Amerika i Kina spremaju (zajednichki) napad na Rusiju

ВОДКА

Iskusan
Banovan
Poruka
5.913
LINK 1
LINK 2

US army bases will appear on the Black Sea Coast – in Bulgaria and Romania. About $50 million will be assigned to build the base in Romania, and the Pentagon plans to spend $60 million more for the same purpose in Bulgaria.

Amerika pravi dve vojne baze u Rumuniji i Bugarskoj. Koja je namena tih baza?

The number of US military men at the two bases is not going to be large, but who can say that it will not be doubled, tripped or quadrupled in the future? Furthermore, the appearance of NATO bases on the Black Sea coast will come as an addition to the US military objects in the Baltic region. As a result, Russia will find itself trapped.

Za sada su baze male, ali ko kazhe da se u budutjnosti netje povetjati i Rusija tje tako biti opkoljena sa vih strana.

Why does the USA need these two bases on the Black Sea? To struggle against terrorism? This explanation does not withstand any criticism. There are nearly 4,000 kilometers between Romania and the Middle East. This distance is too large for the nation to maintain its groups in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Objashnjenje da su baze u svrhu borbe protiv terorizma ochito otpada jer su daleko od Bliskog istoka.

I would also like to pay your attention to the fact that the US Military Academy at West Point has recently launched extensive courses to study the Russian culture and language. They started teaching the Iraqi culture and the Arab language three years before invading Iraq.

Zanimljiva je chinjenica da se na Vest Pointu nekoliko godina pre napada na Irak izuchavao arapski jezik i kultura. Sad se na Vest Pointu uchi ruski...

................................................................................................................................

Russia has been working on a new military doctrine for a few years. The old one is outdated and unsuitable.

Ruska vojna doktrina je zastarela i neupotrebljiva. Zato se razvija nova.

In situations “critical for national security” Russia will deliver preventive nuclear strikes.

Rusi su ochajni nesposobnoshtju svoje vojske tako da tje po novoj doktrini motji delovati nuklearnim oruzhjem po susedima ''preventivno''.

The current Russian army is weak. Although it has strong professionals, the majority of the Army is undertrained draft soldiers and contractors with six month contracts. It would be quite scary to imagine a real conflict between the Russian army and NATO or even the Chinese Army. That’s why Russia’s only chance under the circumstances is not to aim at military forces of a potential enemy, but influence civilian society. Russia would have to convince the entire world that if, say, German tanks cross Polish-Belarus border, they might not but Berlin will cease its existence in a couple of hours.

Ruska vojska je trenutno slaba. Iako ima jake profesionalce, vetjinu vojske chine slabo trenirani regruti i 6mesechni vojnici po ugovoru. Strashno je zamisliti sukob Rusije sa NATO paktom ili chak kineskom armijom. Zbog toga je jedina shansa za Rusiju ne da cilja na vojne snage kao potencijalnog protivnika vetj na gradjansko drushtvo. Rusija mora uveriti ceo svet da ako nemachki tenkovi predju granicu, oni netje motji uzvratiti ali tje Berlin prestati da postoji u narednih nekoliko sati
.

However, a mere possibility of such outcome eliminates a possibility of aggression from a civilized enemy.

U svakom sluchaju ove mere tje eliminisati mogutjnost agresije na Rusiju od civilizovanog protivnika. Shta je sa onim koji to nisu?

Despite Russian military doctrine, real aggression against Russia is possible only from those who don’t normally count their losses. Russia is lucky to have Central Asia as a buffer between itself and Afghanistan and Pakistan. If the Taliban or other similar organization decided to show their might on Russian territory, who would Russia bomb in the Afghan desert? Russian nuclear plans would hardly change anything in the country where the rest of the world failed.

Agresija na Rusiju je mogutja od onih koji ne zhale za svojim gubicima. U tom smislu je Rusija sretjna shto ima Kazahstan kao tampon zonu prema teroristima.

Russia’s main enemy is still its old friend China that takes away Russian territories, populates Russian land and issues maps where the Russian Far East is indicated as a part of China.

Ruski glavni protivnik je njen stari prijatelj-Kina, koja uzima rusku teritoriju, naseljava rusku zemlju i izdaje mape gde je ruski daleki istok prikazan kao deo Kine.

China doesn’t care about the Russian nuclear arsenal. They won’t mind if a couple million of their people are killed for the sake of the greater goal. They have a different mentality; they are indifferent to the issues of life and death sacred to the West and they treat pain differently.


Kina se ne plashi ruskog nuklearnog arsenala. Ne mare za nekoliko miliona zhrtava u svrhu vetjeg cilja. Imaju drugachiji mentalitet i poimanje zhivota i smrti.


Taking into consideration that contemporary bombs are much “cleaner” than those that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and that their main function is destruction and not contamination, Russian bombs would hardly prevent anything. If China chooses radical methods of solution of East Siberian issue, Russian military doctrine is at risk of shooting into an empty space.

Uzimajutji u obzir da su moderne nuklearne bombe daleko chistije od onih bachenih na Hiroshimu i da im je glavna funkcija UNISHTENJE A NE ZAGADJENJE, ruske bombe teshko da mogu sprechiti ishta. Ako Kina popizdi, Rusi su najebali.
 
Poslednja izmena:
Док је светог тројства руских нуклеарних снага свака претња је неозбиљна.

A da ti malo prochitash ove linkove shto sam ti dao, kad vetj meni ne verujesh. Kina se ne boji ruskih nuklearnih snaga, Rusija ima tachno 848 ICBM koji mogu pobiti recimo 300 miliona Kineza. Medjutim Kina tje pokoriti Rusiju a ostatje opet skoro milijardu Kineza.
 
Mogu reci pa makar bio banovan...da si ti najveca budala na ovom forumu odavno.....al me nasmejs...bar to......



ovaj stvarno ko da je jeo bunike.
i jos daje linkove americkih novina.........i to onih sto su objavljivali silazak amera na mesec kao i dokaze da sadam poseduje hb oruzje.
amere vise nikakve lazi i nahuskavanje ne mogu spasti. riknuli su zauvek.
 
ovaj stvarno ko da je jeo bunike.
i jos daje linkove americkih novina.........i to onih sto su objavljivali silazak amera na mesec kao i dokaze da sadam poseduje hb oruzje.
amere vise nikakve lazi i nahuskavanje ne mogu spasti. riknuli su zauvek.

ma pusti ga...msm svaki njegov post je ovakav...al msm dobro je kad ima neko ko je sprdnja ...da politika ne bude bas tolko ozbiljna...ovakvi unose nesto u pdf...
 
LINK 1
LINK 2

US army bases will appear on the Black Sea Coast – in Bulgaria and Romania. About $50 million will be assigned to build the base in Romania, and the Pentagon plans to spend $60 million more for the same purpose in Bulgaria.

Amerika pravi dve vojne baze u Rumuniji i Bugarskoj. Koja je namena tih baza?

The number of US military men at the two bases is not going to be large, but who can say that it will not be doubled, tripped or quadrupled in the future? Furthermore, the appearance of NATO bases on the Black Sea coast will come as an addition to the US military objects in the Baltic region. As a result, Russia will find itself trapped.

Za sada su baze male, ali ko kazhe da se u budutjnosti netje povetjati i Rusija tje tako biti opkoljena sa vih strana.

Why does the USA need these two bases on the Black Sea? To struggle against terrorism? This explanation does not withstand any criticism. There are nearly 4,000 kilometers between Romania and the Middle East. This distance is too large for the nation to maintain its groups in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Objashnjenje da su baze u svrhu borbe protiv terorizma ochito otpada jer su daleko od Bliskog istoka.

I would also like to pay your attention to the fact that the US Military Academy at West Point has recently launched extensive courses to study the Russian culture and language. They started teaching the Iraqi culture and the Arab language three years before invading Iraq.

Zanimljiva je chinjenica da se na Vest Pointu nekoliko godina pre napada na Irak izuchavao arapski jezik i kultura. Sad se na Vest Pointu uchi ruski...

................................................................................................................................

Russia has been working on a new military doctrine for a few years. The old one is outdated and unsuitable.

Ruska vojna doktrina je zastarela i neupotrebljiva. Zato se razvija nova.

In situations “critical for national security” Russia will deliver preventive nuclear strikes.

Rusi su ochajni nesposobnoshtju svoje vojske tako da tje po novoj doktrini motji delovati nuklearnim oruzhjem po susedima ''preventivno''.

The current Russian army is weak. Although it has strong professionals, the majority of the Army is undertrained draft soldiers and contractors with six month contracts. It would be quite scary to imagine a real conflict between the Russian army and NATO or even the Chinese Army. That’s why Russia’s only chance under the circumstances is not to aim at military forces of a potential enemy, but influence civilian society. Russia would have to convince the entire world that if, say, German tanks cross Polish-Belarus border, they might not but Berlin will cease its existence in a couple of hours.

Ruska vojska je trenutno slaba. Iako ima jake profesionalce, vetjinu vojske chine slabo trenirani regruti i 6mesechni vojnici po ugovoru. Strashno je zamisliti sukob Rusije sa NATO paktom ili chak kineskom armijom. Zbog toga je jedina shansa za Rusiju ne da cilja na vojne snage kao potencijalnog protivnika vetj na gradjansko drushtvo. Rusija mora uveriti ceo svet da ako nemachki tenkovi predju granicu, oni netje motji uzvratiti ali tje Berlin prestati da postoji u narednih nekoliko sati
.

However, a mere possibility of such outcome eliminates a possibility of aggression from a civilized enemy.

U svakom sluchaju ove mere tje eliminisati mogutjnost agresije na Rusiju od civilizovanog protivnika. Shta je sa onim koji to nisu?

Despite Russian military doctrine, real aggression against Russia is possible only from those who don’t normally count their losses. Russia is lucky to have Central Asia as a buffer between itself and Afghanistan and Pakistan. If the Taliban or other similar organization decided to show their might on Russian territory, who would Russia bomb in the Afghan desert? Russian nuclear plans would hardly change anything in the country where the rest of the world failed.

Agresija na Rusiju je mogutja od onih koji ne zhale za svojim gubicima. U tom smislu je Rusija sretjna shto ima Kazahstan kao tampon zonu prema teroristima.

Russia’s main enemy is still its old friend China that takes away Russian territories, populates Russian land and issues maps where the Russian Far East is indicated as a part of China.

Ruski glavni protivnik je njen stari prijatelj-Kina, koja uzima rusku teritoriju, naseljava rusku zemlju i izdaje mape gde je ruski daleki istok prikazan kao deo Kine.

China doesn’t care about the Russian nuclear arsenal. They won’t mind if a couple million of their people are killed for the sake of the greater goal. They have a different mentality; they are indifferent to the issues of life and death sacred to the West and they treat pain differently.


Kina se ne plashi ruskog nuklearnog arsenala. Ne mare za nekoliko miliona zhrtava u svrhu vetjeg cilja. Imaju drugachiji mentalitet i poimanje zhivota i smrti.


Taking into consideration that contemporary bombs are much “cleaner” than those that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and that their main function is destruction and not contamination, Russian bombs would hardly prevent anything. If China chooses radical methods of solution of East Siberian issue, Russian military doctrine is at risk of shooting into an empty space.

Uzimajutji u obzir da su moderne nuklearne bombe daleko chistije od onih bachenih na Hiroshimu i da im je glavna funkcija UNISHTENJE A NE ZAGADJENJE, ruske bombe teshko da mogu sprechiti ishta. Ako Kina popizdi, Rusi su najebali.

Nažalost, ovo je moguće.
Amerika i NATo ne mogu ništa Rusiji i to znaju. Jedini način je da sa kinom napadnu Rusiju.
Moguće.

Medjutim, u koliko Rusiaj koristi nuklearno oružnje, neće uništiti celu Kinu ali će slomiti Kinesku ekonomiju, industriju i proizvodne kapacitete, što će Kinu pretvoriti u zemlju sa ogromnim brojem siromašnog stanovništva i bei i jednog većeg industrijskog centra.
 
Poslednja izmena:
Nažalost, ovo je moguće.
Amerika i NATo ne mogu ništa Rusiji i to znaju. Jedini način je da sa kinom napadnu Rusiju.
Moguće.

ah..ranjeni lav se bori svim sredstvima...znas ti sta bi bilo da na zemlju padne 10000 nuklearnih bombi...ej....mslis da bi se oni ustrucavali kad bi znali da im je kraj blizu...naravno da ne............

Istina je da ce se kinezi i rusi svadjati oko teritorije..al to ce biti status kvo oko apr teritorijica velicine bosne....

ocenjivanja snage oruzija vam je tragicno...
 
ah..ranjeni lav se bori svim sredstvima...znas ti sta bi bilo da na zemlju padne 10000 nuklearnih bombi...ej....mslis da bi se oni ustrucavali kad bi znali da im je kraj blizu...naravno da ne............

Istina je da ce se kinezi i rusi svadjati oko teritorije..al to ce biti status kvo oko apr teritorijica velicine bosne....

ocenjivanja snage oruzija vam je tragicno...

Rusija nema 10000 nuklearnih bombi vetj svega neshto manje od 1000. Takodje pravljene su da unishte a ne da zagadjuju shto znachi da ako prezhivish sam napad, mozhesh da nastavish sa zhivotom, ne ostavlja velike posledice na zhivotnu sredinu u smislu radioaktivnosti.

Nije u pitanju ''teritorijica'' vetj Kinezi pretenduju na ceo ruski Daleki istok a to je povrshina velichina pola Evrope.
 
To je najobicnija dezinformacija americkih medija, jedna u nizu serviranih u svrhu rusenja morala Ruske federacije. Kina i njen narod, uprkos ogromnom potencijalu su miroljubivi i nece se prvi nikada upustati u neke ratne avanture, dok je ta superiornost SAD u odnosu na Rusiju vrlo diskutabilna...

Izvor uopshte nisu americhki mediji vetj ruski.
 

Back
Top