is then postponed to the following year in return for Israel agreeing to the call for a NWFZ in the Middle East.
This arrangement fell apart for the first time at last year's general conference, when the NWFZ resolution was forced to a vote and adopted by a vote of 89-2.
gost 94023
Ističe se
- Poruka
- 2.527
E baš volem što će Iran da bombarduje Izrael.Konačno neko da se seti da dokrajči te Jevreje.
- Poruka
- 1.861
islandjanin:
Oy vey, here comes the G_d
Dikan
Domaćin
- Poruka
- 4.849
A što ti plavokosi naci shitu uvek tako upadaš na forum i ostavljaš te glupe poruke na
engleskom.
Yebe mi se i za Iran i za Izrael meni ni iz džepa ni u džep.
Bolje ti je da uzmeš nešto da radiš, da se malo izlečiš od te boleštije
što te drma u glavu.
engleskom.
Yebe mi se i za Iran i za Izrael meni ni iz džepa ni u džep.
Bolje ti je da uzmeš nešto da radiš, da se malo izlečiš od te boleštije
što te drma u glavu.
- Poruka
- 1.014
Ahmadinejad says sanctions won't stop Iran
Hossein Jaseb and Fredrik Dahl
Reuters
Saturday September 22, 2007
Iran told Western powers on Saturday that they would regret launching any attack over Tehran's nuclear activities and it rolled out a display of missiles and other hardware that underscored its warning.
"Our message to the enemies is: Do not do it," the head of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards, Mohammad Ali Jafari, said, speaking to reporters less than a week after France's foreign minister publicly raised the prospect of war.
"They will regret it, as they are regretting it in Iraq," Jafari added, speaking on the sidelines of an annual military parade.
The Islamic Republic put on show medium-range missiles it has previously said could reach Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf at the parade marking the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq conflict.
(Article continues below)
Iran is embroiled in a deepening standoff with the West over its atomic ambitions, which the United States suspects is aimed at making bombs but which Tehran says is solely for generating electricity.
Washington has said it wants a diplomatic resolution to the dispute but has not ruled out military action if that fails.
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner last Sunday raised the specter of war, but has since backed away from the comment.
Iran, the world's fourth-largest oil producer, has threatened to hit back at regional U.S. interests if attacked.
Jafari's words of defiance came a day after major powers, meeting in Washington, said they had "serious and constructive" talks about new U.N. Security Council sanctions aimed at trying to force Iran to halt its sensitive nuclear program.
The officials of the five permanent Security Council members and Germany said they will keep pursuing a "dual track" approach to Iran -- trying to persuade it to abandon such activities via negotiations while considering new sanctions.
"DEATH TO AMERICA"
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, addressing the parade, made clear Tehran would not bow to Western pressure.
"Those who think, that by using such decayed tools as psychological warfare and economic sanctions, they can stop the Iranian nation's progress are making a mistake," he said.
The Islamic Republic showed among its weaponry a type of missile it has said has a range of 2,000 km (1,250 miles) -- enabling it to hit Israel and U.S. bases in the region.
But the television commentator said Shahab-3 had a range of only 1,300 km (812 miles). Another missile at the parade, Ghadr-1, can reach targets 1,800 km (1,125 miles) away, he said. It was believed to be the first time it has been shown publicly.
Troops, tanks, anti-aircraft guns, and armored personnel carriers passed in front of the podium. One truck carried the words "Death to America".
Western military experts say Iranian forces would be no match for U.S. military technology but that they could still create havoc in the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz, through which a large volume of the world's traded oil passes.
Jafari admitted Western powers enjoyed air superiority but suggested Iran would be able to outwit them. Asked how Iran would respond if any country allowed its territory to be used as a base for an attack, he said: "You have seen the missiles -- just pull the trigger and shoot."
Hossein Jaseb and Fredrik Dahl
Reuters
Saturday September 22, 2007
Iran told Western powers on Saturday that they would regret launching any attack over Tehran's nuclear activities and it rolled out a display of missiles and other hardware that underscored its warning.
"Our message to the enemies is: Do not do it," the head of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards, Mohammad Ali Jafari, said, speaking to reporters less than a week after France's foreign minister publicly raised the prospect of war.
"They will regret it, as they are regretting it in Iraq," Jafari added, speaking on the sidelines of an annual military parade.
The Islamic Republic put on show medium-range missiles it has previously said could reach Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf at the parade marking the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq conflict.
(Article continues below)
Iran is embroiled in a deepening standoff with the West over its atomic ambitions, which the United States suspects is aimed at making bombs but which Tehran says is solely for generating electricity.
Washington has said it wants a diplomatic resolution to the dispute but has not ruled out military action if that fails.
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner last Sunday raised the specter of war, but has since backed away from the comment.
Iran, the world's fourth-largest oil producer, has threatened to hit back at regional U.S. interests if attacked.
Jafari's words of defiance came a day after major powers, meeting in Washington, said they had "serious and constructive" talks about new U.N. Security Council sanctions aimed at trying to force Iran to halt its sensitive nuclear program.
The officials of the five permanent Security Council members and Germany said they will keep pursuing a "dual track" approach to Iran -- trying to persuade it to abandon such activities via negotiations while considering new sanctions.
"DEATH TO AMERICA"
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, addressing the parade, made clear Tehran would not bow to Western pressure.
"Those who think, that by using such decayed tools as psychological warfare and economic sanctions, they can stop the Iranian nation's progress are making a mistake," he said.
The Islamic Republic showed among its weaponry a type of missile it has said has a range of 2,000 km (1,250 miles) -- enabling it to hit Israel and U.S. bases in the region.
But the television commentator said Shahab-3 had a range of only 1,300 km (812 miles). Another missile at the parade, Ghadr-1, can reach targets 1,800 km (1,125 miles) away, he said. It was believed to be the first time it has been shown publicly.
Troops, tanks, anti-aircraft guns, and armored personnel carriers passed in front of the podium. One truck carried the words "Death to America".
Western military experts say Iranian forces would be no match for U.S. military technology but that they could still create havoc in the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz, through which a large volume of the world's traded oil passes.
Jafari admitted Western powers enjoyed air superiority but suggested Iran would be able to outwit them. Asked how Iran would respond if any country allowed its territory to be used as a base for an attack, he said: "You have seen the missiles -- just pull the trigger and shoot."
islandjanin
Aktivan član
- Poruka
- 1.775
KoscheiBesmertnii:
Hahaha, ko bre prica o srbima???
Duh Sekire
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 6.686
Markelja:Zar vi zaista mislite da ce njima ostati bombardera da nam uzvrate? I ako ostane koji, da ce taj stici do Izraela?:wink:
Коме "вама" Перковићу!?
Чујем да се у "твом" Израелу буне против "твог" концерта у 'Рвацкој
А Израел ће нестати на овај или онај начин
Duh Sekire
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 6.686
KoscheiBesmertnii:
Ова опаска је веома тачна.
Наиме које су ралике у терминима "небески народ" и "изабран народ"?!
Једна разлика је да се фраза "небески народ" користила у једном периоду националне острашћености у Срба, а још и тада у већини случајева је изговарана веома иронично, да не кажем са подсмехом.
Фраза "изабрани народ" је јеврејска опсесија од кад постоје. Просечан Јеврејин се с тиме не спрда чак су убедили друге народе у тако нешто... рецимо злоупотребом холокауста.
Има још једна разлика
Иначе, што рече Ноле - то је исти ку*ац
Spencer
Ističe se
- Poruka
- 2.035
Ахмединеџад је пајац за јавност. Прави владари Ирана су шиитски имами који конце повлаче иза сцене.
gost 47473
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.729
@ covek koji preti klanjem dece( Duh Sekire),
Gospdine Ivane, pripazite na ponasanje :wink:
@tema
Ne moze da nestane, skoro dve hiljade godina ceknja na drzavu ne moze da unisti jedan ludi predsednik Irana.... tako da i u ovoj kao i u ostalim stvarima gresis.... Mada kakav si psihopata i ne mozes bolje....
Gospdine Ivane, pripazite na ponasanje :wink:
@tema
Ne moze da nestane, skoro dve hiljade godina ceknja na drzavu ne moze da unisti jedan ludi predsednik Irana.... tako da i u ovoj kao i u ostalim stvarima gresis.... Mada kakav si psihopata i ne mozes bolje....
- Poruka
- 219
Ih što neće da se napadaju, pa da se unište medju sobom, ceo ovaj podforum bi častio!
- Poruka
- 1.014
TAJMS: SAD STRAHUJU OD NAPADA IZRAELA NA IRAN
TEL AVIV , 8. novembra (Tanjug) - Izjava iranskog predsednika Mahmuda Ahmedinažada da Iran ima 3.000 operativnih centrifuga za obogaćivanje uranijuma, podstaklo je strah u Vašingtonu da će Izrael odgovoriti preventivnim vojnim udarom, prenose danas izraelski mediji pisanje britanskog lista "Tajmsa".
List se poziva na vojne izvore u Vašingtonu koji kažu da bi navedeni broj centrifuga mogao biti kritična tačka koja će podstaći udar izraelskih vazduhoplovnih snaga. Isti izvori navode da Vašington okleva da napadne Iran, ali da je Izrael "drugačija stvar".
Pentagon je spreman da čeka malo duže, kako su rekli.
Izraelska vojna obaveštajna služba je pre dva dana upozorila da bi Iran mogao imati atomsku bombu već do kraja 2009. godine.
I pre izjave Ahmedinežada, američki odbrambeni zvanicnici su prognozirali da bi "Izrael mogao uraditi nešto kada stignu do oko 3.000 radnih centrifuga".
Zabrinutost da bi Izrael mogao napasti, još više je pojačana nakon udara 6. septembra na ciljeve u Siriji, zapravo na navodno nuklearno postrojenje koje se gradilo u saradnji sa Severnom Korejom.
Nekoliko sati nakon izjave iranskog predsednika, izraelski ministar odbrane Ehud Barak je rekao da je vojna operacija jedna od opcija.
"Mi ne možemo skloniti nijednu opciju sa stola i moramo proučiti operativne aspekte. To nije samo za naredne mesece, već i za naredne dve godine", kazao je Barak, naglasivši da ne može ulaziti u detalje.
Barak smatra da novi razvoj događaja u Iranu znači da Izrael mora da povede ozbiljne diskusije o tom problemu.
"Moramo imati sveobuhvatne diskusije da bi delovali i sprečili, sakupljati obaveštajne informacije i sankcijama", naglasio je izraelski ministar odbrane, objasnivši da svet mora da uvede dodatne diplomatske akcije protiv Irana, kao i ekonomske korake koje će odseći finansiranje razvoja nuklearnog programa.
Ahmedinežad je saopštio da je Iran dostigao prekretnicu sa 3.000 centrifuga potpuno operativnih u programu obogaćivanja uranijuma. On je to rekao pred hiljadama Iranaca u istočnom delu zemlje u Birdžandu, u znak otpora međunarodnim zahtevima da se program zaustavi.
Izrael i Zpada tvrde da je cilj razvoja iranskog nuklearnog programa atomska bomba, što Teheran poriče, navodeći da će služiti u mirnodopske svrhe, za proizvodnju struje.
Izraelski zvaničnici su rekli da ne veruju u najnoviju tvrdnju iranskog predsednika, da misle da on pokušava da stvori utisak da je ta zemlja prešla tačku s koje nema povratka i da će to odvratiti svet od oštrijih sankcija, navodi izraelska stampa.
Izrael smatra Iran najvećom pretnjom po svoju egzistenciju jer je iranski predsednik više puta pozivao na uništenje jevrejske države.
TEL AVIV , 8. novembra (Tanjug) - Izjava iranskog predsednika Mahmuda Ahmedinažada da Iran ima 3.000 operativnih centrifuga za obogaćivanje uranijuma, podstaklo je strah u Vašingtonu da će Izrael odgovoriti preventivnim vojnim udarom, prenose danas izraelski mediji pisanje britanskog lista "Tajmsa".
List se poziva na vojne izvore u Vašingtonu koji kažu da bi navedeni broj centrifuga mogao biti kritična tačka koja će podstaći udar izraelskih vazduhoplovnih snaga. Isti izvori navode da Vašington okleva da napadne Iran, ali da je Izrael "drugačija stvar".
Pentagon je spreman da čeka malo duže, kako su rekli.
Izraelska vojna obaveštajna služba je pre dva dana upozorila da bi Iran mogao imati atomsku bombu već do kraja 2009. godine.
I pre izjave Ahmedinežada, američki odbrambeni zvanicnici su prognozirali da bi "Izrael mogao uraditi nešto kada stignu do oko 3.000 radnih centrifuga".
Zabrinutost da bi Izrael mogao napasti, još više je pojačana nakon udara 6. septembra na ciljeve u Siriji, zapravo na navodno nuklearno postrojenje koje se gradilo u saradnji sa Severnom Korejom.
Nekoliko sati nakon izjave iranskog predsednika, izraelski ministar odbrane Ehud Barak je rekao da je vojna operacija jedna od opcija.
"Mi ne možemo skloniti nijednu opciju sa stola i moramo proučiti operativne aspekte. To nije samo za naredne mesece, već i za naredne dve godine", kazao je Barak, naglasivši da ne može ulaziti u detalje.
Barak smatra da novi razvoj događaja u Iranu znači da Izrael mora da povede ozbiljne diskusije o tom problemu.
"Moramo imati sveobuhvatne diskusije da bi delovali i sprečili, sakupljati obaveštajne informacije i sankcijama", naglasio je izraelski ministar odbrane, objasnivši da svet mora da uvede dodatne diplomatske akcije protiv Irana, kao i ekonomske korake koje će odseći finansiranje razvoja nuklearnog programa.
Ahmedinežad je saopštio da je Iran dostigao prekretnicu sa 3.000 centrifuga potpuno operativnih u programu obogaćivanja uranijuma. On je to rekao pred hiljadama Iranaca u istočnom delu zemlje u Birdžandu, u znak otpora međunarodnim zahtevima da se program zaustavi.
Izrael i Zpada tvrde da je cilj razvoja iranskog nuklearnog programa atomska bomba, što Teheran poriče, navodeći da će služiti u mirnodopske svrhe, za proizvodnju struje.
Izraelski zvaničnici su rekli da ne veruju u najnoviju tvrdnju iranskog predsednika, da misle da on pokušava da stvori utisak da je ta zemlja prešla tačku s koje nema povratka i da će to odvratiti svet od oštrijih sankcija, navodi izraelska stampa.
Izrael smatra Iran najvećom pretnjom po svoju egzistenciju jer je iranski predsednik više puta pozivao na uništenje jevrejske države.
Bojan_BRT
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 29.543
Ispusice amerikanci,pa nije putin dzabe bio u teheranu,ono na kafi...
Ako napadne iran,rusija ce da ih snabdeva svojim sistemima za koje amerikanci jos uvek nemaju odgovor...
I da uzmemo u obzir to da je mentalitet islamskih boraca daleko jaci od zapadnjaka i ta istrajnost ce da se pokaze u borbi.
Koliko se amerika zaduzila i sta je postigla?Nista
Ako napadne iran,rusija ce da ih snabdeva svojim sistemima za koje amerikanci jos uvek nemaju odgovor...
I da uzmemo u obzir to da je mentalitet islamskih boraca daleko jaci od zapadnjaka i ta istrajnost ce da se pokaze u borbi.
Koliko se amerika zaduzila i sta je postigla?Nista
PAWLLE
Poznat
- Poruka
- 8.745
Vec koji put se to ponavlja .............
Zar vi zaista mislite da ce njima ostati bombardera da nam uzvrate? I ako ostane koji, da ce taj stici do Izraela?
u ovom slucaju prvi napad Irana na izrael je najbolja odbrana.
ArnoldLayne
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.103
reče čovek koji se zalaže za jednakost svih
krauterbox
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.492
Humanista i internacionalista.
