kristiansand
Veoma poznat
- Poruka
- 10.393
Poslednja izmena:
-
- Popularno:
- Vučić: Umoran sam i iscrpljen od toga...
- Zašto Andrei, Rumun sa interneta, mrzi...
- Da li Picula treba da bude prinudni...
- Maslac u Nemačkoj dzabe.
- Синиша Мали: БДП по глави становника у...
- "Tvrđenje pazara" prilikom muvanja
- Tipovi muskaraca koji se najbolje...
- Šta ako bi sutra Srbija postala EU...
- šta ovo znači?
- Помоћ при читању писма
RAT U LIBIJI
- Začetnik teme Paganko
- Datum pokretanja
- stanje
akomoze
Poznat
- Poruka
- 7.257
Dio intervjua sa ambasadorom Libije u BiH, dnevnik RT Republike Srpske .
od 17:20 do 21:50
15 aprila u 18:00 kompletna emisija
http://lat.rtrs.tv/av/player.php?id=12496&x=1
od 17:20 do 21:50
15 aprila u 18:00 kompletna emisija
http://lat.rtrs.tv/av/player.php?id=12496&x=1
kristiansand
Veoma poznat
- Poruka
- 10.393
Poslednja izmena:
Lepi Bora
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 38.422
Libya: The DC/NATO Agenda and the Next Great War
by Paul Craig Roberts
April 7, 2011
This article was originally published by the Trends Research Institute. It has been republished here with permission from the author.
In the 1930s, the US, Great Britain, and the Netherlands set a course for World War II in the Pacific by conspiring against Japan. The three governments seized Japan’s bank accounts in their countries that Japan used to pay for imports and cut Japan off from oil, rubber, tin, iron and other vital materials. Was Pearl Harbor Japan’s response?
Now Washington and its NATO puppets are employing the same strategy against China.
Protests in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain, and Yemen arose from the people protesting against Washington’s tyrannical puppet governments. However, the protests against Gaddafi, who is not a Western puppet, appear to have been organized by the CIA in the eastern part of Libya, where the oil is and where China has substantial energy investments.
Eighty percent of Libya’s oil reserves are believed to be in the Sirte Basin in eastern Libya, now controlled by rebels supported by Washington. As seventy percent of Libya’s GDP is produced by oil, a successful partitioning of Libya would leave Gaddafi’s Tripoli-based regime impoverished.
The People’s Daily Online (March 23) reported that China has 50 large-scale projects in Libya. The outbreak of hostilities has halted these projects and resulted in 30,000 Chinese workers being evacuated from Libya. Chinese companies report that they expect to lose hundreds of millions of yuan.
China is relying on Africa, principally Libya, Angola, and Nigeria, for future energy needs. In response to China’s economic engagement with Africa, Washington is engaging the continent militarily with the US African Command (AFRICOM) created by President George W. Bush in 2007. Forty-nine African countries agreed to participate with Washington in AFRICOM, but Gaddafi refused, thus creating a second reason for Washington to target Libya for takeover.
A third reason for targeting Libya is that Libya and Syria are the only two countries with Mediterranean sea coasts that are not under the control or influence of Washington. Suggestively, protests also have broken out in Syria. Whatever Syrians might think of their government, after watching Iraq’s fate, and now Libya’s, it is unlikely that Syrians would set themselves up for US military intervention. Both the CIA and Mossad are known to use social networking sites to foment protests and to spread disinformation. These intelligence services are the likely conspirators that the Syrian and Libyan governments blame for the protests.
Caught off guard by protests in Tunisia and Egypt, Washington realized that protests could be used to remove Gaddafi and Assad. The humanitarian excuse for intervening in Libya is not credible, considering Washington’s go-ahead to the Saudi military to crush the protests in Bahrain, the home base for the US Fifth Fleet.
If Washington succeeds in overthrowing the Assad government in Syria, Russia would lose its Mediterranean naval base at the Syrian port of Tartus. Thus, Washington has much to gain if it can use the cloak of popular rebellion to eject both China and Russia from the Mediterranean. Rome’s mare nostrum (“our sea”) would become Washington’s mare nostrum.
“Gaddafi must go,” declared Obama. How long before we also hear, “Assad must go?”
The American captive press is at work demonizing both Gaddafi and Assad, an eye doctor who returned to Syria from London to head the government after his father’s death.
The hypocrisy passes unremarked when Obama calls Gaddafi and Assad dictators. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the American president has been a Caesar. Based on nothing more than a Justice Department memo, George W. Bush was declared to be above US statutory law, international law, and the power of Congress as long as he was acting in his role as commander-in-chief in the “war on terror.”
Caesar Obama has done Bush one step better. Caesar Obama has taken the US to war against Libya without even the pretense of asking Congress for authorization. This is an impeachable offense, but an impotent Congress is unable to protect its power. By accepting the claims of executive authority, Congress has acquiesced to Caesarism. The American people have no more control over their government than do people in countries ruled by dictators.
Washington’s quest for world hegemony is driving the world toward World War III. China is no less proud than was Japan in the 1930s and is unlikely to submit to being bullied and governed by what China regards as the decadent West. Russia’s resentment to its military encirclement is rising. Washington’s hubris can lead to fatal miscalculation.
A evo i glavnog pregovaraca Africke Unije - na svadbi sa 5 zenom ...
by Paul Craig Roberts
April 7, 2011
This article was originally published by the Trends Research Institute. It has been republished here with permission from the author.
In the 1930s, the US, Great Britain, and the Netherlands set a course for World War II in the Pacific by conspiring against Japan. The three governments seized Japan’s bank accounts in their countries that Japan used to pay for imports and cut Japan off from oil, rubber, tin, iron and other vital materials. Was Pearl Harbor Japan’s response?
Now Washington and its NATO puppets are employing the same strategy against China.
Protests in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain, and Yemen arose from the people protesting against Washington’s tyrannical puppet governments. However, the protests against Gaddafi, who is not a Western puppet, appear to have been organized by the CIA in the eastern part of Libya, where the oil is and where China has substantial energy investments.
Eighty percent of Libya’s oil reserves are believed to be in the Sirte Basin in eastern Libya, now controlled by rebels supported by Washington. As seventy percent of Libya’s GDP is produced by oil, a successful partitioning of Libya would leave Gaddafi’s Tripoli-based regime impoverished.
The People’s Daily Online (March 23) reported that China has 50 large-scale projects in Libya. The outbreak of hostilities has halted these projects and resulted in 30,000 Chinese workers being evacuated from Libya. Chinese companies report that they expect to lose hundreds of millions of yuan.
China is relying on Africa, principally Libya, Angola, and Nigeria, for future energy needs. In response to China’s economic engagement with Africa, Washington is engaging the continent militarily with the US African Command (AFRICOM) created by President George W. Bush in 2007. Forty-nine African countries agreed to participate with Washington in AFRICOM, but Gaddafi refused, thus creating a second reason for Washington to target Libya for takeover.
A third reason for targeting Libya is that Libya and Syria are the only two countries with Mediterranean sea coasts that are not under the control or influence of Washington. Suggestively, protests also have broken out in Syria. Whatever Syrians might think of their government, after watching Iraq’s fate, and now Libya’s, it is unlikely that Syrians would set themselves up for US military intervention. Both the CIA and Mossad are known to use social networking sites to foment protests and to spread disinformation. These intelligence services are the likely conspirators that the Syrian and Libyan governments blame for the protests.
Caught off guard by protests in Tunisia and Egypt, Washington realized that protests could be used to remove Gaddafi and Assad. The humanitarian excuse for intervening in Libya is not credible, considering Washington’s go-ahead to the Saudi military to crush the protests in Bahrain, the home base for the US Fifth Fleet.
If Washington succeeds in overthrowing the Assad government in Syria, Russia would lose its Mediterranean naval base at the Syrian port of Tartus. Thus, Washington has much to gain if it can use the cloak of popular rebellion to eject both China and Russia from the Mediterranean. Rome’s mare nostrum (“our sea”) would become Washington’s mare nostrum.
“Gaddafi must go,” declared Obama. How long before we also hear, “Assad must go?”
The American captive press is at work demonizing both Gaddafi and Assad, an eye doctor who returned to Syria from London to head the government after his father’s death.
The hypocrisy passes unremarked when Obama calls Gaddafi and Assad dictators. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the American president has been a Caesar. Based on nothing more than a Justice Department memo, George W. Bush was declared to be above US statutory law, international law, and the power of Congress as long as he was acting in his role as commander-in-chief in the “war on terror.”
Caesar Obama has done Bush one step better. Caesar Obama has taken the US to war against Libya without even the pretense of asking Congress for authorization. This is an impeachable offense, but an impotent Congress is unable to protect its power. By accepting the claims of executive authority, Congress has acquiesced to Caesarism. The American people have no more control over their government than do people in countries ruled by dictators.
Washington’s quest for world hegemony is driving the world toward World War III. China is no less proud than was Japan in the 1930s and is unlikely to submit to being bullied and governed by what China regards as the decadent West. Russia’s resentment to its military encirclement is rising. Washington’s hubris can lead to fatal miscalculation.
A evo i glavnog pregovaraca Africke Unije - na svadbi sa 5 zenom ...
Astrica
Poznat
- Poruka
- 8.182
Politika, Svijet
Ponedjeljak, 11.04.2011.
Tagovi: Libija, Moamer Gadafi
08:38
Gadafi prihvatio "mirovne smjernice" Afričke unije
Izaslanstvo AU-a danas treba posjetiti Bengazi, uporište libijskih pobunjenika, gdje će ih pokušati uvjeriti da polože oružje
Moamer Gadafi prihvatio je "mirovne smjernice" za miran ishod sukoba u Libiji na prijedlog izaslanstva AU-a koje u ponedjeljak treba posjetiti Bengazi, uporište libijskih pobunjenika, u pokušaju uvjeravanja pobunjenika da polože oružje.
Objavu je iznio južnoafrički predsjednik Jacob Zuma u nedjelju kasno navečer, nakon sastanka libijskog čelnika i izaslanstva u Tripoliju.
Izaslanstvo AU-a došlo je založiti se za prekid sukoba u kojima su smrtno stradalo najmanje 23 osobe od subote u Adžabiji i Misrati, prema medicinskim i pobunjeničkim izvorima. NATO je iznio "beznadnu" situaciju u ta dva grada i obećao nastavak bombardiranja radi razoružavanja libijskog režima.
Pukovnik Gadafi primio je u šatoru u svojoj rezidenciji Bab al-Azizija izaslanstvo AU-a sastavljeno od predsjednika JAR-a, Malija, Mauritanije i Konga, kao i ugandskog ministra vanjskih poslova.
Tijekom večeri Zuma je dao kratku izjavu novinarima u kojoj kaže da je "izaslanstvo brata vođe prihvatilo mirovne smjernice koje smo predložili" i poziva "NATO da prekine zračne napade kako bi se dala prilika prekidu vatre".
Međutim, predstavnik vodstva libijske oporbe u inozemstvu, Guma al Gamati, izjavio je za britanski BBC da pobunjeničke i proturežimske libijske snage neće prihvatiti nijedan sporazum u kojem Gadafi i njegovi sinovi ostaju na svojim dužnostima. Libijska oporba i pobunjenici od početke sukoba zahtijevaju da se Gadafi povuče, što libijski vođa odbija. (H)
Monitor.hr
Ponedjeljak, 11.04.2011.
Tagovi: Libija, Moamer Gadafi
08:38
Gadafi prihvatio "mirovne smjernice" Afričke unije
Izaslanstvo AU-a danas treba posjetiti Bengazi, uporište libijskih pobunjenika, gdje će ih pokušati uvjeriti da polože oružje
Moamer Gadafi prihvatio je "mirovne smjernice" za miran ishod sukoba u Libiji na prijedlog izaslanstva AU-a koje u ponedjeljak treba posjetiti Bengazi, uporište libijskih pobunjenika, u pokušaju uvjeravanja pobunjenika da polože oružje.
Objavu je iznio južnoafrički predsjednik Jacob Zuma u nedjelju kasno navečer, nakon sastanka libijskog čelnika i izaslanstva u Tripoliju.
Izaslanstvo AU-a došlo je založiti se za prekid sukoba u kojima su smrtno stradalo najmanje 23 osobe od subote u Adžabiji i Misrati, prema medicinskim i pobunjeničkim izvorima. NATO je iznio "beznadnu" situaciju u ta dva grada i obećao nastavak bombardiranja radi razoružavanja libijskog režima.
Pukovnik Gadafi primio je u šatoru u svojoj rezidenciji Bab al-Azizija izaslanstvo AU-a sastavljeno od predsjednika JAR-a, Malija, Mauritanije i Konga, kao i ugandskog ministra vanjskih poslova.
Tijekom večeri Zuma je dao kratku izjavu novinarima u kojoj kaže da je "izaslanstvo brata vođe prihvatilo mirovne smjernice koje smo predložili" i poziva "NATO da prekine zračne napade kako bi se dala prilika prekidu vatre".
Međutim, predstavnik vodstva libijske oporbe u inozemstvu, Guma al Gamati, izjavio je za britanski BBC da pobunjeničke i proturežimske libijske snage neće prihvatiti nijedan sporazum u kojem Gadafi i njegovi sinovi ostaju na svojim dužnostima. Libijska oporba i pobunjenici od početke sukoba zahtijevaju da se Gadafi povuče, što libijski vođa odbija. (H)
Monitor.hr
Poznavalac stvari
Legenda
- Poruka
- 60.338
Овај НАТО је толико оронуо да се то не може описати.
Пате се с том Либијом без икаквих резултата.
Да овај назови преЦедник, а у своје време министар одбране, није овако схебао војску, одерали би смо их без проблема и за три недеље избили на Атлантик!
И то без Руске асистенције!!!
Пате се с том Либијом без икаквих резултата.
Да овај назови преЦедник, а у своје време министар одбране, није овако схебао војску, одерали би смо их без проблема и за три недеље избили на Атлантик!
И то без Руске асистенције!!!
Добро дошли
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 27.854
NATO pozdravlja predlog Afričke unije o primirju u Libiji
Autor: Beta
NATO se danas upoznao sa predlogom Afričke unije o uspostavljanju prekida vatre u Libiji i pozdravlja sve inicijative koje vode ka zaustavljanju nasilja protiv civila, saopštila je danas portparolka Alijanse Oana Lungesku.
http://www.danas.rs/danasrs/iz_sata...ije_o_primirju_u_libiji.83.html?news_id=32866
**********************************************************
Либијски проблем, као врућ кестен, прелази из руке у руку. Најпре Амери (који су и иницијатори побуне у Либији), предали кестен НАТО-у а када се појавила Афричка унија, НАТО је то једва дочекао да га се и он ослободи.
Верујем да ће Гадафи и Афричка унија решити настали проблем, инициран споља, на обострано задовољство.
Добро је што се показала слабост и Амера и НАТО силеџија.
Autor: Beta
NATO se danas upoznao sa predlogom Afričke unije o uspostavljanju prekida vatre u Libiji i pozdravlja sve inicijative koje vode ka zaustavljanju nasilja protiv civila, saopštila je danas portparolka Alijanse Oana Lungesku.
http://www.danas.rs/danasrs/iz_sata...ije_o_primirju_u_libiji.83.html?news_id=32866
**********************************************************
Либијски проблем, као врућ кестен, прелази из руке у руку. Најпре Амери (који су и иницијатори побуне у Либији), предали кестен НАТО-у а када се појавила Афричка унија, НАТО је то једва дочекао да га се и он ослободи.
Верујем да ће Гадафи и Афричка унија решити настали проблем, инициран споља, на обострано задовољство.
Добро је што се показала слабост и Амера и НАТО силеџија.
Poslednja izmena:
Brzi Bravari Srbije
Veoma poznat
- Poruka
- 12.987
ko sto rekoh...Gadafi ce pobediti....
crni lepotan
Elita
- Poruka
- 21.393
sta ce nam ti Rusi? oni su ionako samo teret ovako lepo bi se dogovorili o podeli Evrope sa Lukasenkom i sve bi bilo sredjeno
crni lepotan
Elita
- Poruka
- 21.393
naravno, svi moji prijatelji su pobednici, tako i Gadafi
ZIVEO GADAFI!!! ZIVELA SRBIJA!!!
- Poruka
- 3.883
to su neka druga vrimena...
Astrica
Poznat
- Poruka
- 8.182
Wrong.Jesi ti ćorav? U pitanju je nafta.Nego pisalo je da Gadafi ubija i djecu civile.Al sve je to opravdano.
Libija je jedna zemlja koja je cisto musolimanska i mogu vam reci da sami muslimani mogu se brinuti o sebi jer oni imaju Serijat i mogu da se sude i da uspostave mir i red u zemlji.To je rasizam sto se ovdje spominje da bijeli covjek treba staviti pod tutorstvo Arape i Crnce i tako upravljati njima.To vise nece proci i ta vremena su prosla jer bijeli covjek ne mopze upravljati civilizacijom koju imaju Arapi i koju su imali vjeokvima tako da su se muslimani sudili Serijatom u svijetu civilizacijskog razvitka Islamskog Kalifata i da jedino Serijat moze da bude pravni sistem Islamske zemlje.Sada kad se Libijski narod bori za slobodu mi moramo podrzati taj narod u zelji da se oslobodi i da svrgne diktatora Gadhafija koji vlada vec 42 godine i to je mnogo i narod zeli promijene i zeli da se Libijom vlada putem volje naroda jer jedino narod moze izabrati najboljeg predsjednika i najboljeg lidera.
- Poruka
- 3.883
legendo,znas kad su arapi bili civilizacija.kad NISU bili muslimani,i kad su se vodili pod,perzijanci.e,to je onda bila najjaca civilizacija ondasnjeg svijeta.cim su se poislamili otislo je sve u milokliz.ebajiga,nemere niti jedna civilizacija napredovati, ako se pet-puta na dan klanja,kleci,moli,NERADI...
Ti si rasista i pobornik teze Adolfa Hitlera!! Jesil cuo za Umajade i za Abbaside?I da li si cuo za predivnu Islamsku civilizaciju u Spaniji?To su sve bile Imperije koje su dale nesto covjecanstvu a svi su se oni sudili Serijatom i svi su se oni klanjali pet puta na dan.Inace moze se raditi i privredjivati uz klanjanje pet puta dnevno tako da nemoj pricati gluposti da muslimani nista ne rade.Oni su jedna razvijena civilizacija i oni zasluzuju da imaju Islamsku drzavu jer jedina civilizacija je Islam a ko se odrekne te civilizacije taj propada.Ko kaze da su Persijanci bili razvijeniji prije nego sto su postali muslimani?Jesil cuo za Timuridsko carstvo i da li si cuo da je Islamska Perisiaj bila jedno ravijeno podrucje u sklopu Islamskog Kalifata?Nemoj molim te stvari gledati ikroz to sto Zapad sada ima tehniku i sto ima dobre automobile ali dusu svjetske civilizacije su dali muslimani.
sudar botova 
- Poruka
- 3.883
pazi,prika,strasno si mi drag,i ne samo zato sto perfektno sprehas Hrvatski.ali 90% drzava di je islam drzavna religija, nemere osigurati tri dnevna obroka svojem stanovnistvu,a kamoli neka veca za nas normalna civilizaciska dostignuca.to je jednostavno tako ma koliko to vrijedjalo tvoje vjerske osjecaje..
gost 23146
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 46.396
bot bot botovanje
to je pravo boksovanje
to je pravo boksovanje
Za to nije kriv Islam nego propast Kalifata i postkolonijalni Imperijalizam.Inace kako Islamske zemlje mogu da se razviju kad su na celu tih drzava marionete i ljudi koji namjeravaju dozivotno ostati na celu Islamskih drzava.Zato su se pobunili Arapi i zato sto zele da imaju jednu slobodnu drzavu u kojoj nece biti diktature,.Ovo inace ne vazi za Saudijsku Arabiju koja ima dovoljno novca da prehrani cijelu zemlju i sve zemlje oko nje.Inace civilizacija se ne mjeri kolicinom novca u dzepu nego u kulturi i opohodjenju.Kod muslimana je obicaj da se starijem covjeku poljubi ruka a kod Krscana se to ne cini nego jednostavno se majci kaze ej kevo donesi mi vodu.Jel to ta civilizacija Krscanstva?Nemojte mi molim vas pricati kojestarije.
Mingov djed
Gost
- Poruka
- 16.125
Mora da vazi i za Arabiju...tamo se na imrne demonstrante puca, sto je greh prema Islamu.
Ali tamo vlada Kralj i vlada Monarhija a muslimanima je grijeh da se bune protiv Monarhije jer Saudijska Arabija je Kraljeva zemlja i on upravlja Kraljevstvom tako da je sada Saudijska Arabija jedna od najbogatijih drzava svijeta.Muslimani su u Saudijskoj Arabijhi veoma dobri i oni stalno odlaze u Mekku da bi se pomolili Allahu.Inace Saudijska Arabija je vjerska drzava i ko zeli zivjeti u Saudijskoj Arabiji on mora klanjati.
Mingov djed
Gost
- Poruka
- 16.125
Kralj je pocinio greh jer je ubio demonstrante muslimane koji su klanjali...
Nije Kralj pocinio grijeh jer u Saudijskoj Arabiji nisu imale neke masovne demonstracije sem u istocnom dijelu zemlje gdje pretezno zive Siiti.Oni su tada ustali i htjeli da izraze negodovanje protiv Monarhije u Saudijskoj Arabiji ali vecina gradjana Saudijske Arabije nisu ustali i oni su svi za Kralja i za Saudijsku Arabiju ovakva kakva jeste jer ova Saudijska Arabija je slatka i lijepa jer ima dva svijeta grada Mekku i Medinu.Inace muslimanima je zabranjeno da se bune protiv Monarhije jer Monarhija je donijela Saudijskoj Arabiji dosta uspjeha na ekonomskom planu tako da nema prava nijedan gradjanin da se pobuni protiv Monarhije koja je lijepa i slatka.
- stanje
