potom su rimljani prevladali, nase ARIJEVCE I POLUARIJEVCE ocrnili lazno ih optuzujuci, a svoje uzdigli, i sad imamo kult konstantina, u njegovom gradu vaseljenski pod americkom vlascu., a moskva bi da bude treci rim - ja kazem da nista to ne valja, ali istoriju su vec napisali pobednici, nasi neprijatelji, cim ih porazimo, napisacemo ISTINITU ISTORIJU, a kjljuc za nasu pobedu je da se raskrinka lazno otkrivenje, posle ih imamo kao na dlanuSrbi su hrišćanstvo primili u vreme apostola. Na balkanskom prostoru propovedali su apostol Pavle i apostol Tit
Istoriju Crkve od naseg Jevsevija [Euzebija] nisu uspeli da satru, Bog im nije dao!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eusebius
It is very difficult to explain the seeming paradoxical fact that this word, along with the explanation given by Constantine, was accepted by the "Arian" Eusebius, whereas it has left no traces at all in the works of his opponents, the leaders of the anti-Arian party such as Alexander of Alexandria, Ossius of Cordova, Marcellus of Ancyra, and Eustathius of Antioch, who are usually considered Constantine's theological advisers and the strongest supporters of the council. Neither before nor during Constantine's time is there any evidence of a normal, well-established Christian use of the term homoousios in its strictly Trinitarian meaning. Having once excluded any relationship of the Nicene homoousios with the Christian tradition, it becomes legitimate to propose a new explanation, based on an analysis of two pagan documents which have so far never been taken into account. The main thesis of this paper is that homoousios came straight from Constantine's Hermetic background. As can be clearly seen in the Poimandres, and even more clearly in an inscription mentioned exclusively in the Theosophia, in the theological language of Egyptian paganism the word homoousios meant that the Nous-Father and the Logos-Son, who are two distinct beings, share the same perfection of the divine nature.
Poslednja izmena: