Autorska tema
Zasto su se svi digili protiv srpskog litijuma ? Niko nema sta srpski litijum imade ?
Da litijum treba da se kopa bilo gdre u svetu ne bi bio problem, ali u Srbiji je problem ?
U cemu je problem ? Zasto se svi boje sikopavanja srpskog litijuma ?
Љиљана Смајловић: Литијум узнемирава и власт у Приштини и антисрпске западне аналитичаре
https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/...t-u-Pristini-i-antisrpske-zapadne-analiticare
За ову власт литијум није полигон за политичку борбу
https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/633763/Za-ovu-vlast-litijum-nije-poligon-za-politicku-borbu
Zato što tvoji gazde iz ljubljenog vam Danke Deutschland-a jako vole Srbe pa brinu za njihovo zdravlje.
Možda bi i da malo lupetaš o tome da Bodo Srboljub Veber to “nije rekao”? Ili da su “pogrešno preneli”?
Gle šta kaže tvoja Ostpolitik, inače, ljubljeni ti neuporedivi Germani neosetno ulaze i u klinč i sa Amerikom, hiće ljudi da samostalno gospodare nad EU.
There is no genuine study that would shed light on the source of the attitude of Western diplomacy today in relation to Serbia and specifically the “Serbian World” project, but the perception that this diplomacy, or rather this generation of diplomats, is failing again in relation to Balkans, is increasingly acceptable in critical Western intellectual circles.
But if the German Chancellor, Olaf Scholz, promised a new course after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which he described as a Zeitvende [Turning Point], he is meanwhile repeating the same mistake with Serbia, even signing the agreement on Serbian lithium that keeps the autocrat Vucic in power, completely ignoring the values on which the EU was founded.
The German analyst, Bodo Weber, in an interview for the Serbian newspaper “Danas”, spoke about the agreement between the European Union, Germany and Belgrade on lithium.[6]Commenting on the press conference of Chancellor Scholz and Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, including the Kosova issue, Weber did not fail to underline the phenomenon of the fall of Western diplomacy into the Serbian trap, somewhat similar to that of the beginning of the Cold War, when specific interests prevailed over the ideological ones.
All of this is happening according to
Weber, therefore, with this move by the EU, this community is opening the door to the third phase of softening Serbia.
He says that the tragedy of this policy of appeasement “much more than its moral dimension — that is,
the betrayal of the liberal-democratic values of the West itself, has to do with the fact that this policy, according to the Vučić regime, has already been proven to has failed”.
Weber, as always direct, underlines that this has failed in an “episode of territorial exchange, where the region, and therefore Europe, narrowly avoided wider destabilization and violent escalation on a wider scale. Therefore, this policy of exchanging one interest for another, while serving to satisfy one interest in the short term, at the same time, in the long term, completely undermines the other strategic interests of Germany, the EU and the West. as a whole, with incalculable consequences”.[7]
https://www.eurasiareview.com/14082...piritual-unity-and-strategic-advantages-oped/