Gost377586
Veoma poznat
- Poruka
- 11.136
*znam da je spominjano ranije al ako je bila vec tema izbrisite..
**ovo je vise slobodan prevod teksta
http://peacefulwarriors.net/india-declares-dolphins-to-be-non-human-persons-dolphin-shows-banned-2/
Agency American Associations
Amusement Parks Animal Right
India Declares Dolphins To Be “Non-Human Persons”, Dolphin Shows Banned
AUGUST 15, 2014 / 43576 VIEWS
1
India’s Ministry of Environment and Forests has decided to forbid the keeping of captive dolphins for public entertainment anywhere in the country.
*ministarstvo za zastitu prirode i suma u indiji je odlucilo da zabrani cuvanje delfina u zarobljenistvu,radi ljudske zabave,u bilo kom delu te zemlje..
In a policy statement released Friday, the ministry advised state governments to reject any proposal to establish a dolphinarium “by any person / persons, organizations, government agencies, private or public enterprises that involves import, capture of cetacean species to establish for commercial entertainment, private or public exhibition and interaction purposes whatsoever.”
*u izjavi objavljenoj proslog petka ministarstvo je savetovalo sve drzavne vlasti da odbiju bilo koji predlog za osnivanje delifinarijuma(vodenog parka) od strane:
bilo koga......cime se zabranjuje uvoz,zarobljavanje te vrste zivorinja radi komercijalne zabave,privatnog ili javnog prikazivanja itd..
Why?
“Whereas cetaceans in general are highly intelligent and sensitive, and various scientists who have researched dolphin behavior have suggested that the unusually high intelligence; as compared to other animals means that dolphins should be seen as ‘non-human persons’ and as such should have their own specific rights and is morally unacceptable to keep them captive for entertainment purpose,” the ministry said.
zasto?
naucnici si utvrdili da si delfini izuzetno inteligentne zivotinje.znatno vise u odnosu na druge vrste,i da ih kao takve treba tretirati kao
'neljudske osobe' sto znaci da imaju odredjena prava i moralno je neprihvatljivo drzati ih u zatocenistvu..
I was surprised to read about this the other night, since it happened back in May and somehow escaped worldwide attention and the 24 hour media hoopla. The effort to re-categorize Cetaceans (dolphins, whales, porpoises) as non-human persons has been gathering steam since a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2011 where a group of philosophers, conservationists, and animal behaviorists attempted to gather wide support for a Declaration of Rights for Cetaceans from the scientific community.
The Declaration:
1. Every individual cetacean has the right to life.
2. No cetacean should be held in captivity or servitude; be subject to cruel treatment; or be removed from their natural environment.
3. All cetaceans have the right to freedom of movement and residence within their natural environment.
4. No cetacean is the property of any State, corporation, human group or individual.
5. Cetaceans have the right to the protection of their natural environment.
6. Cetaceans have the right not to be subject to the disruption of their cultures.
7. The rights, freedoms and norms set forth in this Declaration should be protected under international and domestic law.
And what does it mean to say an animal has “rights”?
“Unlike[…] positive rights, such as the ‘right’ to education or health care, the animal right is, at bottom, a right to be left alone. It does not call for government to tax us in order to provide animals with food, shelter, and veterinary care. It only requires us to stop killing them and making them suffer.”
i sta znace zivotinjska prava?pa u osnovi zabranjuje se njihovo zarobljavanje i mucenje..a poseldice uvodjenja ovih pravila bi bile i zatvaranje akvaparkova i oslobadjanje delfina iz istih,i iz zooloskih vrtova itd..
Seems reasonable enough. Considering dolphin intelligence has been long been established, this declaration doesn’t seem to be a particularly radical move. They exhibit self-awareness, use tools, cooperate to solve tasks, and very recently it was found that they possibly communicate to each other using individual names. The major real world implications of declaring them non-human persons would be the closing of dolphin and orca shows at marine parks, setting them free from aquariums and zoos, and a prohibition against kills, such as the one documented in Academy Award winning movie The Cove.
Like this article? Then join the Conversation with many others in EWAO !
Of course, the biggest implication is the whole idea of creating a new category of non-human persons. Do we stop at dolphins and whales? And, if not, where do we draw the line? Once we give rights to some animals how do we justify our continued exploitation of others?
naravno najvaznija stvar u svemu ovome je sto se stvara posebna kategorija "neljudskih bica"..da li je dovoljno da tim terminom obuhvatimo samo delfine i kitove,ili ga treba prosiriti i na dr zivotinje?sta vi.mislite,ako je odgovor da,koje z bi vi ubacili u ovu kategoriju i zasto?
**ovo je vise slobodan prevod teksta
http://peacefulwarriors.net/india-declares-dolphins-to-be-non-human-persons-dolphin-shows-banned-2/
Agency American Associations
Amusement Parks Animal Right
India Declares Dolphins To Be “Non-Human Persons”, Dolphin Shows Banned
AUGUST 15, 2014 / 43576 VIEWS
1
India’s Ministry of Environment and Forests has decided to forbid the keeping of captive dolphins for public entertainment anywhere in the country.
*ministarstvo za zastitu prirode i suma u indiji je odlucilo da zabrani cuvanje delfina u zarobljenistvu,radi ljudske zabave,u bilo kom delu te zemlje..
In a policy statement released Friday, the ministry advised state governments to reject any proposal to establish a dolphinarium “by any person / persons, organizations, government agencies, private or public enterprises that involves import, capture of cetacean species to establish for commercial entertainment, private or public exhibition and interaction purposes whatsoever.”
*u izjavi objavljenoj proslog petka ministarstvo je savetovalo sve drzavne vlasti da odbiju bilo koji predlog za osnivanje delifinarijuma(vodenog parka) od strane:
bilo koga......cime se zabranjuje uvoz,zarobljavanje te vrste zivorinja radi komercijalne zabave,privatnog ili javnog prikazivanja itd..
Why?
“Whereas cetaceans in general are highly intelligent and sensitive, and various scientists who have researched dolphin behavior have suggested that the unusually high intelligence; as compared to other animals means that dolphins should be seen as ‘non-human persons’ and as such should have their own specific rights and is morally unacceptable to keep them captive for entertainment purpose,” the ministry said.
zasto?
naucnici si utvrdili da si delfini izuzetno inteligentne zivotinje.znatno vise u odnosu na druge vrste,i da ih kao takve treba tretirati kao
'neljudske osobe' sto znaci da imaju odredjena prava i moralno je neprihvatljivo drzati ih u zatocenistvu..
I was surprised to read about this the other night, since it happened back in May and somehow escaped worldwide attention and the 24 hour media hoopla. The effort to re-categorize Cetaceans (dolphins, whales, porpoises) as non-human persons has been gathering steam since a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2011 where a group of philosophers, conservationists, and animal behaviorists attempted to gather wide support for a Declaration of Rights for Cetaceans from the scientific community.
The Declaration:
1. Every individual cetacean has the right to life.
2. No cetacean should be held in captivity or servitude; be subject to cruel treatment; or be removed from their natural environment.
3. All cetaceans have the right to freedom of movement and residence within their natural environment.
4. No cetacean is the property of any State, corporation, human group or individual.
5. Cetaceans have the right to the protection of their natural environment.
6. Cetaceans have the right not to be subject to the disruption of their cultures.
7. The rights, freedoms and norms set forth in this Declaration should be protected under international and domestic law.
And what does it mean to say an animal has “rights”?
“Unlike[…] positive rights, such as the ‘right’ to education or health care, the animal right is, at bottom, a right to be left alone. It does not call for government to tax us in order to provide animals with food, shelter, and veterinary care. It only requires us to stop killing them and making them suffer.”
i sta znace zivotinjska prava?pa u osnovi zabranjuje se njihovo zarobljavanje i mucenje..a poseldice uvodjenja ovih pravila bi bile i zatvaranje akvaparkova i oslobadjanje delfina iz istih,i iz zooloskih vrtova itd..
Seems reasonable enough. Considering dolphin intelligence has been long been established, this declaration doesn’t seem to be a particularly radical move. They exhibit self-awareness, use tools, cooperate to solve tasks, and very recently it was found that they possibly communicate to each other using individual names. The major real world implications of declaring them non-human persons would be the closing of dolphin and orca shows at marine parks, setting them free from aquariums and zoos, and a prohibition against kills, such as the one documented in Academy Award winning movie The Cove.
Like this article? Then join the Conversation with many others in EWAO !
Of course, the biggest implication is the whole idea of creating a new category of non-human persons. Do we stop at dolphins and whales? And, if not, where do we draw the line? Once we give rights to some animals how do we justify our continued exploitation of others?
naravno najvaznija stvar u svemu ovome je sto se stvara posebna kategorija "neljudskih bica"..da li je dovoljno da tim terminom obuhvatimo samo delfine i kitove,ili ga treba prosiriti i na dr zivotinje?sta vi.mislite,ako je odgovor da,koje z bi vi ubacili u ovu kategoriju i zasto?
..al ajd dr tema)i najvise me nerviraju oni sto krenu sa pricom
koristeci neku ribu
