Englands antiserbian actions now and in history
Thursday, November 14th. February 2019. UK Ambassador Karen Pierce, at the last session of the UN Security Council, has outlined the interpretation of resolution 1244, under which if something is not expressly prohibited, then the formation of "The Army of Kosovo " is allowed. Friday, October 8. February 2019. Great Britain reiterated the request for the so-called. Kosovo is permanently removed from the United Nations Security Council agenda. Wednesday, August 2018. For the first time in 18 years, a report by the UN Secretary General on the situation on the so-called. Kosovo and the work of Unmika. The Great Britain that is chairing this body's work has not put this issue on the agenda.
November, 2017. Following Surin's decision to withdraw its decision to recognise Kosovo, the UK is drawing an extremely inappropriate and unusual diplomatic move: a protest against Surinamo. Hashim Thaci praises the UK: "Kosovo's independence carries a huge stamp of London." Wednesday, October 8. July 2015. The UK presents the UN Security Council with a proposal for the Srebrenica resolution, which is an attempt to declare Serbia and Republika Srpska the only ones responsible for the atrocities in BiH and to stamp our entire people as genocid.
The rewinding of the chroniclers of a few days could bring us back and the century and a half ago and lead to the ancient "Srebrenica resolution", when far 1876. In the time of the Serbian-Turkish War, Benjamin Dizraeli, the president of the British Government, accused Serbia of leading "a hate and criminal war against all principles of public morality and honour". The Serbian national-liberation battle called the "Serbian conspiracy assisted by the Russian money and Russian soldiers". He looked forward to every Serbian defeat, and in autumn 1877. He suggested to the Austrians to occupy her.
The Srbophobia, which has spent almost two centuries in the heads of the strategist in London, has reported for only one reason--fear that Serbs "are the main cavalry of Russian cosars on hot waters of the Mediterranean". As a result, since the outbreak of the First Serbian uprising, the main direction of British foreign policy was to preserve Turkey's territorial integrity. The Berlin Congress has disabled Serbia's enlargement in the South, and Bosnia and Herzegovina is practically donated to Austria. Members of the British delegation, Lords Russell and Solsbury, in Berlin, treated Serbia as if they were in an open war with her.
The principles of this policy are largely held by the English at the beginning of the 20th century. Century. After the Maysky coup 1903. And the murders of King Alexander Obrenovic, London interrupts diplomatic relations with Belgrade. The boycott lasts for three years: Nikola Pasic with the diplomatic game, pledging that British firms will build a railroad track from Belgrade to the Adriatic, to make the headquarter of the gentlemen off the shores of the Thames. Meanwhile, London has gradually grown to the belief that their main enemy is not Russia, but Germany, and its aggressive foreign, imperial policy in the Balkans. That's how they change their policies towards the Serbian people and his country. Anacxia BiH and the Balkan Wars contributed more positive treatment between Serbia and Serbs in the British political life and the public. Still, its turkophilic policy will continue until Turkey's entry in the First World War, to the side of the central forces in the fall of 1914. Year.
The importance of the Serbian military in the crackdown on the Central Powers was the only reason the English, occasionally, had been "broad hands" and offered Serbia various territorial extensions to the Western Balkans. But it only happened as long as the war lasted and the final outcome was not certain. The end of World War I has made a change in borders, but not a change of world policy relation to the Serbian issue, which, as we see, remains until today.