engleski

[laura87]

Mislim da "were" uvek ide u IS umesto "was"....ili sam pomesala sa necim ....ne znam.

 

[Kad_LupimLupim]

@winnetou

I was
You were
He, She, It was

We were
You were
They were

Ko pesmica :wink:


I feel as if my head was on fire.
>> Osecam se k'o da mi je glava bila pod vatrom.

I feel as if my head is on fire.
>> Osecam se k'o da mi je glava pod vatrom.

(Ok, ovo "glava pod vatrom" zvuci potpuno glupavo, u pravom prevodu bih rekao "glava mi je (bila) usijana", al' sam se drzao bukvalistike da bi se lakse poredio original i prevod)

 

[Keeper]

ja sam mislio da makar malo znam engleski al sad kad sam vas video vishe nishta ne znam.

 

[spring_storm]

pa sta ce da ti fali i da ne znas ?

 

[winnetou]

@winnetou

I was
You were
He, She, It was

We were
You were
They were

Ko pesmica :wink:

znam to. nego se ponekad koristi he were, i were.. i on ili ona je to sada spomenio/la. i mene zanima da li u jos nekim slucajevima ide tako, osim u kajanju.. isla sam na takmicenje, naravno da znam da ide tako kao pesmica :wink:

 

[miss]

@winnetou

I was
You were
He, She, It was

We were
You were
They were

Ko pesmica :wink:

znam to. nego se ponekad koristi he were, i were.. i on ili ona je to sada spomenio/la. i mene zanima da li u jos nekim slucajevima ide tako, osim u kajanju.. isla sam na takmicenje, naravno da znam da ide tako kao pesmica :wink:

to ide kad je drugi kondicional...jupili sto sam pametna...buahahahaaa 8)

 

[Turn off the light]

ja sam mislio da makar malo znam engleski al sad kad sam vas video vishe nishta ne znam.

i ja!!!

p.s. moze I were, recimo:

"if I were you, i would..."

 

[winnetou]

ja sam mislio da makar malo znam engleski al sad kad sam vas video vishe nishta ne znam.

i ja!!!

p.s. moze I were, recimo:

"if I were you, i would..."

pa da, kada je nemoguca situacija.. aaa, secam se sada tog casa..

 

[Moon Child]

A meni se činilo da njemu head nije stvarno on fire, a to bi bila unreal situation, tako da i dalje mislim da tu ide subjunctive... Što se tiče primera znam da su debilni, izvinjavam se, ali samo to sam na brzinu našla......

da, ali to head on fire je fraza... bar sam ja tako skontala. ne prevodis bukvalno...

 

[tanja_cudo]

Prvo. Mozes samo da kazes he said he could do a lot for me, a mozes i da ubacis ono that.

 

[tanja_cudo]

i nemoj da te zbunjuje ono drugo jer ako napise, he said he could have done a lot for me, posle ako hoces da kazes samo sta je on rekao bilo bi " i could have done a lot for u"

 

[bleach]

Prvo. Mozes samo da kazes he said he could do a lot for me, a mozes i da ubacis ono that.

:da: slazhem se potpuno i apsolutno! (8

 

[bigsister]

He said: 'I could do a lot for you'
ako je u ovoj rechenici 'could' u smislu 'mogao' (proshlo vreme) onda je tachno:
2. He said he could have done a lot for me ?
ako je 'could' sa znachenjem 'mogao bi' (potencijal), onda je tachno
1. He said he could do a lot for me...
ako rechenica nije izvuchena iz kontexta onda je
2. He said he could have done a lot for me ?

 

[mslav]

He said that he could do a lot for me.
I to je to, kraj rasprave.
8)
Dobro je da je tu bigsis. da me ispravi...

 

[mslav]

A sto joj je to potrebno???
Neka lepo objasni to sto smo mi napisali...

 

[Tusenfryd]

Drugo drugo drugo
Sto posto, slaganje vremena... bilo bi previshe jednostavno da je prvo. Naravno, ne kazhem samo zbog toga.... e chekate, sad cju ja da pitam svog dragog koji je ovog meseca polagao CAE

 

[bleach]

i... jesi li ga pitala? (:

a ja i dalje mislim da je prvo u pitanju. jeste slaganje vremena, i vreme je slozheno () u tom sluchaju, samo shto se poklapa taj oblik (could). uf, al' sam razumljiva...