ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU
Strana 1 od 5 12345 PoslednjaPoslednja
Prikazujem rezultate 1 do 25 od 119

Tema: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

  1. #1
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Pozdrav svima
    Morao sam da otvorim ovu temu,zbog nepravde i lazi koja nam se nasilno namece,kako je poceo II svetski rat.
    Za mnoge koji ne znaju (prijatelje,kolege,drugove,bracu,poznanike)
    Kao sto znate da pobednici pisu istoriju (sto nije bio slucaj kod Ramzesa 2-og)
    pa evo ja zelim da pitam sve vas,a narocito Istoricare koji su ovde na ovom forumu,da opovrgnu ili pobiju ovu ISTINU a ne da je odbace
    ps. neka se zna da NISAM nacistoljubac niti gajim bilo kakve simpatije prema njima.
    Hvala





    TABLE OF ACTS OF MALICE, AGGRESSION
    AND DECLARATIONS OF WAR BEGINNING IN SEPTEMBER 1939
    Announced on or before December 31, 1941 November 1936. "Germany is too strong. We must destroy her." Winston Churchill.


    March 1939. Poland already occupying German territory occupied after World War 1 invades her smaller neighbour Czechoslovakia.

    1st September 1939. Following numerous and well documented Polish violations of Germany's borders and refusal to negotiate, Germany retaliates.

    The following table sets forth the declarations of war and the recognitions of the state of war beginning with the Polish attack on Germany on 31st Aug/1st September 1939 and through 1941.

    For convenience the term "on" is used to indicate for example that Great Britain declared war on Germany. Where time is given it is the time used in the capital of the declaring country.

    Poland Declared War on Germany at Midnight 31st August - 1st Sept 1939. [See the German White Book]
    Great Britain on Germany September 3, 1939, 11 a.m.
    France on Germany September 3, 1939, 5 p.m.
    India on Germany September 3, 1939
    Australia on Germany September 3, 1939
    New Zealand on Germany September 3, 1939
    Union of South Africa on Germany September 6, 1939
    Canada on Germany September 10, 1939
    Norway and Germany No formal declaration of war
    Belgium and Germany No formal declaration of war
    Luxembourg and Germany No formal declaration of war
    The Netherlands on Germany May 10, 1940
    Italy on France June 10, 1940
    Canada on Italy June 10, 1940
    New Zealand on Italy June 11, 1940
    Australia on Italy June 11, 1940
    Union of South Africa on Italy June 11, 1940
    Greece on Italy October 28,1940
    Germany and Greece No formal declaration of war
    Germany on Yugoslavia April 6, 1941
    Italy and Yugoslavia No formal declaration of war
    Yugoslavia on Bulgaria April 6, 1941
    Yugoslavia on Hungary April 10, 1941
    Bulgaria on Greece April 24, 1941
    Bulgaria on Yugoslavia April 24, 1941
    Germany on USSR June 22, 1941
    Italy on USSR June 22, 1941
    Rumania on USSR No formal declaration of war
    Finland on USSR No formal declaration of war
    Hungary on USSR June 27, 1941
    Great Britain on Rumania December 7, 1941
    Great Britain on Hungary December 7, 1941
    Canada on Finland December 7, 1941
    Canada on Rumania December 7, 1941
    Canada on Hungary December 7, 1941
    Australia on Finland December 8, 1941
    Australia on Rumania December 8, 1941
    Australia on Hungary December 8, 1941
    Union of South Africa on Finland December 8, 1941
    Union of South Africa on Rumania December 8, 1941
    Union of South Africa on Hungary December 8, 1941
    New Zealand on Finland December 7, 1941
    New Zealand on Hungary December 7, 1941
    New Zealand on Rumania December 7, 1941
    Japan on the United States December 7, 1941
    Japan on the British Empire December 7, 1941
    Great Britain on Japan December 8, 1941
    The United States on Japan December 8, 1941
    Canada on Japan December 8, 1941, as of December 7, 1941
    Costa Rica on Japan December 8, 1941
    Dominican Republic on Japan December 8, 1941
    Guatemala on Japan December 8, 1941
    Haiti on Japan December 8, 1941
    Honduras on Japan December 8, 1941
    El Salvador on Japan December 8, 1941
    Panama on Japan December 8, 1941
    Cuba on Japan December 9, 1941
    The Netherlands on Japan December 8, 1941
    The Netherlands Indies on Japan December 8, 1941
    China on Japan December 9, 1941
    China on Germany December 9, 1941
    China on Italy December 9, 1941
    Union of South Africa on Japan December 8, 1941
    Australia on Japan December 8, 1941
    Free France on Japan December 8, 1941
    Germany on the United States December 11, 1941
    Italy on the United States December 11, 1941
    The United States on Germany December 11, 1941
    The United States on Italy December 11, 1941
    Costa Rica on Germany and Italy December 11, 1941
    Guatemala on Germany and Italy December 11, 1941
    Cuba on Germany and Italy December 11, 1941
    Nicaragua on Germany, Italy and Japan December 11, 1941
    Poland on Japan December 11, 1941
    Dominican Republic on Germany and Italy December 11, 1941
    Haiti on Germany and Italy December 12, 1941
    Honduras on Germany and Italy December 12, 1941
    El Salvador on Germany and Italy December 12, 1941
    Panama on Germany and Italy December 12, 1941
    Rumania on the United States December 12, 1941
    Bulgaria on the United States December 13, 1941
    Bulgaria on Great Britain December 13, 1941
    Hungary on the United States December 13, 1941
    Czechoslovakia on all countries that are in
    a state of war with Great Britain, theUnited
    States, or the USSR December 16, 1941
    Albania on the United States December 17, 1941
    Nicaragua on Bulgaria, Hungary, & Rumania December 20, 1941
    Belgium on Japan December 20, 1941
    Haiti on Bulgaria, Hungary, and Rumania December 24, 1941
    Great Britain on Bulgaria December 27, 1941, as of December 13, 1941
    The Netherlands on Italy December 30, 1941, as of December 11, 1941
    Union of South Africa on Bulgaria December 31, 1941, as of December 13, 1941


    sve informacije mozete naci ovde
    http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scr...larations.html



  2. #2
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU


  3. #3
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Foreword
    "The first casualty when war comes is truth." - Senator Hiram Johnson, 1917

    After sixty-years of World War II indoctrination most people consider themselves reasonably knowledgeable about the events leading to and through this conflict. The most fascinating aspect of this compilation is the revelation that the victor's account of these events is pure bunkum. 'Round One to the Barbarians' rips the victors' propaganda to shreds and surely casts a new perspective on the great European tragedy of 1939 - 1945.

    The post war propagandists' role is best summed up by George Orwell's analysis of their function in his satirical account in 1984 of the 'Ministry of Truth.'

    "This government department spent its time around the clock falsifying the past. It did so by excising all uncomfortable previous events from the public record and burning them, and reprinting continuously revised editions brought up to date in harmony with the latest twist in the political line of his fictional, but terribly real, in fact, regime."

    "The preparation of 'convenient history' has long been a lucrative undertaking. Besides making an Establishment feel comfortable and secure, and justifying its policies, it can result in the reflection upon its authors of official smiles and blessings which converts into such things as secure and generously paid official and academic posts, and many related prebends and benefactions.

    "Their patrons can also have harnessed to such functionaries' machinery of favourable publicity, which unwearyingly promotes them and their works as paragons of veracity and literary brilliance, while showering them with prizes, awards and dazzling distinctions.

    "Official accounts become the political Scriptures of powerful interest groups, and are repeated unceasingly in the Establishment mass communications media, while being assiduously log-rolled in the upper levels of the 'academic' watchdogs of the intellect' leading to additional veneration.

    "The sanctified official chroniclers prefer to ignore inconvenient history and generally behave as though it never was written. If any of it manages to break through to their consciousness, they may stare at the producers of these uncomfortable and abrasive accounts in their sedate and chilly hauteur and sniff imperiously while dismissing the product with a casual and patronising wave of a frill-cuffed hand, as 'pseudo scholarship,' an ad hominem ploy to reassure the believers, and those who want to believe, alike, that they need not fear as to the rectitude and solidity of their established corner.

    How perfectly this observation illustrates the allies' propagandists of the present day as cur-like they swallow 'convenient history' only to defecate it hours later in the face of their own. There have been many other wars since the 'world war'. The latest being the war on Iraq. Again this victim country was vilified for its 'weapons of mass destruction' (a refreshing change from gas chamber allegations). It too was said to be a threat to the world and/or freedom; mix as you wish. It also (yawn) was an 'exporter of terrorism' and much else.

    Perhaps people are finally waking up to the duplicitous nature of their rulers, many of whom with shadowy interests they have no inkling of. This will leave only those who fall into the category: 'Convince a fool against their will; they'll hold the same opinions still.'

    Why on earth do otherwise intelligent people, knowing their rulers have lied about every conflict they have engaged themselves in convince themselves they are told the truth about World War Two?

    Is it because the truth is too awful to confront; that we prefer the comfort of self-deception? Round One to the Barbarians will be an enlightening experience. Those of weaker disposition may prefer to self delude themselves with the victors' propaganda.

    Michael Walsh

    PRELUDE TO WAR

    As any schoolboy knows the origins of the Second Word War can be traced directly back to the deeply flawed Versailles Treaty, imposed on Germany drafted following World War One. This unfairly relegated that nation to a pariah state with swingeing financial and trade punishments.

    Such was the suffering of the German people that they eventually turned to Adolf Hitler's National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDPA) for deliverance.

    Upon his election in January 1933 and his appointment as Chancellor the new German leader asked (February 1st 1933) only that he be given four years to restore German security and prosperity. When just three years later on March 29, 1936 the German people were given the opportunity to express their approval or disapproval of the more open form of democracy as provided by the National Socialist system of government the overwhelming majority enthusiastically voted in favour of its continuation.

    By 1938 Hitler's Germany was reckoned to be the most prosperous nation on earth; a nation with so many employment opportunities that the retired were given incentives to return to work, and citizens of neighbouring states flooded in to share in its prosperity.

    Even sixty years on no nation has achieved Nazi Germany's level of prosperity; full employment, workers and women's rights, child and retired care, leisure, travel opportunity, and met the aspirational achievements of a healthy vibrant youth.

    All this was achieved without outside help, loans or assistance. Sadly Germany's very prosperity and superior form of government became a threat to the competing Communist and Capitalist systems, and a magnet for emerging modern nations in Europe.

    Those who had the most to lose from National Socialism; bankers whose system was based on ruinous usury, communists whose ambitions would be curbed, highly-placed Jews whose interests, and in Germany careers were threatened (in favour of Germans), those whose protectionist trade systems were inferior, conspired to bring about the downfall of Hitler's Germany.

    The 1930s decade was marked by the clamour for war on Hitler's Germany. Theirs was a hatred fuelled by a growing public awareness that whilst the democracies suffered greatly from unemployment, economic misery, hellish social deprivation, and political corruption, their German neighbours were revelling in prosperity and civic well-being that exceeded even that of the United States.

    Worse still, the intelligentsia and governments of other European countries were beginning to sit up and take notice. Communism and Capitalism were on the verge of extinction. The rush to war and the destruction of Germany as a competing trading nation and more democratic alternative turned into a stampede.

    The Orwellian media, staffed by state apparatchiks and dependent on capitalist advertising and patronage, joined by assorted other self-interest warmongers up to their elbows in war profiteering mounted a furious anti-German rhetoric. Much as they do today when any country stands in the way of their economic ambitions or threatens their intended sphere of influence.

  4. #4
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    BUT THERE WERE SOME WHO
    WOULD HAVE NO PART OF IT

    A twice over British Prime Minister warns of the real warmongers: "I strive not to throw Europe into this criminal adventure. But the States, even the British Crown, are not the masters of their destiny. Powers that elude us are promoting in Great Britain, as in other countries, special interests and an aberrant idealism." – Stanley Baldwin, British Prime Minister 1924-1929 and 1935-1937

    "World history: There are two world histories. One is the official and full of lies, destined to be taught in schools – the other is the secret history, which harbors the true causes and occurrences." – Honore de Balzac

    THE SECOND WORLD WAR IN A PARAGRAPH
    "Battle doesn't determine who is right. Only who is left. We destroyed fascists, not fascism; men, not ideas. Our triumphs did not serve as evidence that democracy is best for the world any more than Russian victories proved that communism is an ideal system for all mankind. Only through our peacetime efforts to abolish war and bring a larger measure of freedom and security to all peoples can we reveal to others that we are any better than our defeated opponents." - Peter Bowman 'Beach Red'

    THE SUPREMACY OF TRUTH
    "Whenever we insist upon a truth we are witnessing to Almighty God.' – Hilaire Belloc. The Cruise of the Nona

    ANOTHER WITH SUPREME INSIDER KNOWLEDGE
    The Prime Minister David Lloyd George told the editor of the Manchester Guardian that is was as well that the real nature of war was not revealed. "If the people really knew, the war would be stopped tomorrow. But, of course, they don't know and they can't know. The correspondents don't write and the censorship would not pass the truth."

    WHAT THE 'GENTLEMEN' OF THE PRESS SAY

    "Stirring up the animals (the newspaper readers) was one of the great ends of life." – Charles A. Dana (1819 – 1897) One of America's greatest journalists.

    A thirteen-year veteran of Time magazine recently groused to a reporter on another periodical that he 'was asked to do a 40-inch story, which was pretty long for us, but that, 'when it came out, there were two words – two goddam words – that were mine.' – Geoffrey Stokes, The Village Voice, June 21 1976.

    "I wouldn't tell the people anything until the war is over and then I'd tell them who won." – Military Censor at a meeting in Washington.

    "I'm certain that readers of The Times in 1854 had a damned sight better view of the Crimean War than readers of The Times in 1939-1945 did of the Second World War. Inevitably prejudices were fed, and I believe that it was impossible for a general reader of a newspaper to form a balanced view of the progress of the war." - Captain Reginald Thompson, British Intelligence Corps, War Correspondent Sunday Times, Military Historian.

    "If you start from the premise that a lot of rascals are having a fight, it is not unnatural to want to see the victory of the rascal you like, and I liked the Italians during that scrimmage more than I did the British or the Abyssinians." – Herbert Matthews, New York Times War Correspondent 'The Education of a Correspondent.'

    "What is one to do when in order to rule men it is necessary to deceive them? For almost invariably the more simple, the more silly, and the more gross the phenomenon, the more likely they are to succeed." – Helena P. Blavatsky.

    "Practices are not prohibited because they are wrong, they are wrong because they have been prohibited." – Prof. Leslie A.White, The Science of Culture (New York, Farrar, Strauss and Cudahy, 1949)

    "If the British ran the rest of the Empire as they had run things recently in Singapore, then they did not deserve to have an empire at all." – Ian Morrison, London Correspondent The Times (early 1942)

    "We were just leeches, reporters trying to suck headlines out of all this death and suffering." – Robert St. John, Associated Press

    FROM ADMIRAL TO CABIN BOY
    "From that time onwards I had a strong suspicion that there was some mysterious power at work behind the scenes controlling the actions of the figures visibly taking part in the government of the country. I had not the least idea whence this power emanated, nor could I gauge its influence. I was in far too humble a position to make such lofty discoveries. Still, the feeling persisted. We always vaguely referred to this hidden control amongst ourselves as 'The Treasury.'" Admiral Sir Barry Domville, RN. Assistant Secretary Imperial Defence Committee prior to World War 1.

    Note: The admiral was arrested during World War 11 and imprisoned for three years for 'seeking peace.' His book, From Admiral to Cabin Boy has been airbrushed out of circulation.

    MASS ARRESTS
    Major General J.F.C Fuller and Major Lidell Hart (History of World War One and History of World War Two, etc) were placed under house arrest for predicting that war with Germany would lead to the ruin of Britain and the end of the British Empire. Many others were gaoled without trial. These included mothers whose children were taken into care.

    TELLING TALES

    Describing a conversation with Louis Marshall, the lawyer acting on behalf of New York Jewish-owned banks that funded the Communist revolution: "When taking leave of the famous lawyer he showed me that part of New York that could be seen from his Wall Street window, and told me: "Look what we can do for a country we love. In Russia we have shown the world what we can do for a country we hate." - Mr. Marshall felt obliged to repeat this statement to our Financial Attaché, Mr. Gheorghe Boncescu.' - The Suicide of Europe, Memoirs of Prince Michael Sturdza.

    After the war the German constitutional lawyer, Professor Friedrich Grimm told the English propagandist that it was time to desist. "No," Delmer replied. "Now we shall start all the more. We shall continue this atrocity propaganda, we shall intensify it, until nobody shall accept a good word from the Germans anymore, until all the sympathy you had in other countries shall be destroyed and until the Germans themselves shall be so confused that they do not know anymore what they are doing." – The Methods of Re-Education, Udo Walendy.

    THE CORRUPTION OF THE MEDIA
    "The news companies could sandwich my pictures and talk between the sack of cities and the mangled bodies of refugees. Once they have such a film, they can cut it and use it in any way they like. I have decided against speaking for the sound films. American press accounts of the war are so prejudiced and confused that it is almost impossible to obtain a balanced picture." – Charles A. Lindbergh, American flying ace

    "I do not pretend to speak for all veterans. In the course of forty months of war duty and five major battles I was only an ambulance driver, a merchant seaman, an Army historian, and a war correspondent, never a downright GI. Possibly the men who were subjected much more completely than I to the whims of militarism are now satisfied with their hollow victory, but I doubt it. I never met that fabulous character, typical Gl Joes who's every thought and post-war desire was so well known to politicians and the writers of advertising copy. But I met a lot of other Joes, and my guess is that before long - and the sooner the better - the veteran serviceman is going to wake from his deep dreams of peace, a job, and a home and realize that his country has let him down, and badly." - Edgar L. Jones, U.S. Second World War veteran. Atlantic Monthly, February 1946

    Among other things about modern warfare, I think the home front should also comprehend the full significance of the fact that a front-line soldier had a good chance of being killed in this war by his own side as well as by his opponents. Battle positions changed so rapidly that American soldiers were shelled by American artillery and warships, bombed and strafed by American planes, and machine-gunned by American tanks - not occasionally, but often. We also sank our own ships and shot down numbers of our own planes - how many no one knows, but the ship I was on in the invasion of Sicily knocked out four German planes and three of our own, which was considered a good average. - Edgar L. Jones, U.S. Second World War veteran. Atlantic Monthly, February 1946.

  5. #5
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    "IT WAS CRAP"

    Many Allied journalists were appalled at the restrictions placed on their observations as events unfolded during World War Two. Many were scathing in their cynicism and self-deprecating as a profession.

    Canadian Reuters correspondent Charles Lynch accredited to the British Army was refreshingly candid: "It's humiliating to look back at what we wrote during the war. It was crap, and I don't exclude the Ernie Pyles or the Alan Mooreheads. We were a propaganda arm of our governments. At the start the censors enforced that but at the end we were our own censors. We were cheerleaders. I suppose there wasn't an alternative at the time. It was total war, but, for God's sake, let's not glorify our role. It wasn't good journalism. It wasn't journalism at all."

  6. #6
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    HITLER'S SUPERIOR SYSTEM
    WAS THE REAL REASON FOR WAR?

    General Robert Wood testified that in 1936 Winston Churchill told him that Germany is getting too strong and must be smashed (p.130). Bernard Baruch, the American-Jewish banker agreed in an interview with F.D Roosevelt:

    "If we keep prices down, there is no reason why we shouldn't get the customers from belligerent nations that they had had to drop because of the war. In that event Germany's barter system will be destroyed – New York Times 14th September 1939.

    The London Times stated that Germany's barter system made her an aggressor in the world market: "One of the fundamental causes of this war has been the un-relaxing efforts of Germany since 1918 to secure wide enough foreign markets to straighten her finances at the very time when all her competitors were forced by their own debts to adopt exactly the same course. Continuous friction was inevitable."

    In effect Germany was acting like the striking worker paying by credit card for over-priced goods from the company-owned shop. He now agrees only to barter his hours of labour for his sustenance. So there you have it. The war lobbying nations strangled by international debt; could not compete with a debt free National Socialist Germany, and so the German state had to be removed, indeed destroyed.

    YOUR PARENTS TAXES ROSE – GERMANY'S WERE REDUCED
    Yet you, Tommy Atkins, even today are still holding your breath for the next budget or tax increase? You now work almost half the year for your government – and you call yourself free? Sounds to me like your freedom is having one arm and leg free of the shackles!

    Read on: In National Socialist Germany "Nothing is ever heard of the necessity of increasing taxation, compulsory savings (pension schemes?) or the issue of enormous public war loans. On the contrary! Recently an important tax was abolished. Money is so plentiful that the interest rate on Reich loans could recently be reduced from 41/2 to just 4 per cent." London Times, October 11,12,13, 1940.

    Note the date! This was the time when Churchill had bankrupted the British nation and had to beg American President Roosevelt for loans; the pledges being the British Empire; its possessions and its preferential trading agreements.

    SOUNDS LIKE SENSIBLE BUDGETING TO ME
    "Germany was trying to break the (high interest) credit ring of the money monopolists by the sheer force of economic sanity – and that was unforgivable". In 1937 Hitler said: "Germany will enter into no obligations to pay for her imports than she is capable of fulfilling. The German Government therefore takes the standpoint of the respectable merchant who keeps his orders in harmony with what he can pay. We have come to learn that the value of our currency lies in the productive capacity of our nation." (In other words, Germany wouldn't borrow on the high interest credit card. If it couldn't pay it wouldn't buy).

    The world financial monopolists – the unseen gangsters behind the governments – were aghast. If Germany was allowed to succeed in her plans for economic penetration other nations would follow her example. The whole world would then exchange goods for goods on a basis of equality and friendship. No one would find the need to borrow and the financial period of debt (unearned wealth) from the apex of which Almighty Finance ruled the world, would collapse. Humanity from there on would be well fed with its natural resources diverted directly to its own people's mouths and needs.

    At this point "Statesmen began to prepare the public mind for war. No mention was made of the real causes of the crisis; the bitter scramble for world markets, the trickery and inhuman methods used to obtain spheres of influence and increase the world's mountain of debt and the power it wielded.

    Once again, statesmen, many of them bribed, sacrificed the youth of their country on the bloody altar of Mammon. As in peace, so in war! The efforts – and even the lives of humanity must be sacrificed for a worthless economic system that's only 'value' was the power it gave to the few who controlled it.

    "Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people." – Former U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt.


    THE GREAT BRITISH LIE FACTORIES

    As the Second World War progressed Department EH became officially delegated for the invention and the spreading many of myths and rumours. This was a small sub-section of M.I6. Some of their ruses were so clever and innovative that even the Joint Intelligence Committee took many seriously.

    One of the specialties of The Ministry of Information was to publish fake refugee memoirs. The Diary of a Dutch Boy Refugee by the fictitious Dirk van der Heide was baloney. Likewise films such as The Foreman Went to France and Went the Day Well?

    All continued to peddle ludicrous German and British stereotypes. Clearly their descendants are still employed in the kraut-bashing British media; see also The Diary of Ann Frank and virtually all books on the alleged holocaust.

    Several of the fictional sold-as-fact books that were published during 1940 and 1941 were officially inspired tall stories. These included Through the Dark Night by James Lansdale Hodson, a Daily Sketch correspondent. These have all been added to since – with further embellishments.

    Other correspondents solicited to churn out propaganda included Douglas Williams (The New Contemptibles, 1940) and Bernard Gray (War Reporter, 1941). Another was van Kleffens The Rape of the Netherlands.

    From such literary 'gentlemen' came the stories of German paratroops dressed as nuns, priests, nurses, and women. Newspapers picked up these cock and bull stories and peddled them on a daily basis.

    They still repeat the same old lies – and worst of all, media toadies re-cycle lies that were first heard in the post war torture chambers, where screaming Axis servicemen told their torturers anything – signed anything, that their tormentors demanded of them. That is the most sickening thing about so-called journalists. In doing so they scribble on their pads at the scene of these crimes while the torturer follows his filthy calling.

    In Britain, a former Czech resistance fighter Edward Spiro wrote a series of less than reliable books on intelligence matters under the pseudonym E.H Cookridge. The first of these, Secrets of the British Secret Service was published in 1947. It was nonsense from first page to last.

    THE FICTION THAT LED TO MASS INTERNMENT

    Today there is outrage over summary imprisonment without trial at Guantanamo Bay and British gaols such as Belmarsh Prison, in 1940 Churchill desperately sought an excuse to round up thousands of those he considered enemy aliens. Many were simply of German or Italian extraction who had made their home here, in some cases they were second or third generation and some had served in the British armed forces.

    Assisting the government in justifying mass arrests without trial was one of the most notorious spinners of fifth column nonsense. He was Sir Neville Bland, the British Minister to the Dutch Government in The Hague.

    James Hayward, the noted dissembler of wartime myths described Bland's 'report' as 'a thousand word fantasy'. He added that some in the know credit Bland with importing the worst of the paratroop and fifth column myths into Britain.

    He later disclosed that these tactics were used to 'justify the mass internment of male aliens, which the Home Secretary, under Churchill's direction, had ordered on May 13th 1940.'

    THE METHODS BEHIND THE MADNESS

    "What motive underpinned these outlandish falsehoods? Clearly, many on the allied side had a vested interest in ascribing the German victories to an underhand secret weapon rather than poor leadership and military incompetence. Yet as we have seen, many in the British military and political establishment, including Churchill, Ramsey and Ironside, gave these myths full credit. Churchill even offering 20,000 organised Nazis in Britain.

    Some historians have concluded that the fifth column menace was deliberately fabricated to support mass internment in Britain, and in this there is a great deal of truth." – James Hayward, Myths and Legends of the Second World War.

  7. #7
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP – BUT THEY DID MYTHS FROM THE BRITISH TALL TALES FACTORY

    * The same fictitious poisoned sweets passed out to children by German troops in the First World War were not surprisingly handed out to children in the Second World War.
    * In 1914 dachshund dogs were kicked and stoned on the streets of Britain. In 1939 they had an easier time, being merely denigrated in the press by having swastikas crudely drawn on their backs.
    * At the outbreak of war delicatessens and German owned shops were attacked and looted, as was anyone with a German sounding name. Ironically some were German Jews.
    * Drew Middleton of the Associated Press questioned the hard-line British propaganda machine: "it's – come on-Hitler-we're-ready-stuff." Such was the psychotic effects of propaganda that tennis courts were foolishly identified as gun platforms. Matches struck in the street were reported as signals to spies or submarines.
    * Just as in the First World War the Kaiser was said to be insane in the next war Adolf Hitler was said to be insane. One can only wonder at the state of mind of those who swallow such nonsense.
    * On May 21 1940 the French Prime Minister whined that the loss of the bridges over the River Meuse was on account of fifth columnists. They were in fact lost due to military incompetence. Mythical fifth columnists simply make a convenient scapegoat.
    * There were never any secret U-boat bases in Ireland. Nor did German submarines put to sea with cold-stored severed limbs to be jettisoned to simulate their own sinking.
    * Hitler's plumbing was perfectly normal.
    * Denmark was overrun in a single day. Many of the German troops invaded simply by using the ferry services. It isn't known whether they paid for their tickets!
    * The alleged gas chambers came after the war when it was realized that this theme park nonsense was a money spinner without equal – but with remarkable bonuses.
    * German paratroopers were never disguised as nuns, in female attire or any other outlandish garbs as alleged by allied propandists.

    CONCENTRATION CAMPS, MADE IN STATEN ISLAND
    In 1981, Jack Glenn, director of the popular 1940s newsreel series March of Time (Which the History Channel still uses), died at the age of 76. His obituary, distributed by the Associated Press and published in the Bergen, New Jersey, Sunday Record (February 15, 1981) let slip an amazing revelation.

    "As senior director for the popular movie house newsreel, he often created world events with actors and movie sets. One such news feature film, Inside Nazi Germany, made in 1939, included footage allegedly of a Nazi concentration camp.

    In fact it was filmed on Staten Island, New York with scores of New York City actors. Much of the film's footage was shot within the 3rd Reich's borders by a freelance cameraman but the imaginary Nazi camp atrocities were quite certainly 'Made in the US of A.'

    POLAND, THE REAL BULL TERRIER OF EUROPE
    Poland, for obvious reasons, is portrayed as the innocent victim of Nazi Germany's insatiable desire for lebensraum. What you are not told is that until Germany's retaliation early in September 1939, Poland was rightly regarded as a bellicose troublemaker throughout Eastern Europe. It had engaged in skirmishes against most of its neighbours, including the Germans of Silesia whose land it had occupied in defiance of international law in 1920.

    Even the architects of the infamous Versailles Treaty were embarrassed by Poland's cruel pogroms against its 1,500,000 German victims. In an orgy of ethnic cleansing many were dragged from their homes and beaten or stoned to death. International Red Cross put the figure at 3,000 dead over a 20 year period from 1919. They were all civilians, many of them children. In 1939 over 500 German minorities were murdered by Poles.

    These are facts that like so many others have been airbrushed out of history books. These provocations prior to war breaking out are censored and those who dare to expose them are either ignored or slandered by British media hacks.

    POLISH MILITARY SUPERIORITY
    Polish belligerency rested on its formidable means of waging war which exceeded that of their German neighbours. Over twenty years they had created a million man army (bigger than the British Empire's). They had thirty fully modernized infantry divisions backed up by a National Defense of 100,000 National Reservists.

    The Cavendish Encyclopedia described Poland's army as 'one of the largest in the world'. The Polish infantry were supported by an armoured brigade of 300 tanks. This puts the lie to the myth that theirs was an operatic cavalry defence force.

    The Poles did of course have 37 horse regiments; so did all other nations at the time including Britain and the USA. In 1939 over 50% of the German war machine was drawn by horses.

    The Poles operated a modern navy of five submarines, four destroyers, six mine sweepers and a mine layer. Poland's navy continued to fight long after their capital fell in October 1939. Over 6 months later on April 8, 1940 the German transport Rio de Janeiro was sunk in the Baltic by the Polish submarine Orzel.

    The Poles had an air fleet of over 1,000 aircraft. These included long range medium bombers (suitable only for aggressive warfare). The advanced P.37 'Elk' medium bomber was considerably faster than its German counterpart the Heinkel HE 111H-16.

    The premier fighter of the Polish Air Force was the nimble PZL P.11 was more than a formidable adversary against its German equivalents. The downing of 285 Luftwaffe aircraft during the brief campaign is testimony to Poland's military airborne abilities.

    Whilst some of Germany's superior military achievements are highlighted what isn't mentioned is that unlike Poland with just the one border to defend the Germans needed to simultaneously protect their western borders from France and Britain.

    The Poles did fight bravely under the illusion that British an French promises to come to their aid would be fulfilled. Sadly the French didn't have enthusiasm beyond talking a good fight; Britain likewise failed to send the promised hardware.

    THE GREAT INVASION SCARE
    John Colville, Churchill's private secretary, on July 12th recorded a very revealing conversation that he had with the British neo-autocrat Winston Churchill. "He emphasised that the great invasion scare (which he had derided six weeks earlier) is serving a most useful purpose: it is well on the way to providing us with the finest offensive army, and is keeping every man and woman tuned to a high pitch of readiness.

    He does not wish the (fifth column) scare to abate therefore, and although personally he doubts whether invasion is a serious menace, he intends to give that impression, and to talk about long and dangerous vigils, etc, when he broadcasts on Sunday."

    Even today the compliant Press re-cycle the German invasion myth despite knowing that it was and remains, union jack emblazoned codswhallop.

    THE BORE WAR
    Very little happened between the British and French declaration of war on September 3 1939 and Germany's pre-emptive strike on 10th May 1940. Germany refused to be provoked into opening a western front. Correspondents called the stalemate 'the bore war'.

    This hardly pleased the war lobby in France and Britain. These then conspired to broaden the front through Holland and Belgium, a ruse that as expected brought about a German military response.

    Churchill was delighted when, to protect Germany's western borders from British and French aggression, German troops crossed into France. On that very day Churchill's war party ousted British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, the British warmonger and his henchmen was elated.

    One of the great ironies of the Second World War was that unlike Winston Churchill Adolf Hitler was not only empowered in a legitimate election but was overwhelmingly popular. Churchill was never elected to be Britain's war leader. He assumed leadership after a House of Commons coup, backed by the Jewish financed war lobby.

  8. #8
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    EVO DELA GDE JE ISTINA !!!

    CONCENTRATION CAMPS, MADE IN STATEN ISLAND
    In 1981, Jack Glenn, director of the popular 1940s newsreel series March of Time (Which the History Channel still uses), died at the age of 76. His obituary, distributed by the Associated Press and published in the Bergen, New Jersey, Sunday Record (February 15, 1981) let slip an amazing revelation.

    "As senior director for the popular movie house newsreel, he often created world events with actors and movie sets. One such news feature film, Inside Nazi Germany, made in 1939, included footage allegedly of a Nazi concentration camp.

    In fact it was filmed on Staten Island, New York with scores of New York City actors. Much of the film's footage was shot within the 3rd Reich's borders by a freelance cameraman but the imaginary Nazi camp atrocities were quite certainly 'Made in the US of A.'

    POLAND, THE REAL BULL TERRIER OF EUROPE
    Poland, for obvious reasons, is portrayed as the innocent victim of Nazi Germany's insatiable desire for lebensraum. What you are not told is that until Germany's retaliation early in September 1939, Poland was rightly regarded as a bellicose troublemaker throughout Eastern Europe. It had engaged in skirmishes against most of its neighbours, including the Germans of Silesia whose land it had occupied in defiance of international law in 1920.

    Even the architects of the infamous Versailles Treaty were embarrassed by Poland's cruel pogroms against its 1,500,000 German victims. In an orgy of ethnic cleansing many were dragged from their homes and beaten or stoned to death. International Red Cross put the figure at 3,000 dead over a 20 year period from 1919. They were all civilians, many of them children. In 1939 over 500 German minorities were murdered by Poles.

    These are facts that like so many others have been airbrushed out of history books. These provocations prior to war breaking out are censored and those who dare to expose them are either ignored or slandered by British media hacks.

    POLISH MILITARY SUPERIORITY
    Polish belligerency rested on its formidable means of waging war which exceeded that of their German neighbours. Over twenty years they had created a million man army (bigger than the British Empire's). They had thirty fully modernized infantry divisions backed up by a National Defense of 100,000 National Reservists.

    The Cavendish Encyclopedia described Poland's army as 'one of the largest in the world'. The Polish infantry were supported by an armoured brigade of 300 tanks. This puts the lie to the myth that theirs was an operatic cavalry defence force.

    The Poles did of course have 37 horse regiments; so did all other nations at the time including Britain and the USA. In 1939 over 50% of the German war machine was drawn by horses.

    The Poles operated a modern navy of five submarines, four destroyers, six mine sweepers and a mine layer. Poland's navy continued to fight long after their capital fell in October 1939. Over 6 months later on April 8, 1940 the German transport Rio de Janeiro was sunk in the Baltic by the Polish submarine Orzel.

    The Poles had an air fleet of over 1,000 aircraft. These included long range medium bombers (suitable only for aggressive warfare). The advanced P.37 'Elk' medium bomber was considerably faster than its German counterpart the Heinkel HE 111H-16.

    The premier fighter of the Polish Air Force was the nimble PZL P.11 was more than a formidable adversary against its German equivalents. The downing of 285 Luftwaffe aircraft during the brief campaign is testimony to Poland's military airborne abilities.

    Whilst some of Germany's superior military achievements are highlighted what isn't mentioned is that unlike Poland with just the one border to defend the Germans needed to simultaneously protect their western borders from France and Britain.

    The Poles did fight bravely under the illusion that British an French promises to come to their aid would be fulfilled. Sadly the French didn't have enthusiasm beyond talking a good fight; Britain likewise failed to send the promised hardware.

    THE GREAT INVASION SCARE
    John Colville, Churchill's private secretary, on July 12th recorded a very revealing conversation that he had with the British neo-autocrat Winston Churchill. "He emphasised that the great invasion scare (which he had derided six weeks earlier) is serving a most useful purpose: it is well on the way to providing us with the finest offensive army, and is keeping every man and woman tuned to a high pitch of readiness.

    He does not wish the (fifth column) scare to abate therefore, and although personally he doubts whether invasion is a serious menace, he intends to give that impression, and to talk about long and dangerous vigils, etc, when he broadcasts on Sunday."

    Even today the compliant Press re-cycle the German invasion myth despite knowing that it was and remains, union jack emblazoned codswhallop.

  9. #9
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    AND YOU THOUGHT YOUR VOTES
    BOUGHT PRIME MINISTERS?

    HOW TO BUY A PRIME MINISTER
    The post war reputation of Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill is largely based on accounts written by brown-nose sycophants. Any impartial and considered analysis of his life reveals him as a thoroughly unwholesome character. A persistent drunkard who could drink most men under the table he was also your archetypical bungler. The more guileful Josef Stalin out-foxed the fat oaf of the Fifth Remove on every occasion.

    Churchill was recently revealed, by none other than television journalist Jeremy Paxman, as having a penchant for wearing expensive female underwear. He also patronised gay orgies attended by members of the aristocracy – and London's underworld including the notorious gangsters, the Kray twins.

    10,000 YOUNG MEN LOST THANKS TO CHURCHILL
    Still remembered are Churchill's inept military strategies such as the Gallipoli Campaign. He had little choice but to take complete responsibility for this 'cunning plan' which led to the total defeat and humiliation of the cream of the British Empire's armed forces. At Gallipoli the Turks inflicted 100,000 casualties on Churchill's forces.

    THE FAT OWL SLINKS OFF TO THE USA
    Forced to resign his post as First Lord of the Admiralty and with his reputation in tatters he slunk off to the United States where, the less savvy Americans gave him some credit.

    Always one for the good life Churchill constantly lived beyond his meagre means. Four years after his bus pass being issued; the old fool faced the loss of his country estate and imminent bankruptcy. Confronted by financial, social and political disgrace Churchill made himself available to the highest bidder, as many do even today. He too was a professional politician and ambitious opportunist ready to sell himself to the highest bidder

    CHURCHILL PAID IN SHEKELS
    Who should appear on the horizon but one Henry Strakosch, a multi-millionaire Jewish gentleman who had made his pile from the near slave conditions of South Africa's diamond mines.

    There being no such thing as a free lunch there had to be a catch when anyone, but most of all a Jewish millionaire bails you out. The half-American sot soon found he was richer by a cool £150,000. Work that out in today's money and you will draw breath. We can bet he did. That kind of money buys you a lot of claret, cigars, silken pantaloons. It even buys you a war.

    The catch was of course the warlike lobby's need for someone with the oratory skills, charisma and connections to skilfully pull together their 'War with Germany' lobby.

    They got what they wanted and Churchill got what he wanted; political and financial salvation. He had been well and truly bought. The Jewish manna now cascaded into the arms of the warmongers lobby. While 'Tommy' was called to arms, the Members of Parliament and other assorted parasitical riff-raff were called to their stockbrokers' offices. A fortune was to be made in the armaments and related industries. MPs of all persuasions were heavy investors in the arms industry.

    As opportunist and chameleon-like as ever, Churchill the party-hopping pill-popping cigar-smoking dilettante took up the war-cry: 'Delenda est Germania - Germany must be destroyed.' Could this really be the same 'man' who less than two years earlier had said of Adolf Hitler: "If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations." A pity that Adolf Hitler didn't offer a bigger bribe to Churchill than did the war lobbyists.

    SACKED FOR REMEMBERING WHAT WAS BEST FORGOTTEN
    On September 17th the Soviet Union invaded Poland and eleven days later Poland's independence ended. The Soviet Union's invasion of that country raised not a murmur of protest from London.

    When Polish General Kazimeirz Sosnkowski, the Supreme Commander of the Polish troops, reminded his soldiers that 'Poland entered this war because of the urging of Great Britain, it was at Winston Churchill's insistence that the outspoken Supreme Commander was deprived of his command.

    Eight weeks later the Soviet Union invaded Finland. Winston Churchill's coalition government also declared war on this hapless Scandinavian state that had a few years earlier in the gallant 'Winter War' defended its territory so fearlessly against the might of the Red Army.
    THE MAKERS OF WAR
    On November 26, 1912, an editorial writer of the London Times, in a lucid moment, asked the direct question: "Who, then, makes war?" The answer is to be found in the Chancelleries of Europe, among the men who have too long played with human lives as pawns in a game of chess, who have become so enmeshed in formulas and the jargon of diplomacy that they have ceased to be conscious of the poignant realities with which they trifle

    And thus war will continue to be made, until the great masses who are the sport of the professional schemers and dreamers say the word which will bring, not eternal peace, for that is impossible, but a determination that wars shall be fought only in just and righteous and vital cause."

  10. #10
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    338,000 BRITISH AND FRENCH TROOPS
    - SAVED BY HITLER

    A major tactical error on Hitler's part was his reluctance to wage war beyond that which was necessary to secure his country's borders. As late as 2004 it was conceded that whilst the Dunkirk evacuation was a disaster deliverance of tens of thousands of troops made it possible for Britain to carry on the war.

    In explaining why Hitler intervened to allow the escape of 188,000 British and 150,200 French troops at Dunkirk, General Blumentritt said: "He then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence and of the civilisation that Britain had brought to the world.

    He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church - saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany's position on the continent.

    The return of Germany's lost colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support British troops, if she should be involved in any difficulties anywhere. He concluded by saying that his aim was to make peace with Britain, on a basis that she would regard as compatible with her honour to accept."

    Blumentritt added, "The German generals in charge were dumbfounded and outraged at Hitler's attitude in thus preventing them from pressing an advantage which they believed would result in the capture of the entire British Expeditionary Force. But Hitler was adamant in his refusal and issued the most peremptory orders for the German armoured forces to stay at a distance while the British embarkation went on." – Over The Hill, Sir Basil Liddell Hart.

    Thus the success of the British retreat at Dunkirk described as 'the miracle of Dunkirk' owes its miraculous nature to the French Army fighting a rearguard retreat while British troops escaped - and Hitler again behaving in a characteristically conciliatory way.

    Referring to the romanticised official version of the retreat to Dunkirk Edward R. Morrow, CBS correspondent in London wrote, "There is a tendency to call the withdrawal a victory and there will be disagreement on that point."

    THE ROUT

    As the British retreat to Dunkirk turned into a rout certain British Army units used dum-dum bullets against advancing German troops. They had also been ordered not to take any prisoners except for interrogation. Dum-dum bullets expand on impact; survival is highly unlikely as the entire area struck explodes. They are banned under the Geneva Convention.

    This behaviour so infuriated one SS Unit that it retaliated by shooting a number of captured British soldiers; members of the Warwickshire Regiment.

    THE CHICKEN RUN

    Not everyone in Britain was prepared to 'fight them on the beaches.' As the British Expeditionary Force retreated towards Dunkirk the Duke of Windsor was quickly appointed Governor of the Bahamas and the gold reserves of the Bank of England were shipped off to Ottawa.

    Alfred Duff Cooper, the Minister of Information sent his son Julius to Canada. Some Minister of Information! He forgot to tell anyone he had done so.

    Those parents who could afford it shipped their families out to America or the Commonwealth. Various Royal Navy ships were placed on standby to evacuate members of the Royal Family and various key members of the government to the United States.

    In P. Addison's analysis, The Fears that Flawed the Finest Hour we learn that in June, July and August of 1940, 'over 6,000 children took part in the exodus of the rich'. Phillip Knightley the acclaimed military historian said, "The working class began to feel, with some justification, that the rich had plans to get out whilst the going was good."

    Statesmen will einvent cheap lies, putting blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." - Mark Twain, Chronicle of Young Satan

    THE MYTHICAL FIFTH COLUMN IN FRANCE
    Government promoted Fifth Column hysteria in France reached such ludicrous levels that one commentator, Margery Allingham in The Oaken Heart surmised: "The weekly comic papers had nothing on the new Jerry in the matter of invention."

    Not so funny were the tragic consequences of public apprehension and panic. In France thousands of perfectly innocent people were slaughtered when French military units were given carte blanche to summarily shoot any persons unable to account for their presence in any given district.

    In a single incident twenty-two people were casually executed in the small town of Abbeville. Specialist historians such as James Hayward believe that thousands more were slaughtered in woodlands and at the side of roads.

    That downed German aircrews were taken into custody and ended up in POW camps is a myth. The commonplace procedure was to execute them on the spot.

    There was little ceremony to these brutal killings. Indeed the invasion gave the perfect excuse for an orgy of bloodlust and the selection of victims was casual. In one hospital a dispenser had five people shot, one a beautiful young girl. Their 'crime'? They were said to have shown lights and curtains of different colours. More French civilians died at the hands of their own countrymen and the allies than were ever killed by the Germans.

    ALLIED SUMMARY EXECUTIONS
    "The widespread killing of suspected fifth columnists in France, Belgium and Holland, invariably on the basis of little or no evidence, reflects credit on no one, including the British Expeditionary Force. The fact that the total number of killings and summary executions probably ran into the low thousands during a campaign which lasted little more than a month is particularly disturbing." - James Hayward, Myths and Legends of the Second World War.

    MOST BRITONS WERE AGAINST THE WAR WITH GERMANY
    Most people from the Prince of Wales and former Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin to the man in the street were opposed to waging war on Germany. These included such luminaries as Prime Minister Ramsey MacDonald, Sir Samuel Hoare, Sir John Simon, Lord Hartwood, Lord Lothian, Lord Rothermere. Lord Arnold, Captain Bernard Ackworth, Prof. Sir Raymond Beazley, Mr. C.E Carroll, and Sir. John Smedley Crooke, M.P.

    Mr. W.H. Dawson, Admiral Sir, Barry Domville, Mr. A.E.R Dyer, Lord Fairfax of Cameron, Viscount Hardinge of Penshurst, Mr. F.C Jarvis, Mr. Douglas Jerrold, Sir. John Latta, Prof. A.P Laurie, The Marquess of Londonderry, Vice-Admiral V.B Molteno, Captain A.H Maule Ramsey, M.P.

    Mr. Wilmot Nicholson, Lord Redesdale, Captain Lane-Fox Pitt-Rivers, Capt. Arthur Rogers, OBE, Major-Gen, Arthur Solly-Flood, Mrs. Nesta Webster, Mr. Bernard Wilson.

    Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's heart wasn't in a war with Germany. On his return from Munich the war lobby denounced him for having negotiated a peaceful settlement. Communists and warmongers were incensed when they learned that war had been avoided.

    The British Prime Minister's effigy was burned in Moscow; an expression of the Communist Party's displeasure at his avoiding war. However, the public was right behind the hapless British Prime Minister. In October 1939 he conceded that "In three days last week I had 2,450 letters, and 1,860 (76%) of these were 'stop the war', in one form or another."

    So much for the so-called 'peoples war.'

    Lord Lothian in his last speech to Chatham House was absolutely right when he remarked: "If the principle of self-determination had been applied in Germany's favor as it was applied against her, it would have meant the return of the Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia, parts of Poland, the Polish Corridor and Danzig to the Reich."

    Sir Philip Gibbs was generous in his praise of the conciliatory German leader. "Hitler," he said, "has given new hope to humanity. His points are inspired by a most generous spirit which, if accepted, will surely blow away the dark fears."

    IMPRISONED FOR DENOUNCING STALIN
    A woman was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for publicly criticising Stalin and the 'heroic' Red army as murderers, which they undoubtedly were. 'Uncle Joe' was portrayed as England's kindly ally against 'the German beasts'.

  11. #11
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    POLAND WAS THE REAL AGGRESSOR
    As a matter of real politik the USSR remained an ally of Hitler's Reich for 22-months. The German leader's defensive strategy exposed the media to excessive mendacity. Here were two political systems, in their view one good and one bad, whose equal actions called for unequal explanations.

    Whereas Uncle Joe Stalin could do no wrong the German leader could do no right. The sublime descended to the ridiculous. Britain without bothering with normal parliamentary procedures declared war on Germany in response to Polish aggression but a couple of weeks later assisted the USSR when it too invaded Poland. Double standards of course but had Britons questioned them they would have been gaoled; and they were.

    Poland was hardly the innocent victim the media makes it out to be. One of the best-kept secrets of the war is that it was Poland, encouraged by Britain that mobilised first. Furthermore Poland egged on by Britain and in defiance of the Versailles Treaty blockaded the free German City of Danzig and the Corridor itself.

    The Germans were responding to months if not years of Polish threats made against German territory. There had been many armed incursions by Polish armed forces, atrocities committed against the German section living in Poland, and avoidance of talks and agreements.

    It might also be remembered that not only was Poland already occupying German territory seized as reparations after World War One. As recently as three months earlier it had invaded and occupied their Czechoslovakian neighbour.

    When the Soviet Union with no such justification at all launched an almost simultaneous attack on Poland Winston Churchill was at his fawning double-standards best. "In a speech broadcast on October 1st 1939 this wretched British Minister apologised for their occupation of Eastern Poland. Prime Minister Chamberlain not to be outdone in brown-nosing the Soviet dictator told the House of Commons that the Soviet invasion was 'an act of self defence' though Poland had never acted aggressively towards the USSR. Pass the bucket!

    BOUGHT FOR £50,000
    On July 22nd 1936, at a small dinner in north London, it was put to Winston Churchill by various wealthy businessmen that they might finance him. One of those present was the Vice-Chairman of the Board of (Jewish) Deputies, Sir Robert Wale Cohen.

    His biography was published in an authorised version by Robert Henriques. In it he openly boasts at this dinner the group put up £50,000 to finance a secret group to keep Churchill afloat, provided he turned his magnificent oratory, his brilliant writing talents away from the targets at the time, which were India and defence, and direct his canon squarely upon their enemy, Nazi Germany. The pressure group was given he title The Focus.

    OH DEAR! NO MORE BRIBES?
    Note the date: October 3rd 1938 (four days after the signing of the Munich Agreement (of peace in Europe). "Poor Edward (General Sir Edward Spears). Now there's bound to be a General election, and now faced with the prospect of losing £2,000 a year from the Czechs. Can you believe it? And his seat in parliament!" – The American novelist and wife of Sir Edward bemoaning the fact that her husband would no longer be receiving Czech bribes for his anti-German stance.

    GRASPING POLITICIANS WITH THE FILTHY PAWS OUTSTRETCHED
    "In the files (Boston University, Massachusetts) I found a telephone call from the Czech Ambassador, Mr Jan Masaryk made in September 1938 in Prague, saying 'Mr Churchill is asking for more. Mr Atlee is asking for more as well!'

    These Czech files revealed that 2 million pound had already been sent from Prague to London in July 1938 for the bribing of 'influential opposition Conservative MPs'. These included Mr Churchill, Anthony Eden and Harold Macmillan; all became prime ministers.

    AMERICAN AID OR AMERICAN CHUTZPAH
    Roosevelt's America was far from being a generous friend to war-torn Britain. In Britain's hour of need he sent 50 old frigates and destroyers to Britain. Some were so useless that they had already been taken out of service.

    In exchange Britain ceded to the Americans seven Caribbean naval bases and a Canadian naval base. We wonder how many British lives had been lost in claiming these territories for the then British Empire.

    Sure enough, America was happy to supply Churchill's warring Britain with everything it needed, at a price. Britain paid through its gold and dollar reserves, and the liquidation of its substantial commercial interests in the USA. By 1941, before America had even joined the international mugging of Germany, Britain was a busted flush.

    THE LEND-LEASE AGREEMENT
    The Lend Lease Agreement is often painted up as an act of American generosity, special relations and all that fanciful nonsense from the bison's backside. Roosevelt was a little more transparent: 'The United States would be repaid after the war, 'in similar materials or, at our option, in other goods of many kinds which they can produce and which we need.'

    Roosevelt also said that he wanted to see the post war dismantling of the British Empire. And so while the British Forces were dying to preserve the British Empire against a 'foe' who had offered to defend it with German troops if need be, Churchill was selling the Empire to finance his foul war. You have a right to be confused, until you see the big picture!

    The Lend Lease Agreement Britain required Britain to abandon Imperial Preference, our system of nil or reduced tariffs in trade within our Empire. This would give the United States equality of trade in our territorial possessions, for which they had shed not an ounce of American blood. With friends like America who needs enemies?

    THE ONLY LEADER WITHOUT A BANK ACCOUNT
    Adolf Hitler was the only prominent figure of the period that never had a bank account or cheque book. He refused to be subsidised by the State and his income was derived from his own writings.

    THE ANTI-WAR KING LOSES HIS CROWN
    "As long as I am here, there will be no war," said Edward, the then Prince of Wales. From the moment he uttered these fateful words to Prime Minister Mr. Stanley Baldwin there was no possibility of him becoming King.

    "So you see, my dear Coningsby, the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.' – Coningsby by Benjamin Disraeli, 1844 (Sidonia, otherwise Lionel Rothschild, son of Nathan Rothschild II is speaking to Coningsby (Disraeli).

  12. #12
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    I mnogo vise o ISTINI o II svetskom ratu na ovoj adresi

    http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/roundone.htm

  13. #13
    Ističe se
    Učlanjen
    01.07.2004.
    Pol
    muški
    Lokacija
    Nis
    Poruke
    2.775
    Reputaciona moć
    65

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Kakve su ovo gluposti?
    Ispada da su Poljaci napali Nemce bezveze, samo da izginu.
    Čiste ruke
    Hladna glava
    I vatreno srce

  14. #14
    Aktivan član matijakupa (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    07.12.2008.
    Pol
    muški
    Lokacija
    Sisak
    Poruke
    1.196
    Reputaciona moć
    34

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio Pjer_Nis Pogledaj poruku
    Kakve su ovo gluposti?
    Ispada da su Poljaci napali Nemce bezveze, samo da izginu.

    još jedan koji je otkrio čari interneta.....što reći?

  15. #15
    Elita krauterbox (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    14.03.2006.
    Pol
    muški
    Lokacija
    Novorosijsk
    Poruke
    5.394
    Reputaciona moć
    257

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Pa vidiš da je na početku jedan od izvora njemačka Bijela knjiga.


    Nego Korkanj da li bi ti ovo malo nama prepričao, mnogo je ovo engleskog za čitati.


    I ovaj čini mi se da je ovo što si pejstovao od onoga Majkla Volša, a on nije istoričar.
    Ein Gespenst geht um in Europa - das Gespenst ...

  16. #16
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio krauterbox Pogledaj poruku
    Pa vidiš da je na početku jedan od izvora njemačka Bijela knjiga.


    Nego Korkanj da li bi ti ovo malo nama prepričao, mnogo je ovo engleskog za čitati.


    I ovaj čini mi se da je ovo što si pejstovao od onoga Majkla Volša, a on nije istoričar.
    Takvih Belih i crnih knjiga imas koliko hoces i sa bilo koje strane,i dan danas imas takve knjige
    HITLER
    THE ONLY TRUE DEMOCRAT

    Adolf Hitler is invariably described as a dictator. In fact he was the only war leader who was legitimately and overwhelmingly elected in a free vote by his people.

    The election on July 31st 1932 was a major victory for the National Socialists. They polled 13,574,000 votes. With 38% of the total votes cast NSDAP became the largest Party in the Reichstag with 230 seats. The Social Democrats had 133 seats and the Communists just 89. On January 30th Adolf Hitler was democratically appointed Chancellor of Germany.

    At the polls of March 5th the NSDAP polled 17,277,180 votes; an increase of 5.5 million bringing their voting percentage up to 44%. In coalition with the Nationalists who had polled 3,136,760 votes this showed an overwhelming majority of Germans had made their preference for German nationalism clear.

    In Adolf Hitler's first appeal to the German nation on February 1st 1933 he asked to be allowed just four years in order to carry out the task of national reconstruction. On March 29th 1936 the German nation was given the opportunity to express their approval or disapproval of the National Socialist State.

    TOTAL QUALIFIED VOTES 45,453,691
    TOTAL VOTES CAST 45,001,489 (99%)
    VOTES 'NO' OR INVALID 540,211
    VOTES FOR HITLER'S NSDAP 44,461,278 (98.8%)

    THE SAAR TERRITORY: The Versailles Treaty had deprived Germany of the Saar territory falsely claiming that the region was French with a French population of 150,000. In fact the French population was just 2,000 and for every French citizen in the Saar there were 250 Germans living there.

    On January 13th 1935 the electorate was asked whether they wished to remain French become part of Hitler's Third Reich.

    IN FAVOR OF UNIFICATION WITH GERMANY 477,119
    THOSE FAVORING NO CHANGE 46,513
    IN FAVOR OF REMAINING FRENCH 2,124

    On March 13th 1938 the Austrian Government enacted a plebiscite for the reunion of Austria with the Third Reich. On 18th March 1938 Hitler dissolved the Reichstag and announced conformity with the plebiscite, which was called on April 10th 1938.

    AUSTRIA: THE RESULTS
    ENTITLED TO VOTE 4,474,138
    ACTUAL VOTE 4,460,778 (99.07%)
    TOTAL VALID VOTES 4,455,015
    VOTES IN FAVOUR OR UNIFICATION 4,443,208 (99.73%)
    VOTES AGAINST UNIFICATION 11,807
    SPOILT PAPERS 5,763

    GERMANY: THE RESULTS
    ENTITLED TO VOTE 45,073,303
    ACTUAL VOTE 44,872,702 (99.55%)
    TOTAL VALID VOTES 44,803,096
    VOTES IN FAVOUR OF UNIFICATION 44,362,667 (99.02%)
    VOTES AGAINST UNIFICATION 440,429
    SPOILT PAPERS 69,606

    "Most foreign observers present in Vienna that day accepted that the polling had been free from any open intimidations." - Gordon Brook-Shepherd, British Correspondent.

    "The papers conducted by Lord Rothermere and Lord Beaverbrook are not newspapers in the ordinary acceptance of the term. They are engines of propaganda, for the constantly changing policies, desires, personal wishes, personal likes and dislikes of two men... it is power without responsibility" - Stanley Baldwin, British Prime Minister

    BRITAIN STEALS THE FUHRER'S ECONOMIC MIRACLE
    Adolf Hitler introduced the superior barter system of trade and variable Deutsche mark trading rates. Such innovation gave Germany a trading advantage over Britain's complex usury-linked system. Germany's economic success caused the British establishment to glow 'incandescent with indignation' This was the true reason for Britain's belligerency for people won't give their sons lives for trade wars; The Second World War needed to be dressed up as a patriotic war.

    Hitler's Germany had never expressed any criticism of Britain, had never threatened Britain, and had no designs on Britain. British historians never show examples of German hostility towards Britain simply because it didn't exist.

    The German people and their leadership admired the British Empire and looked upon their British cousins as blood brothers with a common heritage. Defending Poland was merely the pretext for a war to remove a more successful competitor.

    BRITAIN STEALS THE FUHRER'S CLOTHES
    Ironically changing circumstances led to Britain adopting the German leader's innovative trading system. Many people thought it strange that after years of demonising Germany's trading methods as being unfair Britain adopted them herself.

    On March 5th 1940 the British Export Council's White Paper admitted: "The Council places no limits on the expedients they would be prepared to consider, involving barter arrangements and trade negotiations and insurance facilities (such as guaranteed export credits) for foreign trade."

    From this point on there were devised two different valued pounds: one pegged at $4.02 for the home market and the other a 'free' pound sterling which dropped the first week of April 1940 to $3.44. This was virtually identical to the German practice of assigning the mark a different value depending on where it was being spent.

    If you can't fight them join them. Adopting the same trading practices as Hitler's Germany 'neutral U.S.A.' then assisted Britain in buying Latin American raw materials at advantageous prices and then literally burning them. This was termed the 'Buy and Burn Policy.' The U.S. also proscribed 1,800 South American firms thus preventing them from trading with Hitler's Germany.

    BUT YOU WON'T FIND THIS IN BRITISH ARCHIVES
    In the summer of 1940, when the world stood on the brink of disaster, Britain was 'at bay' and France, Poland, the Low Countries, Denmark, Norway were all in German hands, the German Leader offered peace terms that were so generous that if you were allowed to read them you would ask, 'well what on earth went wrong?'

    On July 19th 1940 the German Leader rose to address the Reichstag in Berlin. In the Kroll Opera House ablaze with flowers, the Fuhrer set out his peace terms saying, "In this hour I feel it to be my duty before my own conscience to appeal once more to reason and common-sense in Great Britain . . . I consider myself in a position to make this appeal I am not the vanquished seeking favours but the victor speaking in the name of reason. I see no reason why this war must go on. I am grieved to think of the sacrifices which it will claim. I would like to avert them."

    Hitler then declared that he was prepared to pull out of all these countries, and Czechoslovakia; all except those regions which were historically German and accepted as such under international law. Through his emissaries the fuehrer made approaches through all the usual diplomatic procedures, in an effort to placate the British un-elected British Government and to avoid further bloodshed.

    AND WHO WAS IT WHO REJECTED PEACE?
    Who rejected these peace offerings? Why have the facts been made available only through German, Swedish and the American archives? Why, none other than Winston Churchill and his warmonger cabinet of course.

    He had just been handed supreme power, he would be a dead-end premier, the Focus Group of warmongers would be thwarted; as would everyone who wanted a central European war and the carve ups that would follow. Churchill got his war! Fifty million people would lose their lives, many of Europe's fines cities would be reduced to rubble, and eleven formerly free countries would be ceded to the Soviet slave regime.

    Britain would sacrifice 350,000 lives, 290,000 servicemen and sailors, 60,000 civilians. Hitler prophesied that the war would cost Britain its Empire. Hitler was of course right.

    Yet within a short time the vanquished Germany population would be 20% richer than the British people and Britain's humiliating departure from the European exchange rate mechanism was a demonstration of the power of the German Mark

  17. #17
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio krauterbox Pogledaj poruku
    Pa vidiš da je na početku jedan od izvora njemačka Bijela knjiga.


    Nego Korkanj da li bi ti ovo malo nama prepričao, mnogo je ovo engleskog za čitati.


    I ovaj čini mi se da je ovo što si pejstovao od onoga Majkla Volša, a on nije istoričar.
    Bi ti ja rode rado preveo ovo,ali ti je lakse na google translate znam da ti nece biti indenticno ali ce biti priblizno i moci ces da skontas.( Nije, da necu, nego mi se neda!!! )

  18. #18
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio krauterbox Pogledaj poruku
    Pa vidiš da je na početku jedan od izvora njemačka Bijela knjiga.


    Nego Korkanj da li bi ti ovo malo nama prepričao, mnogo je ovo engleskog za čitati.


    I ovaj čini mi se da je ovo što si pejstovao od onoga Majkla Volša, a on nije istoričar.
    To mi tvoje zvuci kao ono nase AKO NIJE KOMUNISTICKO ONDA NIJE DOBRO I TREBA GA ISKORENITI jel tako ??? i ako su ga napisali Nemci,da po nama oni su bili fasisti i okupatori nase zemlje,jesu i tebe ovako trovali u skoli kao MENE a ti i sam znas ko je bio okupator i fasista,ako neces da priznas meni bar piznaj sebi
    pozdrav

  19. #19
    Aktivan član matijakupa (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    07.12.2008.
    Pol
    muški
    Lokacija
    Sisak
    Poruke
    1.196
    Reputaciona moć
    34

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    heheheheee, ... a meni moderatori brišu potpise i šalju opomene.....

    sve stručnjak do stručnjaka.

  20. #20
    Legenda Akay (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    21.02.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Lokacija
    Млечни пут
    Poruke
    10.907
    Reputaciona moć
    626

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio matijakupa Pogledaj poruku
    heheheheee, ... a meni moderatori brišu potpise i šalju opomene.....

    sve stručnjak do stručnjaka.
    Хроби ко ми те дирао ?


    Него, не видим никакву сврху ове теме. Коркањ колега, да ли ти то нама откриваш некакву истину о другом светском рату коју нисмо знали ? Тема се не почиње са гомилом c/p постова. Оставићу тему да видимо како ће се развити, али постоји знатна могућност да иде под кључ.

  21. #21
    Elita krauterbox (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    14.03.2006.
    Pol
    muški
    Lokacija
    Novorosijsk
    Poruke
    5.394
    Reputaciona moć
    257

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio korkanj Pogledaj poruku
    To mi tvoje zvuci kao ono nase AKO NIJE KOMUNISTICKO ONDA NIJE DOBRO I TREBA GA ISKORENITI jel tako ??? i ako su ga napisali Nemci,da po nama oni su bili fasisti i okupatori nase zemlje,jesu i tebe ovako trovali u skoli kao MENE a ti i sam znas ko je bio okupator i fasista,ako neces da priznas meni bar piznaj sebi
    pozdrav
    Hajd' se ti malo smiri.

    U toj ebn njem. Bijeloj knjizi piše da su rat izazvali Poljaci tako što su napali njemački Glajvic, a ko god je pročitao samo jednu knjigu o WWII zna da je to podla i notorna laž.
    Tako da tu nema nikakvog ebnog komunizma.

    A i ko je bio okupator znam dobro - to su bile Švabe i njihova saveznička bagra, a pomagao im je naš kolaboracionistički škart.
    A ako je tebi po tom pitanju nešto nejasno, onda jarane imaš težak problem.

    I sad reci jesi li to copy od Volša .., jer ako jesi onda odmah da ti kažem da na pisanije krenkova neću da gubim vrijeme.
    Poslednji put ažurirao/la Akay : 24.04.2011. u 23:16
    Ein Gespenst geht um in Europa - das Gespenst ...

  22. #22
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio krauterbox Pogledaj poruku
    Hajd' se ti malo smiri.

    U toj ebn njem. Bijeloj knjizi piše da su rat izazvali Poljaci tako što su napali njemački Glajvic, a ko god je pročitao samo jednu knjigu o WWII zna da je to podla i notorna laž.
    Tako da tu nema nikakvog ebnog komunizma.

    A i ko je bio okupator znam dobro - to su bile Švabe i njihova saveznička bagra, a pomagao im je naš genetski kolaboracionistički škart.
    A ako je tebi po tom pitanju nešto nejasno, onda jarane imaš težak problem.

    I sad reci jesi li to copy od Volša .., jer ako jesi onda odmah da ti kažem da na pisanije krenkova neću da gubim vrijeme.
    Imas stranicu gde sam ti ostavio da vidis celu celu knjigu,

    i sve preskacete i negirate, Cercilov govor:Nemacka je postala prejaka moramo je UNISTITI !!! ustvari evo i kada je to izjavio
    Announced on or before December 31, 1941 November 1936. "Germany is too strong. We must destroy her." Winston Churchill.

    Kao sto svi znate da istoriju pisu pobednici !!!
    hvala
    pozdrav

  23. #23
    Elita krauterbox (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    14.03.2006.
    Pol
    muški
    Lokacija
    Novorosijsk
    Poruke
    5.394
    Reputaciona moć
    257

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio korkanj Pogledaj poruku
    Imas stranicu gde sam ti ostavio da vidis celu celu knjigu,

    i sve preskacete i negirate, Cercilov govor:Nemacka je postala prejaka moramo je UNISTITI !!! ustvari evo i kada je to izjavio
    Announced on or before December 31, 1941 November 1936. "Germany is too strong. We must destroy her." Winston Churchill.

    Kao sto svi znate da istoriju pisu pobednici !!!
    hvala
    pozdrav
    Ma rekao sam ti da nemam vremena da čitam pisanije krenkova!

    A ser Vinstonu Leonardu Spenseru svaka čast - njemu kao da je Bog rekao kako će u skoro svemu u životu fulati, ali će zato biti i jedan od prvih na Zapadu koji će prepoznati apsolutno zlo i koji će imati tu čast da to zlo (uz veliku pomoć drugih) i pobjedi.

    I to je rekao dok je bio u opoziciji i zato ga niko nije ni slušao, a ni uzimao za ozbiljno. Daj Bože da je bio na vlasti pa da su guju na vrijeme zgazili.
    Ein Gespenst geht um in Europa - das Gespenst ...

  24. #24
    Domaćin Bajo Pivljanin (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    14.09.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Lokacija
    Београд
    Poruke
    3.069
    Reputaciona moć
    55

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio korkanj Pogledaj poruku
    Imas stranicu gde sam ti ostavio da vidis celu celu knjigu,

    i sve preskacete i negirate, Cercilov govor:Nemacka je postala prejaka moramo je UNISTITI !!! ustvari evo i kada je to izjavio
    Announced on or before December 31, 1941 November 1936. "Germany is too strong. We must destroy her." Winston Churchill.

    Kao sto svi znate da istoriju pisu pobednici !!!
    hvala
    pozdrav
    Као прво, Черчил је `36 био само посланик у британском парламенту, без икакве функције и још прилично политички изолован, а као друго: како је кад се о Србима ради, све из Берлина (и Беча) непожељно, него "треба да гледамо код Турака, Арапа и Монгола" како си то једном рекао, а овде је нека немачка пропагандна "Бела књига" сасвим валидан извор?

  25. #25
    Ističe se korkanj (avatar)
    Učlanjen
    02.12.2010.
    Pol
    muški
    Poruke
    2.449
    Reputaciona moć
    38

    Podrazumevano Re: ISTINA O DRUGOM SVETSKOM RATU

    Citat Original postavio Bajo Pivljanin Pogledaj poruku
    Као прво, Черчил је `36 био само посланик у британском парламенту, без икакве функције и још прилично политички изолован, а као друго: како је кад се о Србима ради, све из Берлина (и Беча) непожељно, него "треба да гледамо код Турака, Арапа и Монгола" како си то једном рекао, а овде је нека немачка пропагандна "Бела књига" сасвим валидан извор?
    Evo opet ti!!! ali ako,ja sam to naveo za ISTORIJU I POREKLO SRBA a NE za II svetski rat.Jos jedan dokaz da samo prikupljamo i govorimo ono sto nama odgovara, zar ne???
    Jos hoces da kazes da je i I svetski rat nastao posto je Gavrilo ubio ferdinanda po vasem ( ne persiram nego celokupno govorim) a to sve te vase zapadne sile govore a pogotovo NASE uce decu u skolama da je za I svetski rat kriva SRBIJA aaaa???
    kada znamo da to nije istina
    jos samo da mi kazete da je i to ISTINA onda stvarno nemam sta vise da kazem niti dodam
    pozdrav

Slične teme

  1. Odgovora: 196
    Poslednja poruka: 20.04.2011., 13:47
  2. Odgovora: 25
    Poslednja poruka: 01.01.2010., 11:39
  3. Nemacka u prvom i drugom svetskom ratu?
    Autor bilosta u forumu Istorija
    Odgovora: 6
    Poslednja poruka: 29.08.2009., 01:21
  4. Odgovora: 3
    Poslednja poruka: 20.10.2008., 21:02
  5. Istina o Prvom i Drugom svetskom ratu
    Autor Владан u forumu Istorija
    Odgovora: 8
    Poslednja poruka: 31.01.2005., 15:33

Pravila za slanje poruka

  • Ne možete kreirati novu temu
  • Ne možete poslati odgovor
  • Ne možete dodati priloge
  • Ne možete prepraviti svoju poruku
  •