Povratak Korpusa i Divizija na velika vrata

Casual Observer

Veoma poznat
Poruka
14.424

Divisions, Corps to Replace Brigades As Army’s Wartime Formation Of Choice​

Brigades that operated largely independently in Iraq and Afghanistan will fight as part of larger units in future conflicts, officials said.​

CAITLIN M. KENNEY

OCTOBER 10, 2022


The Army’s brigade combat teams may have been the signature units of recent wars, but service leaders believe future conflicts will be dominated by divisions and even corps, officials said Monday.
“The large-scale combat [operations] against a peer threat, the amount of complexity, speed, violence, chaos, leads us to the conclusion that our great brigade combat team commanders are going to be wholly consumed winning the fight they're in,” said Gen. James Rainey, the new chief of Army Futures Command, at the Association of the United States Army’s conference in Washington, D.C.
Operations during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars were largely planned by brigade combat teams—some 4,000 troops led by a colonel—and executed by their battalions and companies. Rainey said these BCTs were built in a way that had them hold and operate in an area for a year but were not a “maneuver formation.”

The war in Ukraine has shown what the Army could face in a large-scale conflict, said James Greer, an associate professor at the U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies, who spoke on a future-of-warfare panel with Rainey. Ukraine has committed the equivalent of two full corps of troops and is fighting across a vast area, about 150 times larger than the Army’s National Training Center in California, Greer said. A single U.S. Army corps can be comprised of two to five divisions with up to 45,000 soldiers, commanded by a lieutenant general.
“So: very large formations, very large spaces, and of course, everyone's familiar with the lethality, the destruction, the consumption of materiel, ammunition, etc., on a scale that we haven't really thought through in a long time,” Greer said.

Focusing the Army on these larger formations will mean they will be able to work closer with the other services as well as allies and partners, Secretary Christine Wormuth in her Monday keynote.

“Our study and analysis of recent conflicts, exercises, simulation, and training, tells us that brigade commanders must focus fully on winning the close fight. To allow frontline leaders to concentrate on the close fight, division and corps commanders will have the responsibility and capability to visualize the larger picture,” Wormuth said. “To ensure they can do this, our theater armies, corps, and divisions will gain the personnel, organizations, and equipment they need to disrupt and defeat peer adversaries on the future battlefield.”

That means bringing artillery, engineers, and intelligence together at the division level, she said.

Rainey said division commanders will be able to provide these capabilities to the brigades when they need it.

The secretary said this focus on larger formations would be part of the Army’s upcoming doctrine on multi-domain operations, Wormuth said.

https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2...igades-armys-wartime-formation-choice/378234/
 
Poslednja izmena:

Casual Observer

Veoma poznat
Poruka
14.424
Rat u Ukrajini je naterao i U.S Army da malo razmisli kako dalje. Do sada smo se od raznih sveznajućih analitičara naslušali o “modernom” Korpusno-Brigadnom načinu organizovanja vojske, naslušali se mantre o “malim ali efikasnim mobilnim” jedinicama i celim vojskama, o “zastarelosti” divizija i korpusa, kao “preglomaznih”, ali se sada odjednom američka vojska vraća armijama, armijskim korpusoma i divizijama, i izgleda i većoj koncentraciji snaga - kao da je prestalo vreme asimetričnih ratova sa golorukim protivnicima.

Gde je tu naša Srbija?
 
Poslednja izmena:

paketije

Domaćin
Poruka
3.531
Rat u Ukrajini je naterao i U.S Army da malo razmisli kako dalje. Do sada smo se od raznih sveznajućih analitičara naslušali o “modernom” Korpusno-Brigadnom načinu organizovanja vojske, naslušali se mantre o “malim ali efikasnim mobilnim” jedinicama i celim vojskama, o “zastarelosti” divizija i korpusa, kao “preglomaznih”, ali se sada odjednom američka vojska vraća armijama, armijskim korpusoma i divizijama, i izgleda i većoj koncentraciji snaga - kao da je prestalo vreme asimetričnih ratova sa golorukim protivnicima.

Gde je tu naša Srbija?
Ako imas na terenu dve ili tri "modularne brigade" ili "brigade combat team" mozes ih po potrebi koordinirati novo formiranim stabom divizije. Amerikanci imaju par divizija u svom borbenom poretku jos od 2013 godine, ali njihova vojska je profesionalna i relativno mala.

ACTIVE 1,395,350 (Army 489,050 Navy 349,600 Air Force 329,400 Space Force 6,400 US Marine Corps 179,250 US Coast Guard 41,650)
RESERVE 843,450 (Army 522,300 Navy 100,450 Air Force 178,600 Marine Corps Reserve 35,850 US Coast Guard 6,250)

Srbija
ACTIVE 28,150 (Army 13,250 Air Force and Air Defence 5,100 Training Command 3,000 Guards 1,600 Other MoD 5,200) Gendarmerie & Paramilitary 3,700
Conscript liability 6 months (voluntary)
RESERVE 50,150
Srbija je u stanju da formira mozda dve divizije, vrlo slabe vatrene moci, i pokretljivosti za moderno ratovanje
 

Casual Observer

Veoma poznat
Poruka
14.424
Ako imas na terenu dve ili tri "modularne brigade" ili "brigade combat team" mozes ih po potrebi koordinirati novo formiranim stabom divizije. Amerikanci imaju par divizija u svom borbenom poretku jos od 2013 godine, ali njihova vojska je profesionalna i relativno mala.



Srbija

Srbija je u stanju da formira mozda dve divizije, vrlo slabe vatrene moci, i pokretljivosti za moderno ratovanje
Srbija (a ni ostatak exYU) nisu neko merilo vojne snage.
 
Da biste mogli da kreirate nove teme, trajno koristite svoje ime i ne pogađate stalno slike - kliknite ovde da se registrujete.

Top
  Blokirali ste reklame
Dragi prijatelju, nemojte da blokirate reklame - isključite Ad Blocker na Forumu, jer će tako mesto vaših susreta na Krstarici ostati besplatno za korišćenje.