Quantcast

Admiral Lou preti ratom Americi: Kina ce resiti americku pretnju u kineskom moru potapanjem nekoliko nosaca aviona!

Тихи

Zaslužan član
Poruka
124.156
China Could Solve the South China Sea Challenge by Sinking U.S. Navy Aircraft Carriers
That was the implied threat: “What the United States fears the most is taking casualties,” said Lou. “We’ll see how frightened America is.”
by Michael Peck

Key Point: Sinking U.S. carriers would be an act of war. Not a warning shot across the bows. Not a spy plane downed for crossing into Chinese territory. Not an accidental collision between an American patrol plane and a Chinese fighter.


Admiral Lou Yuan is China’s Curtis LeMay.

LeMay, the U.S. Air Force general who torched Japanese cities and later headed Strategic Air Command, was notorious for his bellicosity. In the 1950s and during the Cuban Missile Crisis, he tried to get the U.S. to launch a nuclear first strike against the Soviet Union: during the Vietnam War, he urged bombing North Vietnam “back to the Stone Age.”
Now comes Lou Yuan, deputy chief of the Chinese Academy of Military Sciences and a prolifically hawkish military commentator who supports a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Last month, Yuan told an audience at a Chinese military-industrial conference that China could solve tensions over the South East China Sea by sinking two U.S. aircraft carriers.
This would kill 10,000 American sailors. “What the United States fears the most is taking casualties,” said Lou. “We’ll see how frightened America is.”


Lou has previously urged an invasion of Taiwan if the U.S. Navy uses the island, regarded by China as a renegade territory, as a naval base. “If the US naval fleet dares to stop in Taiwan, it is time for the People’s Liberation Army to deploy troops to promote national unity on the island,” he said.
LeMay was no fan of Communism, but he would have understood Lou’s sentiment.

Unfortunately, neither man seemed to know the difference between aggressiveness and foolhardiness. LeMay’s first strike on the Soviet Union would have triggered World War III against a nuclear-armed superpower: even if the U.S. had managed to destroy most Soviet nuclear weapons, it would only have taken a few bombs landing New York or Los Angeles to kill millions, not to mention a Soviet Army that would have wreaked vengeance on Western Europe.
Now comes Admiral Lou, who represents what seems to be a growing Chinese belief that America is too weak to fight. The Chinese are certainly not the first: the Germans and Japanese thought the same in 1941 (perhaps China should remember that the Japanese thought the Chinese were weaklings in the 1930s).

Lou says China’s anti-ship missiles are sufficient to destroy U.S. carriers and their escorts. Militarily, it may be true that hypersonic missiles, or ballistic missiles converted into anti-ship weapons, could do the job. Then again, they might not, because these weapons have not been tested in war.
Which brings up the real issue here: sinking U.S. carriers would be an act of war. Not a warning shot across the bows. Not a spy plane downed for crossing into Chinese territory. Not an accidental collision between an American patrol plane and a Chinese fighter.

Sinking an American carrier would be an act of war, period. If Chinese like Admiral Lou are right, then America is finished as a major power. If 10,000 dead American sailors aren’t worth fighting over, then neither will the U.S. defend Taiwan, or Japan, or Israel, or Western Europe.
But what if Lou is wrong, as he is almost certainly is? No U.S. president, no Senator or Congressman, could remain in office if they did not respond forcefully to the sinking of U.S. carriers, the very symbol of American power and prestige. To the American psyche, such an act would be equivalent to Pearl Harbor or 9/11.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...lenge-sinking-us-navy-aircraft-carriers-95706

Sve smo blizi ratu izmedju Kine i Amerike....

Kineski admiral Lou preti Americi otvorenim ratom ako se ne povuku iz juznog kineskog mora...


Kineski vojni vrh tvrdi da je Amerika suvise slaba da se bori protiv Kine, i da bi Kina trebala da predje u ofanzivu potopi nekoliko americkih nosaca aviona i tako i natera na kapitulaciju jer su to zrtve koja amerika nece moci da podnese....
 

Тихи

Zaslužan član
Poruka
124.156
Admiral Lud misli da je Kina prenapučena i treba to razrijediti.


kinezi samo da pisaju nista drugo da ne rade, svi bi se vi NATOguzi podavili u njihovoj pisaci....

A zamisli tek puske da uzmu....

Ne bi vas ostalo ni za pelcera...

Uostalom poslednji put kad je Kina ratovala protiv NATO pakta u korejskom ratu, i ako tehnoloski inferiona, je uspela da nanese abnormalno teske poraze i do nogu porazi NATO soldatesku.
 

piciginx

Buduća legenda
Poruka
39.660
China Could Solve the South China Sea Challenge by Sinking U.S. Navy Aircraft Carriers
That was the implied threat: “What the United States fears the most is taking casualties,” said Lou. “We’ll see how frightened America is.”
by Michael Peck

Key Point: Sinking U.S. carriers would be an act of war. Not a warning shot across the bows. Not a spy plane downed for crossing into Chinese territory. Not an accidental collision between an American patrol plane and a Chinese fighter.


Admiral Lou Yuan is China’s Curtis LeMay.

LeMay, the U.S. Air Force general who torched Japanese cities and later headed Strategic Air Command, was notorious for his bellicosity. In the 1950s and during the Cuban Missile Crisis, he tried to get the U.S. to launch a nuclear first strike against the Soviet Union: during the Vietnam War, he urged bombing North Vietnam “back to the Stone Age.”
Now comes Lou Yuan, deputy chief of the Chinese Academy of Military Sciences and a prolifically hawkish military commentator who supports a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Last month, Yuan told an audience at a Chinese military-industrial conference that China could solve tensions over the South East China Sea by sinking two U.S. aircraft carriers.
This would kill 10,000 American sailors. “What the United States fears the most is taking casualties,” said Lou. “We’ll see how frightened America is.”


Lou has previously urged an invasion of Taiwan if the U.S. Navy uses the island, regarded by China as a renegade territory, as a naval base. “If the US naval fleet dares to stop in Taiwan, it is time for the People’s Liberation Army to deploy troops to promote national unity on the island,” he said.
LeMay was no fan of Communism, but he would have understood Lou’s sentiment.

Unfortunately, neither man seemed to know the difference between aggressiveness and foolhardiness. LeMay’s first strike on the Soviet Union would have triggered World War III against a nuclear-armed superpower: even if the U.S. had managed to destroy most Soviet nuclear weapons, it would only have taken a few bombs landing New York or Los Angeles to kill millions, not to mention a Soviet Army that would have wreaked vengeance on Western Europe.
Now comes Admiral Lou, who represents what seems to be a growing Chinese belief that America is too weak to fight. The Chinese are certainly not the first: the Germans and Japanese thought the same in 1941 (perhaps China should remember that the Japanese thought the Chinese were weaklings in the 1930s).

Lou says China’s anti-ship missiles are sufficient to destroy U.S. carriers and their escorts. Militarily, it may be true that hypersonic missiles, or ballistic missiles converted into anti-ship weapons, could do the job. Then again, they might not, because these weapons have not been tested in war.
Which brings up the real issue here: sinking U.S. carriers would be an act of war. Not a warning shot across the bows. Not a spy plane downed for crossing into Chinese territory. Not an accidental collision between an American patrol plane and a Chinese fighter.

Sinking an American carrier would be an act of war, period. If Chinese like Admiral Lou are right, then America is finished as a major power. If 10,000 dead American sailors aren’t worth fighting over, then neither will the U.S. defend Taiwan, or Japan, or Israel, or Western Europe.
But what if Lou is wrong, as he is almost certainly is? No U.S. president, no Senator or Congressman, could remain in office if they did not respond forcefully to the sinking of U.S. carriers, the very symbol of American power and prestige. To the American psyche, such an act would be equivalent to Pearl Harbor or 9/11.

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...lenge-sinking-us-navy-aircraft-carriers-95706

Sve smo blizi ratu izmedju Kine i Amerike....

Kineski admiral Lou preti Americi otvorenim ratom ako se ne povuku iz juznog kineskog mora...


Kineski vojni vrh tvrdi da je Amerika suvise slaba da se bori protiv Kine, i da bi Kina trebala da predje u ofanzivu potopi nekoliko americkih nosaca aviona i tako i natera na kapitulaciju jer su to zrtve koja amerika nece moci da podnese....
Bajkovito...
 

Mej bregami

Elita
Poruka
15.567
kinezi samo da pisaju nista drugo da ne rade, svi bi se vi NATOguzi podavili u njihovoj pisaci....

A zamisli tek puske da uzmu....

Ne bi vas ostalo ni za pelcera...

Uostalom poslednji put kad je Kina ratovala protiv NATO pakta u korejskom ratu, i ako tehnoloski inferiona, je uspela da nanese abnormalno teske poraze i do nogu porazi NATO soldatesku.
Bilo malo iznenađenje kad je milion kineza naoružanih sa kalašima jurnulo preko granice, ali je 60 000 dobrih starih garanda riješilo situaciju pobivši pola miliona tih sa kalašima. Od tada su još Kinezi dobili po njušci od Rusa i Vijetnamaca i nema ih više vam Kine od tada.
 

Тихи

Zaslužan član
Poruka
124.156
tad su kinezi ko sto rekoh bili tehnicki inferioni, u kamenom dobu prakticno, nisu imali ni artiljerije ni avijacije ni mornarice, ni oklopne jedinice

Sada je Kina 1000 puta jaca nego tada...

Zamisli sta bi vas tek snaslo da se vojno sudarite sa danasnjom kinom....

Nego kazi ti meni hoces li ti ici sada , kao Hrvat, kao americko cvijece da ratujes za njihove interese ako admiral Lou ostvari svoje pretnje ? Ili ces pobeci za Irsku? :D
 

Mej bregami

Elita
Poruka
15.567
tad su kinezi ko sto rekoh bili tehnicki inferioni, u kamenom dobu prakticno, nisu imali ni artiljerije ni avijacije ni mornarice, ni oklopne jedinice

Sada je Kina 1000 puta jaca nego tada...

Zamisli sta bi vas tek snaslo da se vojno sudarite sa danasnjom kinom....

Nego kazi ti meni hoces li ti ici sada , kao Hrvat, kao americko cvijece da ratujes za njihove interese ako admiral Lou ostvari svoje pretnje ? Ili ces pobeci za Irsku? :D
Dok Hrvatska mornarica dopliva do kineskog mora rat će biti gotov, kao i cijeli planet.
100 nuklearki u kratkom vremenu je dovoljno za uništiti cijeli svijet, a strane u sukobu bi imale 100 puta više, pa si misli.
 
Poslednja izmena:

norge_srbin

Aktivan član
Banovan
Poruka
1.530
Kineski vojni vrh tvrdi da je Amerika suvise slaba da se bori protiv Kine, i da bi Kina trebala da predje u ofanzivu potopi nekoliko americkih nosaca aviona i tako i natera na kapitulaciju jer su to zrtve koja amerika nece moci da podnese....
Ne znam odakle ti ovo, ali ja u engleskom tekstu uvodnog posta to pronaci nisam mogao. Jel mozes da mi das tacan izvod/tekst gde to Kinezi kazu?
 

Ejbisidi

Ističe se
Poruka
2.320
Могу они то да ураде, ал се не исплати. Не испати се ни Русима ни Кинезима да руше Америку. Много је пара ту везано да нико неће да квари бизнис.
Njima se ne isplati, ali se izgleda Americi isplati. Amerikanci su ti koji provociraju.
 

Тихи

Zaslužan član
Poruka
124.156
Ne znam odakle ti ovo, ali ja u engleskom tekstu uvodnog posta to pronaci nisam mogao. Jel mozes da mi das tacan izvod/tekst gde to Kinezi kazu?

pa lepo ti pise u tekstu covece. Ti radis na engleskom

Now comes Admiral Lou, who represents what seems to be a growing Chinese belief that America is too weak to fight. The Chinese are certainly not the first: the Germans and Japanese thought the same in 1941 (perhaps China should remember that the Japanese thought the Chinese were weaklings in the 1930s).

https://www.stripes.com/news/many-c...lve-to-prevail-in-battle-expert-says-1.562838
 

Тихи

Zaslužan član
Poruka
124.156
Rat izmedju Amerike i Kine vec je u toku

On je za sada ekonomski, diplomatski i kulturni

Ove demonstracije u Hong KOngu su deo tog rata zapada protiv Kine

Samo je pitanje kad ce neko izgubiti zivce i rat preci u vojnu fazu....

Na isti nacin je doslo do rata izmedju Japana i Amerike svojevremeno.

Japan je napao Ameriku kao odgovor na americko uvodjenje sankcija Japanu na kupovinu nafte iz Indokine....

Japan je time ostao sa samo par meseci nafte za svoju vojnu masineriju

Novu naftu , osigurali su napadom na Ameriku .

I ko zna kad bi se i kako taj rat zavrsio da Amerika nije dosla u posed nuklearne bombe i koliko bi jos stotina hiljada amerikanaca umrlo u pokusajima da pokore Japance.
 
Poruka
3.355
....
I ko zna kad bi se i kako taj rat zavrsio da Amerika nije dosla u posed nuklearne bombe i koliko bi jos stotina hiljada amerikanaca umrlo u pokusajima da pokore Japance.

Ne bi se ni završio, tj završio bi ga Staljin 1946-47, posle osvajanja Berlina i Nemačke.
Ne bi Ameri imali petlju da kopneno udare na Japan, pa njima su ona usamljena filipinska ostrva-utvrdjenja bila nepremostiv problem, bombarduju mesec dana i ovi izadju iz zemlje živi i zdravi.
 

Sunday1

Aktivan član
Poruka
1.195
Bilo malo iznenađenje kad je milion kineza naoružanih sa kalašima jurnulo preko granice, ali je 60 000 dobrih starih garanda riješilo situaciju pobivši pola miliona tih sa kalašima. Od tada su još Kinezi dobili po njušci od Rusa i Vijetnamaca i nema ih više vam Kine od tada.
Ajde da vidimo što bi danas sa Garandom rešio Kineze koji nema kakvo nemaju naoružnje. Izmasakrirali bi čitav NATO a ne šaku jada Amerikance. Americi bi se proredila drastično populacija. Pa Rusija bi sama izmasakrirala Amerikance, a šta bi im tek Kinezi napravili ti samo zamisli.
 

Mita Komita

Buduća legenda
Moderator
Poruka
26.346
I ko zna kad bi se i kako taj rat zavrsio da Amerika nije dosla u posed nuklearne bombe i koliko bi jos stotina hiljada amerikanaca umrlo u pokusajima da pokore Japance.
Шта би било да је било. Није америма пала бомба случајно у руке него су се потрудили.
 
stanje
Ova tema je zatvorena zbog neaktivnosti. Molim objavite novu temu i pridružite se diskusiji.

Top
  Blokirali ste reklame
Dragi prijatelju, nemojte da blokirate reklame - isključite Ad Blocker na Forumu, jer će tako mesto vaših susreta na Krstarici ostati besplatno za korišćenje.