jedina razlika izmedju gay i hetero osobe je u seksu
a sam si rekao da to ne utice na djecu + isto rade i hetero ljudi
dakle, koji je zapravo tvoj argument za zdravo ili normalno?
-
- Popularno:
- Iran napao američke baze u Kataru
- Srbija vraća redovan vojni rok: Ako...
- Rusija: Srbija zaobilaznim putem šalje...
- Da li je empatija urođena ili naučena?
- Koliko novaca su zemlje regiona dobile...
- Budimpešta okićena zastavama tzv...
- Da li vas nervira kada je neko spor u...
- Америка жели да Иран затвори Хормуз и...
- Amerika napala Iran
- Blokirati Predsedništvo do ispunjenja...
Bili smo u pravu- posle parade odobravanje gej-brakova i izmena ustava...
- Začetnik teme Brzi Bravari Srbije
- Datum pokretanja
a sam si rekao da to ne utice na djecu + isto rade i hetero ljudi
dakle, koji je zapravo tvoj argument za zdravo ili normalno?
kambodza
Elita
- Poruka
- 15.736
apstraktno razmisljanje i sposobnost izlaganja su znacajno razvijeni vec kod 12g. djeteta
malko je apsurda ova tvoja insinuacija
da odrasla osoba ne bi bila u stanju da odgovori na navedena pitanja
homoseksualnost ne znaci da je osoba mentalno zaostala
da se meni kojim slucajem pojave trubaci ili harmonikasi, ili neka kafanska/svadbena pjevaljka, ubila bih partnera............
- Poruka
- 4.065
Dete nece gledati u krevet sta mu roditelji rade.
Samo odrastanje sa sa oba oca ili obe majke je neprirodno zar ne?
kambodza
Elita
- Poruka
- 15.736
da se meni kojim slucajem pojave trubaci ili harmonikasi, ili neka kafanska/svadbena pjevaljka, ubila bih partnera
........pa verovatno ti svira kamerni orkestar ili DJ pushta zadnje hiteve........
.......
Andjela
Elita
- Poruka
- 23.874
Ali moc rezonovanja kod deteta u 12 godina jod nije u potpunosti razvijena. Obicno deca teze da budu kao roditelji, a u tom slucaju ne mozemo ih nazvati roditeljima, jer to nisu!Ne znaci da je mentalno zaostala 100%, vec da im je moc percepcije poremecena i da su nastrani (sto i jeste mentalna zaostalost)!
kambodza
Elita
- Poruka
- 15.736
draksson
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.674
Interesantna tendencija u USA je da gejovi usvajaju decake a lezbejke devojcice;
sto ce reci zlostavljanje i pedofilija u najavi.
Andjela
Elita
- Poruka
- 23.874
kambodza
Elita
- Poruka
- 15.736
- Poruka
- 4.065
Na osnovu prirodnih pravila.
To je nezdrava sredina.
I jos nesto,to pravoslavna vera ne dozvoljava.
Zasto bi mi rusili principe nase vere za koju su mnogi Srbi izginuli.
Pederastiji jednostavno nije mesto u Srbiji.
Andjela
Elita
- Poruka
- 23.874
Pa posto su i Turska i Bosna na putu za Eu, sto njima ne traze da slede demokratiju i tamo odrze parade i da menjaju ustav?
draksson
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.674
razlika je u psihofizicko-mentalnom sklopu gej i hetero osobe;
jednostavno, u toj izopacenoj prirodi gej osobe je razuzdan seks i perverzije svake vrste,
kojima se oni hvale i ponose kao
i nemanje nikavih moralnih obzira prema vaspitanju te usvojene dece,
posto su oni sami razbili sve moralne norme u seksualnosti i ponasanju.
tako da ta deca mogu u ranom uzrastu da prisustvuju perverzijama odraslih koji se nicega ne stide i nikome ne odgovaraju.
Valjda ih zato i usvajaju a ne od njih da naprave dobre hriscane i moralne ljude.
Pa zasta su se u toj svojoj gej agendi boril, nego za svaku vrstu takozvanih sloboda?
tome nema kraja, ta deca su izgubljena i u velikoj su psiho-fizickoj opasnosti kod takvih ljudi.
Poslednja izmena:
*BILJA*
Buduća legenda
- Poruka
- 32.190
Zdravo i normalno je da zena i muskarac imaju decu, potpuno prirodno.
Neprirodno je da oni koji nikad ne mogu imati svoje, usvoje neko dete, i ko garantuje da oni (posto nije njhiovo rojdeno i posto su nastrani ) da nece zloupotrebiti dete?
Sta ce sutra usvojeno dete u obadnistu, SKOLI?
Koliko ce biti sikranirano, vredjano, ponizavano, kroz koje patnje prolazi takvo dete kad kaze da ima dve tate, ili dve mame, ako su deca koja su vanbracno rodjena predmet svih mogucih neprijatnosti, kako tek usvojeno dete lezbijki ili homoseksualaca? Hoce li im biti zahvalno, ili ce gledati da cim dovoljn oodraste- pobegne gde god bude moglo, pa i na ulicu? Nehumano je ne misliti o tome a udvoljiti bolesnim ljudima da imaju ono sto svojom (verovatno nevoljnom) voljom- ne mogu imtai. I time sto su takvi oni se PONOSE, a u zatvorima trunu normalni cija deca placu za njima i cekaju ih, sramota!
Skydancer
Elita
- Poruka
- 23.426
Primitivizam i fobije cvetaju. 
Пријезда
Elita
- Poruka
- 15.306
Па мисле да могу наћи решење. Зар не видиш да граде концетрациони логор од државе. Чик нека твоје дете ишчикава педерског усвојеника..неколико хиљада еура по џепу па иди види. Него верујем да им то неће проћи. Мислим да се већ назире крај тој белосветској пошасти званој нови светски поредак.
Skydancer
Elita
- Poruka
- 23.426
Ovo je vec ozbiljna paranoja. 
draksson
Iskusan
- Poruka
- 5.674
Jako lep clanak ko zna engleski: GEJ USVAJANJE JE ZLOSTAVLJANJE DECE"
"Oooo they're so adorable, I went out and bought 2!"
GAY ADOPTION IS CHILD ABUSE
We are born into a heterosexual world by the sheer fact we are born. This biological truth extends to those babies who are sold or transported into western adoption by brokers and traffickers, and to children positioned in the anglosphere, who are orphaned, abandoned or permanently separated from birth parents. There is no evidence to suggest that orphaned and abandoned babies possess a predilection towards homosexuality and that these same children would thrive more in a homosexual setting than they would in a heterosexual or normalised parenting environment.
Choice or Condition?
Is homosexuality a choice, or a condition? Depending on who is asked the answer could be either. It is not the purpose of this Knol to interrogate the nature and cause of homosexuality beyond establishing a number of principles of how children adopted by homosexual couples are forced into a lifelong ‘contract’ of dubious social, psychological, cultural and moral value.
If homosexuality is a choice then this would imply people choose to practise a homosexual lifestyle in opposition to what the standards of human society and indeed nature dictate. By arguing homosexuality is choice and by extension an entitlement in so-called ‘liberal-democracies’ then this choice can theoretically if not morally be placed alongside the deviant lifestyle choices of bestiality and paedophilia. “I choose to mate with my own gender as I choose to mate with my pet dog” – choice is the operative word or principle here! Would a couple who copulates / mates with a dog be assessed as meeting the eligibility criteria to adopt a child? Of course not! Then why is the couple who mate intra-gender more entitled to adopt than the couple who mate inter-species? Both counter-biological ‘persuasions’ are about choice.
If homosexuality is simply a lifestyle choice then surely commoditized imported babies can also be parcelled out to occultist couples, criminal couples, cult couples, feral couples, porn-star couples, prostitute couples, swinging couples, polygamist families and so on. Above all other ‘different’ lifestyles, homosexuality has managed to normalise its 'alternative' lifestyle choice to the point of asserting a ‘moral entitlement’ to buy and adopt children.
"She really completes us and the 2 queens across the road are sooo envious"
Alternatively, homosexuality is viewed as a condition, a sexual orientation which the homosexual afflicted person has little or no control over. This point of view includes research claims homosexuality can be genetically explained, that is, one can be born homosexual. Assuming these explanations are valid then homosexuality could be properly classified as a genetic abnormality or a biological disorder. Homosexuality could in fact be understood as a disability, because it is a physiological condition the person has limited or no control over. Mental illness, acquired brain injury, epilepsy, AIDS and cancer all constitute a form of disability. Using then this clinical interpretation, mentally ill couples, invalid couples, paedophile couples and alcoholic couples are equally entitled to barter and adopt babies as much as their genetically dysfunctional homosexual peers.
Choice and condition are at the very minimum spurious claims, argued from the homosexual wannabe parents’ point of view. Introduced here is a different dimension into the ‘discourse’, an aspect so chronically, though understandably overlooked. This constituent being the rights and “best interest” of the child - factors that must assume primacy over all other considerations, including the whim of white middle-class homosexuals to ‘own’ and ‘mother’ a baby.
What about the Rights of the Child
Gay adoption of children constitutes 2 layers of child abuse. Children acquired by homosexuals on home territory are sacrificed to a perverse strain of anglophile political correctness and thereby are denied the opportunity to be placed in normalized (heterosexual or group home) settings. Those children sourced from under-developed countries are in addition to becoming a commodity of a selfish homosexual agenda, are culturally butchered by a new wave of anglo imperialism. This cultural imperialism places the egocentric, racist, atomized, materialist and deviant culture of the angloshpere above all other cultures, essentially asserting the “west is the best”. Pause for a second if you will, and picture this cultural imperialism reversed where traditional headhunter tribes in the PNG Highlands adopt white children from downtown Melbourne group homes. Imagine the sanctimonious racist uproar. Envisage further if members of these same tribes were homosexual or dare it be said, Muslim!
"I want to adopt white orphan babies because they're cute.
You have a problem with this?"
Every child has the right to a normalized, safe and nurturing upbringing. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (section iii Human Rights and the Child) decrees as much. Homosexual adoptions are neither normal nor arguably safe for a child. A child traded into homosexual custody will eventually learn of his deviant situation. Every child everywhere must ultimately contend with a heterosexual world irrespective of the counter dogma and propaganda espoused by gay activists. The world is naturally heterosexual and will remain such no matter how much this reality is defied, denied and usurped by homosexual activists!
Winter is cold and summer is hot. Humanity everywhere bears the responsibility of bringing up their young to best adapt to the natural world in which they are born. Blankets in winter, shade in summer - children nurtured, loved and shaped by heterosexual men and women alike. Animals everywhere likewise raise their offspring to meet the challenges of nature. Why then are homosexuals exempted from this universal law? Why are we prepared to jeopardise the wellbeing of children already identified as vulnerable and disadvantaged to merely satisfy the ‘desires’ of one deviant or disabled subset of society?
Those children plunged into gay adoption will grow up and discover how ‘special’ they really are. Undoubtedly their gay ‘parents’ will spend countless hours coaching if not brainwashing them into accepting the abnormality of their circumstances. “Instead of 1 you have 2 dads, and when we kiss each other’s mouth it’s because we love each other”. This, the perversion of the natural order of things, is in itself a form of child abuse, where innocent minds are soiled with the unnatural vices of their keepers. The ridicule and awkward moments these children will endure throughout their lives is never spoken of. They will grow up never experiencing a semblance of family normality because the 2 gays around the corner felt incomplete without an imported Korean baby cradled in the spare bedroom. Where’s the fairness in this, the balance? Absolutely none. Babies trafficked from South East Asia into the gay anglosphere have no say for the obvious reason they are infants. Thus this entire dialogue on gay adoptions has been constructed and contrived by the gays themselves.
Yup we'll learn Bub to love us, as we learned Fido to fetch a ball
One claim however does offer a skerrick of rationale in defence of gay adoption and that is the provision of food and shelter to children who might otherwise go without. This is a cynical claim at best. If gay parents were to relinquish their adopted children, these children would either be readopted by heterosexuals or raised in group homes managed by heterosexual care givers and or house parents. The percentage of orphaned and trafficked children adopted by homosexuals is minute compared to the vast number of children in State or NGO care. Homosexual adoptions have absolutely nothing to do with the global or indeed local wellbeing of neglected, distressed and abused children. Homosexual adoption is all about the needs and the 'politically correct fabricated entitlement' of white middle-class homosexuals! The entitlement of children to a culturally, sexually and emotionally safe upbringing is completely ignored....
http://knol.google.com/k/jackamarra/gay-adoption-is-child-abuse/1p570gp3aeb2l/26#
"Oooo they're so adorable, I went out and bought 2!"
GAY ADOPTION IS CHILD ABUSE
We are born into a heterosexual world by the sheer fact we are born. This biological truth extends to those babies who are sold or transported into western adoption by brokers and traffickers, and to children positioned in the anglosphere, who are orphaned, abandoned or permanently separated from birth parents. There is no evidence to suggest that orphaned and abandoned babies possess a predilection towards homosexuality and that these same children would thrive more in a homosexual setting than they would in a heterosexual or normalised parenting environment.
Choice or Condition?
Is homosexuality a choice, or a condition? Depending on who is asked the answer could be either. It is not the purpose of this Knol to interrogate the nature and cause of homosexuality beyond establishing a number of principles of how children adopted by homosexual couples are forced into a lifelong ‘contract’ of dubious social, psychological, cultural and moral value.
If homosexuality is a choice then this would imply people choose to practise a homosexual lifestyle in opposition to what the standards of human society and indeed nature dictate. By arguing homosexuality is choice and by extension an entitlement in so-called ‘liberal-democracies’ then this choice can theoretically if not morally be placed alongside the deviant lifestyle choices of bestiality and paedophilia. “I choose to mate with my own gender as I choose to mate with my pet dog” – choice is the operative word or principle here! Would a couple who copulates / mates with a dog be assessed as meeting the eligibility criteria to adopt a child? Of course not! Then why is the couple who mate intra-gender more entitled to adopt than the couple who mate inter-species? Both counter-biological ‘persuasions’ are about choice.
If homosexuality is simply a lifestyle choice then surely commoditized imported babies can also be parcelled out to occultist couples, criminal couples, cult couples, feral couples, porn-star couples, prostitute couples, swinging couples, polygamist families and so on. Above all other ‘different’ lifestyles, homosexuality has managed to normalise its 'alternative' lifestyle choice to the point of asserting a ‘moral entitlement’ to buy and adopt children.
"She really completes us and the 2 queens across the road are sooo envious"
Alternatively, homosexuality is viewed as a condition, a sexual orientation which the homosexual afflicted person has little or no control over. This point of view includes research claims homosexuality can be genetically explained, that is, one can be born homosexual. Assuming these explanations are valid then homosexuality could be properly classified as a genetic abnormality or a biological disorder. Homosexuality could in fact be understood as a disability, because it is a physiological condition the person has limited or no control over. Mental illness, acquired brain injury, epilepsy, AIDS and cancer all constitute a form of disability. Using then this clinical interpretation, mentally ill couples, invalid couples, paedophile couples and alcoholic couples are equally entitled to barter and adopt babies as much as their genetically dysfunctional homosexual peers.
Choice and condition are at the very minimum spurious claims, argued from the homosexual wannabe parents’ point of view. Introduced here is a different dimension into the ‘discourse’, an aspect so chronically, though understandably overlooked. This constituent being the rights and “best interest” of the child - factors that must assume primacy over all other considerations, including the whim of white middle-class homosexuals to ‘own’ and ‘mother’ a baby.
What about the Rights of the Child
Gay adoption of children constitutes 2 layers of child abuse. Children acquired by homosexuals on home territory are sacrificed to a perverse strain of anglophile political correctness and thereby are denied the opportunity to be placed in normalized (heterosexual or group home) settings. Those children sourced from under-developed countries are in addition to becoming a commodity of a selfish homosexual agenda, are culturally butchered by a new wave of anglo imperialism. This cultural imperialism places the egocentric, racist, atomized, materialist and deviant culture of the angloshpere above all other cultures, essentially asserting the “west is the best”. Pause for a second if you will, and picture this cultural imperialism reversed where traditional headhunter tribes in the PNG Highlands adopt white children from downtown Melbourne group homes. Imagine the sanctimonious racist uproar. Envisage further if members of these same tribes were homosexual or dare it be said, Muslim!
"I want to adopt white orphan babies because they're cute.
You have a problem with this?"
Every child has the right to a normalized, safe and nurturing upbringing. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (section iii Human Rights and the Child) decrees as much. Homosexual adoptions are neither normal nor arguably safe for a child. A child traded into homosexual custody will eventually learn of his deviant situation. Every child everywhere must ultimately contend with a heterosexual world irrespective of the counter dogma and propaganda espoused by gay activists. The world is naturally heterosexual and will remain such no matter how much this reality is defied, denied and usurped by homosexual activists!
Winter is cold and summer is hot. Humanity everywhere bears the responsibility of bringing up their young to best adapt to the natural world in which they are born. Blankets in winter, shade in summer - children nurtured, loved and shaped by heterosexual men and women alike. Animals everywhere likewise raise their offspring to meet the challenges of nature. Why then are homosexuals exempted from this universal law? Why are we prepared to jeopardise the wellbeing of children already identified as vulnerable and disadvantaged to merely satisfy the ‘desires’ of one deviant or disabled subset of society?
Those children plunged into gay adoption will grow up and discover how ‘special’ they really are. Undoubtedly their gay ‘parents’ will spend countless hours coaching if not brainwashing them into accepting the abnormality of their circumstances. “Instead of 1 you have 2 dads, and when we kiss each other’s mouth it’s because we love each other”. This, the perversion of the natural order of things, is in itself a form of child abuse, where innocent minds are soiled with the unnatural vices of their keepers. The ridicule and awkward moments these children will endure throughout their lives is never spoken of. They will grow up never experiencing a semblance of family normality because the 2 gays around the corner felt incomplete without an imported Korean baby cradled in the spare bedroom. Where’s the fairness in this, the balance? Absolutely none. Babies trafficked from South East Asia into the gay anglosphere have no say for the obvious reason they are infants. Thus this entire dialogue on gay adoptions has been constructed and contrived by the gays themselves.
Yup we'll learn Bub to love us, as we learned Fido to fetch a ball
One claim however does offer a skerrick of rationale in defence of gay adoption and that is the provision of food and shelter to children who might otherwise go without. This is a cynical claim at best. If gay parents were to relinquish their adopted children, these children would either be readopted by heterosexuals or raised in group homes managed by heterosexual care givers and or house parents. The percentage of orphaned and trafficked children adopted by homosexuals is minute compared to the vast number of children in State or NGO care. Homosexual adoptions have absolutely nothing to do with the global or indeed local wellbeing of neglected, distressed and abused children. Homosexual adoption is all about the needs and the 'politically correct fabricated entitlement' of white middle-class homosexuals! The entitlement of children to a culturally, sexually and emotionally safe upbringing is completely ignored....
http://knol.google.com/k/jackamarra/gay-adoption-is-child-abuse/1p570gp3aeb2l/26#
Пријезда
Elita
- Poruka
- 15.306
Primitivizam i fobije cvetaju.
Штета што ти мама и тата нису тако размишљали...свету би било бар за који промил лакше
Skydancer
Elita
- Poruka
- 23.426
Штета што ти мама и тата нису тако размишљали...свету би било бар за који промил лакше
Kiss my lily white Serbian ass.
Пријезда
Elita
- Poruka
- 15.306
Kiss my lily white Serbian ass.
Само се ти намести...ја и он стално се курвамо...зато смо и тако добри ортаци
Skydancer
Elita
- Poruka
- 23.426
Само се ти намести...ја и он стално се курвамо...зато смо и тако добри ортаци
Znala sam da si ku*va. Sigurno volis da se obuces u 'aljince i stiklice.
